Tranquilizing Agents

镇静剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在(1)描述2003-2019年爱沙尼亚镇静剂和镇静剂(TS)滥用的趋势,以及(2)分析TS滥用与解释因素之间的关联(感知获得TS,TS的医疗用途,家庭相关,朋友相关的,学校相关因素,风险行为和休闲时间体育活动)。
    方法:横断面研究。
    方法:数据来自爱沙尼亚2003年至2019年的欧洲学校酒精和其他药物调查项目(ESPAD)。
    方法:15-16岁的爱沙尼亚学童(n=11328),48.6%是男孩。
    方法:患病率,TS误用的粗OR和调整OR,CI为95%。
    结果:终生TS滥用的患病率从2003年(男孩为5.0%,女孩为12.6%)到2019年(11.3%和17.5%,分别)(p<0.001)。在男孩中,在2003-2019年报告使用TS的患者中,TS滥用从21.1%显著增加到41.4%(p=0.006)。TS的医疗使用使男孩的误用几率增加了6.89(95%CI为5.15至9.24),女孩的误用几率增加了4.53(95%CI为3.58至5.73)。感觉容易获得TS使男孩的误用几率增加了6.57(95%CI4.13至10.46)倍,女孩的误用几率增加了4.66(95%CI3.25至6.70)倍。有许多滥用TS的朋友,男孩的滥用几率增加了3.27(95%CI2.16至4.95)倍,女孩的滥用几率增加了5.07(95%CI3.79至6.77)倍。此外,在吸烟和从事较少运动的青少年中,TS滥用的几率较高.
    结论:从2003年到2019年,爱沙尼亚青少年中TS滥用的患病率显着增加。滥用与医疗使用密切相关,感知容易访问和朋友\'TS误用。这些发现强调了有针对性的预防策略的必要性,包括改善处方实践,限制TS访问和促进青少年之间的健康行为和积极的同伴关系。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) to describe trends of tranquilliser and sedative (TS) misuse in Estonia during 2003-2019 and (2) to analyse the associations between TS misuse and explanatory factors (perceived access to TS, medical use of TS, family-related, friends-related, school-related factors, risk behaviour and leisure time physical activity).
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study.
    METHODS: Data were collected from the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD) from 2003 to 2019 in Estonia.
    METHODS: Estonian schoolchildren aged 15-16 years old (n=11 328), 48.6% were boys.
    METHODS: Prevalence, crude and adjusted ORs with 95% CIs for TS misuse.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of lifetime TS misuse significantly increased from 2003 (5.0% of boys and 12.6% of girls) to 2019 (11.3% and 17.5%, respectively) (p<0.001). Among boys, TS misuse increased significantly among those reporting medical use of TS from 21.1% to 41.4% in 2003-2019 (p=0.006). Medical use of TS multiplied the odds of misuse by 6.89 (95% CI 5.15 to 9.24) for boys and by 4.53 (95% CI 3.58 to 5.73) for girls. Perceived easy access to TS increased the odds of misuse by 6.57 (95% CI 4.13 to 10.46) times for boys and by 4.66 (95% CI 3.25 to 6.70) times for girls. Having many friends who misuse TS increased the odds of misuse by 3.27 (95% CI 2.16 to 4.95) times for boys and by 5.07 (95% CI 3.79 to 6.77) times for girls. Furthermore, higher odds of TS misuse were observed among adolescents who smoked cigarettes and engaged in less sports.
    CONCLUSIONS: TS misuse prevalence among Estonian adolescents increased significantly from 2003 to 2019. Misuse was strongly associated with medical use, perceived easy access and friends\' TS misuse. These findings emphasise the need for targeted prevention strategies, including improving prescription practices, limiting TS access and promoting healthy behaviours and positive peer relationships among adolescents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    白细胞弹性蛋白酶是炎症的标志物。以前,发现患者精神障碍的严重程度与血浆弹性蛋白酶样活性有关.在体外实验中分析了各种亲神经药物对白细胞弹性蛋白酶活性的影响。我们揭示了苯并二氮卓类镇静剂地西泮和溴代氢氯苯基苯并二氮卓类和免疫调节剂氨基二氢噻嗪二酮和双氯芬酸对健康供体和纯人类中性粒细胞弹性蛋白酶的血浆弹性蛋白酶样活性的抑制作用。抗精神病药物氯丙嗪和阿利马嗪,以及促智药长春西汀以剂量依赖性方式增加弹性蛋白酶样活性。氯丙嗪和长春西汀的激活作用,但不是阿利马嗪,在中性粒细胞弹性蛋白酶中复制。我们假设这些药物可以在精神障碍的复杂治疗中影响炎症反应的发展。
    Leukocyte elastase is a marker of inflammation. Previously, a relationship was found between the severity of mental disorders in patients and elastase-like activity of blood plasma. The effect of various neurotropic drugs on leukocyte elastase activity was analyzed in an in vitro experiment. We revealed an inhibitory effect of the benzodiazepine tranquilizers diazepam and bromodihydrochlorophenylbenzodiazepine and immunomodulators aminodihydrophthalazinedione and diclofenac on the plasma elastase-like activity of healthy donors and pure human neutrophil elastase. The antipsychotics chlorpromazine and alimemazine, as well as the nootropic vinpocetine increased elastase-like activity in a dose-dependent manner. The activating effect of chlorpromazine and vinpocetine, but not alimemazine, was reproduced in neutrophil elastase. We hypothesized that these drugs can affect the development of inflammatory reactions in the complex therapy of mental disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    青春期是世界范围内开始使用药物的关键发展阶段,这是可能影响青少年身心健康的主要冒险行为之一。这项研究的目的是(1)评估共同使用镇静剂的患病率,镇静剂,2018年西班牙青少年人口按性别分列的含酒精安眠药(TSSp&AC)和(2)确定与TSSp&AC相关的变量。根据STROBE指南进行了一项观察性横断面研究。我们分析了2018年参加ESTUDES(西班牙中等教育药物使用调查)的38,010名14至18岁青少年(男性18,579名,女性19,431名)的数据。女性青少年报告TSSp和AC的患病率高于男性(p<0.001)。与女性共同使用相关的因素是16-18岁(OR1.65);烟草消费(OR1.73),可卡因(OR1.84),其他非法精神活性药物(OR1.89);和新型非法精神活性药物(OR1.74);TSSps的消费没有感知到的健康风险(OR2.45);以及TSSps(OR2.23)和酒精(OR2.09)的感知可用性。在西班牙女性青少年中,有几个与TSSp和AC相关的因素对医疗保健提供者有潜在影响。
    Adolescence is a critical developmental stage for the initiation of substance use worldwide, which is one of the main risk-taking behaviors that may impact adolescents\' physical and mental well-being. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the prevalence of the co-use of tranquilizers, sedatives, and sleeping pills with alcohol (TSSp&AC) by gender in the Spanish adolescent population in 2018 and (2) identify the variables associated with TSSp&AC. An observational cross-sectional study following STROBE guidelines was conducted. We analyzed data from 38,010 adolescents aged 14 to 18 years old (18,579 males and 19,431 females) who participated in ESTUDES (Survey on Drug Use in Secondary Education in Spain) 2018. Female adolescents reported a higher prevalence of TSSp&AC than males (p < 0.001). The factors associated with female co-use were being 16-18 years of age (OR 1.65); the consumption of tobacco (OR 1.73), cocaine (OR 1.84), other illicit psychoactive drugs (OR 1.89); and novel illicit psychoactive drugs (OR 1.74); no perceived health risk from the consumption of TSSps (OR 2.45); and the perceived availability of TSSps (OR 2.23) and alcohol (OR 2.09). There are several factors associated with TSSp&AC in Spanish female adolescents with potential implications for healthcare providers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    在一般实践和急性精神病服务中,患者经常遇到焦虑和痛苦的非特异性症状。当非药物干预措施不足或不可用时,小镇静剂可能是一种治疗选择。我们对短期(1-4周)药物治疗新出现的焦虑和痛苦症状的证据进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析。我们搜查了PsycInfo,MEDLINE,EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库以及遵循预定义结果层次结构的提取数据。我们使用Cochrane偏差风险工具评估偏差风险,并使用建议分级评估来评估证据的确定性,发展和评价框架(等级)。我们纳入了34项随机试验,共包括7044例调整障碍或焦虑谱系障碍患者。网络荟萃分析显示,关于1-4周内焦虑的关键结局症状苯二氮卓类药物(SMD-0.58,95%CI-0.77至-0.40),喹硫平(SMD-0.51,95%CI-0.90至-0.13)和普瑞巴林(SMD-0.58,95%CI-0.87至-0.28)的疗效均优于安慰剂,两种药物之间无统计学差异.其他重要结果的数据报告不一致。副作用各不相同,但总的来说,不确定两种干预措施的不良反应是否不同.关于依赖风险的证据是不确定的,但即使是短期治疗,依赖也可能是易感个体的担忧。总的来说,根据GRADE得出的证据的确定性在不同结局中被评为低到非常低.尽管证据有限,这项审查的结果可以为治疗指南提供信息,在这种流行和寻求帮助的情况下,支持临床医生选择轻微的镇静剂,临床异质性人群。
    Unspecific symptoms of anxiety and distress are frequently encountered in patients in both general practice and acute psychiatric services. Minor tranquillizers may be a treatment option when non-pharmacological interventions are insufficient or unavailable. We conducted a systematic review with network meta-analysis of the evidence for short-term (1-4 weeks) pharmacological treatment of newly onset symptoms of anxiety and distress. We searched the PsycInfo, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases and extracted data following a predefined hierarchy of outcomes. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework (GRADE). We included 34 randomized trials comprising a total of 7044 patients with adjustment disorders or anxiety spectrum disorders. The network meta-analysis showed that regarding the critical outcome symptoms of anxiety within 1-4 weeks benzodiazepines (SMD - 0.58, 95% CI - 0.77 to - 0.40), quetiapine (SMD - 0.51, 95% CI - 0.90 to - 0.13) and pregabalin (SMD - 0.58, 95% CI - 0.87 to - 0.28) all performed better than placebo with no statistically significant difference between the drugs. Data on other important outcomes were inconsistently reported. Adverse effects varied, but overall, it was uncertain whether adverse effects differed between interventions. The evidence regarding the risk of dependence was uncertain, but dependence may be a concern in susceptible individuals even with short-term treatment. Overall, the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE was rated as low to very low across outcomes. Despite the limitations in the evidence, the results of this review can inform treatment guidelines, supporting clinicians in the choice of minor tranquillizer in this prevalent and help-seeking, clinically heterogeneous population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在确定10-24岁人群中不同香烟和电子烟使用轨迹对处方药滥用精神治疗药物的潜在纵向影响。
    方法:数据来自烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究(2013-2019年;n=14,454)的第1-5波。基于群体的轨迹建模基于五波中的香烟和电子烟使用确定了青少年和年轻人群体。加权逻辑回归模型适合于检查组成员资格与所有波中两个结果的关联:1)滥用阿片类药物,镇静剂,和/或镇静剂,和2)滥用利他林和/或Adderall,调整背景特征。
    结果:出现了五个轨迹组:(1)不使用(77.7%);(2)减少使用的早发性香烟(4.6%);(3)不断增加的电子烟使用(6.1%);(4)稳定地双重使用香烟和电子烟(3.2%);(5)加速双重使用香烟和电子烟(8.4%)。与非使用组相比,所有其他组滥用阿片类药物的几率明显更高,镇静剂,和/或镇静剂以及除早期吸烟和减少吸烟组外的所有药物在第5波结束时滥用利他林和/或Adderall的几率均显着较高。
    结论:青少年人群中香烟和电子烟的使用模式可能是并发和前瞻性处方心理治疗药物误用的重要指标。调查结果强调了预防香烟和电子烟使用的必要性,减少危害,和/或青少年和年轻人的戒烟努力。
    This study aimed to determine the potential longitudinal impact of different cigarette and e-cigarette use trajectories among people aged 10-24 on prescription drug misuse of psychotherapeutic drugs.
    Data came from waves 1-5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study (2013-2019; n = 14,454). Group-based trajectory modeling identified groups of adolescents and young adults based on cigarette and e-cigarette use across the five waves. Weighted logistic regression models were fit to examine the association of group membership with two outcomes at all waves: 1) misuse of opioids, sedatives, and/or tranquilizers, and 2) misuse of Ritalin and/or Adderall, adjusting for background characteristics.
    Five trajectory groups emerged: (1) non-use (77.7 %); (2) early-onset cigarette use with reducing use (4.6 %); (3) ever-increasing e-cigarette use (6.1 %); (4) stable dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes (3.2 %); and (5) accelerating dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes (8.4 %). In comparison to the non-use group, all other groups had significantly higher odds of misuse of opioids, tranquilizers, and/or sedatives and all but the early-onset cigarette use with reducing use group had significantly higher odds of misuse of Ritalin and/or Adderall by the end of wave 5.
    Patterns of cigarette and e-cigarette use in adolescent and young adult populations may serve as important indicators for concurrent and prospective prescription psychotherapeutic drug misuse. Findings highlight the need for cigarette and e-cigarette use prevention, harm reduction, and/or cessation efforts among adolescents and young adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然处方心理治疗药物的使用(PPDU)和尼古丁的使用带来了实质性的问题,它们共同构成风险增加。这项研究旨在评估年轻人PPDU的患病率,按尼古丁使用状况分层。使用趋势分析来检查PPDU和尼古丁使用随时间的变化。方法:我们使用了来自国家健康和营养调查(NHANES,2003-2018)。对于每个数据周期,自我报告的PPDU和尼古丁(包括止痛药)的患病率,镇静剂,兴奋剂,和镇静剂估计。使用Joinpoint回归,我们使用对数线性模型和置换检验方法检验了趋势的显著变化,并得出了平均数据周期变化百分比(ADCPC).结果:从2003年到2018年,6.7%的年轻人患有PPDU,27.3%的人使用尼古丁。吸烟的患病率下降,而其他尼古丁产品的使用增加(p<0.001)。那些使用尼古丁的人更有可能患有PPDU(8.2%;95%CI=6.5%,9.8%)与非尼古丁使用(6.1%;95%CI=5.1%,7.0%;p=0.01)。结果表明尼古丁使用呈下降趋势(ADCPC=-3.8,95%CI=-7.2,-0.3;p=0.04),但不适用于PPDU(ADCPC=1.3;95%CI=-4.7,7.8;p=0.61)。在进一步检查中,阿片类药物的使用减少,镇静剂使用保持稳定,兴奋剂和镇静剂的使用随着时间的推移而增加。结论:从2003年到2018年,使用尼古丁的年轻人的PPDU患病率高于未使用尼古丁的年轻人。临床医生在处方或管理年轻患者药物时,应传达尼古丁使用与处方药之间的关联。
    Background: While prescription psychotherapeutic drug use (PPDU) and nicotine use pose substantial problems in isolation, they pose an increased risk in combination. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of PPDU for young people, stratified by nicotine use status. A trend analysis was used to examine changes in PPDU and nicotine use over time. Methods: We used a cross-sectional population-based sample of young people aged 16-25 years (n = 10,454) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2003-2018). For each data cycle, the prevalence of self-reported PPDU and nicotine including pain relievers, sedatives, stimulants, and tranquilizers was estimated. Using Joinpoint regression, we tested for significant changes in trends using a log-linear model and permutation test approach and produced the average data cycle percentage change (ADCPC). Results: From 2003 to 2018, 6.7% of young people had PPDU and 27.3% used nicotine. The prevalence of cigarette smoking decreased while other nicotine product use increased (p\'s < 0.001). Those who used nicotine were more likely to have PPDU (8.2%; 95% CI = 6.5%, 9.8%) vs. non-nicotine use (6.1%; 95% CI = 5.1%, 7.0%; p = 0.01). Results indicated a decreasing trend for nicotine use (ADCPC = -3.8, 95% CI = -7.2, -0.3; p = 0.04), but not for PPDU (ADCPC = 1.3; 95% CI = -4.7, 7.8; p = 0.61). On further examination, opioid use decreased, sedative use remained stable, and stimulant and tranquilizer use increased over time. Conclusions: From 2003 to 2018, young people who used nicotine had a higher prevalence of PPDU than those who did not. Clinicians should communicate the association between nicotine use and prescription drugs when prescribing or managing young patients\' medications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:在街头工作和生活的街头儿童和青年(SICY)更有可能注射毒品和使用精神活性物质。目的:本研究旨在确定患病率,分布,社会人口统计学决定因素,以及SICY中与酒精和药物使用相关的冒险行为。方法:从1985年12月1日至2022年7月1日,在PubMed上搜索了以英语发表的与SICY中酒精和药物使用有关的研究,Scopus,科克伦,和WebofScience。结果:经过全文论文评价,73项研究纳入荟萃分析。结果表明,终生患病率为44%(酒精),44%(裂纹),33%(吸入剂),44%(溶剂),16%(镇静剂/镇静剂),22%(阿片类药物),62%(多物质使用)。目前的患病率为40%(酒精),21%(裂纹),20%(吸入剂),11%(镇静剂/镇静剂),和1%(阿片类药物)。此外,酒精和裂缝使用的寿命和当前患病率,目前使用镇静剂/镇静剂的患病率,在年龄较大的人群中,使用多种物质的终生患病率较高.老年人群使用镇静剂/镇静剂的终生患病率较低。结论:使用酒精的高患病率,裂纹,吸入剂是一个主要问题,因为它们在不同年龄段广泛使用,包括未成年人。这些发现对决策者来说是有益的,卫生当局,和专业人员制定旨在最大程度地减少吸入剂使用和其他类型物质使用危害的计划。重要的是要准确监测这些风险暴露人群,以了解可能有助于保护他们免受高风险物质使用的机制。
    Background: Street-involved children and youth (SICY) who work and live on/of the streets are more likely to inject drugs and engage in psychoactive substance use.Objectives: The present study aimed to identify the prevalence, distribution, sociodemographic determinants, and risk-taking associated with alcohol and drug use among SICY.Methods: Studies published in English related to alcohol and drug use among SICY were searched for from December 1 1985 to July 1 2022, on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science.Results: After full-text paper evaluation, 73 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results indicated that lifetime prevalence rates were 44% (alcohol), 44% (crack), 33% (inhalants), 44% (solvents), 16% (tranquilizer/sedatives), 22% (opioids), and 62% (polysubstance use). The current prevalence rates were 40% (alcohol), 21% (crack), 20% (inhalants), 11% (tranquilizer/sedatives), and 1% (opioids). Also, life-time and current prevalence of alcohol and crack use, current prevalence of tranquilizer/sedative use, and life-time prevalence of polysubstance use were higher among older age groups. Life-time prevalence of tranquilizer/sedative use was lower among older age groups.Conclusions: The high prevalence of using alcohol, crack, and inhalants is a major issue because they are used extensively among different age groups, including minors. Such findings are beneficial for policymakers, health authorities, and professionals in developing programs aimed at minimizing inhalant use and other types of substance use harms among this group. It is important to accurately monitor this risk-exposed population to understand the mechanisms that might help protect them from high-risk substance use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:处方药滥用(PDM)是一个重大的公共卫生问题。随着研究的发展,滥用的定义随着时间的推移而变化,然而,这种变异性的含义尚未得到系统研究。这项研究的目的是利用大型人口调查中PDM测量的变化来确定其对这种行为的患病率和相关性的影响。
    方法:在将PDM的定义从限制来源和使用动机改为捕获除处方者指示外的任何误用之前和之后,比较了来自全国药物使用和健康调查的数据。建立了三年队列,代表PDM的受限定义(2012-2014)和PDM的广义定义(2015-2017)。
    结果:分段逻辑回归模型表明,所有3种检查的药物类型(阿片类药物,镇静剂,和镇静剂)。尽管差异的程度因药物类型而异,更广泛的定义通常与年龄有关,医疗保险的患病率更高,滥用自己处方的几率更高。观察到心理健康指标有所恶化,但结果表明其他临床或药物使用差异不大。
    结论:处方药误用的定义对误用的患病率有很大影响,对人群特征也有一定影响。需要进一步的研究来了解测量这种行为的最佳策略,基于科学或公共卫生问题或兴趣。
    Prescription drug misuse (PDM) is a significant public health problem. As research has evolved, the definitions of misuse have varied over time, yet the implications of this variability have not been systematically studied. The objective of this study was to leverage a change in the measurement of PDM in a large population survey to identify its impact on the prevalence and correlates of this behavior.
    Data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health were compared before and after a change in the definition of PDM from one that restricted the source and motive for use to one that captured any misuse other than directed by a prescriber. Three-year cohorts were constructed, representing a restricted definition of PDM (2012-2014) and a broad definition of PDM (2015-2017).
    Segmented logistic regression models indicated a significant increase in PDM prevalence for all 3 drug types examined (opioids, tranquilizers, and sedatives). Although the magnitude of differences varied somewhat based on drug type, the broader definition was generally associated with older age, higher prevalence of health insurance, and higher odds of misusing one\'s own prescription. Some worsening of mental health indicators was observed, but results indicated few other clinical or substance use differences.
    Definitions of prescription drug misuse have a substantial impact on the prevalence of misuse and some impact on the characteristics of the population. Further research is needed to understand the optimal strategy for measuring this behavior, based on the scientific or public health question or interest.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目前尚不清楚临床试验的证据如何最好地转化为复杂的临床环境。此质量改进(QI)项目的目的是改变处方实践,以在住院精神卫生保健服务中快速镇静,检查Plan-Do-Study-Act(PDSA)方法的有效性。
    方法:进行了前瞻性QI项目,以确保在住院精神保健中,肌内(IM)地西泮被IM劳拉西泮代替苯二氮卓类药物的快速镇定。我们监测了药物的处方和给药之前的快速镇静(N=371),在QI干预期间(N=1130)和之后(N=364)。使用多组分干预方法进行了七个迭代PDSA循环,以逐渐将处方实践转向所需的方向。同时,为了确保患者安全,我们引入了标准监测方案.
    结果:在干预后持续的干预期间,劳拉西泮的给药逐渐取代地西泮,其中劳拉西泮占苯二氮卓给药的96%,用于快速镇静。从干预前(14.40mg地西泮当量)到干预后(14.61mg),苯二氮卓的平均剂量保持稳定。在观察期结束时达到接近完全遵守生命体征监测(>80%)。
    结论:使用基于迭代PDSA循环和连续数据反馈的逐步方法,可以提高大型住院精神卫生保健机构中急性躁动的治疗质量。在当地利益相关者和意见领袖的反馈下,这种方法在其他处方实践方案中可能很有价值。
    OBJECTIVE: It is unclear how the evidence from clinical trials best translates into complex clinical settings. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) project was to change prescribing practice for rapid tranquillization in inpatient mental health care services examining the effectiveness of the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) method.
    METHODS: A prospective QI project was conducted to ensure that intramuscular (IM) diazepam was substituted with IM lorazepam for benzodiazepine rapid tranquillization in inpatient mental health care. We monitored the prescription and administration of medication for rapid tranquillization before (N = 371), during (N = 1130) and after (N = 364) the QI intervention. Seven iterative PDSA cycles with a multiple-component intervention approach were conducted to gradually turn the prescribing practice in the desired direction. Simultaneously, a standard monitoring regimen was introduced to ensure patient safety.
    RESULTS: Lorazepam administrations gradually replaced diazepam during the intervention period which was sustained post-intervention where lorazepam comprised 96% of benzodiazepine administrations for rapid tranquillization. The mean dose of benzodiazepine administered remained stable from pre (14.40 mg diazepam equivalents) to post (14.61 mg) intervention phase. Close to full compliance (> 80%) with vital signs monitoring was achieved by the end of the observation period.
    CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to increase the quality of treatment of acute agitation in a large inpatient mental health care setting using a stepwise approach based on iterative PDSA cycles and continuous data feedback. This approach might be valuable in other prescribing practice scenarios with feedback from local stakeholders and opinion leaders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究社区住院老年急性住院患者住院前和出院后(PDI)抗胆碱能(AC)和镇静剂(SED)药物负担之间的关系。
    方法:采用挪威患者登记处和挪威处方数据库数据的横断面研究。我们研究了2013年≥70岁的社区住院患者(N=86,509)。急性进入老年病房的患者进行了亚组分析(n=1,715)。我们通过药物负担指数(DBI)计算药物负担,使用AC/SED药物,以及AC/SED药物的数量。确定了DBI与PDI的分段线性和节点(DBI=2.45)。统计分析包括调整后的多变量逻辑回归模型。
    结果:在总人口中,45.4%暴露于至少一种AC/SED药物,与老年亚组的52.5%相比。AC/SED药物与PDI显著相关。DBI<2.45时,Odds比率(ORs)为1.11(95%CI1.07-1.15),DBI≥2.45时,Odds比率为1.08(95%CI1.04-1.13)。OR为1.07的AC/SED药物数量(95%CI1.05-1.09)。DBI的AC组分OR为1.23,AC药物的数目OR为1.13。在子组中,AC药物的ORs接近1。
    结论:老年患者在急性入院前使用AC/SED药物非常普遍,并与PDI显著相关。数字,或者只是使用AC/SED药物,与应用DBI相比,给出了与PDI相似的关联。使用AC药物显示出更高的敏感性,这表明为了降低PDI的风险,临床方法可能是减少AC药物的数量.
    Investigate the association between anticholinergic (AC) and sedative (SED) drug burden before hospitalization and postdischarge institutionalization (PDI) in community-dwelling older patients acutely admitted to hospital.
    A cross-sectional study using data from the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Prescription Database. We studied acutely hospitalized community-dwelling patients ≥70 years during 2013 (N = 86 509). Patients acutely admitted to geriatric wards underwent subgroup analyses (n = 1715). We calculated drug burden by the Drug Burden Index (DBI), use of AC/SED drugs, and the number of AC/SED drugs. Piecewise linearity of DBI versus PDI and a knot point (DBI = 2.45) was identified. Statistical analyses included an adjusted multivariable logistic regression model.
    In the total population, 45.4% were exposed to at least one AC/SED drug, compared to 52.5% in the geriatric subgroup. AC/SED drugs were significantly associated with PDI. The DBI with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.11 (95% CI 1.07-1.15) for DBI < 2.45 and 1.08 (95% CI 1.04-1.13) for DBI ≥ 2.45. The number of AC/SED drugs with OR of 1.07 (95% CI 1.05-1.09). The AC component of DBI with OR 1.23 and the number of AC drugs with OR 1.13. In the subgroup, ORs were closer to 1 for AC drugs.
    The use of AC/SED drugs was highly prevalent in older patients before acute hospital admissions, and significantly associated with PDI. The number, or just using AC/SED drugs, gave similar associations with PDI compared to applying the DBI. Using AC drugs showed higher sensitivity, indicating that to reduce the risk of PDI, a clinical approach could be to reduce the number of AC drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号