Textbooks as Topic

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:数字教科书(DTs),学生阅读几十个段落片段,并通过新问题系统化他们的知识水平,可以成为数字原住民考虑的替代方案。在本科护理学校教授数字原住民时,需要开发DTs。需要进行范围审查,以了解DTs在护理教育中的现状。
    方法:已经进行了初步搜索,以检查PubMed(NCBI)产生的结果是否在10年内以英文发表,并且与DTs相关。本研究包括针对护理本科生的研究。将使用Embase(Elsevier)进一步搜索文献,Cochrane图书馆和护理和相关健康累积指数(CINAHL)数据库。这项范围审查还将考虑定量,定性,和混合的研究方法,文本和意见文件;审查研究;和试点测试。选择的研究将首先根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围审查审查数据提取部分进行提取,以确定其一般特征。将根据电子教科书框架:信息产品,技术和利益相关者。
    背景:南布大学机构审查委员会,韩国,批准本研究审查豁免(批准号:1041478-2022-HR-009)。这项研究的结果将通过研究成果传播给护理教育机构和医院。开放式科学框架:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF。IO/QS6WH。
    BACKGROUND: Digital textbooks (DTs), in which students read dozens of paragraph clips and systematise their level of knowledge through new questions, can be an alternative for digital natives to consider. Developing DTs is required when teaching digital natives at undergraduate nursing schools. A scoping review is required to understand the current status of DTs in nursing education.
    METHODS: The preliminary search has been conducted to check whether the results produced by PubMed (NCBI) were published in English within 10 years and related to DTs. This study includes research targeting undergraduate nursing students. Literature will be further searched using Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Library and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL) databases. This scoping review will also consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods, texts and opinion documents; review studies; and pilot tests. The chosen studies will first be extracted based on the scoping review data extraction section of Joanna Briggs Institute to identify their general characteristics. DTs will be analysed based on the e-textbook framework: information goods, technology and stakeholders.
    BACKGROUND: The Institutional Review Board of Nambu University, South Korea, approved this study for review exemption (approval number: 1041478-2022-HR-009). The results of this study will be disseminated through research results to nursing education institutions and hospitals. OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QS6WH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    By extracting the acupoint names and their main indications from cases in Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion Therapy and Practical Acupuncture and Moxibustion, the acupoints and their main indications are represented in a reduced dimension, establishing an \"acupoint-indication\" linkage. Using complex network detection results (node degree values), the specificity of acupoints was assessed. The small-world characteristics of the \"acupoint-indication\" network are utilized to analyze the consistency of acupoint selection in acupuncture prescriptions and strategies to avoid redundant acupoints. The results show that the \"acupoint-indication\" network formed by both texts exhibited an approximate \"long-tail\" distribution, with a large number of node degree values concentrated between 0 and 4 000, while a few nodes have degree values exceeding 10 000. There are significant differences in the number and distribution of nodes with degree values> 10 000 between the two texts. Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion Therapy includes 11 acupoints with multiple edges across the body, whereas Practical Acupuncture and Moxibustion contains only 2 such acupoints, located in the lower limbs. Clinically, some acupoints have a broad therapeutic effect and appear in numerous prescriptions. The division of acupoints based on node degree values can coarsely evaluate the body region specificity of acupoints\' regulatory effects. The \"acupoint-indication\" network of Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion Therapy has a higher number of edges than that of Practical Acupuncture and Moxibustion, which might be related to the different historical contexts of the two texts. In the future, diagnostic and therapeutic patterns with historical continuity can be utilized to optimize acupuncture prescriptions.
    提取《中国针灸治疗学》《实用针灸学》中病案的腧穴名称、主治病症,对穴位与主治病症进行降维表示,建立“穴-症”联系,采用复杂网络检测结果(节点度值)评估穴位的特异性,利用穴-症网络的“小世界”特性分析针灸处方选穴的一致性和避免冗余穴位的策略。结果显示,两本著作形成的“穴-症”网络均存在近似“长尾”的度分布,大量节点度值集中在0~4 000,少量节点的度值高达10 000以上。对于度值>10 000的节点出现了明显的个数与分布差异,《中国针灸治疗学》中包括11个具有多连边数的穴位,遍布全身,《实用针灸学》中仅有2个多连边数的穴位,位于下肢。临床中存在个别穴位具有广泛的治疗效应,出现在大量处方中,通过节点度值的穴位划分能够粗粒度地评估穴位调控作用的躯体区域特异性;《中国针灸治疗学》穴-症网络连边数高于《实用针灸学》穴-症网络,与2本著作不同的时代背景有关,今后可利用具有时代传承特征的诊疗规律优化针灸处方。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:美国代谢和减肥手术学会(ASMBS)教科书是减肥手术的综合资源,涵盖最新进展和临床问题。使用此权威来源测试人工智能(AI)引擎可确保准确和最新的信息,并提供其对外科教育和培训的潜在影响的洞察力。
    目的:确定质量并比较不同的大型语言模型(LLM)对与减肥手术有关的教科书问题的回答能力。
    方法:远程。
    方法:提示进入LLM是多项选择题,见于“ASMBS减肥手术教科书,第二版。提示被查询到3个LLM中:OpenAI的ChatGPT-4,Microsoft的Bing,和谷歌的吟游诗人。根据总体准确性评估生成的响应,根据主题正确答案的数量,以及根据问题类型正确答案的数量。进行统计分析以确定正确的每个类别的每个LLM的响应数。
    结果:使用了200个问题来查询AI模型。答案的准确性总体上存在显着差异,ChatGPT-4的准确率为83.0%,其次是Bard(76.0%)和Bing(65.0%)。亚组分析显示,模型在问题类别中的性能存在显著差异,ChatGPT-4在与治疗和外科手术(83.1%)和并发症(91.7%)相关的问题中,正确答案的比例最高。不同题型的表现也有显著差异,ChatGPT-4在包容性问题中表现出卓越的性能。Bard和Bing无法回答某些问题,而ChatGPT-4没有任何问题未回答。
    结论:LLM,特别是ChatGPT-4,在回答与减肥手术相关的临床问题时,显示出有希望的准确性。需要不断的AI进步和研究来阐明LLM在培训和教育中的潜在应用。
    BACKGROUND: The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) textbook serves as a comprehensive resource for bariatric surgery, covering recent advancements and clinical questions. Testing artificial intelligence (AI) engines using this authoritative source ensures accurate and up-to-date information and provides insight in its potential implications for surgical education and training.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the quality and to compare different large language models\' (LLMs) ability to respond to textbook questions relating to bariatric surgery.
    METHODS: Remote.
    METHODS: Prompts to be entered into the LLMs were multiple-choice questions found in \"The ASMBS Textbook of Bariatric Surgery, second Edition. The prompts were queried into 3 LLMs: OpenAI\'s ChatGPT-4, Microsoft\'s Bing, and Google\'s Bard. The generated responses were assessed based on overall accuracy, the number of correct answers according to subject matter, and the number of correct answers based on question type. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the number of responses per LLMs per category that were correct.
    RESULTS: Two hundred questions were used to query the AI models. There was an overall significant difference in the accuracy of answers, with an accuracy of 83.0% for ChatGPT-4, followed by Bard (76.0%) and Bing (65.0%). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference between the models\' performance in question categories, with ChatGPT-4\'s demonstrating the highest proportion of correct answers in questions related to treatment and surgical procedures (83.1%) and complications (91.7%). There was also a significant difference between the performance in different question types, with ChatGPT-4 showing superior performance in inclusionary questions. Bard and Bing were unable to answer certain questions whereas ChatGPT-4 left no questions unanswered.
    CONCLUSIONS: LLMs, particularly ChatGPT-4, demonstrated promising accuracy when answering clinical questions related to bariatric surgery. Continued AI advancements and research is required to elucidate the potential applications of LLMs in training and education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: News
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:美国医学执照考试(USMLE)步骤1是医学院前两年(基础科学阶段)完成后的两项考试之一,有资格申请在美国接受住院医师培训。大量和类型的学习材料可用于准备考试,这可能会使学生选择资源感到困惑。我们调查了第三和第五学期医学生使用的学习资源及其与学习成绩的关系。我们还比较了高绩效和低绩效学生的学习资源和考试成绩。
    方法:在面对面访谈中使用结构化(定量研究)和半结构化(定性研究)问卷进行数据收集。本文是关于定量部分的相关研究。单因素单向方差分析(ANOVA),皮尔逊相关系数检验,T检验,采用Fisher精确检验对数据进行分析。
    结果:大约一半的学生使用三个或更多的商业资源来处理相同的内容。商业资源的数量与考试成绩之间存在弱负相关,特别是当这些资源的数量是三个或更多(r=-0.26)。教科书使用者的平均考试成绩在统计学上显着高于非教科书使用者的平均考试成绩(p=0.01)。与其他学生相比,顶尖学生的教科书使用率在统计学上显着较高(p=0.006)。除了减少教科书的使用,在最弱的学生组中,复习书的平均数量更高(2.84比3.7;p=0.75)。
    结论:大多数学生没有使用专业教科书,大约一半的学生使用了太多的商业评论资源。虽然前一个事实与学习成绩差显著相关,后来的事实与考试成绩呈弱负相关。迫切需要教学干预,通过使专业教科书更加面向USMLE,并帮助学生选择最佳和正确数量的资源以获得最佳学习成绩,从而提供正确类型的学习资源。通过以这种方式满足学生观察到的需求,他们可能会因为自决而感到被授权,这将激励学习。
    BACKGROUND: The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 is one of the two examinations written after completion of the first two years (basic science stage) of medical school to be eligible to apply for residency training in the USA. A huge number and types of study materials are available to prepare for the exam which might confuse students choosing a resource. We investigated learning resources being used by the third and fifth-semester medical students and their association with academic performance. We also compared learning resources and exam scores of high-performing and low-performing students.
    METHODS: Data collection was done using structured (quantitative study) and semi-structured (qualitative study) questionnaires during a face-to-face interview. This article is about the quantitative part which was designed as a correlational study. Single factor one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson correlation coefficient test, T-test, and Fisher\'s exact test were used to analyze the data.
    RESULTS: About half of all students used three or more commercial resources dealing with the same content. A weak negative correlation was observed between the number of commercial resources and the exam scores, especially when the number of these resources was three or more (r = -0.26). The mean exam score of textbook users was statistically significantly higher than the mean score of textbook non-users (p = 0.01). The usage of textbooks was statistically significantly higher in the cohort of top performers in comparison to the rest of the students (p = 0.006). In addition to less usage of textbooks, the mean number of review books was higher in the group of weakest students (2.84 versus 3.7; p = 0.75).
    CONCLUSIONS: Most students did not use professional textbooks and about half used too many commercial review resources. While the former fact was significantly associated with poor academic performance, the later fact had weak negative correlation with exam score. Pedagogical interventions are urgently needed to make the right type of learning resources available by making professional textbooks more USMLE-oriented and helping the students choose the best and right number of resources for optimum academic performance. By fulfilling the observed needs of the students in this way, they might feel empowered because of self-determination which will motivate studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究表明,医学课程中代表性不足会使医疗保健中的不平等现象长期存在。这项研究旨在量化人类表型多样性的患病率(例如,肤色,性别,身体尺寸,和年龄)跨越11个常用的解剖学地图集和教科书,从2015年到2020年出版。对5001张图像进行了系统的视觉内容分析,其中至少一种表型属性是可量化的。解剖学图像最普遍地描绘了浅肤色,男性,中等体型的人,以及年轻人到中年人。在3883张具有可编码肤色的图像中,81.2%(n=3154)描绘光,14.3%(n=554)描述的中间体,4.5%(n=175)描绘深色肤色。在2384张可以归类为性别二元的图像中,38.4%(n=915)描述女性,61.6%(n=1469)描述男性。男性偏见持续存在于所有全身和区域身体图像中,包括那些显示性器官的人或那些显示通常与特定性别相关的特征的人(例如,对于男性,面部毛发和/或肌肉肥大)。在特定性别的背景下,较深的皮肤代表不足,但是男性的描述显示出更大的整体肤色变化。虽然大多数图像不能被分配到一个身体大小或年龄类别,当可编码时,这些图像绝大多数描绘了较小(34.7%;93/268)或中等(64.6%;173/268)体型的成年人(85.0%;567中的482人)。最终,这些结果为监测正在进行的和未来的工作提供了参考指标,以解决解剖学图像中描绘的表示不平等.
    Previous research suggests that underrepresentation in medical curricula perpetuates inequities in healthcare. This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of human phenotypic diversity (e.g., skin tone, sex, body size, and age) across 11 commonly used anatomy atlases and textbooks in pre-clerkship medical education, published from 2015 to 2020. A systematic visual content analysis was conducted on 5001 images in which at least one phenotypic attribute was quantifiable. Anatomy images most prevalently portrayed light skin tones, males, persons with intermediate body sizes, and young to middle-aged adults. Of the 3883 images in which there was a codable skin tone, 81.2% (n = 3154) depicted light, 14.3% (n = 554) depicted intermediate, and 4.5% (n = 175) depicted dark skin tones. Of the 2384 images that could be categorized into a sex binary, 38.4% (n = 915) depicted females and 61.6% (n = 1469) depicted males. A male bias persisted across all whole-body and regional-body images, including those showing sex organs or those showing characteristics commonly associated with a specific sex (e.g. for males, facial hair and/or muscle hypertrophy). Within sex-specific contexts, darker skin was underrepresented, but male depictions displayed greater overall skin tone variation. Although most images could not be assigned to a body size or age category, when codable, these images overwhelmingly depicted adults (85.0%; 482 of 567) with smaller (34.7%; 93 of 268) or intermediate (64.6%; 173 of 268) body sizes. Ultimately, these outcomes provide reference metrics for monitoring ongoing and future efforts to address representation inequalities portrayed in anatomical imagery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号