OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to explore the effectiveness of systematic nursing care based on health empowerment theory on the self-care and functional abilities of patients with spinal fractures.
METHODS: We selected a total of 50 patients with spinal fractures from our hospital and randomly divided them into the control group and the observation group, with 25 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received conventional nursing care, while those in the observation group received systematic nursing care grounded in the health empowerment theory. We recorded and compared the self-care ability, functional ability, knowledge about the condition, and pain scores of patients in the two groups before and after the nursing intervention.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05), and there was no significant difference in self-care ability, functional ability, knowledge about the condition, or the visual analog scale (VAS) score between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). After treatment, outcomes in the observation group in terms of self-care ability, functional ability, and knowledge about the condition were significantly better than those in the control group (P < 0.05), while the VAS score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional nursing care, patients with spinal fractures who received systematic nursing inputs based on health empowerment theory reported significant improvements in pain, self-care, functional ability, and knowledge of the condition, and this is an approach that is worthy of promotion in clinical use.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of systematic nursing on the stress response and recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted among 102 patients with gallbladder system disease. They were divided into an observation group (n=51, perioperative systematic care) and a control group (n=51, perioperative conventional care) according to a random number table. The clinical indicators, postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function, and patients\' stress response, psychological status and quality of life before and after intervention were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the time to get out of bed for the first time after operation, the recovery time of bowel sounds, and the time of first gas/defecation after operation in the observation group were significantly earlier (all P<0.01), and the hospital stay was significantly shorter (P<0.001). Compared with 12 hours before operation, the serum adrenaline and cortisol levels of the two groups were significantly higher at 48 hours after operation, and the levels in the observation group were lower than the control group (all P<0.001). Compared with 1 day before the operation, the scores of Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) in both groups were reduced when they were discharged from the hospital, and the scores in the observation group were lower than that of the control group (all P<0.01). Three months after the operation, the scores of Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74) in the two groups increased in all dimensions, and the scores in the observation group were higher than the control group (all P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Systematic care during the perioperative period of laparoscopic cholecystectomy can alleviate the degree of stress, promote the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function, relieve the level of anxiety and depression, and improve the quality of life of patients after discharge from the hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application of systematic nursing in patients with maniac access of bipolar disorder and its impact on treatment compliance and quality of life.
METHODS: Using a random number table method, 91 patients with manic episodes of bipolar disorder were divided into a control group (n=46, received conventional nursing) and an observation group (n=45, combined with systematic care including health education, ward environment, mental health nursing, and rehabilitation training, mental state assessment and family and social support). The treatment compliance of Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS), the manic state of Bech-Rafaelsdn Mania Rating Scale (BRMS), the mental state of Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), the quality of life of Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74), the self-efficacy of Strategies Used by Patients to Promote Health (SUPPH), and the cognitive function of the Chinese Version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised (WAIS-RC) before and 3 months after intervention were compared.
RESULTS: After intervention, the BRMS scores of the patients in both groups were significantly decreased, and those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). After intervention, the MMAS scores of patients in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). After intervention, the scores of GQOLI-74, SUPPH and WAIS-RC in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05). After intervention, the scores of HAMA and HAMD in both groups decreased, and those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Systematic nursing for patients with maniac access of bipolar disorder can clearly relieve their bad moods, control their manic state, and improve their self-efficacy, quality of life and treatment compliance.

Purpose: To study the effect of systematic nursing on patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding and rehabilitation. Methods: 98 patients who were treated in our hospital for dysfunctional uterine bleeding from May 2017 to May 2019 were selected, and were divided into a control group (n=49, conventional nursing) and an observation group (n=49, systematic nursing) according to the random number table method. The curative effect, uterine bleeding time, normalization time of biochemical index recovery, psychologic status, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results: The efficacy rate of the observation group (93.88%) was higher than the control group (77.55%); the observation group had less uterine bleeding time and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in comparison with the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05); after intervention, the SAS and SDS scores of both groups decreased, with the observation group being more significant (P<0.05. The quality of life score and nursing satisfaction rate of the observation group were higher (P<0.05). Conclusion: Systematic nursing can improve the curative effect of patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding, accelerate the rehabilitation process, relieve negative emotions, and improve the quality of life and nursing satisfaction.