TROPHIES

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了描述2型糖尿病(T2D)成年患者开始注射胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)治疗后的医疗保健资源利用(HCRU)和相关成本,观察,在法国进行24个月的Trophies学习,德国,和意大利。
    HCRU的成本计算数据是在GLP-1RA开始服用每周一次杜拉鲁肽或每天一次利拉鲁肽后约6、12、18和24个月的基线和随访访视期间由治疗医师收集的。从国家医疗系统(第三方付款人)的角度评估了成本,并更新到2018年的价格。
    总共,2,005例患者符合HCRU分析的条件(1,014杜拉鲁肽;991利拉鲁肽)。治疗组和国家之间的基线患者特征通常相似。在基线(42.9-43.4%)和第24个月(44.0-45.1%)使用≥2种口服降糖药物(GLM)和在第24个月(15.3-23.2%)使用另一种可注射GLM的患者比例最大的是法国。在每个评估期间,法国(范围=4.0-10.7)和德国(范围=2.9-5.7)的初级和二级医疗保健接触者的平均人数最高,分别。每位患者平均年化成本的最大比例(≥60%)包括药物成本。每位患者的平均年度HCRU费用因治疗队列和国家而异:最高水平是法国的利拉鲁肽队列(909欧元)和德国的杜拉鲁肽队列(883欧元)。
    限制包括排除在GLP-1RA启动时使用胰岛素的患者,以及由医生收集HCRU数据,不是通过病人完成的日记。
    现实世界中的HCRU和与T2D成人治疗相关的成本在《财富》中使用两个GLP-1RA强调,在评估特定国家/地区的新疗法的影响时,需要避免对HCRU和与特定疗法相关的成本进行概括。
    胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)已成为2型糖尿病(T2D)中高血糖症的常用治疗方法。并非所有类型的临床研究都提供有关这些治疗的成本或它们可能对使用其他药物和设备来控制T2D或需要去看医生或护士以及在医院接受不同类型治疗的影响的信息。这项研究在法国成年人的常规护理中收集了这些信息,德国,或意大利,他们的家庭医生或T2D专家开了杜拉鲁肽或利拉鲁肽(两种类型的GLP-1RA)。在这三个国家中,使用杜拉鲁肽或利拉鲁肽的人与使用相同GLP-1RA的人之间的成本以及对其他药物和医疗服务的需求存在差异。这项研究的信息可用于更准确地了解患者在法国使用杜拉鲁肽或利拉鲁肽时所需的总成本和医疗护理,德国,或者意大利。
    UNASSIGNED: To describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs after initiation of injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) therapy by adult patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the prospective, observational, 24-month TROPHIES study in France, Germany, and Italy.
    UNASSIGNED: HCRU data for cost calculations were collected by treating physicians during patient interviews at baseline and follow-up visits approximately 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after GLP-1 RA initiation with once-weekly dulaglutide or once-daily liraglutide. Costs were evaluated from the national healthcare system (third-party payer) perspective and updated to 2018 prices.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 2,005 patients were eligible for the HCRU analysis (1,014 dulaglutide; 991 liraglutide). Baseline patient characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups and countries. The largest proportions of patients using ≥2 oral glucose-lowering medications (GLMs) at baseline (42.9-43.4%) and month 24 (44.0-45.1%) and using another injectable GLM at month 24 (15.3-23.2%) were in France. Mean numbers of primary and secondary healthcare contacts during each assessment period were highest in France (range = 4.0-10.7) and Germany (range = 2.9-5.7), respectively. The greatest proportions (≥60%) of mean annualized costs per patient comprised medication costs. Mean annualized HCRU costs per patient varied by treatment cohort and country: the highest levels were in the liraglutide cohort in France (€909) and the dulaglutide cohort in Germany (€883).
    UNASSIGNED: Limitations included exclusion of patients using insulin at GLP-1 RA initiation and collection of HCRU data by physician, not via patient-completed diaries.
    UNASSIGNED: Real-world HCRU and costs associated with the treatment of adults with T2D with two GLP-1 RAs in TROPHIES emphasize the need to avoid generalization with respect to HCRU and costs associated with a particular therapy when estimating the impact of a new treatment in a country-specific setting.
    Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become frequent treatments of hyperglycemia in type-2 diabetes (T2D). Not all types of clinical study provide information about the cost of these treatments or the effects they might have on use of other medicines and equipment to control T2D or the need for visits to a doctor or nurse and different types of treatment in hospital. This study collected this information during the regular care of adults in France, Germany, or Italy who were prescribed either dulaglutide or liraglutide (both types of GLP-1 RAs) by their family doctor or a specialist in T2D. There were differences in costs and the need for other medicines and medical services between people using either dulaglutide or liraglutide and for people who were using the same GLP-1 RA in each of the three countries. The information from this study could be used to more accurately understand the overall costs and medical care needed when patients use dulaglutide or liraglutide in France, Germany, or Italy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然大多数人都听说过“纪念品”,\'奖杯\',和\'纪念品\',在书籍和电影中讨论了性杀人犯的真实罪行,有限的研究已经深入研究了性杀人罪(SH)中的盗窃现象。使用来自国际性杀人案数据库的762例SH病例样本,本研究考察了犯罪前的犯罪过程,犯罪,以及在SH期间从事盗窃的性杀人犯(SHO)的犯罪后阶段。此外,这项研究旨在确定特定类型的SHO是否比其他类型的SHO参与这种行为。序贯逻辑回归的结果表明,16岁或以上的受害者,是Sho的陌生人,性工作者更有可能成为盗窃的受害者。此外,结果表明,虐待狂的存在使SHO更有可能从受害者和/或犯罪现场盗窃。调查结果表明,有一群SHO从事盗窃不是出于金钱目的,而是由于犯罪者的亲热。这些发现可以为警方调查这些罪行提供信息。
    Although most people have heard the terms \'souvenirs\', \'trophies\', and \'mementos\', discussed in books and movies on the true crimes of sexual murderers, limited research has delved into the phenomenon of theft in sexual homicide (SH). Using a sample of 762 SH cases coming from the Sexual Homicide International Database, the current study examines the crime-commission process of the pre-crime, crime, and post-crime phases of sexual homicide offenders (SHOs) who engaged in theft during a SH. Additionally, this study seeks to determine if a specific type of SHO engages in this behaviour over others. Results from the sequential logistic regression indicate that victims who are 16 years or older, were strangers to the SHO, and were sex workers were more likely to be victims of theft. Additionally, results indicate that the presence of sadism made it more likely the SHO would engage in theft from the victim and/or crime scene. Findings suggest there is a group of SHOs who engage in theft not for monetary purposes but due to the paraphilia of the offender. These findings can inform the police investigation of these crimes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:介绍TROPHIES研究(杜拉鲁肽和利拉鲁肽对2型糖尿病患者健康结局的真实世界观察性前瞻性研究)的最终结果。
    方法:前瞻性,现实世界的TROPHIES研究包括2型糖尿病患者开始他们的第一个注射降糖药物(GLM),杜拉鲁肽或利拉鲁肽,在法国,德国和意大利。主要终点是在24个月内使用杜拉鲁肽或利拉鲁肽直至显著治疗改变的时间。其他终点测量了治疗的持久性,临床结果(糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c]和体重)和治疗模式。产生了对首次显著治疗改变的时间的Kaplan-Meier估计和治疗的持久性。使用基于倾向评分的治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)来调整队列之间比较中的基线不平衡。
    结果:杜拉鲁肽队列中1014例患者中的286例(28.2%)和利拉鲁肽队列中991例患者中的448例(45.2%)在24个月内发生了显著的治疗变化。通过IPTW分析,与使用利拉鲁肽的患者相比,使用杜拉鲁肽的患者在24个月内发生显著治疗改变的可能性较小(风险比[HR]0.54,95%置信区间[CI]0.46~0.63),并且在治疗后持续(HR0.69,95%CI0.56~0.86)的可能性更大.从基线到24个月,杜拉鲁肽和利拉鲁肽产生了相似的HbA1c(-11.80mmol/mol[1.08%]和-11.91mmol/mol[1.09%])和体重(-3.5kg和-3.3kg)减少。在两个队列中观察到其他GLM的治疗模式几乎没有变化。
    结论:与使用利拉鲁肽的患者相比,使用达拉鲁肽的患者花费的时间更长,没有任何明显的治疗改变,并且持续的时间更高。使用任一胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的治疗在HbA1c和体重方面产生了相似且临床上有意义的降低。
    To present the final results of the TROPHIES study (The real-world observational prospective study of health outcomes with dulaglutide and liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes).
    The prospective, real-world TROPHIES study included patients with type 2 diabetes initiating their first injectable glucose-lowering medication (GLM), dulaglutide or liraglutide, in France, Germany and Italy. The primary endpoint was the time spent on dulaglutide or liraglutide until a significant treatment change over 24 months. Other endpoints measured persistence with treatment, clinical outcomes (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] and weight) and treatment patterns. Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to first significant treatment change and persistence with treatment were generated. Propensity-score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for baseline imbalances in the comparison between cohorts.
    The 286 of 1014 patients (28.2%) in the dulaglutide cohort and 448 of 991 patients (45.2%) in the liraglutide cohort had a significant treatment change over 24 months. By IPTW analysis, dulaglutide-initiating patients were less likely to have a significant treatment change (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.63) and more likely to be persistent with treatment (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.86) over 24 months than liraglutide-initiating patients. Dulaglutide and liraglutide yielded similar HbA1c (-11.80 mmol/mol [1.08%] and -11.91 mmol/mol [1.09%]) and weight (-3.5 kg and -3.3 kg) reductions from baseline to 24 months. Few changes in patterns of treatment with other GLMs were observed in the two cohorts.
    Dulaglutide-initiating patients had a longer time spent without any significant treatment change and higher persistence than those initiating liraglutide. Treatment with either glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist yielded similar and clinically meaningful reductions in HbA1c and body weight.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号