The Lichtenstein hernioplasty has long been seen as the gold standard for inguinal hernia repair. Unfortunately, this repair is often associated with chronic pain, up to 10-35%. Therefore, several new techniques have been developed, such as the transinguinal preperitoneal patch (TIPP) and the endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique. Several studies showed beneficial results of the TIPP and TEP compared to the Lichtenstein hernioplasty; however, little is published on the outcome when comparing the TIPP and TEP procedures. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes after the TIPP vs the TEP technique for inguinal hernia repair.
A single-center randomized controlled trial was carried out between 2015 and 2020. A total of 300 patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were enrolled and randomized to the TIPP- or TEP technique. Primary outcome was chronic pain (defined as any pain following the last 3 months) and quality of life, assessed with Carolinas comfort scale (CCS) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were: wound infection, wound hypoesthesia, recurrence, readmission within 30 days, and reoperation.
A total of 300 patients were randomized (150 per group). After a follow-up of 12 months, we observed significantly less postoperative chronic groin pain, chronic pain at exertion, wound hypoesthesia, and wound infections after the TEP when compared to the TIPP procedure. No significant differences in quality of life, reoperations, recurrence rate, and readmission within 30 days were observed.
We showed that the TEP has a favorable outcome compared to the TIPP procedure, leading to less postoperative pain and wound complications, whereas recurrence rates and reoperations were equal in both the groups.

OBJECTIVE: Onflex™ mesh has replaced Polysoft™ patch on the market, without being clinically evaluated thus far in the transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) technique.
METHODS: All consecutive TIPP registered in our registry during the overlap period of availability of both meshes were included and studied with the chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) as primary endpoint, assessed with a verbal rating scale (VRS), and included in a patient-related outcome measurement (PROM) phone questionnaire.
RESULTS: A total of 181 Onflex cases vs 182 Polysoft cases were studied with a 2-year follow-up rate of 92% vs 88%. The overall rate of pain or discomfort was not statistically different in the 2 studied subgroups (16.5% vs 17.6%; p = 0.71), while moderate or severe pain were significantly more frequent in the Polysoft subgroup (5.5% vs 11.6%; p = 0.01). These symptoms did not interfere with the patient daily life in 16% vs 16.5% of cases, and they were self-assessed as more bothersome than the hernia in only 0.5% vs 0.5% of cases, suggesting an overestimation of the pain by the VRS. Patients assessed the result of their hernia repair as excellent or good in 97.8% vs 96.7% and medium or bad in 2.2% vs 3.3% (p = 0.53). The cumulative recurrence rate was 0% vs 2.2%. Two reoperations (one for early and one for late recurrence) were reported in the Polysoft subgroup (1%), none related to the non-absorbable memory ring.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that TIPP with Onflex provides results at least similar than those with Polysoft.

Background: Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) and Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repairs are largely acclaimed for their lower risk of chronic postoperative pain and acceptable recurrence rates. However, hybrid/combined open procedures are still a reliable option among surgeons. Our aim is to compare the outcomes and patients satisfaction of hybrid TIPP (hTIPP) procedure using the Ultrapro Hernia System with laparoscopic pre-peritoneal mesh repair approaches (TEP) to assess its safety and effectiveness. Patients and Methods: The study design is a single center, retrospective comparative study on 90 patients who had hTIPP and TEP inguinal hernia repair in the NAAS General Hospital, over a four-year period (2013-2017). Results: Unplanned postoperative hospital admission was comparable both groups, the figures were 3 patients for hTIPP and 3 patients for TEP. There was no statistically significant difference in the immediate, early and late postoperative pain and complications in both groups. The recurrence rate was nil in hTIPP group compared to one recurrent case in TEP. There is no statistical difference in the five outcomes of the PROM questionnaire and satisfaction rate between hTIPP and TEP. Conclusions: There is no significant difference between hTIPP and TEP in terms of postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction. hTIPP approach is a safe and feasible alternative to TEP.

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and long-term outcome of TIPP for the adjunct therapy of superficial venous reflux-related VLUs.
A total of 93 consecutive patients (104 legs) with superficial venous insufficiency-related VLUs who underwent TIPP (53 legs) or conventional phlebectomy (51 legs) between January 2010 and December 2013 were retrospectively studied.
Compared to patients in the conventional phlebectomy group, TIPP patients had larger ulcer areas before surgery (P < 0.005). However, TIPP group required a significantly shorter operation time (P < 0.005), fewer incisions (P < 0.005) but less ulcer healing time (1.25 month vs 2.5 months, P < 0.05). No significant difference in in-hospital and follow-up complications was found between the two groups. For long-term outcome, TIPP group leaded a lower ulcer recurrence rate at 36 months (13.2% vs 29.4%, P < 0.05).
TIPP may be an adjunct surgical method contributes to healing of VLUs, especially for large ulcer areas.