PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
Purpose: To study the effect of systematic nursing on patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding and rehabilitation. Methods: 98 patients who were treated in our hospital for dysfunctional uterine bleeding from May 2017 to May 2019 were selected, and were divided into a control group (n=49, conventional nursing) and an observation group (n=49, systematic nursing) according to the random number table method. The curative effect, uterine bleeding time, normalization time of biochemical index recovery, psychologic status, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results: The efficacy rate of the observation group (93.88%) was higher than the control group (77.55%); the observation group had less uterine bleeding time and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in comparison with the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05); after intervention, the SAS and SDS scores of both groups decreased, with the observation group being more significant (P<0.05. The quality of life score and nursing satisfaction rate of the observation group were higher (P<0.05). Conclusion: Systematic nursing can improve the curative effect of patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding, accelerate the rehabilitation process, relieve negative emotions, and improve the quality of life and nursing satisfaction.
摘要：
目的:研究系统护理对功能失调性子宫出血患者康复的影响。方法:选取我院2017年5月至2019年5月收治的功能性子宫出血患者98例,按随机数字表法分为对照组(n=49,常规护理)和观察组(n=49,系统护理)。疗效,子宫出血时间,生化指标恢复的归一化时间，心理状态，生活质量,比较两组患者的护理满意度。结果：观察组有效率（93.88%）高于对照组（77.55%）；观察组子宫出血时间、活化部分凝血活酶时间（APTT）较对照组少（P＜0.05）。干预前,两组焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组SAS和SDS评分均下降,观察组更为显著(P<0.05。观察组患者生活质量评分、护理满意率均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:系统化护理可提高功能失调性子宫出血患者的疗效,加快康复进程，缓解负面情绪，提高生活质量和护理满意度。
