Team-based learning

基于团队的学习
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    分配学生在永久团队中工作是基于团队的学习(TBL)的设计原则。人们认为,稳定的团队组成支持协作解决问题和学习的出现:当学生变得更加熟悉时,他们分享了更多的信息并一起解决了差异,这反过来又刺激了知识的获取和理解。然而,一项以效能评估为结局的随机对照试验并未对这一假设进行调查.在第二学期医学生的在线课程中,四节课要解决的24个问题中,有50%的学生被重新分配到新的团队,从而排除了熟悉。在四个课程中的第三个课程之后不久,通过领域知识测试评估了学习结果。TBL团队是永久性的还是临时性的,都不会影响领域知识测试的得分。不出所料,参与在线TBL提高了领域知识测试结果。总的来说,永久团队对认知学习成果的重要性似乎不如以前假设的那样重要,但这可能取决于具体的教育环境。然而,熟悉团队对团队决策仍然很重要。由于医疗工作场所的临床推理通常涉及在不断变化的团队中进行合作,未来对TBL的研究应集中在如何利用这种格式为医学生在这些条件下的决策和最佳学习结果做好准备。
    Assigning students to work in permanent teams is a design principle in Team-based learning (TBL). It has been assumed that a stable team composition supports the emergence of collaborative problem-solving and learning: when students became more familiar with each other, they shared more information and resolved discrepancies together, which in turn stimulated knowledge acquisition and comprehension. However, this assumption had not been probed by a randomized controlled trial with performance assessment as an outcome. In an online course for second term medical students, 50% of the students were reassigned to new teams for each of the 24 problems to be solved during four classes, thus precluding familiarity. The learning outcome was assessed shortly after the third of four classes by a domain knowledge test. Whether TBL teams were permanent or temporary did not affect the score of a domain knowledge test. As expected, participation in online TBL improved the domain knowledge test results. Overall, the permanent team seems to be less important for cognitive learning outcomes than previously assumed, but this may depend on the specific educational setting. However, team familiarity may still be important for team decision-making. As clinical reasoning in the medical workplace often involves collaborating in changing teams, future research on TBL should focus on how to utilize this format to prepare medical students for decision-making and optimal learning outcomes under these conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:营养不良是可预防死亡的主要原因,但在医学教育中教授不一致,在医疗保健中讨论不充分。为了克服这个问题,我们开发了一种以营养团队为基础的混合学习/烹饪医学方法,将实用营养知识和基本烹饪技能融入未来卫生专业人员的培训中。
    方法:营养被整合到整骨医学院的基于系统的课程中,辅以基于健康满足食品课程(HmF;culinarymedicine.org)的烹饪医学课程。学生参加了该计划一年,该分析包括两组学生。结果是通过在线食物频率问卷(FFQ,Viosscreen,Viocare,Inc)和通过Qualtrics在线调查软件进行的调查。饮食质量使用健康饮食指数(HEI)-2015年进行测量。使用SAS9.4分析数据。
    结果:一百九十五名一年级学生完成了基线FFQ(97.5%的响应率)。学生的平均年龄是26岁,47%为女性(n=92/195)。参与者的平均BMI为24.8kg/m2(范围17-45.4),大多数参与者报告活跃。75名学生(38%)完成了年度FFQ。基线时学生的饮食质量较差(n=195;67.59(SD10.54)),在第1年结束时略有改善,但显着改善(n=75,69.63(SD:12.42),p=0.04)。该调查仅对第二组进行;63名学生回答(回答率为53%)。受访者认为与患者谈论营养比与患者谈论安全性行为更与未来的实践相关。体重,烟草,酒精,其他药物滥用和家庭暴力。
    结论:本研究评估了一所新的骨科医学院的营养和烹饪医学课程。学生对该计划的评价很高,出勤率很高,即使不是必需的。在医学院的第一年,学生的饮食质量没有下降。学生们认为与病人谈论营养是高度相关的,鼓励他们在未来的实践中这样做。我们相信我们的工作表明,营养可以融入未来医生的培训中,它可能会带来好处,特别是随着人们对预防保健重要性的认识不断提高。
    BACKGROUND: Poor nutrition is a leading cause of preventable death, but is inconsistently taught in medical education and inadequately discussed in medical care. To overcome this problem, we developed a hybrid nutrition team-based learning/culinary medicine approach to integrate practical nutrition knowledge and basic cooking skills into the training of future health professionals.
    METHODS: Nutrition was integrated into the systems-based courses at a college of osteopathic medicine, complemented by culinary medicine sessions based on the Health meets Food curriculum (HmF; culinarymedicine.org). Students participated in the program for one year and two cohorts of students were included in this analysis. Outcomes were measured via online food frequency questionnaire (FFQ, Vioscreen, Viocare, Inc) and surveys administered via Qualtrics online survey software. Diet quality was measured using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.4.
    RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-five first year students completed a baseline FFQ (97.5% response rate). Mean age of students was 26 years, 47% were female (n = 92/195). The average BMI of participants was 24.8 kg/m2 (range 17-45.4) and the majority of participants reported being active. Seventy-five students (38%) completed an end of year FFQ. Diet quality was poor among students at baseline (n = 195; 67.59 (SD 10.54)) and improved slightly but significantly at the end of year 1 (n = 75, 69.63 (SD: 12.42), p = 0.04). The survey was administered to the second cohort only; 63 students responded (53% response rate). Talking to patients about nutrition was seen as more relevant to future practice among respondents than talking to patients about safe sex, weight, tobacco, alcohol, other substance abuse and domestic violence.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluated the nutrition and culinary medicine curriculum at a new college of osteopathic medicine. Students rated the program highly and attendance was excellent, even though not required. Student diet quality did not decline over the first year of medical school. Students rated talking to patients about nutrition as highly relevant, providing encouragement that they will do so in future practice. We believe our work shows that nutrition can be integrated into the training of future physicians and that it may pay dividends, particularly with the increasing awareness of the importance of preventive care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:临床从业者首先考虑疾病的常见原因,而不是花费资源寻找罕见的条件。然而,重要的是继续调查所有常见疾病何时被丢弃。本科医学生在寻求潜在诊断时必须掌握倾听和提出相关问题的技能。
    方法:我们的目标是确定在罕见疾病背景下,以团队为基础的学习(TBL)结合视频插图(干预)是否能提高学生的临床和通用技能,与单独的TBL(比较)相比。我们遵循了涉及五年级医学生的单中心准实验后测设计。
    结果:干预组(n=178)在客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)中的平均总分(12.04±2.54vs.11.27±3.16;P=0.021),临床技能的平均百分比得分较高(47.63%vs.44.63%;P=0.025)和通用技能(42.99%vs.40.33%;P=0.027)比对比组(n=118)。OSCE检查的成功与干预措施显着相关(P=0.002)。
    结论:带有视频插图的TBL课程与医学生在OSCE的更好表现相关。这里提出的概念可能对其他教学机构有益。
    BACKGROUND: Clinical practitioners think of frequent causes of diseases first rather than expending resources searching for rare conditions. However, it is important to continue investigating when all common illnesses have been discarded. Undergraduate medical students must acquire skills to listen and ask relevant questions when seeking a potential diagnosis.
    METHODS: Our objective was to determine whether team-based learning (TBL) focused on clinical reasoning in the context of rare diseases combined with video vignettes (intervention) improved the clinical and generic skills of students compared with TBL alone (comparator). We followed a single-center quasi-experimental posttest-only design involving fifth-year medical students.
    RESULTS: The intervention group (n = 178) had a significantly higher mean overall score on the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) (12.04 ± 2.54 vs. 11.27 ± 3.16; P = 0.021) and a higher mean percentage score in clinical skills (47.63% vs. 44.63%; P = 0.025) and generic skills (42.99% vs. 40.33%; P = 0.027) than the comparator group (n = 118). Success on the OSCE examination was significantly associated with the intervention (P = 0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: The TBL with video vignettes curriculum was associated with better performance of medical students on the OSCE. The concept presented here may be beneficial to other teaching institutions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:科学和健康宣传活动旨在激发和激发未来学生在这些领域从事职业的兴趣;然而,支持这一假设的研究是有限的。
    目的:我们研究的目的是组织一个综合的解剖学和生理学外展活动,以检查大学前学生的学习经历(学习工具,活动,和促进者)以及从事医疗保健事业并收集有关他们对此类活动的态度和看法的证据的动机。
    方法:在新加坡的李光中华医学院开设了为期2天的心肺和胃肠解剖系统课程,使用其关键的教学方法,也就是说,多模式实践和基于团队的学习。来自新加坡21所大学预科院校的90名大学预科学生参加了这个为期2天的课程,他们的经验使用4点Likert量表和开放式调查问题进行了评估。使用归纳主题分析法对自由文本评论进行分析。
    结果:88名参与者中的81名(92%)完成了使用4点Likert量表的调查。大多数学生认为课程材料足够(平均3.57,SD0.57)并达到学习目标(平均3.73,SD0.52)。学生认为教师是明确的(平均3.73,SD0.52)和有效的(平均3.70,SD0.53)。他们喜欢外展会议的组织(平均3.64,SD0.48),并且非常积极地研究医学或联合/生物医学科学(平均3.69,SD0.54)。实践和基于团队的学习被认为是非常令人满意的(分别为平均3.63,SD0.53和平均3.58,SD0.54)。所有受访者都表示,他们会向同行推荐这门课程。主题分析表明,参与者对人体结构和功能有了新的认识,他们喜欢独特的学习环境,他们有动力去追求医疗保健事业,他们对会议感到满意,与主持人的互动增加了他们对人体解剖学和生理学的理解。
    结论:结构化的健康宣传活动为学生提供了独特的机会,可以在医学院体验临床前学习环境,加深对人体结构和功能的理解,并增加他们对科学的动机和兴趣。Further,外展计划可能为旨在追求健康专业教育的潜在学生奠定基础。
    BACKGROUND: Science and health outreach activities are aimed at motivating and sparking interest among prospective students to pursue careers in these fields; however, research studies supporting this hypothesis are limited.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to organize an integrated Anatomy and Physiology outreach to examine preuniversity students\' learning experiences (learning tools, activities, and facilitators) and motivation to pursue a career in health care and to gather evidence on their attitudes and perceptions of such activities.
    METHODS: A 2-day course on cardiorespiratory and gastrointestinal anatomical systems was presented at the Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine in Singapore using its key pedagogies, that is, multimodal practical and team-based learning. Ninety preuniversity students from 21 preuniversity institutions in Singapore participated in this 2-day course, and their experiences were evaluated using a 4-point Likert scale and open-ended survey questions. Free-text comments were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: The survey using the 4-point Likert scale was completed by 81 (92%) of the 88 participants. Most students felt that the course materials were adequate (mean 3.57, SD 0.57) and met the learning objectives (mean 3.73, SD 0.52). The students felt that the instructors were clear (mean 3.73, SD 0.52) and effective (mean 3.70, SD 0.53). They liked the organization of the outreach session (mean 3.64, SD 0.48) and were highly motivated to study medicine or allied/biomedical sciences (mean 3.69, SD 0.54). Practical and team-based learning were regarded as exceedingly satisfactory (mean 3.63, SD 0.53 and mean 3.58, SD 0.54, respectively). All the respondents said that they would recommend this course to peers. Thematic analysis revealed that the participants gained a new perspective of the human body structure and function, they liked the unique learning settings, they were motivated to pursue a career in health care, they were satisfied with the sessions, and interactions with the facilitators increased their understanding of the human anatomy and physiology.
    CONCLUSIONS: Structured health outreach activities provide students with unique opportunities to experience a preclinical learning environment in a medical school, deepen their understanding of human body structure and function, and increase their motivation and interest in science. Further, outreach programs may lay the foundations for potential students aiming to pursue health profession education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    创伤是当今现代和工业社会中大多数国家考虑的最重要的问题和问题之一。由于院前护理是创伤护理系统的第一组成部分,如果做得好,它可以减少与长期残疾和因创伤而死亡相关的问题。因此,本研究旨在确定2022年基于改良团队学习(TBL)方法的培训对急救医疗人员管理创伤患者技能的影响.
    本研究是一项两组临床前/后研究,其中使用分层随机抽样方法选择了96名技术人员。将样本成员随机分为干预组和对照组。在干预组中,通过改进的基于团队的学习方法教授处理创伤患者的技能.结果用SPSS软件21版进行分析。
    重复测量方差分析的结果表明,干预组和对照组在处理创伤患者的学习技能方面存在显着差异(P<0.001),通过检查测试重复的效果和相互作用的效果来确定。TBL组研究变量的变化明显大于对照组(P<0.001)。
    结果表明,基于改进的基于团队的学习方法的培训对于医疗急救人员对创伤患者的管理是有效的,并提高了该领域人员的准备程度。
    UNASSIGNED: Trauma is one of the most important issues and problems considered in most countries in today\'s modern and industrial society. Since pre-hospital care is the first component of a trauma care system, if done properly, it can reduce the problems associated with long-term disability and death due to trauma. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the impact of training based on a modified team-based learning (TBL) method on the skills of medical emergency personnel in managing trauma patients in 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: The present study was a two-group clinical before/after study in which 96 technicians were selected using a stratified random sampling method. The sample members were randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group. In the intervention group, skills for dealing with trauma patients were taught through a modified team-based learning method. The results were analyzed using SPSS software version 21.
    UNASSIGNED: The results of the repeated measures analysis of variance showed a significant difference between the intervention and control groups in learning skills for dealing with trauma patients (P<0.001), which were determined by examining the effect of test repetition and the effect of interaction. The changes in the studied variables in the TBL groups were significantly greater than those in the control group (P<0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: The results indicate that training based on the modified team-based learning method is effective for the management of trauma patients by medical emergency personnel and improves the readiness of personnel in this field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本杰明·布鲁姆(BenjaminBloom)于1956年发表了《教育目标分类法》[1],以帮助教育工作者制定教学的学习目标。从那以后,已经进行了一些修改,以使Bloom的分类法适应各种用途和学科[2-4]。思想介绍:作为社会建构主义教育者,这篇文章的作者认为有必要调整Bloom的分类法,以匹配生理学课程中基于团队的学习(TBL)的独特特征.结果:在这里,我们正在介绍使用TBL在本科生理学课程中教授生理学,可以很容易地转化为其他学科。此外,我们正在介绍TBL的钻石框架,修改了Bloom的分类法,以指导可衡量的学习成果的写作,并创建作业,以帮助学生应用他们的新知识和技能。
    Benjamin Bloom published his Taxonomy of Educational Objectives in 1956 [1] to help educators develop learning objectives for teaching. Since then, several modifications have been made to adapt Bloom\'s taxonomy to various uses and disciplines [2-4]. Introduction of the idea: As social constructivist educators, the authors of this article felt the need to adjust Bloom\'s taxonomy to match the unique characteristics of team-based learning (TBL) in physiology courses. Outcomes: Here, we are introducing the use of TBL for teaching physiology in undergraduate physiology courses that could be easily translated into other disciplines. Additionally, we are introducing the Diamond Framework for TBL, a modified Bloom\'s taxonomy to guide the writing of measurable learning outcomes and create assignments to help students apply their new knowledge and skills.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    协作学习方法,如基于团队的学习,基于案例的学习,基于问题的学习已成为卫生专业教育领域主动学习的主要方法。批判性思维和团队中不同观点的暴露被强调为基于团队的学习的重要好处。然而,不考虑潜在的社会情感,行为,以及与这种学习形式相关的团队动态挑战,支持欢迎学习社区的原则可能会开始恶化。在这篇文章中,作者强调了成长心态的核心概念,心理安全,以及在1)学习者应该知道什么和2)教育者可以做什么的框架内的文化响应教学法,共同创造包容性的协作学习体验。
    Collaborative methods for learning such as team-based learning, case-based learning, and problem-based learning have become leading methods for active learning within the field of health professions education. Critical thinking and exposure to diverse perspectives within a group are highlighted as important benefits of team-based learning. However, without consideration of the potential socioemotional, behavioral, and team dynamic challenges associated with this format of learning, the tenets which support a welcoming learning community can begin to deteriorate. In this essay, authors highlight the core concepts of growth mindset, psychological safety, and culturally responsive pedagogy within a framework of 1) what learners should know and 2) what educators can do, to co-create an inclusive collaborative learning experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于团队的学习(TBL)是医学教育中一种广泛认可的教学方法,将直接教学与小组中的主动合作学习相结合。虽然已知TBL可以增强知识获取,它对学生动机的影响,特别是通过情境兴趣,仍未充分开发。本研究旨在调查跨TBL不同阶段的情境兴趣的发展,专注于每个阶段(个人就绪性保证测试;iRAT,团队准备状态保证测试;tRAT,和应用练习;AE)影响学生的情境兴趣。该研究旨在提供对医学教育环境中TBL的动机动力学的见解。
    方法:共有88名医学生参加了关于“妊娠期出血”的TBL课程。在每个TBL阶段后测量情境兴趣。进行了单向重复测量方差分析(ANOVA),以评估整个会议期间情境兴趣的波动。
    结果:分析显示,不同TBL阶段的情境兴趣存在显著差异。在tRAT之后,情境兴趣显著增加(p=.001)。TRAT后,AE后情境兴趣显著下降(p=.007),返回到在会话开始时观察到的水平。事后相关分析表明,tRAT表现与情境兴趣之间存在负相关关系,表明人们对tRAT期间知识差距的认识有更高的兴趣。
    结论:这项研究的结果可能会挑战传统的TBL观点,建议在知识获取和应用阶段之间建立更加集成和动态的相互作用。结果突出了AE阶段在临床教育中的重要性,并表明情境兴趣是TBL学习过程中的关键驱动因素。未来的研究应该专注于复制这些发现,并比较临床前和临床学生队列之间的情境兴趣发展,以进一步了解情境兴趣对医学教育中TBL的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Team-based learning (TBL) is a widely recognized instructional approach in medical education blending direct instruction with active-cooperative learning in small groups. While TBL is known to enhance knowledge acquisition, its impact on student motivation, particularly through situational interest, remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the development of situational interest across the distinct phases of TBL, focusing on how each phase (individual readiness assurance test; iRAT, team readiness assurance test; tRAT, and application exercise; AE) influences students\' situational interest. The study sought to provide insights into the motivational dynamics underpinning TBL in a medical education setting.
    METHODS: A total of 88 medical students participated in a TBL session on \"Bleeding during Pregnancy.\" Situational interest was measured after each TBL phase. A one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to assess the fluctuation of situational interest throughout the session.
    RESULTS: The analysis revealed significant variations in situational interest across different TBL stages. There was a significant increase in situational interest following the tRAT (p = .001). Post-tRAT, situational interest significantly decreased after the AE (p = .007), returning to levels observed at the session\'s start. Post hoc correlation analysis suggested a negative association between tRAT performance and situational interest, indicating heightened interest in response to awareness of knowledge gaps during the tRAT.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study may challenge the traditional view of TBL, suggesting a more integrated and dynamic interplay between knowledge acquisition and application phases. The results highlight the importance of the AE phase in clinical education and suggest that situational interest is one key driver in the learning process within TBL. Future research should focus on replicating these findings and comparing situational interest development between pre-clinical and clinical student cohorts to further understand the effects of situational interest on TBL in medical education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Team-based learning (TBL) is a student-centered method where learning can be promoted and facilitated by changing the traditional teaching lecture into an active, dynamic, and more engaging problem-solving process. The present study evaluated the student\'s learning experience and satisfaction using a TBL method in a preclinical oral surgery course.
    UNASSIGNED: Twelve TBL sessions were designed for second-year dental students. Six 3-h and 2-h sessions with various preclinical topics were conducted in academic Terms 1 and 2, respectively. Teaching activities such as tests and group discussions were included in the sessions. The last post-session questionnaire sought students\' feedback and satisfaction to assess four parameters related to students\' knowledge acquirement, interpersonal skills enhancement, learning environment, and teacher-student relationships.
    UNASSIGNED: Most average scores of the responses agreed with the related statements in the four parameters. The results of the Pearson\'s correlation test revealed that there was a significant relationship (r = 0.735; P < 0.05) between the parameters of the 3-h and 2-h sessions.
    UNASSIGNED: The TBL method yielded positive and high levels of satisfaction, which may be attributed to the proper implementation of TBL methodology by the teacher and students.
    UNASSIGNED: التعلم القائم على الفريق هو طريقة تركز على الطالب حيث يمكن تعزيز وتسهيل التعلم من خلال تحويل المحاضرة التقليدية إلى عملية حل مشكلات نشطة وديناميكية وأكثر جاذبية. هدفت الدراسة الحالية إلى تقييم تجربة التعلم ورضا الطلاب باستخدام طريقة التعلم القائم على الفريق في دورة جراحة الفم قبل السريرية.
    UNASSIGNED: تم تصميم اثنتي عشرة جلسة تعلم قائمة على الفريق لطلاب السنة الثانية في طب الأسنان. تم إجراء ست جلسات من ثلاث ساعات في الفصل الدراسي الأول وست جلسات من ساعتين في الفصل الدراسي الثاني مع مواضيع مختلفة قبل السريرية. تم تضمين أنشطة تعليمية مثل الاختبارات والمناقشات الجماعية في الجلسات. استهدفت الاستبانة التي تم توزيعها بعد الجلسة الأخيرة معرفة آراء الطلاب ورضاهم لتقييم أربعة معايير تتعلق باكتساب المعرفة، وتعزيز المهارات الشخصية، وبيئة التعلم، وعلاقات المعلم بالطالب.
    UNASSIGNED: توافق معظم متوسطات الدرجات الخاصة بالردود مع العبارات المتعلقة بالمعايير الأربعة. كشفت نتائج اختبار ارتباط بيرسون عن وجود علاقة ذات دلالة إحصائية (معامل الارتباط يساوي 0.735 وقيمة الاحتمال أقل من 0.05) بين معايير الجلسات التي استمرت لثلاث ساعات وتلك التي استمرت لساعتين.
    UNASSIGNED: أظهرت طريقة التعلم القائم على الفريق مستويات عالية من الرضا، والتي قد تعزى إلى التنفيذ السليم لمنهجية التعلم القائم على الفريق من قبل المعلم والطلاب.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自主学习能力对于终身学习至关重要。我国护生自我导向学习能力不足可能是由于其自我管理或学习主动性不足。
    目的:探讨在线学习平台(Tronclass)结合团队学习对护生自主学习和学习成绩的影响。
    方法:前测后测设计。
    方法:2023年3月至7月,通过整群抽样的方法,选取湖南省某高校本科三年级护生69名。
    方法:本研究在儿科护理学课程教学过程中采用Tronclass进行团队学习。比较了护理专业学生课程前后的自我导向学习能力,并将他们的学业成绩与前几年毕业的同行并列。
    结果:在比较比较动机时,自我管理,团队合作和信息素养,这是自我导向学习能力量表的四个子量表方面,这四个维度的调查后得分大于调查前的结果。研究结果显示差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),在从事Tronclass与团队学习相结合的学生中。具体来说,这些学生的期中和期末成绩比那些已经毕业但没有参加这些活动的学生高。(P<0.05)。
    结论:将Tronclass与基于团队的学习相结合,可以增强护生进行自主学习的能力,并提高他们在期中考试和期末考试中的表现,从而促进综合能力的发展。
    BACKGROUND: Self-directed learning ability is crucial for lifelong learning. The inadequate self-directed learning ability of nursing students in China may be due to their deficiency in self-management or learning initiative.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of online learning platform (Tronclass) combined with team-based learning on nursing students\' self-directed learning and academic performance.
    METHODS: Pretest-posttest design.
    METHODS: From March to July 2023, 69 undergraduate third-year nursing students from a university in Hunan Province were selected through a whole-group sampling method.
    METHODS: This study used Tronclass to carry out team-based learning in the teaching process of pediatric nursing courses. It compared the self-directed learning ability nursing students before and after courses, and juxtaposed their academic performance with those of their counterparts who graduated in previous years.
    RESULTS: When comparing compare motivation, self-management, teamwork and information literacy, which are four subscale aspects of the self-directed Learning Ability Scale, the post-survey scores for these four dimensions are greater than the pre-survey results. The results of the study showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05), in the students who engaged in Tronclass combined with team-based learning. Specifically, these students received higher midterm and final grades than to those who had already graduated and did not participate in these activities. (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Combining Tronclass with team-based learning enhances nursing students\' ability to engage in self-directed learning and improves their performance in midterms and finals, thereby fostering the development of comprehensive competence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号