Transfusion threshold

输血阈值
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:65岁的任意年龄截止值可能无法准确定义大量输血(MT)后死亡风险较高的老年人。我们试图重新定义MT的新老年年龄阈值,并了解其与结局的关系。
    方法:在2013-2018年创伤质量改善计划数据库中查询了所有在入院24小时内接受≥10单位压积红细胞(pRBC)的成年人。使用多元逻辑回归建立的输血无效阈值(TT)进行自举分析,其中额外的pRBC不再改善各种年龄截止的死亡率。年龄相对较大和相对较年轻的人的TT具有统计学意义的年龄截止值用于定义MT的新“老年”年龄。然后比较新定义的老年和非老年患者的预后。
    结果:当年龄截止为63岁时,TT的差异首先变得显着。年龄≥63岁的患者的TT(新的老年病,n=2870)与<63y(非儿科,n=17,302)是34和40单位的pRBC,分别为(P=0.04)。尽管老年患者的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分较高(9对6,P<0.01),而腹部的缩略损伤评分较低(3对4,P<0.01),他们的总死亡率更高(62%对45%,P<0.01)。老年患者出院回家的比例较低(7%对35%,P<0.01)。
    结论:MT的新老年年龄为63岁,TT为34个单位。尽管伤势较轻,生理上“老年”患者在MT后的预后更差。
    BACKGROUND: The arbitrary geriatric age cutoff of 65 may not accurately define older adults at higher risk of mortality following massive transfusion (MT). We sought to redefine a new geriatric age threshold for MT and understand its association with outcomes.
    METHODS: The 2013-2018 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all adults who received ≥10 units of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) within 24 h of admission. A bootstrap analysis using multiple logistic regression established transfusion futility thresholds (TTs), where additional pRBCs no longer improved mortality for various age cutoffs. The age cutoff at which the TT for those relatively older and relatively younger was statistically significant was used to define the new \"geriatric\" age for MT. Outcomes were then compared between the newly defined geriatric and nongeriatric patients.
    RESULTS: The difference in TT first became significant when the age cutoff was 63 y. The TT for patients aged ≥63 y (new geriatric, n = 2870) versus <63 y (nongeriatric, n = 17,302) was 34 and 40 units of pRBCs, respectively (P = 0.04). Although geriatric patients had a higher Glasgow coma scale score (9 versus 6, P < 0.01) and lower abbreviated injury score-abdomen (3 versus 4, P < 0.01) than the nongeriatric, they suffered higher overall mortality (62% versus 45%, P < 0.01). A lower percentage of geriatric patients were discharged to home (7% versus 35%, P < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: The new geriatric age for MT is 63 y, with a TT of 34 units. Despite suffering less severe injuries, physiologically \"geriatric\" patients have worse outcomes following MT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:领先数字偏差是一种启发式方法,即人类在评估数字时过分强调最左边的数字(例如,9.99vs.10.00).偏倚可能会影响血红蛋白结果的解释并影响住院患者的红细胞输注。
    方法:在大学健康网络注册时接受红细胞输血的成年人(多伦多,加拿大)在2016年1月1日至2022年1月1日之间(n=6年)被包括在内。主要分析排除了单采血液成分,红细胞紊乱,放射科套房,和手术室。主要比较是对血红蛋白阈值79g/L(本地单位)以上和以下的输血发生的回归不连续性分析。其他分析测试了其他前导数字和对照阈值(71、81和91g/L)。次要分析探讨了时间协变量和临床亚组。
    结果:在研究期间共发现211,872例红细胞输血(输血前血红蛋白中位数76g/L;四分位数范围=69-92g/L),在主要分析中使用107,790例住院输血。79g/L阈值显示高于阈值的815个红细胞单位(95%置信区间[CI]:-1215至-415)。69g/L阈值显示减少了2813个输注单位(95%CI:-4407至-1220),89克/升显示出少40个单位(95%CI:-408至328)。这种影响在白天得到了加强,工作日,5-6月,坚持在包括所有输血在内的分析中,并且在控制阈值时不存在。
    结论:前导数字偏倚可能对输注红细胞的决定有适度的影响。这些发现可能为输血研究的实践指南和准实验研究设计提供信息。
    BACKGROUND: Leading digit bias is a heuristic whereby humans overemphasize the left-most digit when evaluating numbers (e.g., 9.99 vs. 10.00). The bias might affect the interpretation of hemoglobin results and influence red cell transfusion in hospitalized patients.
    METHODS: Adults who received a red cell transfusion while registered at the University Health Network (Toronto, Canada) between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2022 (n = 6 years) were included. The primary analysis excluded apheresis, red cell disorders, radiology suites, and operating rooms. The primary comparison was a regression discontinuity analysis of transfusion occurrence above and below the hemoglobin threshold of 79 g/L (local units). Additional analyses tested other leading digit and control thresholds (71, 81, and 91 g/L). Secondary analyses explored temporal covariates and clinical subgroups.
    RESULTS: A total of 211,872 red cell transfusions were identified over the study period (median pre-transfusion hemoglobin 76 g/L; interquartile range = 69-92 g/L), with 107,790 inpatient transfusions in the primary analysis. The 79 g/L threshold showed 815 fewer red cell units above the threshold (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1215 to -415). The 69 g/L threshold showed 2813 fewer transfused units (95% CI: -4407 to -1220), and 89 g/L showed 40 fewer units (95% CI: -408 to 328). The effect was accentuated during daytime, weekday, and May-June months, persisted in analyses including all transfusions, and was absent at control thresholds.
    CONCLUSIONS: Leading digit bias might have a modest influence on the decision to transfuse red cells. The findings may inform practice guidelines and quasi-experimental study design in transfusion research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脓毒症是一种严重的疾病,通常会导致急性肾损伤等并发症,这显著增加了发病率和死亡率。脓毒症AKI(S-AKI)在ICU患者中很常见,并且与不良预后相关。然而,对于获得最佳临床结果的最佳输血阈值尚无共识.本研究旨在探讨住院期间不同输血阈值与脓毒症AKI预后的关系。
    从MIMIC-IV中提取S-AKI患者的数据。根据输血前24小时的最低血红蛋白水平,患者分为高阈值(≥7g/L)和低阈值(<7g/L)组.我们比较了这两组的结果,包括医院和ICU死亡率作为主要结果,30天,60天,90天死亡率,以及ICU和住院时间作为次要结局。
    本研究共纳入5,654例患者。两组的基线特征差异显著,低阈值组的患者通常较年轻,SOFA评分较高。在进行倾向得分匹配后,两组之间的生存率没有显着差异。然而,低阈值组患者的总体住院时间较长.
    较低的输血阈值不会影响S-AKI患者的死亡率,但这可能会导致住院时间延长。
    UNASSIGNED: Sepsis is a severe condition that often leads to complications such as acute kidney injury, which significantly increases morbidity and mortality rates. Septic AKI (S-AKI) is common in ICU patients and is associated with poor outcomes. However, there is no consensus on the optimal transfusion threshold for achieving the best clinical results. This retrospective study aims to investigate the relationship between different transfusion thresholds during hospitalization and the prognosis of septic AKI.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from patients with S-AKI was extracted from MIMIC-IV. Based on the lowest hemoglobin level 24 h before transfusion, patients were divided into high-threshold (≥7 g/L) and low-threshold (<7 g/L) groups. We compared the outcomes between these two groups, including hospital and ICU mortality rates as primary outcomes, and 30 days, 60 days, and 90 days mortality rates, as well as duration of stay in ICU and hospital as secondary outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 5,654 patients were included in our study. Baseline characteristics differed significantly between the two groups, with patients in the low-threshold group generally being younger and having higher SOFA scores. After performing propensity score matching, no significant differences in survival rates were found between the groups. However, patients in the low-threshold group had a longer overall hospital stay.
    UNASSIGNED: A lower transfusion threshold does not impact the mortality rate in S-AKI patients, but it may lead to a longer hospital stay.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    温本身免疫性溶血性贫血(WAIHA)是一种罕见疾病。大约一半的病例被认为是原发性或特发性。其余病例通常继发于药物反应或潜在的疾病状态,如恶性肿瘤,感染,或慢性自身免疫性疾病。WAIHA的治疗包括皮质类固醇,静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG),利妥昔单抗,和脾切除术.我们提出了一个WAIHA的病例,其潜在的透明细胞肾细胞癌(RCC)是不可切除的,创造了一个艰难的治疗过程。一名最近诊断为透明细胞RCC的76岁男性因有症状的WAIHA和显着的血流动力学不稳定而入院。在他承认的过程中,他接受了25次输血,促红细胞生成素,甲基强的松龙,IVIG,利妥昔单抗,和霉酚酸酯试图控制他的疾病状态。他以心力衰竭的形式遭受终末器官损伤,射血分数降低。对于RCC切除或心脏介入手术,他被认为太不稳定。确定适当的输血阈值被证明是一个值得注意的挑战。在27天的治疗过程中,他的血红蛋白最终稳定在7.4g/dL。他的WAIHA的根本原因被认为是RCC的次要原因。如果根本原因无法解决,WAIHA的治疗过程可能会延长,死亡风险很高。如果是这样的话,在维持正常生命体征的同时将输血相关循环超负荷(TACO)和输血相关急性肺损伤(TRALI)风险降至最低的血红蛋白输注阈值可能很困难.长时间的血流动力学不稳定可能导致终末器官损伤。对我们的病人来说,根据他的平均动脉压(MAP),我们的血红蛋白输血阈值为5.0-6.0g/dL,心率,主观症状。
    Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (WAIHA) is a rare disease. Roughly half of all cases are considered either primary or idiopathic. The remaining cases are typically secondary to a drug reaction or an underlying disease state such as malignancy, infection, or chronic autoimmune disease. Treatments for WAIHA include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), rituximab, and splenectomy. We present a case of WAIHA with underlying clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that was unresectable, creating a difficult treatment course. A 76-year-old male with recently diagnosed clear cell RCC was admitted with symptomatic WAIHA and significant hemodynamic instability. Over the course of his admission, he received 25 blood transfusions, erythropoietin, methylprednisolone, IVIG, rituximab, and mycophenolate mofetil in an attempt to control his disease state. He suffered end-organ damage in the form of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. He was deemed too unstable for RCC resection or interventional cardiac procedures. Determining an appropriate transfusion threshold proved to be a noteworthy challenge. His hemoglobin eventually stabilized to 7.4 g/dL upon discharge over the course of 27 days of treatment. The underlying cause of his WAIHA was believed to be most likely secondary to RCC. WAIHA may have a prolonged treatment course with high risk of mortality if the underlying cause is not resolvable. If this is the case, it can be difficult to determine a hemoglobin transfusion threshold that maintains normal vital signs while minimizing the risk of transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) and transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). Prolonged hemodynamic instability may result in end-organ damage. For our patient, we aimed for a hemoglobin transfusion threshold of 5.0-6.0 g/dL based on his mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, and subjective symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:现场护理(POC)分析仪是患者护理不可或缺的一部分。输血可能是一个紧急决定,不是良性行为,有必要确保POC测得的血红蛋白值与参考分析仪相当。目的是比较三个POC的分析性能:ABL800Flex,血液和iSTAT和中央实验室分析仪:XN-10和对输血决策的影响。
    方法:对50名患者进行了体外研究,这些患者在XN-10上进行了血象检查,在三个POC上平行进行了血红蛋白测定。然后,进行了回顾性研究,以比较常规实践中匹配样本返回的血红蛋白值,用于ABL800Flex的5505,分析了55的Hemocue和70的iSTAT。
    结果:体外研究表明,不同分析仪之间的血红蛋白测量存在系统偏差,对ABL800Flex和Hemocue的高估,低估了ISTAT。这些偏见在iSTAT的当前实践中得到了加剧,但在ABL800Flex中有所减少。在从70到100g/L的输血决定范围内,参考方法和ABL之间有8.6%的临床不一致结果,Hemocue为34.8%,iSTAT为21.4%。
    结论:除了系统偏见之外,POC血红蛋白测量的变化可能涉及许多其他因素。因此,在紧急输血决定的情况下,在中央实验室分析仪上发送血象似乎是必不可少的,同时与危及生命的紧急情况兼容。
    BACKGROUND: Point of care (POC) analyzers are an integral part of the patient care. Transfuse can be an emergency decision, not being a benign act, it is necessary to ensure that the hemoglobin value measured by the POC are comparable with the reference analyzer. The objective is to compare the analytical performance of three POCs: ABL800 Flex, Hemocue and iSTAT and a central laboratory analyzer: XN-10 and the impact on the transfusion decision.
    METHODS: An in vitro study was performed in 50 patients for whom a hemogram had been prescribed on the XN-10, the hemoglobin determination was performed in parallel on the three POCs. Then, retrospective study was performed to compare the hemoglobin values returned for matched samples in routine practice, 5505 for ABL800 Flex, 55 for Hemocue and 70 for iSTAT were analyzed.
    RESULTS: In vitro study shows systematic biases in the measurement of hemoglobin between the different analyzers, overestimation for the ABL800 Flex and the Hemocue, underestimation for the iSTAT. These biases are accentuated in current practice for iSTAT but decreased for ABL800 Flex. In the transfusion decision range from 70 to 100 g/L, there were 8.6% of clinically discordant results between the reference method and ABL, 34.8% for Hemocue and 21.4% for iSTAT.
    CONCLUSIONS: In addition to systematic biases, many additional factors may be involved for variation in hemoglobin measurement with POC. Thus, in the case of urgent transfusion decisions, sending a hemogram on a central laboratory analyzer seems to be essential, while being compatible with a life-threatening emergency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:输血可以作为一种挽救生命的治疗方法,但是不适当的血液制品输血会导致患者伤害和卫生系统的额外费用。尽管有发表的证据支持限制包装红细胞(pRBC)的使用,许多提供者在指南之外进行输血。这里,我们报道了一个新颖的前景,随机对照试验,以增加指南一致的pRBC输血,比较电子健康记录(EHR)中临床决策支持(CDS)的三种变化。
    方法:科罗拉多大学医院(UCH)所有要求输血的住院提供者以1:1:1的方式随机分配到研究的三个方面:(1)一般顺序集改进,(2)一般的订单集改进加上非中断的在线帮助文本警报,和(3)一般订单集改进加中断警报。输血提供者在18个月内接受了相同的随机顺序集更改。这项研究的主要结果是指导原则的pRBC输血率。这项研究的主要目的是比较使用新接口的组(手臂1)与使用具有中断或不间断警报的新接口的两组(手臂2和3,组合)。次要目标比较了第2组和第3组之间的指南一致输血率,并将研究的所有组总体与历史对照进行了比较。该审判在12个月后于2022年4月5日结束。
    结论:CDS工具可以增加指南一致性行为。该试验将检查三种不同的CDS工具,以确定哪种类型在增加指南一致输血方面最有效。
    背景:在ClinicalTrials.gov3/20/21,NCT04823273上注册。由科罗拉多大学机构审查委员会(19-0918)批准,协议版本14/19/2019,批准4/30/2019。
    BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions can serve as a life-saving treatment, but inappropriate blood product transfusions can result in patient harm and excess costs for health systems. Despite published evidence supporting restricted packed red blood cell (pRBC) usage, many providers transfuse outside of guidelines. Here, we report a novel prospective, randomized control trial to increase guideline-concordant pRBC transfusions comparing three variations of clinical decision support (CDS) in the electronic health record (EHR).
    METHODS: All inpatient providers at University of Colorado Hospital (UCH) who order blood transfusions were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to the three arms of the study: (1) general order set improvements, (2) general order set improvements plus non-interruptive in-line help text alert, and (3) general order set improvements plus interruptive alert. Transfusing providers received the same randomized order set changes for 18 months. The primary outcome of this study is the guideline-concordant rate of pRBC transfusions. The primary objective of this study is to compare the group using the new interface (arm 1) versus the two groups using the new interface with interruptive or non-interruptive alerts (arms 2 and 3, combined). The secondary objectives compare guideline-concordant transfusion rates between arm 2 and arm 3 as well as comparing all of arms of the study in aggregate to historical controls. This trial concluded after 12 months on April 5, 2022.
    CONCLUSIONS: CDS tools can increase guideline-concordant behavior. This trial will examine three different CDS tools to determine which type is most effective at increasing guideline-concordant blood transfusions.
    BACKGROUND: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 3/20/21, NCT04823273 . Approved by University of Colorado Institutional Review Board (19-0918), protocol version 1 4/19/2019, approved 4/30/2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患者血液管理(PBM)是一个系统的,以证据为基础的方法,通过管理和保存患者自身的血液和减少同种异体输血的需要和风险来改善患者的预后。根据PBM方法,围手术期贫血管理的目标包括早期诊断,针对性治疗,血液保护,限制性输血,但急性大出血除外,以及持续的质量保证和研究工作,以促进整体血液健康。
    Patient blood management (PBM) is a systematic, evidence-based approach to improve patient outcomes by managing and preserving a patient\'s own blood and minimizing allogenic transfusion need and risk. According to the PBM approach, the goals of perioperative anemia management include early diagnosis, targeted treatment, blood conservation, restrictive transfusion except in cases of acute and massive hemorrhage, and ongoing quality assurance and research efforts to advance overall blood health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    输血是许多患者的重要维持生命的治疗方法。然而,据报道,不必要的输血与患者预后较差有关.Further,由于最近的大流行,维持血液供应更具挑战性。已经进行了许多研究来阐明许多临床条件的最佳输血阈值。大多数人认为限制性输血策略比自由输血策略有优势。血液系统疾病,在许多情况下需要慢性输血,不是这些研究的主要主题,关于这些患者的最佳输血阈值的证据很少。根据最近的几项研究,对于血液病患者,由于他们的生活质量,宽松的输血策略更可取.需要以患者为中心的方法来正确管理血液系统疾病。
    Transfusion is an essential life-sustaining treatment for many patients. However, unnecessary transfusion has been reported to be related to worse patient outcomes. Further, owing to the recent pandemic, blood supply has been more challenging to maintain. Many studies have been conducted to elucidate the optimal transfusion threshold for many clinical conditions, and most suggested that a restrictive transfusion strategy has advantages over a liberal transfusion strategy. Hematologic disorders, which require chronic transfusion in many cases, have not been the main subjects of such studies, and only little evidence is available regarding the optimal transfusion threshold in these patients. According to several recent studies, a liberal transfusion strategy is preferable for patients with hematologic disorders due to their quality of life. A patient-centered approach is needed for proper management of hematologic disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多年来,医师对同种异体红细胞(RBC)的输血方法没有个体化.公认的是,血红蛋白浓度(Hb)低于10g/dL是一般的输血阈值,大多数患者立即输血。近年来,越来越多的证据表明,即使血红蛋白浓度显著降低,也可以在短期内存活下来,而不会留下后遗症。这在某种程度上与中度或轻度贫血与相关的长期发病率和死亡率相关的观察结果相矛盾。为了解决这个明显的矛盾,必须认识到,我们必须避免急性贫血或通过其他方法进行治疗。本文的目的是描述急性贫血的生理极限,将这些考虑与临床现实相匹配,然后提出“患者血液管理”(PBM)作为治疗概念,可以防止贫血和在临床背景下不必要的红细胞浓缩输血,特别是在重症监护病房(ICU)。这种治疗概念可能被证明是未来ICU环境中高质量患者护理的关键。
    For many years, physicians\' approach to the transfusion of allogeneic red blood cells (RBC) was not individualized. It was accepted that a hemoglobin concentration (Hb) of less than 10 g/dL was a general transfusion threshold and the majority of patients were transfused immediately. In recent years, there has been increasing evidence that even significantly lower hemoglobin concentrations can be survived in the short term without sequelae. This somehow contradicts the observation that moderate or mild anemia is associated with relevant long-term morbidity and mortality. To resolve this apparent contradiction, it must be recognized that we have to avoid acute anemia or treat it by alternative methods. The aim of this article is to describe the physiological limits of acute anemia, match these considerations with clinical realities, and then present \"patient blood management\" (PBM) as the therapeutic concept that can prevent both anemia and unnecessary transfusion of RBC concentrates in a clinical context, especially in Intensive Care Units (ICU). This treatment concept may prove to be the key to high-quality patient care in the ICU setting in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    原发性单侧全关节置换术(TJA)与可能需要输血的急性术后贫血有关。临床医生可能会担心手术后血红蛋白(Hgb)大幅下降的患者出院,即使他们的Hgb高于限制性输血阈值。这项研究的目的是确定术前和术后Hgb值(Delta)之间的差异是否与未接受围手术期输血的患者的90天再入院相关。
    对2015年至2020年接受原发性单侧TJA的患者进行了回顾性回顾。主要结果是特定的截断值δHgb是否可以预测90天内由于贫血相关原因而再次入院。次要结果包括急性术后贫血和再入院期间输血。
    六千七百九十一名患者的中位Hgb为2.80。总的来说,268例患者(3.95%)在术后90天内再次入院,两名患者在再次入院期间需要输血。心血管疾病患者的再入院率明显较高(5.16%vs3.68%;P=0.020)。当构建接收器工作特性曲线时,截止值3.20导致曲线下面积为0.595(0.486-0.704).在心血管疾病患者中,截止值3.10导致曲线下面积为0.626(0.466-0.787).
    在未接受围手术期输血的患者中,Hgb变化的幅度不能预测90天内贫血相关的再入院。经历较高的δHgb值但仍高于输血阈值的患者可能具有更大的生理储备。
    Primary unilateral total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is associated with acute postoperative anemia that may require blood transfusion. Clinicians may worry about discharging patients after surgery who experience substantial decreases in hemoglobin (Hgb), even if their Hgb is above restrictive transfusion thresholds. The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences between preoperative and postoperative Hgb values (Delta) correlate with 90-day readmission in patients who did not receive perioperative transfusions.
    A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary unilateral TJA between 2015 and 2020 was performed. The primary outcome was whether a specific cutoff delta Hgb was predictive of readmission within 90 days due to anemia-related causes. Secondary outcomes included the presence of acute postoperative anemia and transfusion during readmission.
    Six thousand seven hundred and ninety one patients had a median delta Hgb of 2.80. In total, 268 patients (3.95%) were readmitted within 90 days postoperatively, with two patients requiring transfusion during readmission. A significantly higher rate of readmission was found in patients with cardiovascular disease (5.16% versus 3.68%; P = .020). When constructing receiver operating characteristic curves, a cutoff value of 3.20 resulted in an area under curve of 0.595 (0.486-0.704). In patients with cardiovascular disease, a cutoff value of 3.10 resulted in an area under curve of 0.626 (0.466-0.787).
    The magnitude of Hgb change was not predictive of anemia-related readmission within 90 days in patients who did not receive a perioperative transfusion. Patients experiencing higher delta Hgb values but remaining above the transfusion threshold may have a greater physiologic reserve.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号