Thrombotic complications

血栓并发症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性胆囊炎是一种常见病,需要立即或选择性手术干预,这种情况是老年人口紧急住院的常见原因之一。然而,在接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中使用抗血栓药物存在争议。很少有研究报告抗凝剂患者出血风险增加,而其他研究报告没有明显的出血结果。然而,缺乏循证指南使决策更加复杂.在这项分析中,我们旨在系统评估抗血栓治疗对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后出血结局和血栓形成的影响。MEDLINE,EMBASE,Cochrane数据库,谷歌学者,WebofScience和http://www.根据腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的抗血栓治疗,搜索了ClinicalTrials.gov的相关出版物。该分析的终点包括:术中出血,术后出血,失血,需要输血和血栓并发症的患者。本分析中使用Revman5.4软件分析数据。风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)用于表示分析后的数据。该分析包括4008名参与者(2002-2019年招募期),其中756名参与者被分配到抗血栓治疗,3592名参与者为对照组。我们的结果显示,抗栓治疗与术中出血的风险显著升高相关(RR:2.23,95%CI:1.77-2.79;P=0.00001)。术后出血(RR:4.77,95%CI:1.13-20.10;P=0.03),和失血(RR:3.01,95%CI:1.13-8.06;P=0.03)。需要输血的患者(RR:4.80,95%CI:1.90-12.13;P=0.0009)在抗血栓治疗组中也显着更高。然而,血栓性并发症(RR:2.17,95%CI:0.50-9.42;P=0.30)没有显著升高.通过这种分析,我们的结论是,抗栓治疗与腹腔镜胆囊切除术后手术中和手术后出血事件的风险显著增加相关.需要输血的患者也明显较高。因此,在腹腔镜胆囊切除术前停用抗血栓药物可以显著降低出血风险.
    Acute cholecyctitis is a common condition which requires immediate or elective surgical interventions and this condition is one among the common causes for emergency hospitalization among the elderly population. However, controversies have been observed with the use of anti-thrombotic agents in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecyctectomy. Few studies have reported increased risk of bleeding in patients with anticoagulants whereas other studies have reported no significant bleeding outcomes. Nevertheless, the lack of evidence-based guidelines further complicates decision-making. In this analysis we aimed to systematically assess the impact of anti-thrombotic therapy on bleeding outcomes and thrombosis following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane database, Google scholar, Web of Science and http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant publications based on anti-thrombotic therapy among patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The endpoints in this analysis included: intra-operative bleeding, post-operative bleeding, blood loss, patients requiring blood transfusion and thrombotic complications. The Revman 5.4 software was used to analyze data in this analysis. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to represent the data following analysis. A total number of 4008 participants (enrollment period 2002-2019) were included in this analysis whereby 756 participants were assigned to an anti-thrombotic therapy and 3592 participants were in the control group. Our results showed that antithrombotic therapy was associated with significantly higher risk of intra-operative bleeding (RR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.77-2.79; P = 0.00001), post-operative bleeding (RR: 4.77, 95% CI: 1.13-20.10; P = 0.03), and blood loss (RR: 3.01, 95% CI: 1.13-8.06; P = 0.03). Patients requiring blood transfusion (RR: 4.80, 95% CI: 1.90-12.13; P = 0.0009) were also significantly higher in the anti-thrombotic group. However, thrombotic complications (RR: 2.17, 95% CI: 0.50-9.42; P = 0.30) were not significantly higher. Through this analysis, we concluded that anti-thrombotic therapy was associated with significantly increased risks of intra-operative and post-operative bleeding events following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients requiring blood transfusion were also significantly higher. Therefore, stopping anti-thrombotic agents prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy could significantly minimize bleeding risks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的管理,脑血管意外(CVA),和肺栓塞(PE)需要及时干预,延迟治疗可能会导致严重的后果。这些病症中的每一种都存在重大挑战,并且具有高发病率和死亡率的风险。我们介绍了一名86岁的女性,有4期尿路上皮癌转移到肺部的病史,因急性缺血性卒中(AIS)到急诊科(ED)就诊,ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI),和双边PE。我们提出术语“多器官血栓栓塞危象”(MOTEC),以简化发生影响多器官系统的严重血栓栓塞事件的患者的沟通和管理方法。
    Management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and pulmonary embolism (PE) necessitates prompt intervention, as delayed treatment may lead to severe consequences. Each of these conditions presents significant challenges and carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. We present the case of an 86-year-old female with a history of stage 4 urothelial carcinoma metastasized to the lungs, who presented to the emergency department (ED) with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and bilateral PE. We propose the term \"multi-organ thromboembolic crisis\" (MOTEC) to streamline the communication and management approach for patients experiencing critical thromboembolic events affecting multiple organ systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估复杂动脉瘤血管内手术修复过程中与上肢导管插入术相关的疗效和并发症。
    方法:遵循PRISMA指南进行了系统评价,涉及在PubMed上进行搜索,科克伦中部,和WebofScience。主要终点是30天的卒中。次要终点是目标血管技术成功,30天死亡率,局部通路相关并发症。使用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。
    结果:纳入了16项观察性研究,包括4,137名患者。上肢通道的30天中风发生率为1.4%(95%CI1.0%-1.8%),略高于下肢,尽管没有统计学意义。死亡率在0-6.8%之间变化,局部通路相关并发症发生率为3.2%(95%CI1.9%-4.4%).靶血管导管插入术的技术成功率为99.2%(95%CI98.4%-100.0%)。
    结论:这项系统评价和荟萃分析证明了f/b-EVAR上肢通路的安全性和有效性,中风风险低,死亡率,和最小的局部并发症。尽管存在偏见的风险,研究结果表明,上肢通道可能是有益的,尤其是在股骨通路失败的救助情况下,为临床决策提供有价值的见解。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the efficacy and complications associated with upper limb catheterization during complex aneurysm endovascular surgery repair.
    METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, involving a search across PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Primary endpoint was represented by 30-day stroke. Secondary endpoints were target vessels technical success, 30-day mortality, local access-related complications. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.
    RESULTS: Sixteen observational studies encompassing 4,137 patients were included. The 30-day stroke incidence for upper limb access was 1.4% (95% CI 1.0%-1.8%), slightly higher than lower limb, despite not statistically significant. Mortality varied between 0-6.8%, and local access-related complications occurred in 3.2% (95% CI 1.9%-4.4%). Technical success in target vessel catheterization was 99.2% (95% CI 98.4%-100.0%).
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate the safety and efficacy of upper limb access for f/b-EVAR, with low stroke risk, mortality rates, and minimal local complications. Despite the risk of bias, the findings suggest that upper limb access may be beneficial, especially in bailout situations when femoral access fails, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    由于高凝状态,癌症患者有血栓并发症的风险。然而,在这些患者的许多亚组中,预防性抗凝治疗的益处尚不清楚.对于活动性癌症患者的急性血栓栓塞性疾病(VTE)的首次发作,抗凝治疗至少持续3至6个月。在这里,我们向一名31岁的女性展示了活跃的,复发性IIIa期经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(CHL)(结节性硬化症),以前治疗过的近端上肢深静脉血栓形成(DVT),就诊以评估呼吸急促,并最终诊断为右心房血栓继发的双侧肺栓塞(PE)。患者通过手术切除血栓成功治疗。有了这个病例报告,我们希望鼓励医生在患有活动性癌症和既往DVT的患者中使用预防性无限期抗凝药物,包括上肢DVT患者。
    Patients with cancer are at risk for thrombotic complications due to a hypercoagulable state. However, the benefit of prophylactic anticoagulation is unclear in many subsets of these patients. For the first episode of acute thromboembolic disease (VTE) in patients with active cancer, anticoagulant therapy is administered for at least three to six months. Herein, we present a 31-year-old female with active, recurrent stage IIIa classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) (nodular sclerosis), previously treated for proximal upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), presenting for evaluation of shortness of breath and eventually diagnosed with bilateral pulmonary embolism (PE) secondary to a right atrial thrombus. The patient was successfully treated with surgical resection of the thrombus. With this case report, we hope to encourage physicians to use prophylactic indefinite anticoagulation in patients with active cancer and previous DVT, including patients with upper extremity DVT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    心脏淀粉样变性是一组以淀粉样纤维在心脏组织中沉积为特征的疾病。主要报道两种形式:轻链(AL)和甲状腺素运载蛋白(ATTR)淀粉样变性。在转甲状腺素蛋白淀粉样变性的并发症中,有血栓事件,在较小程度上,出血性事件。后者可能是由血管周围淀粉样蛋白沉积导致毛细血管脆性引起的,除了抗凝治疗期间的INR不稳定性。血栓形成事件的发生可能是由房颤(AF)的高患病率引起的。在转甲状腺素蛋白淀粉样变性患者中观察到的机械性心脏功能障碍和心房肌病。目前尚不清楚为什么即使在窦性心律或适当抗凝的患者中也会发生血栓栓塞事件。尽管可能涉及高凝状态或潜在的炎症。我们报告了一例86岁女性的隐源性缺血性中风,患有转甲状腺素蛋白淀粉样变性和窦性心律。传统的凝血试验,全血旋转血栓弹性测定法和阻抗聚集测定法未显示高凝状态.凝血酶生成测定未显示血栓前状态。然而,对细胞外囊泡的研究强调了潜在的免疫介导的内皮损伤可能是血栓形成的原因.可以假设炎症在甲状腺素运载蛋白淀粉样变性患者的高凝状态中起作用。需要更大的前瞻性研究来验证我们的假设。
    Cardiac amyloidosis is a group of diseases characterized by the deposition of amyloid fibers in cardiac tissue. Two forms are mainly reported: light chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis. Among the complications of transthyretin amyloidosis there are thrombotic events and, to a lesser extent, hemorrhagic events. The latter are likely caused by perivascular amyloid deposition resulting in capillary fragility, in addition to INR lability during anticoagulant therapy. The onset of thrombotic events may be caused by the high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), mechanical cardiac dysfunction and atrial myopathy observed in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis. It remains unclear why thromboembolic events occur even in patients with sinus rhythm or adequate anticoagulation, though a hypercoagulable state or underlying inflammation may be involved. We report a case of cryptogenic ischemic stroke in an 86-year-old woman with transthyretin amyloidosis and sinus rhythm. Traditional coagulation tests, whole blood rotational thromboelastometry and impedance aggregometry did not show a hypercoagulable state. The thrombin generation assay did not reveal a prothrombotic state. However, the study of extracellular vesicles highlighted underlying immune-mediated endothelial damage likely responsible for the thrombotic diathesis. It could be hypothesized that inflammation plays a role in the hypercoagulability of patients with transthyretin amyloidosis. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate our hypothesis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:手术后血栓性并发症是颅神经外科的一个独特挑战,因为主要治疗包括治疗性抗凝治疗。开始治疗的决定及其时机是微妙的,因为外科医生必须平衡灾难性颅内出血(ICH)的风险。由于现有的指导管理的证据有限,当前的实践模式是主观和不一致的。作者评估了接受颅脑手术的神经外科患者血栓并发症的早期治疗性抗凝(术后≤7天),以更好地了解灾难性ICH的风险。
    方法:考虑了颅骨手术后接受早期治疗性抗凝治疗的成年患者。抗凝适应症仅限于血栓或血栓栓塞并发症。对记录进行了人口统计学回顾性审查,手术细节,抗凝治疗开始。主要结果是灾难性ICH的发生率,定义为在抗凝开始后30天内导致再次手术或死亡的ICH。作为次要结果,抗凝后颅骨影像学检查对新的或恶化的急性血液制品进行了回顾。Fisher精确和Wilcoxon秩和检验用于比较队列。根据抗凝开始时间对主要和次要结局进行累积结局分析。
    结果:71例患者符合纳入标准。在平均术后天数(POD)4.3(SD2.2)开始抗凝治疗。在7例患者(9.9%)中观察到灾难性ICH,并且与早期抗凝启动有关(p=0.02)。灾难性ICH患者,6人(85.7%)在索引手术期间进行了轴内探查。与单独进行轴外探查的患者相比,进行轴内探查的患者术后发生灾难性ICH的可能性更大(OR8.5,p=0.04)。在58例术后影像学检查患者中,15人(25.9%)经历了新的或恶化的血液制品。在手术后48小时内开始抗凝治疗发生灾难性ICH的可能性增加9倍(OR8.9,p=0.01)。累积的灾难性ICH风险随着抗凝开始的延迟而降低,从POD2的21.1%到POD7的9.9%。同时服用抗血小板药物与任一结果指标均无相关性。
    结论:当在颅骨手术48小时内开始抗凝治疗时,灾难性ICH的发生率显著增加。在索引手术期间接受轴内探查的患者发生灾难性ICH的风险更高。
    OBJECTIVE: Postoperative thrombotic complications represent a unique challenge in cranial neurosurgery as primary treatment involves therapeutic anticoagulation. The decision to initiate therapy and its timing is nuanced, as surgeons must balance the risk of catastrophic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). With limited existing evidence to guide management, current practice patterns are subjective and inconsistent. The authors assessed their experience with early therapeutic anticoagulation (≤ 7 days postoperatively) initiation for thrombotic complications in neurosurgical patients undergoing cranial surgery to better understand the risks of catastrophic ICH.
    METHODS: Adult patients treated with early therapeutic anticoagulation following cranial surgery were considered. Anticoagulation indications were restricted to thrombotic or thromboembolic complications. Records were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, surgical details, and anticoagulation therapy start. The primary outcome was the incidence of catastrophic ICH, defined as ICH resulting in reoperation or death within 30 days of anticoagulation initiation. As a secondary outcome, post-anticoagulation cranial imaging was reviewed for new or worsening acute blood products. Fisher\'s exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare cohorts. Cumulative outcome analyses were performed for primary and secondary outcomes according to anticoagulation start time.
    RESULTS: Seventy-one patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Anticoagulation commenced on mean postoperative day (POD) 4.3 (SD 2.2). Catastrophic ICH was observed in 7 patients (9.9%) and was associated with earlier anticoagulation initiation (p = 0.02). Of patients with catastrophic ICH, 6 (85.7%) had intra-axial exploration during their index surgery. Patients with intra-axial exploration were more likely to experience a catastrophic ICH postoperatively compared to those with extra-axial exploration alone (OR 8.5, p = 0.04). Of the 58 patients with postoperative imaging, 15 (25.9%) experienced new or worsening blood products. Catastrophic ICH was 9 times more likely with anticoagulation initiation within 48 hours of surgery (OR 8.9, p = 0.01). The cumulative catastrophic ICH risk decreased with delay in initiation of anticoagulation, from 21.1% on POD 2 to 9.9% on POD 7. Concurrent antiplatelet medication was not associated with either outcome measure.
    CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of catastrophic ICH was significantly increased when anticoagulation was initiated within 48 hours of cranial surgery. Patients undergoing intra-axial exploration during their index surgery were at higher risk of a catastrophic ICH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的指南建议,在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后没有长期口服抗凝(OAC)适应症的患者中,抗血小板治疗(APT)是治疗的标准。一种方法优于另一种方法仍然存在争议。
    几个数据库,包括MEDLINE,谷歌学者,和EMBASE,电子搜索。主要终点是全因死亡率(ACM)。次要终点包括心血管死亡,心肌梗死(MI),中风/TIA,出血性中风,出血事件,全身性栓塞,接受APT和口服抗凝剂(OAC)的TAVR后患者的瓣膜血栓形成。使用ReviewManager版本5.4生成森林地块,p值小于0.05,表明有统计学意义。进行亚组分析以探索异质性的潜在来源。
    选择了12项研究。APT和OAC组ACM无显著差异[风险比(RR):0.67;95%CI:0.45-1.01;P=0.05],心血管死亡[RR:0.91;95%CI:0.73-1.14;P=0.42],MI[RR:1.69;95%CI:0.43-6.72;P=0.46],卒中/TIA[RR:0.79;95%CI:0.58-1.06;P=0.12],缺血性卒中[RR:0.83;95%CI:0.50-1.37;P=0.47],出血性卒中[RR:1.08;95%CI:0.23-5.15;P=0.92],大出血[RR:0.79;95%CI:0.51-1.21;P=0.28],轻微出血[RR:1.09;95%CI:0.80-1.47;P=0.58],危及生命的出血[RR:0.85;95%CI:0.55-1.30;P=0.45],任何出血[RR:0.98;95%CI:0.83-1.15;P=0.78],和全身性栓塞[RR:0.87;95%CI:0.44-1.70;P=0.68]。接受APT的患者发生瓣膜血栓形成的风险高于接受OAC的患者[RR:2.61;95%CI:1.56-4.36;P=0.0002]。
    尽管接受APT的患者瓣膜血栓形成的风险增加,两组的其他终点风险相当.
    UNASSIGNED: Recent guidelines suggest that antiplatelet therapy (APT) is the standard of care in the absence of long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) indications in patients post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The superiority of one method over the other remains controversial.
    UNASSIGNED: Several databases, including MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EMBASE, were electronically searched. The primary endpoint was the all-cause mortality (ACM) rate. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke/TIA, haemorrhagic stroke, bleeding events, systemic embolism, and valve thrombosis in post-TAVR patients receiving APT and oral anticoagulants (OACs). Forest plots were generated using Review Manager version 5.4, with a p value less than 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.
    UNASSIGNED: Twelve studies were selected. No significant differences were observed in APT and OAC group for ACM [risk ratio (RR): 0.67; 95% CI:0.45-1.01; P=0.05], cardiovascular death [RR:0.91; 95% CI:0.73-1.14; P=0.42], MI [RR:1.69; 95% CI:0.43-6.72; P=0.46], Stroke/TIA [RR:0.79; 95% CI:0.58-1.06; P=0.12], ischaemic stroke [RR:0.83; 95% CI:0.50-1.37; P=0.47], haemorrhagic stroke [RR:1.08; 95% CI: 0.23-5.15; P=0.92], major bleeding [RR:0.79; 95% CI:0.51-1.21; P=0.28], minor bleeding [RR:1.09; 95% CI: 0.80-1.47; P=0.58], life-threatening bleeding [RR:0.85; 95% CI:0.55-1.30; P=0.45], any bleeding [RR:0.98; 95% CI:0.83-1.15; P=0.78], and systemic embolism [RR:0.87; 95% CI:0.44-1.70; P=0.68]. The risk of valve thrombosis was higher in patients receiving APT than in those receiving OAC [RR:2.61; 95% CI:1.56-4.36; P =0.0002].
    UNASSIGNED: Although the risk of valve thrombosis increased in patients receiving APT, the risk of other endpoints was comparable between the two groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    •尽管有标准的肝素抗凝方案,但COVID-19的回路血栓形成会使CRRT复杂化。•5例CRRT血栓形成,尽管使用直接凝血酶抑制剂以肝素为基础的抗凝治疗,阿加曲班。•纤维蛋白原水平的变化比D-二聚体水平的变化更好地反映抗凝反应。•在这些情况下,高纤维蛋白原水平和抗凝血酶III活性降低可能与阿加曲班优势有关。
    •Circuit thrombosis complicates CRRT in COVID-19 despite standard heparin-based anticoagulation regimens.•5 cases of CRRT thrombosis despite heparin-based anticoagulation resolved using a direct thrombin inhibitor, argatroban.•Changes in fibrinogen levels better reflected response to anticoagulation than did changes in D-dimer levels.•High fibrinogen levels and decreased anti-thrombin III activity may relate to argatroban superiority in these cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:长期使用全身性类固醇对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后的电和机械并发症的影响尚未得到广泛研究。方法在2018年至2020年的国家住院患者样本(NIS)的回顾性队列研究中,根据长期(当前)全身性类固醇(LTCSS)使用的存在,对STEMI患者进行了二分。主要结果是全因死亡率。次要结果包括复合机械性并发症,电气,血液动力学,和血栓性并发症,以及血运重建的复杂性,停留时间(LOS)和总收费。多元线性和逻辑回归用于校正混杂因素。结果在608,210名STEMI患者中,5,310(0.9%)使用了LTCSS。全因死亡率(aOR:0.89,95CI:0.74-1.08,p值:0.245)和机械性并发症的组合(aOR:0.74,95CI:0.25-2.30,p值:0.599)的几率无显著差异。使用LTCSS与较低的室性心动过速相关,房室传导阻滞,新的永久性起搏器插入,心源性休克,需要机械循环支持,机械通气,心脏复律,LOS减少1天,总收费减少34,512美元(所有P值:<0.05)。血运重建策略(冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI))或复合血栓事件的发生率。结论STEMI患者使用LTCSS与较低的电功能障碍和血流动力学不稳定的几率相关,但机械并发症的几率没有差异。CABG速率,全因死亡率,心脏骤停,或者血栓性并发症.需要进一步的前瞻性研究来进一步评估这些发现。
    Background The impact of long-term systemic steroid use on electrical and mechanical complications following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been extensively studied. Methods In a retrospective cohort study of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2018 to 2020, adults admitted with STEMI were dichotomized based on the presence of long-term (current) systemic steroid (LTCSS) use. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included a composite of mechanical complications, electrical, hemodynamic, and thrombotic complications, as well as revascularization complexity, length of stay (LOS), and total charge. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were used to adjust for confounders. Results Out of 608,210 admissions for STEMI, 5,310 (0.9%) had LTCSS use. There was no significant difference in the odds of all-cause mortality (aOR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.74-1.08, p-value: 0.245) and the composite of mechanical complications (aOR: 0.74, 95%CI: 0.25-2.30, p-value: 0.599). LTCSS use was associated with lower odds of ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular blocks, new permanent-pacemaker insertion, cardiogenic shock, the need for mechanical circulatory support, mechanical ventilation, cardioversion, a reduced LOS by 1 day, and a reduced total charge by 34,512 USD (all p-values: <0.05). There were no significant differences in the revascularization strategy (coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)) or in the incidence of composite thrombotic events. Conclusion LTCSS use among patients admitted with STEMI was associated with lower odds of electrical dysfunction and hemodynamic instability but no difference in the odds of mechanical complications, CABG rate, all-cause mortality, cardiac arrest, or thrombotic complications. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate these findings further.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    左心室辅助装置(LVAD)是一种机械循环支持装置,可支持心力衰竭患者作为移植桥梁(BTT)或作为具有其他医疗合并症或并发症的患者的目的地治疗,使他们无法达到移植标准。严重心力衰竭患者,LVAD的使用延长了生存期,改善了心脏充血和低心输出量的体征和症状,如呼吸困难,疲劳,锻炼不容忍。然而,这些装置与特定的血液学和血栓性并发症相关.在这份手稿中,我们回顾了LVAD的常见血液学并发症。
    The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a mechanical circulatory support device that supports the heart failure patient as a bridge to transplant (BTT) or as a destination therapy for those who have other medical comorbidities or complications that disqualify them from meeting transplant criteria. In patients with severe heart failure, LVAD use has extended survival and improved signs and symptoms of cardiac congestion and low cardiac output, such as dyspnea, fatigue, and exercise intolerance. However, these devices are associated with specific hematologic and thrombotic complications. In this manuscript, we review the common hematologic complications of LVADs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号