Twelve Step

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于Zoom的网站于2020年开发,首次提供连续访问在线毒品匿名(NA)会议的机会。该网站为患有物质使用障碍的人提供即时访问,以支持戒除与物质相关的成瘾障碍。目标:本研究旨在表征采用这种在线格式的与会者;评估他们获得支持以保持禁欲的经验;并将他们参加的24/7体验与面对面(FF)会议进行比较。方法:在24/7NA网站上提供了一项匿名的33项调查,该网站链接到24/7会议。访问现场的人可以选择填写调查表。结果:530名受访者完成了调查(64.9%为女性/35.1%为男性)。大多数人在NA中有稳定的先前参与。他们在上个月参加了24/7会议(14.9,SD19.7),而不是FF会议(4.6,SD7.8)。86%以前参加过FF会议,48%曾担任赞助商,92%的人报告说,24/7会议比FF会议更舒适(p<.001,科恩的d=0.65),更支持禁欲(p<.001,科恩的d=0.91)。在受访者中,8%仍在使用药物,其中52%的人之前已经完成了十二步中的一些。结论:24/7格式为NA成员提供了一种新的,易于获得的方式来获得对禁欲的支持,并受到寻求从物质使用障碍中恢复的支持的与会者的积极评价。它可以作为传统FF格式的有价值的辅助。
    Background: A Zoom-based website was developed in 2020 that offers continuous access to online Narcotics Anonymous (NA) meetings for the first time. This website provides immediate access for persons with substance use disorder to support abstinence from substance-related addictive disorders.Objectives: This study is designed to characterize attendees employing this online format; to evaluate their experiences for gaining support to maintain abstinence; and to compare the 24/7 experience to face-to-face (FF) meetings they attend.Methods: An anonymous 33-item survey was made available on the 24/7 NA website that links to the 24/7 meetings. Persons accessing the site could choose to fill out the survey.Results: 530 respondents completed the survey (64.9% female/35.1% male). Most had stable prior involvement in NA. They had attended more 24/7 meetings (14.9, SD 19.7) than FF meetings (4.6, SD 7.8) in the previous month. 86% had previously attended FF meetings, 48% had served as sponsors, and 92% reported that the 24/7 meetings were more comfortable for them than the FF meetings (p < .001, Cohen\'s d = 0.65) and more supportive of abstinence (p < .001, Cohen\'s d = 0.91). Of the respondents, 8% were still using drugs, of whom 52% had previously completed some of the Twelve Steps.Conclusions: The 24/7 format provides a new and easily accessible way for NA members to gain support for abstinence and is positively rated by attendees seeking support for recovery from substance use disorders. It may serve as a valuable adjunct to the traditional FF format.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Background: Residential treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs) typically involves both medical and psychological treatments to best meet the needs of service users. Common treatments include Twelve Step Facilitation (TSF) as well as evidence-based practices (EBPs) such as cognitive behavioral therapies and medications. Researchers have discussed the difficulties with implementation and sustainability of EBPs within treatment centers that predominantly use TSF. Objectives: Understanding the process of implementation is an important area of study to inform future implementation efforts. The present study involved a qualitative investigation of a residential treatment center that integrated EBPs alongside TSF. Treatment stakeholders (N=22) were interviewed about their experience with integration. Results: The results indicated that the organization\'s evolution to integrate evidence-based practices (e.g., medication, evidenced-based psychotherapy) occurred through a process of themes including staff members\' personal allegiance to Twelve Step; tension among staff members; staff collaboration; and integration of theoretical orientations. The results parallel those found in the Normalization Process Theory of implementation. Conclusions: The present study provides an understanding as to how Twelve Step and EBPs can be integrated into a residential treatment center, allowing for service users to have choice in their care. The program\'s ability to navigate the treatment evolution can be used as an example for integrating evidence-based practice with Twelve Step to meet the many needs of individuals seeking substance use treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一些试点研究提供了证据,支持像psilocybin这样的经典迷幻药在治疗物质使用障碍(SUDs)中的潜力。如果更大的试验证实疗效,经典的迷幻辅助心理治疗可能最终被整合到现有的成瘾治疗中,如认知行为疗法,应急管理,和药物辅助治疗。许多寻求SUD治疗的人也加入了十二步促进(TSF)计划,例如戒酒匿名(AA),这是世界上最广泛可用和获得的酒精使用障碍治疗方法之一。对于这样的个人,从事经典的迷幻辅助心理治疗可能会被视为有争议的,由于AA/TSF计划的成员历来拒绝药物辅助治疗,而倾向于无药物治疗方法。我们认为,经典的迷幻药及其引发的主观体验可能代表着一种特殊的,比传统药物更兼容的情况。为了支持这一说法,我们描述了比尔·威尔逊(AA的创始人)鲜为人知的迷幻药经历,并在此基础上,我们认为,经典迷幻疗法的各个方面可以补充AA/TSF计划。我们提供了在SUD背景下评估迷幻药的临床试验的综述,并讨论了它们最终整合到AA/TSF中的潜在大规模影响。
    Several pilot studies have provided evidence supporting the potential of classic psychedelics like psilocybin in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUDs). If larger trials confirm efficacy, classic psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy may eventually be integrated into existing addiction treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy, contingency management, and medication-assisted therapies. Many individuals seeking treatment for SUDs also join twelve-step facilitation (TSF) programs like Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), which are among the most widely available and accessed treatments for alcohol use disorder worldwide. For such individuals, engaging in classic psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy could be seen as controversial, as members of AA/TSF programs have historically rejected medication-assisted treatments in favor of a pharmacotherapy-free approach. We argue that classic psychedelics and the subjective experiences they elicit may represent a special, more compatible case than conventional medications. In support of this claim, we describe Bill Wilson\'s (the founder of AA) little known experiences with psychedelics and on this basis, we argue that aspects of classic psychedelic treatments could complement AA/TSF programs. We provide a review of clinical trials evaluating psychedelics in the context of SUDs and discuss their potential large-scale impact should they be ultimately integrated into AA/TSF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Codependence is an ambiguous and disputed term often used to characterize both those who maintain relationships with alcoholics and those who seek help through resources such as Al-Anon Family Groups.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to better understand non-pathological reasons for maintaining alcoholic relationships and for help-seeking by detailing the costs and benefits of those choices.
    METHODS: The costs and benefits both of remaining in an alcoholic relationship and of seeking help in Al-Anon were identified through a review of available research on alcoholic family systems, Al-Anon, and other mutual-support groups.
    RESULTS: Alcoholic relationships may benefit concerned others by preserving self-identity, social identity, values, security, stability, and hope. Costs of alcoholic relationships include physical symptoms, injury, mental problems, financial difficulty, legal troubles, and relational distress. Al-Anon is perceived beneficial for six primary reasons: Al-Anon philosophy, format, social support, accessibility, effectiveness, and potential to change the drinker\'s behavior. Possible costs of Al-Anon include marginalization of the concerned other, blame, codependent pathology, sexist stereotyping, substitute dependency, and perpetuating victimization. Conclusions/Importance: The identified costs and benefits of alcoholic relationships and help-seeking in Al-Anon can help to model decision-making processes using existing behavioral health frameworks without defaulting to the stigmatized and ambiguous codependence terminology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号