背景:经口腔机器人手术(TORS)和放疗被认为是早期HPV阳性口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)的肿瘤学等同的主要治疗选择。因此,生活质量(QoL)和患者报告的结果指标(PROM)对于支持临床决策和优化以患者为中心的护理至关重要。本文的目的是评估这些主要治疗方式在QoL方面的比较。
方法:使用验证的QoL工具对OPSCC的原发性TORS和原发性放疗进行系统评价和荟萃分析。吞咽和全局QoL是主要终点,次要终点包括所有其他QoL域。采用逆方差随机效应模型来计算各个试验的治疗效果的加权估计。
结果:共纳入6项研究,共报告555例患者(n=236TORS和n=319放疗)。Meta分析显示吞咽(平均差=-0.24,p=0.89)和总体QoL(平均差=4.55,p=0.14)没有显着差异。对于其余的QoL域(颈/肩损伤,神经毒性,声音,口干症,演讲,和痛苦),数据的稀缺性不允许进行荟萃分析.然而,现有数据显示,除口腔干燥症外,其他疾病均无显著差异.
结论:就QoL而言,TORS和放疗似乎是早期OPSCC的主要治疗选择。然而,TORS组中相当比例的患者接受了辅助(化学)放疗,这使得仅手术后很难确定真实的QoL结局.除了吞咽和全球QoL之外,还有很少的研究报告QoL结果。因此需要进一步的研究,包括更多随机试验,足以检测QoL结局的差异。
BACKGROUND: Transoral Robotic Surgery (
TORS) and radiotherapy are considered oncologically equivalent primary treatment options for early-stage HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are therefore imperative in supporting clinical decision-making and optimising patient-centred care. The aim of this article is to evaluate how these primary treatment modalities compare in terms of QoL.
METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing primary
TORS and primary radiotherapy for OPSCC using validated QoL tools. Swallowing and global QoL were the primary endpoints with secondary endpoints including all other QoL domains. An inverse variance random-effects model was employed to calculate the weighted estimate of the treatment effects across trials.
RESULTS: A total of six studies collectively reporting on 555 patients were included (n = 236
TORS and n = 319 radiotherapy). Meta-analysis showed no significant difference for swallowing (mean difference = -0.24, p = 0.89) and global QoL (mean difference = 4.55, p = 0.14). For the remaining QoL domains (neck/shoulder impairment, neurotoxicity, voice, xerostomia, speech, and distress), the scarcity of data did not permit meta-analysis. However, the existing data showed no significant difference for any except for xerostomia where
TORS appears favourable in the sole study reporting on this.
CONCLUSIONS: TORS and radiotherapy appear to be comparable primary treatment options for early stage OPSCC when it comes to QoL. However, a substantial proportion of patients in the
TORS group received adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy rendering it difficult to establish the \'true\' QoL outcomes following surgery alone. There are also minimal studies reporting QoL outcomes beyond swallowing and global QoL. Further research is therefore needed, including more randomised trials adequately powered to detect differences in QoL outcomes.