背景:基因组改变的鉴定(例如,EGFR,ALK,ROS1,BRAF,NTRK,和MET)对于晚期非小细胞肺癌(aNSCLC)患者启动靶向治疗至关重要。这项研究估计了使用序贯单基因(SSG)测试的预算影响,一次一个地测试每个突变,与下一代测序(NGS)相比,同时测试所有突变,从日本医疗保健支付者的角度来看,新诊断的aNSCLC患者。
方法:使用预算影响模型(BIM)来确定日本新诊断的aNSCLC在3年内与NGS相关的预期预算影响。BIM比较了总成本(活检,测试,和治疗)以及“未来NGS”和“当前NGS”与SSG测试的平均周转时间。
结果:采用当前的NGS而不是SSG测试的预算影响为-0.24%,但在未来3年的时间范围内,采用NGS而非SSG检测对日本aNSCLC治疗预算的预算影响为+4.33%.在SSG测试上采用当前或未来的NGS将缩短测试的平均周转时间。
结论:采用当前的NGS而不是SSG测试将略微降低年度成本。然而,在SSG测试上采用未来或当前的NGS将缩短平均周转时间,能够在日本更快地鉴定基因组改变并更早地开始治疗aNSCLC患者。
BACKGROUND: Identification of genomic alterations (e.g., EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, NTRK, and MET) is essential for initiating targeted therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). This study estimated the budget impact of using the sequential single-gene (SSG) test, which tests for each mutation one at a time, versus next-generation sequencing (NGS), which tests for all mutations at the same time, among newly diagnosed patients with aNSCLC from a Japanese healthcare payer\'s perspective.
METHODS: A budget impact model (BIM) was used to determine the expected budget impact associated with NGS for newly diagnosed aNSCLC in Japan over a 3-year period. The BIM compared the total costs (biopsy, testing, and treatment) and average turnaround time of \"future NGS\" and \"current NGS\" versus SSG testing.
RESULTS: The adoption of current NGS over SSG testing had a budget impact of -0.24%, but adoption of future NGS over SSG testing had a budget impact of +4.33% across a 3-year time horizon on the Japanese budget for aNSCLC treatment. The adoption of current or future NGS over SSG testing would shorten the average turnaround time for testing.
CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of current NGS over SSG testing would slightly decrease the yearly costs. However, the adoption of future or current NGS over SSG testing would shorten the average turnaround time, enabling faster identification of genomic alterations and earlier initiation of treatment for aNSCLC patients in Japan.