OBJECTIVE: The transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) technique is an open approach to groin hernia repair with posteriorly positioned mesh supposed to reduce recurrence rates. However, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques have similar mesh positioning with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing TIPP and MIS for groin hernia repair.
METHODS: Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Scielo, and PubMed were systematically searched for studies comparing TIPP and MIS techniques for groin hernia repair. Outcomes assessed were recurrence, chronic pain, surgical site infection (SSI), seroma, and hematoma. We performed a subgroup analysis of TAPP and TEP techniques separately. Statistical analysis was performed with R Studio.
RESULTS: 81 studies were screened and 19 were thoroughly reviewed. Six studies were included, of which two compared TIPP with TEP technique, two compared TIPP with TAPP, and two compared TIPP with both TEP and TAPP techniques. We found lower recurrence rates for the TEP technique compared to TIPP (0.38% versus 1.19%; RR 2.68; 95% CI 1.01 to 7.11; P = 0.04). Also, we found lower seroma rates for TIPP group on the overall analysis (RR 0.21; P = 0.002). We did not find statistically significant differences regarding overall recurrence (RR 1.6; P = 0.19), chronic pain (RR 1.53; P = 0.2), SSI (RR 2.51; P = 0.47), and hematoma (RR 1.29; P = 0.76) between MIS and TIPP. No statistically significant differences were found in the subgroup analysis of TAPP technique for all the outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis found no differences between TIPP and MIS approaches in the overall analysis of recurrence, SSI, and chronic pain rates. Further research is needed to analyze individual techniques and draw a more precise conclusion on this subject.
UNASSIGNED: ID CRD42024530107, April 8, 2024.

The Lichtenstein hernioplasty has long been seen as the gold standard for inguinal hernia repair. Unfortunately, this repair is often associated with chronic pain, up to 10-35%. Therefore, several new techniques have been developed, such as the transinguinal preperitoneal patch (TIPP) and the endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique. Several studies showed beneficial results of the TIPP and TEP compared to the Lichtenstein hernioplasty; however, little is published on the outcome when comparing the TIPP and TEP procedures. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes after the TIPP vs the TEP technique for inguinal hernia repair.
A single-center randomized controlled trial was carried out between 2015 and 2020. A total of 300 patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were enrolled and randomized to the TIPP- or TEP technique. Primary outcome was chronic pain (defined as any pain following the last 3 months) and quality of life, assessed with Carolinas comfort scale (CCS) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were: wound infection, wound hypoesthesia, recurrence, readmission within 30 days, and reoperation.
A total of 300 patients were randomized (150 per group). After a follow-up of 12 months, we observed significantly less postoperative chronic groin pain, chronic pain at exertion, wound hypoesthesia, and wound infections after the TEP when compared to the TIPP procedure. No significant differences in quality of life, reoperations, recurrence rate, and readmission within 30 days were observed.
We showed that the TEP has a favorable outcome compared to the TIPP procedure, leading to less postoperative pain and wound complications, whereas recurrence rates and reoperations were equal in both the groups.

UNASSIGNED: The present study was performed to compare postoperative pain following transinguinal preperitoneal repair (TIPP) and transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) performed by a single surgeon with adequate experience in each procedure.
UNASSIGNED: Adult patients who underwent herniorrhaphy for elective unilateral primary inguinal hernia repair from April 2013 to October 2019 were identified. After propensity score matching, a numeric rating scale was used to compare postoperative pain scores at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month between patients who underwent TAPP and TIPP.
UNASSIGNED: Among 784 patients who underwent herniorrhaphy during the study period, 354 were analyzed by propensity score matching (TAPP, n = 177; TIPP, n = 177). Postoperative pain during normal activity was significantly lower in the TAPP group than in the TIPP group on day 1 (2.75 ± 1.67 versus 3.59 ± 1.86, p < 0.01), at 1 week (0.98 ± 1.11 versus 1.75 ± 1.51, p < 0.01), and at 1 month (0.11 ± 0.48 versus 0.29 ± 0.78, p = 0.01). There was no difference in pain at rest on day 1 and at one week, although TAPP was associated with significantly less pain at rest at one month than was TIPP (0.01 ± 0.08 versus 0.1 ± 0.49, p = 0.02).
UNASSIGNED: TAPP is preferable to TIPP in patients undergoing elective unilateral primary inguinal hernia repair in terms of reducing short-term pain.

BACKGROUND: TransInguinal PrePeritoneal (TIPP) inguinal hernia repair (IHR) combines an open anterior approach with a preperitoneal position of the mesh. Advantages include reduced chronic postoperative inguinal pain, low recurrence rates and quick recovery. Critics have expressed concerns that recurrent IHR after TIPP could be difficult and with an increased risk of complications due to the formation of scar tissue in both the anterior and posterior anatomical inguinal planes. This study reports feasibility and outcomes of recurrent IHR after TIPP repair.
METHODS: Patients who underwent recurrent IHR after TIPP between January 2013 and January 2015 in a single hernia-dedicated teaching hospital were included. Exclusion criteria were femoral hernia, incarcerated hernia and reasons for unreliable follow-up. Electronic medical records were assessed retrospectively to register surgical outcomes and complications.
RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernia after TIPP. Twenty patients were treated with a \"re-TIPP when possible\" strategy; resulting in 13 successful re-TIPPs and 7 conversions to Lichtenstein repair. Eleven patients underwent a primary Lichtenstein\'s repair, the remaining two patients underwent recurrent IHR using other techniques (TransREctus sheath PrePeritoneal and TransAbdominal PrePeritoneal repair). Mean time of surgery was 44.7 min (standard deviation 16.7). There was one patient (3.0%) with a re-recurrent inguinal hernia during follow-up. Other minor complications included urinary tract infection.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that after TIPP it is feasible and safe to perform re-surgery for recurrent inguinal hernia with an anterior approach again. For these recurrences, a Lichtenstein repair can be performed, or a \"re-TIPP if possible\" strategy can be applied by experienced TIPP surgeons, tailored to the intraoperative findings. Whether a re-TIPP has advantages over Lichtenstein should be evaluated in a prospective manner.

BACKGROUND: Both the open transinguinal preperitoneal repair (TIPP) and the laparoscopic total extraperitoneal mesh repair (TEP) show excellent outcomes. Direct comparative data between these 2 preperitoneal techniques is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess postoperative outcomes and quality of life (QoL) for these open and laparoscopic preperitoneal repair techniques.
METHODS: Between 2014 and 2016, 204 male patients underwent unilateral inguinal hernia repair through TIPP (n = 135) or TEP (n = 69). Data recorded include demographic profile, preoperative and intraoperative variables, postoperative complications and postoperative quality of life. Two validated hernia-specific QoL questionnaires, the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) and the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score (EuraHS QoL) were used to assess postoperative QoL.
RESULTS: The TIPP group consisted of 135 patients, the TEP group of 69 patients. The mean age of patients was significantly higher in TIPP (64.07 ± 17.10 years) than in TEP (59.0 ± 15.53 years) (p = 0.022). A total of 96 patients (47.1%) responded to our invitation for longterm follow-up: 58 in the TIPP group (43%) and 38 in the TEP group (55.1%). There was no difference in mean follow-up time between the surgical procedure and filling in the questionnaires: 37.4 ± 12.8 months for TIPP and 33.5 ± 11.3 months for TEP group (p = 0.13). No significant differences in quality of life were found between TIPP and TEP for all explored domains.
CONCLUSIONS: TIPP and TEP show equivalent results considering postoperative quality of life. Compared to existing literature on mesh repair for unilateral inguinal hernias, we may conclude that the preperitoneal location of the mesh probably is a more decisive factor for quality of life than the surgical approach used.

OBJECTIVE: Onflex™ mesh has replaced Polysoft™ patch on the market, without being clinically evaluated thus far in the transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) technique.
METHODS: All consecutive TIPP registered in our registry during the overlap period of availability of both meshes were included and studied with the chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) as primary endpoint, assessed with a verbal rating scale (VRS), and included in a patient-related outcome measurement (PROM) phone questionnaire.
RESULTS: A total of 181 Onflex cases vs 182 Polysoft cases were studied with a 2-year follow-up rate of 92% vs 88%. The overall rate of pain or discomfort was not statistically different in the 2 studied subgroups (16.5% vs 17.6%; p = 0.71), while moderate or severe pain were significantly more frequent in the Polysoft subgroup (5.5% vs 11.6%; p = 0.01). These symptoms did not interfere with the patient daily life in 16% vs 16.5% of cases, and they were self-assessed as more bothersome than the hernia in only 0.5% vs 0.5% of cases, suggesting an overestimation of the pain by the VRS. Patients assessed the result of their hernia repair as excellent or good in 97.8% vs 96.7% and medium or bad in 2.2% vs 3.3% (p = 0.53). The cumulative recurrence rate was 0% vs 2.2%. Two reoperations (one for early and one for late recurrence) were reported in the Polysoft subgroup (1%), none related to the non-absorbable memory ring.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that TIPP with Onflex provides results at least similar than those with Polysoft.

With the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer, there is renewed interest in sustainable interventions to improve childhood cancer care in low-/middle-income countries (LMICs). Practitioners in LMICs have traditionally practiced \"twinning,\" i.e., targeted international pediatric oncology partnerships (TIPPs) between one or more institutions in a high-income country (HIC) and an LMIC, to improve care for children with cancer in the latter. The International Society of Paediatric Oncology Committee for Paediatric Oncology in Developing Countries Working Group on Twinning, Collaboration, and Support reviewed guidelines from https://cancerpointe.com and the current literature, gathered input from practitioners in LMICs, and in this article discuss the role of TIPPs in the WHO initiative.

UNASSIGNED: The Lichtenstein mesh technique is recommended as the standard surgical procedure for inguinal hernias. Shouldice is the best non-mesh technique. However, there are reports that the transinguinal preperitoneal technique (TIPP), which uses a preperitoneal mesh, has potential advantages in relation to the Lichtenstein and the Shouldice techniques.
UNASSIGNED: Three hundred patients with inguinal hernias were randomized into three groups of hundred patients each: Group 1 whose inguinal hernia repair was performed using the Lichtenstein technique; Group 2 using the Shouldice technique; and Group 3 using TIPP. The parameters for monitoring were: length of operation, blood loss, length of hospitalization, length of incision, post-operative pain, and the patient\'s satisfaction level.
UNASSIGNED: The visual analog scale (VAS) score after 6, 12, 24 and 48 h, and 14 d was lower in TIPP than the Lichtenstein and Shouldice groups (p < .0001). The satisfaction level was higher in TIPP than in the Lichtenstein and Shouldice groups (p < .0001).
UNASSIGNED: TIPP technique has advantages in comparison with the Lichtenstein and Shouldice techniques. This method takes a shorter time, the skin incision is smaller, the VAS score is lower and the patient satisfaction level is higher. These advantages are in balance with the higher costs of this procedure.

Background: Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) and Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repairs are largely acclaimed for their lower risk of chronic postoperative pain and acceptable recurrence rates. However, hybrid/combined open procedures are still a reliable option among surgeons. Our aim is to compare the outcomes and patients satisfaction of hybrid TIPP (hTIPP) procedure using the Ultrapro Hernia System with laparoscopic pre-peritoneal mesh repair approaches (TEP) to assess its safety and effectiveness. Patients and Methods: The study design is a single center, retrospective comparative study on 90 patients who had hTIPP and TEP inguinal hernia repair in the NAAS General Hospital, over a four-year period (2013-2017). Results: Unplanned postoperative hospital admission was comparable both groups, the figures were 3 patients for hTIPP and 3 patients for TEP. There was no statistically significant difference in the immediate, early and late postoperative pain and complications in both groups. The recurrence rate was nil in hTIPP group compared to one recurrent case in TEP. There is no statistical difference in the five outcomes of the PROM questionnaire and satisfaction rate between hTIPP and TEP. Conclusions: There is no significant difference between hTIPP and TEP in terms of postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction. hTIPP approach is a safe and feasible alternative to TEP.

Background: complex groin hernia is a well describe entity with a high risk of recurrence and postoperative complications. There is no standardized approach and no reports to confirm the efficcacy of a surgical procedure. Our goal was to compare Lichtenstein repair (LR) as \"golden standard\" for open anterior approach with the transinguinal preperitoneal plasty (TIPP) in the treatment of complex groin hernia repair. Material and methods: the study was a prospective one and includes all patients with complex hernias admitted in the Department of Surgery of the Military Hospital Cluj-Napoca between January 2010 and December 2014. All the patients were randomized in two groups: LR and TIPP. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative findings, pain and complications were recorded. Follow-up was at least 1 year. The main outcome after 1 year were recurrence, chronic pain and its intensity recorded on VAS scale. Results: 205 patients (101 in LR group and 104 in TIPP) were included in the study. There were no differences in baseline characteristics and operative findings. Postoperative pain was lower for TIPP group (p 0.05). Follw-up was 98% at 1 month, 74% after 6 months and 64% after 1 year. Recurrence rate was higher for LR (p=0.027). Pain was increased in LR group. Conclusion: TIPP is equal in terms of chronic pain and recurrence for complex groin inguinal hernias.