背景:在美国,蜱传疾病是一种日益严重的公共卫生威胁。尽管蜱传疾病的流行和负担不断上升,在基线知识和滴答向量的监测工作方面存在重大差距,甚至在病媒控制区和公共卫生机构之间。为了解决这个问题,通过东南媒介传播疾病卓越中心(SECOEVBD)开发了在线蜱培训课程(OTTC),以提供有关蜱的全面知识库,蜱传疾病,和他们的管理。
方法:OTTC由培训模块组成,涵盖主题包括蜱生物学,滴答识别,蜱传疾病,和公共卫生,个人蜱安全,并勾选监视。该课程主要向美国东南部的病媒控制专家和公共卫生员工推广。我们收集了参与者的评估和调查数据来衡量学习成果,对所获得知识的效用的感知,以及在该领域应用知识的障碍和促进者。
结果:OTTC成功地增加了所有课程学科领域的参与者的基线知识,评估的平均分数从62.6%(课程前)增加到86.7%(课程后)。超过一半的参与者(63.6%)表示他们肯定会在工作中使用课程中的信息。使用延迟评估中确定的信息的障碍包括缺乏应用技能的机会(18.5%)以及需要额外的专业培训,而OTTC目前提供的培训(18.5%)。虽然应用知识的主要推动者(70.4%)是在工作中有机会,例如现有的滴答监视程序。
结论:总体而言,这个OTTC展示了在必要和服务不足的公共卫生领域提高知识的能力,超过一半的参与者在工作中使用或计划使用这些信息。这个在线资源的地理范围比它设计的东南地区大得多,表明对这种资源的更广泛需求。了解此类培训计划的实用性和外显率对于精炼材料和评估最佳培训目标非常重要。
BACKGROUND: Tick-borne diseases are a growing public health threat in the United States. Despite the prevalence and rising burden of tick-borne diseases, there are major gaps in baseline knowledge and surveillance efforts for tick vectors, even among vector control districts and public health agencies. To address this issue, an online tick training course (OTTC) was developed through the Southeastern Center of Excellence in Vector-Borne Diseases (SECOEVBD) to provide a comprehensive knowledge base on
ticks, tick-borne diseases, and their management.
METHODS: The OTTC consisted of training modules covering topics including tick biology, tick identification, tick-borne diseases, and public health, personal tick safety, and tick surveillance. The course was largely promoted to vector control specialists and public health employees throughout the Southeastern US. We collected assessment and survey data on participants to gauge learning outcomes, perceptions of the utility of knowledge gained, and barriers and facilitators to applying the knowledge in the field.
RESULTS: The OTTC was successful in increasing participants\' baseline knowledge across all course subject areas, with the average score on assessment increasing from 62.6% (pre-course) to 86.7% (post-course). More than half of participants (63.6%) indicated that they would definitely use information from the course in their work. Barriers to using information identified in the delayed assessment included lack of opportunities to apply skills (18.5%) and the need for additional specialized training beyond what the OTTC currently offers (18.5%), while the main facilitator (70.4%) for applying knowledge was having opportunities at work, such as an existing tick surveillance program.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this OTTC demonstrated capacity to improve knowledge in a necessary and underserved public health field, and more than half of participants use or plan to use the information in their work. The geographic reach of this online resource was much larger than simply for the Southeastern region for which it was designed, suggesting a much broader need for this resource. Understanding the utility and penetrance of training programs such as these is important for refining materials and assessing optimal targets for training.