T1 mapping

T1 映射
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估T1作图在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的表现,并探讨其与乳腺癌组织病理学特征的相关性。
    方法:本研究前瞻性招募了103名参与者,共108个病灶,其中良性病变25例,恶性病变83例。T1映射,弥散加权成像(DWI),并进行动态对比增强(DCE)。两名放射科医生独立概述了ROI,并分析了每个病变的T1和表观扩散系数(ADC)值。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者间的可靠性。比较良恶性病变的T1和ADC值,不同的组织病理学特征(组织学等级,雌激素,孕激素和HER2受体表达,Ki67,N状态)。进行接收器工作特性(ROC)分析和皮尔逊相关系数(ρ)。
    结果:T1值显示良性和恶性组之间的统计学差异(P<0.001),与良性组(1429.31ms±167.66)相比,恶性组(1817.08ms±126.64)的值更高。此外,ER(-)组T1值显著增加(P=0.001)。T1值在HER2、Ki67、N状态、和组织学分级组。此外,T1值与ER(P<0.01)和PR(P=0.03)呈显著相关。T1值在鉴别良恶性病变中的AUC为0.69(95%CI:0.55-0.82,P=0.005),为了评估ER状态,它是0.75(95%CI:0.62-0.87,P=0.002)。
    结论:T1作图具有作为成像生物标志物的潜力,有助于区分良性和恶性乳腺病变并评估乳腺癌中的ER表达状态。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess T1 mapping performance in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions and to explore its correlation with histopathologic features in breast cancer.
    METHODS: This study prospectively enrolled 103 participants with a total of 108 lesions, including 25 benign and 83 malignant lesions. T1 mapping, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) were performed. Two radiologists independently outlined the ROIs and analyzed T1 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for each lesion, assessing interobserver reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). T1 and ADC values were compared between benign and malignant lesions, across different histopathological characteristics (histological grades, estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptors expression, Ki67, N status). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ) were performed.
    RESULTS: T1 values showed statistically significant differences between benign and malignant groups (P < 0.001), with higher values in the malignant (1817.08 ms ± 126.64) compared to the benign group (1429.31 ms ± 167.66). In addition, T1 values significantly increased in the ER (-) group (P = 0.001). No significant differences were found in T1 values among HER2, Ki67, N status, and histological grades groups. Furthermore, T1 values exhibited a significant correlation (ρ) with ER (P < 0.01) and PR (P = 0.03). The AUC for T1 value in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions was 0.69 (95 % CI: 0.55 - 0.82, P = 0.005), and for evaluating ER status, it was 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.62 - 0.87, P = 0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: T1 mapping holds the potential as an imaging biomarker to assist in the discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions and assessing the ER expression status in breast cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了表征胰腺的T1弛豫时间,肝脏,有或无腹部病理的儿童的脾脏。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括儿科患者(<18岁)。使用修改的Look-Locker反转恢复序列进行T1映射。根据影像学报告和电子病历的回顾对患者进行分组。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dunn的多重比较来比较各组。
    结果:包括220名参与者(平均年龄:11.4±4.2岁(1.5T);10.9±4.5岁(3T))。在1.5T时,亚组之间的胰腺T1(毫秒)显着不同(p<0.0001)。显着成对差异包括:正常(中位数:583;IQR:561-654)与急性胰腺炎(731;632-945;p=0.0024),正常vs.慢性胰腺炎(700;643-863;p=0.0013),和正常与急性+慢性胰腺炎(1020;897-1099;p<0.0001)。胰腺T1在3T时也在亚组之间显著不同(p<0.0001)。显着成对差异包括:正常(779;753-851)与急性胰腺炎(1087;910-1259;p=0.0012),和正常与急性+慢性胰腺炎(1226;1025-1367;p<0.0001)。仅在3T时,亚组之间的肝脏T1存在显着差异(p=0.0011),正常人(818,788-819)与正常人之间的成对差异脂肪(959;848-997;p=0.0017)和正常与其他肝病(882;831-904;p=0.0455)。肝脏T1在1.5T时与肝脏脂肪分数弱相关(r=0.39;0.24-0.52;p<0.0001),在3T时中度相关(r=0.64;0.49-0.76;p<0.0001)。亚组之间的脾T1弛豫时间没有显着差异。
    结论:胰腺炎患儿的胰腺T1弛豫时间在1.5T和3T时较高,而脂肪变性和非脂肪变性慢性肝病患儿的肝脏T1弛豫时间在3T时较高。
    OBJECTIVE: To characterize T1 relaxation times of the pancreas, liver, and spleen in children with and without abdominal pathology.
    METHODS: This retrospective study included pediatric patients (< 18-years-old). T1 mapping was performed with a Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery sequence. Patients were grouped based on review of imaging reports and electronic medical records. The Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn\'s multiple comparison was used to compare groups.
    RESULTS: 220 participants were included (mean age: 11.4 ± 4.2 years (1.5 T); 10.9 ± 4.5 years (3 T)). Pancreas T1 (msec) was significantly different between subgroups at 1.5 T (p < 0.0001). Significant pairwise differences included: normal (median: 583; IQR: 561-654) vs. acute pancreatitis (731; 632-945; p = 0.0024), normal vs. chronic pancreatitis (700; 643-863; p = 0.0013), and normal vs. acute + chronic pancreatitis (1020; 897-1099; p < 0.0001). Pancreas T1 was also significantly different between subgroups at 3 T (p < 0.0001). Significant pairwise differences included: normal (779; 753-851) vs. acute pancreatitis (1087; 910-1259; p = 0.0012), and normal vs. acute + chronic pancreatitis (1226; 1025-1367; p < 0.0001). Liver T1 was significantly different between subgroups only at 3 T (p = 0.0011) with pairwise differences between normal (818, 788-819) vs. steatotic (959; 848-997; p = 0.0017) and normal vs. other liver disease (882; 831-904; p = 0.0455). Liver T1 was weakly correlated with liver fat fraction at 1.5 T (r = 0.39; 0.24-0.52; p < 0.0001) and moderately correlated at 3 T (r = 0.64; 0.49-0.76; p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in splenic T1 relaxation times between subgroups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas T1 relaxation times are higher at 1.5 T and 3 T in children with pancreatitis and liver T1 relaxation times are higher in children with steatotic and non-steatotic chronic liver disease at 3 T.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:定量T1定位有可能取代活检用于慢性肝病的无创诊断和定量分期。传统的T1映射方法被fat和B1+$${B}_1^{+}$$不均匀性混淆,导致不可靠的T1估计。此外,这些方法权衡了空间分辨率和体积覆盖率,以获得较短的采集时间,而屏气仅获得少量图像。这项工作提出了一个小说,体积(3D),自由呼吸T1映射方法在一次采集中考虑多个混杂因素。
    方法:自由呼吸,通过非笛卡尔成像的组合实现了混杂校正T1映射,磁化准备,化学位移编码,和可变翻转角采集。子空间约束,采用局部低秩图像重建算法进行图像重建。通过数值模拟和体模实验,在3.0T下使用T1/质子密度脂肪分数体模评估了所提出方法的准确性。通过健康志愿者的对比增强成像研究了该方法的可行性,也在3.0T。
    结果:该方法在很宽的T1值范围内(200至1000ms,斜率=0.998(95%置信区间(CI)[0.963至1.035]),截距=27.1ms(95%CI[0.454.6]),r2=0.996),和高水平的可重复性。体内成像研究显示中等一致性(斜率=1.099(95%CI[1.067,1.132]),截距=-96.3ms(95%CI[-82.1至-110.5]),r2=0.981)与基于饱和恢复的T1图相比。
    结论:所提出的方法产生全肝,通过同时估计T1,质子密度脂肪分数,和B1+$${B}_1^{+}$$中的一个,自由呼吸采集,并与体模中的参考测量具有极好的一致性。
    OBJECTIVE: Quantitative T1 mapping has the potential to replace biopsy for noninvasive diagnosis and quantitative staging of chronic liver disease. Conventional T1 mapping methods are confounded by fat and B 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ inhomogeneities, resulting in unreliable T1 estimations. Furthermore, these methods trade off spatial resolution and volumetric coverage for shorter acquisitions with only a few images obtained within a breath-hold. This work proposes a novel, volumetric (3D), free-breathing T1 mapping method to account for multiple confounding factors in a single acquisition.
    METHODS: Free-breathing, confounder-corrected T1 mapping was achieved through the combination of non-Cartesian imaging, magnetization preparation, chemical shift encoding, and a variable flip angle acquisition. A subspace-constrained, locally low-rank image reconstruction algorithm was employed for image reconstruction. The accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated through numerical simulations and phantom experiments with a T1/proton density fat fraction phantom at 3.0 T. Further, the feasibility of the proposed method was investigated through contrast-enhanced imaging in healthy volunteers, also at 3.0 T.
    RESULTS: The method showed excellent agreement with reference measurements in phantoms across a wide range of T1 values (200 to 1000 ms, slope = 0.998 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.963 to 1.035]), intercept = 27.1 ms (95% CI [0.4 54.6]), r2 = 0.996), and a high level of repeatability. In vivo imaging studies demonstrated moderate agreement (slope = 1.099 (95% CI [1.067 to 1.132]), intercept = -96.3 ms (95% CI [-82.1 to -110.5]), r2 = 0.981) compared to saturation recovery-based T1 maps.
    CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method produces whole-liver, confounder-corrected T1 maps through simultaneous estimation of T1, proton density fat fraction, and B 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ in a single, free-breathing acquisition and has excellent agreement with reference measurements in phantoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:细胞外体积分数(ECV),用对比增强磁共振成像(CE-MRI)测量,已经被用来研究心肌纤维化,但其在外周动脉疾病(PAD)中的作用尚不清楚。我们假设PAD患者和匹配对照之间的T1映射和ECV不同。
    结果:共有37名个体(18名PAD患者和19名匹配的对照)接受了3.0TCE-MRI检查。在钆对比之前和之后,使用运动校正的改良外观锁定器反转恢复(MOLLI)脉冲序列进行骨骼肌小腿肌肉T1映射。使用三参数Levenberg-Marquardt曲线拟合算法计算T1值。在五个小腿肌肉区室中对ECV和T1图进行了量化(前[AM],横向[LM],和深后[DM]肌群;比目鱼[SM]和腓肠肌[GM]肌肉)。从胫骨前后动脉和腓骨动脉获得平均峰值血池T1值。T1值和ECV在小腿肌肉区室中是异质的。AM的固有峰值T1值,LM,与对照组相比,PAD患者的DM和DM明显更高(均p<0.028)。与对照组相比,PAD患者的AM和SM的ECV明显更高(AM:26.4%(21.2,31.6)与17.3%(10.2、25.1),p=0.046;SM:22.7%(19.5,27.8)与13.8%(10.2,19.1),p=0.020)。
    结论:所有五个小腿肌肉区室的天然T1峰值,与对照组相比,PAD患者的前肌组和比目鱼肌ECV分数显着升高。非侵入性T1映射和ECV定量可能对PAD的研究感兴趣。
    BACKGROUND: Extracellular volume fraction (ECV), measured with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI), has been utilized to study myocardial fibrosis, but its role in peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains unknown. We hypothesized that T1 mapping and ECV differ between PAD patients and matched controls.
    RESULTS: A total of 37 individuals (18 PAD patients and 19 matched controls) underwent 3.0T CE-MRI. Skeletal calf muscle T1 mapping was performed before and after gadolinium contrast with a motion-corrected modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) pulse sequence. T1 values were calculated with a three-parameter Levenberg-Marquardt curve fitting algorithm. ECV and T1 maps were quantified in five calf muscle compartments (anterior [AM], lateral [LM], and deep posterior [DM] muscle groups; soleus [SM] and gastrocnemius [GM] muscles). Averaged peak blood pool T1 values were obtained from the posterior and anterior tibialis and peroneal arteries. T1 values and ECV are heterogeneous across calf muscle compartments. Native peak T1 values of the AM, LM, and DM were significantly higher in PAD patients compared to controls (all p < 0.028). ECVs of the AM and SM were significantly higher in PAD patients compared to controls (AM: 26.4% (21.2, 31.6) vs. 17.3% (10.2, 25.1), p = 0.046; SM: 22.7% (19.5, 27.8) vs. 13.8% (10.2, 19.1), p = 0.020).
    CONCLUSIONS: Native peak T1 values across all five calf muscle compartments, and ECV fractions of the anterior muscle group and the soleus muscle were significantly elevated in PAD patients compared with matched controls. Non-invasive T1 mapping and ECV quantification may be of interest for the study of PAD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:准确预测肝细胞癌(HCC)分级可能有助于合理选择治疗策略。乙氧基苯二亚乙基三胺五乙酸(Gd-EOB-DTPA)增强T1映射和表观扩散系数(ADC)值预测HCC等级的组合的诊断功效需要进一步验证。
    目的:本研究旨在评估Gd-EOB-DTPA增强的T1映射能力和ADC值,无论是单独还是组合,区分不同等级的HCC。
    方法:2017年7月至2020年2月,96例患者(男性,83岁;平均年龄,53.67岁;年龄范围,29-71岁)临床诊断为HCC被纳入本研究。所有患者均接受Gd-EOB-DTPA增强磁共振成像(MRI,包括T1映射序列)在手术或活检之前。根据病理结果分为3组(其中高分化肝癌24例,59例中分化肝癌,13例和低分化的HCC)。计算并比较不同分级HCC组之间的平均Gd-EOB-DTPA增强T1值(&#916;T1=[(T1pre-T1post)/T1pre]×100%)和ADC值。特征曲线下面积(AUC),诊断阈值,灵敏度,并分析了ΔT1和ADC对鉴别诊断的特异性。
    结果:高分化的HCC的平均值&#916;T1为58%,中等分化的HCC为50%,分化差的HCC为43%。ΔT1显示各组间有统计学差异(P<0.001)。3组的平均ADC值为1.11×10-3mm2/s,0.91×10-3mm2/s,0.80×10-3mm2/s,分别。ADC组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。在区分高分化组和中分化组时,ΔT1的AUC为0.751(95%CI:0.642,0.859),ADC的AUC为0.782(95%CI:0.671,0.894),联合模型的AUC为0.811(95%CI:0.709,0.914)。在区分低分化组和中分化组时,ΔT1的AUC为0.768(95%CI:0.634,0.902),ADC的AUC为0.754(95%CI:0.603,0.904),联合模型的AUC为0.841(95%CI:0.729,0.953)。
    结论:Gd-EOB-DTPA增强T1作图,和ADC值对识别不同HCC分级的敏感性和特异性具有互补作用。Gd-EOB-DTPA增强MRIT1映射和ADC值的组合模型可以提高预测HCC分级的诊断性能。

    BACKGROUND: Accurately predicting the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) grade may facilitate the rational selection of treatment strategies. The diagnostic efficacy of the combination of Gadolinium ethoxybenzy diethylenetriamine pentaacetic (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhancement T1 mapping and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in predicting HCC grade needs further validation.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the capacity of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1 mapping and ADC values, both individually and in combination, to discriminate between different grades of HCC.
    METHODS: From July 2017 to February 2020, 96 patients (male, 83; mean age, 53.67 years; age range, 29-71 years) clinically diagnosed with HCC were included in the present study. All patients underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, including T1 mapping sequence) before surgery or biopsy. All the patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the pathological results (including 24 cases of well-differentiated HCCs, 59 cases of moderately differentiated HCCs, 13 cases of and poorly differentiated HCCs). The mean Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1 values (ΔT1=[(T1pre-T1post)/T1pre]×100%) and ADC values between different grading groups of HCC were calculated and compared. The area under the characteristics curve (AUC), the diagnostic threshold, sensitivity, and specificity of ΔT1 and ADC for differential diagnosis were analyzed.
    RESULTS: Mean ΔT1 was 58% for well-differentiated HCCs, 50% for moderately-differentiated HCCs, and 43% for poorly-differentiated HCCs. ΔT1 showed statistical differences between the groups (P<0.001). The mean ADC values of the 3 groups were 1.11×10-3 mm2/s, 0.91×10-3 mm2/s, and 0.80×10-3mm2/s, respectively. ADC showed statistical differences between the groups (P<0.001). In discriminating well- differentiated group from the moderately differentiated group, the AUC of ΔT1 was 0.751 (95% CI: 0.642, 0.859), the AUC of ADC was 0.782 (95% CI: 0.671, 0.894), the AUC of combined model was 0.811 (95% CI: 0.709, 0.914). In discriminating the poorly differentiated group from the moderately differentiated group, the AUC of ΔT1 was 0.768 (95% CI: 0.634, 0.902), the AUC of ADC was 0.754 (95% CI: 0.603, 0.904), and the AUC of the combined model was 0.841 (95% CI: 0.729, 0.953).
    CONCLUSIONS: Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1 mapping, and ADC values have complementary effects on the sensitivity and specificity for identifying different HCC grades. A combined model of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI T1 mapping and ADC values could improve diagnostic performance for predicting HCC grades.

    .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估不同的心血管磁共振(CMR)参数对轻链淀粉样变性(AL)和转甲状腺素蛋白相关性淀粉样变性(ATTR)的区分。
    结果:总计,75名患者,心脏淀粉样变性53例(AL患者20例(66±12岁,14例男性[70%])和33例ATTR患者(78±5年,28名男性[88%]))对CMR参数如T1和T2作图进行了回顾性分析,细胞外体积(ECV),和晚期钆增强(LGE)分布模式,和心肌劳损,并与其他原因导致左心室肥厚的对照组进行比较(LVH;22例患者(53±16岁,17名男性[85%])。单因素方差分析和接收器工作特性分析用于统计分析。ECV是区分心脏淀粉样变性和对照的唯一最佳参数(曲线下面积[AUC]:0.97,95%置信区间[CI]:0.89-0.99,p<0.0001,截止值:>30%)。T2作图是区分AL和ATTR淀粉样变性的最佳单一参数(AL:63±4ms,ATTR:58±2ms,p<.001,AUC:0.86,95%CI:0.74-0.94,截止:>61ms)。心内膜下LGE主要在AL患者中观察到(10/20[50%]vs.5/33[15%];p=.002)。在ATTR患者中主要观察到透壁LGE(23/33[70%]vs.2/20[10%];p<.001)。T2作图区分AL和ATTR淀粉样变性的诊断性能随着LGE模式的纳入而进一步增强(AUC:0.96,95%CI:0.86-0.99];p=.05)。
    结论:ECV可将心脏淀粉样变性与其他原因引起的LVH区分开来。T2作图结合LGE在患者水平上以高精度将AL与ATTR淀粉样变性区分开来。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate different cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters for the differentiation of light chain amyloidosis (AL) and transthyretin-related amyloidosis (ATTR).
    RESULTS: In total, 75 patients, 53 with cardiac amyloidosis (20 patients with AL (66±12 years, 14 males [70%]) and 33 patients with ATTR (78±5 years, 28 males [88%])) were retrospectively analyzed regarding CMR parameters such as T1 and T2 mapping, extracellular volume (ECV), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) distribution patterns, and myocardial strain, and compared to a control cohort with other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH; 22 patients (53±16 years, 17 males [85%])). One way-ANOVA and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used for statistical analysis. ECV was the single best parameter to differentiate between cardiac amyloidosis and controls (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.97, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.89-0.99, p<.0001, cutoff: >30%). T2 mapping was the best single parameter to differentiate between AL and ATTR amyloidosis (AL: 63±4 ms, ATTR: 58±2 ms, p<.001, AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74-0.94, cutoff: >61 ms). Subendocardial LGE was predominantly observed in AL patients (10/20 [50%] vs. 5/33 [15%]; p=.002). Transmural LGE was predominantly observed in ATTR patients (23/33 [70%] vs. 2/20 [10%]; p<.001). The diagnostic performance of T2 mapping to differentiate between AL and ATTR amyloidosis was further increased with the inclusion of LGE patterns (AUC: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86-0.99]; p=.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: ECV differentiates cardiac amyloidosis from other causes of LVH. T2 mapping combined with LGE differentiates AL from ATTR amyloidosis with high accuracy on a patient level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    瞬时信号损失模拟(InSiL)模型是心脏T1标测应用中经典的改良Look-Locker反转恢复(MOLLI)序列的单指数拟合的有希望的替代方法。这可以实现更好的准确性,并且对心率(HR)变化不太敏感。经典的非线性最小二乘(NLLS)估计方法需要先验固定模型的某些参数,以给出可靠的T1估计并避免异常值。这在估计中引入了进一步的偏差,降低InSiL模型提供的优势。在本文中,提出了一种新的贝叶斯估计方法,使用分层模型来拟合InSiL模型的参数。分层贝叶斯建模具有收缩效应,可作为估计值的正则化,通过将虚假的估计值拉向组均值,因此大大减少了异常值的数量。模拟,物理幻影,和体内人体心脏数据已被用来表明,这种方法准确地估计了所有的InSiL参数,与经典的MOLLI模型和NLLSInSiL估计相比,实现了T1的高精度估计。
    The Instantaneous Signal Loss Simulation (InSiL) model is a promising alternative to the classical mono-exponential fitting of the Modified Look-Locker Inversion-recovery (MOLLI) sequence in cardiac T1 mapping applications, which achieves better accuracy and is less sensitive to heart rate (HR) variations. Classical non-linear least squares (NLLS) estimation methods require some parameters of the model to be fixed a priori in order to give reliable T1 estimations and avoid outliers. This introduces further bias in the estimation, reducing the advantages provided by the InSiL model. In this paper, a novel Bayesian estimation method using a hierarchical model is proposed to fit the parameters of the InSiL model. The hierarchical Bayesian modeling has a shrinkage effect that works as a regularizer for the estimated values, by pulling spurious estimated values toward the group-mean, hence reducing greatly the number of outliers. Simulations, physical phantoms, and in-vivo human cardiac data have been used to show that this approach estimates accurately all the InSiL parameters, and achieve high precision estimation of the T1 compared to the classical MOLLI model and NLLS InSiL estimation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:定量T1作图可以成为评估多发性硬化症(MS)组织损伤的重要工具。我们介绍T1-REQUIRE,一种将单个高分辨率解剖3DT1加权涡轮场回波(3DT1TFE)扫描转换为可用于定量评估组织损伤的参数T1图的方法。我们在MS中介绍了该方法的准确性和可行性。
    方法:检查了14例复发缓解型MS患者和10例健康受试者。使用T1-REQUIRE从3DT1TFE图像生成T1图,其使用MR信号方程和内部组织参考T1值来估计T1值。估计的T1病变,白色,将灰质区域与参考反演-恢复快速场回波T1值进行比较,并通过相关性和Bland-Altman(BA)统计进行分析。
    结果:检查了159个T1加权(T1W)低信号型MS病变和288个灰质区域。MS病变的T1值显示皮尔逊相关性r=0.81(p<0.000),R2=0.65,偏差=4.18%。BA统计数据显示,平均差为-53.95ms,一致性极限(LOA)为-344.20和236.30ms。非病灶性正常表现白质的相关系数r=0.82(p<0.000),R2=0.67,偏差=8.78%,平均差73.87ms,和-55.67和203.41ms的LOA。
    结论:我们证明了从常规采集的解剖图像中追溯得出高分辨率T1图的可行性,可用于量化MS中的组织病理学。这项研究的结果将为在更大的临床研究中测试这种方法奠定基础,以检查MS疾病的活动性和进展。
    OBJECTIVE: Quantitative T1 mapping can be an essential tool for assessing tissue injury in multiple sclerosis (MS). We introduce T1-REQUIRE, a method that converts a single high-resolution anatomical 3D T1-weighted Turbo Field Echo (3DT1TFE) scan into a parametric T1 map that could be used for quantitative assessment of tissue damage. We present the accuracy and feasibility of this method in MS.
    METHODS: 14 subjects with relapsing-remitting MS and 10 healthy subjects were examined. T1 maps were generated from 3DT1TFE images using T1-REQUIRE, which estimates T1 values using MR signal equations and internal tissue reference T1 values. Estimated T1 of lesions, white, and gray matter regions were compared with reference Inversion-Recovery Fast Field Echo T1 values and analyzed via correlation and Bland-Altman (BA) statistics.
    RESULTS: 159 T1-weighted (T1W) hypointense MS lesions and 288 gray matter regions were examined. T1 values for MS lesions showed a Pearson\'s correlation of r = 0.81 (p < 0.000), R2 = 0.65, and Bias = 4.18%. BA statistics showed a mean difference of -53.95 ms and limits of agreement (LOA) of -344.20 and 236.30 ms. Non-lesional normal-appearing white matter had a correlation coefficient of r = 0.82 (p < 0.000), R2 = 0.67, Bias = 8.78%, mean difference of 73.87 ms, and LOA of -55.67 and 203.41 ms.
    CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of retroactively derived high-resolution T1 maps from routinely acquired anatomical images, which could be used to quantify tissue pathology in MS. The results of this study will set the stage for testing this method in larger clinical studies for examining MS disease activity and progression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心脏磁共振是评估心脏容积的金标准成像技术,壁厚,质量,和收缩功能,但也提供了几乎所有心脏疾病的非侵入性心肌组织表征。在心脏淀粉样变性患者中,所有心腔的壁厚增加,射血分数轻度降低,偶尔胸膜和心包积液是特征性的形态学异常。造影剂注射后的典型模式由晚期钆增强的扩散区域表示,在非常早期的阶段可能是局灶性的和零散的,圆周,在中间阶段和心内膜下,甚至在更晚期阶段弥漫性透壁。
    Cardiac magnetic resonance represents the gold standard imaging technique to assess cardiac volumes, wall thickness, mass, and systolic function but also to provide noninvasive myocardial tissue characterization across almost all cardiac diseases. In patients with cardiac amyloidosis, increased wall thickness of all heart chambers, a mildly reduced ejection fraction and occasionally pleural and pericardial effusion are the characteristic morphologic anomalies. The typical pattern after contrast injection is represented by diffuse areas of late gadolinium enhancement, which can be focal and patchy in very early stages, circumferential, and subendocardial in intermediate stages or even diffuse transmural in more advanced stages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前,缺乏客观的定量措施来全面评估axSpA的炎症活性,这对准确评估疾病活动提出了一定的挑战。
    探讨骶髂关节(SIJs)MRI弛豫测量和外周血黏膜相关不变T(MAIT)细胞联合参数模型在评估轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)炎症活动中的价值。
    这项回顾性临床研究包括88名axSpA患者(中位年龄31.0(22.0,41.8)岁,21.6%的女性)和20个对照组(中位年龄28.0(20.5,49.5)岁,40.0%女性)。根据ASDAS-CRP将axSpA组分为有活性亚组(n=50)和无活性亚组(n=38)。所有参与者均接受SIJsMRI检查,包括T1和T2*标测,和MAIT细胞(定义为CD3+Vα7.2+CD161+)及其活化标志物(CD69)的外周血流式细胞术分析。T1和T2*值,比较不同组之间MAIT细胞和CD69+MAIT细胞的百分比。使用逻辑回归建立组合参数模型,采用ROC曲线评价诊断效能。
    axSpA组及其亚组SIJs和%CD69MAIT细胞的T1值均高于对照组(p<0.05),而MAIT细胞%均低于对照组(p<0.05)。T1值与%CD69+MAIT细胞呈正相关,而%MAIT细胞负相关,与ASDAS-CRP(r=0.555,0.524,-0.357,p<0.001)。在对照组和axSpA组之间,在不活跃和活跃的亚组之间,联合参数模型T1映射+%CD69+MAIT细胞具有最佳疗效(AUC=0.959,0.879,灵敏度=88.6,70%,特异性=95.0,94.7%,分别)。
    组合参数模型T1作图%CD69MAIT细胞可以更准确地评估炎症活性水平。
    UNASSIGNED: Currently, there is a lack of an objective quantitative measure to comprehensively evaluate the inflammatory activity of axSpA, which poses certain challenges in accurately assessing the disease activity.
    UNASSIGNED: To explore the value of combined-parameter models of sacroiliac joints (SIJs) MRI relaxometry and peripheral blood Mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells in evaluating the inflammatory activity of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective clinical study included 88 axSpA patients (median age 31.0 (22.0, 41.8) years, 21.6% females) and 20 controls (median age 28.0 (20.5, 49.5) years, 40.0% females). The axSpA group was classified into active subgroup (n=50) and inactive subgroup (n=38) based on ASDAS-CRP. All participants underwent SIJs MRI examination including T1 and T2* mapping, and peripheral blood flow cytometry analysis of MAIT cells (defined as CD3+Vα7.2+CD161+) and their activation markers (CD69). The T1 and T2* values, as were the percentages of MAIT cells and CD69+MAIT cells were compared between different groups. Combined-parameter models were established using logistic regression, and ROC curves were employed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy.
    UNASSIGNED: The T1 values of SIJs and %CD69+MAIT cells in the axSpA group and its subgroup were higher than the control group (p<0.05), while %MAIT cells were lower than the control group (p<0.05). The T1 values and %CD69+MAIT cells correlated positively, while %MAIT cells correlated negatively, with the ASDAS-CRP (r=0.555, 0.524, -0.357, p<0.001). Between the control and axSpA groups, and between the inactive and active subgroups, the combined-parameter model T1 mapping+%CD69+MAIT cells has the best efficacy (AUC=0.959, 0.879, sensibility=88.6, 70%, specificity=95.0, 94.7%, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: The combined-parameter model T1 mapping+%CD69+MAIT cells allows a more accurate evaluation of the level of inflammatory activity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号