Systematic literature review (SLR)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文介绍了从系统文献综述(SLR)中获得的有关使用隐喻和扩展技术进行沉浸式新闻的数据[1]。布尔运算符,英语和西班牙语,用于使用Scopus上的Publish或Perish8软件检索科学文献,2017年至2022年之间的WebofScience和GoogleScholar。在找到所有的科学文献之后,使用选择标准并遵循PRISMA模型进行了方法学过程,获得了总共61篇科学论文的样本.使用DESLOCIS框架对检索到的数据进行评估以及定量和定性分析。第一个数据集[2]包含根据PRISMA语句的阶段检索的出版物的元数据。第二个数据集[3]包含根据DESLOCIS框架的这些出版物的特征。这些数据提供了在沉浸式新闻领域开发新的纵向研究和荟萃分析的可能性。
    This article presents the data obtained from a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on the use of metaverse and extended technologies for immersive journalism [1]. Boolean operators, both in English and Spanish, were used to retrieve scientific literature using Publish or Perish 8 software on Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar between 2017 and 2022. After finding all the scientific literature, a methodological process was carried out using selection criteria and following the PRISMA model to obtain a total sample of 61 scientific articles. The DESLOCIS framework was used for the evaluation and quantitative and qualitative analysis of the retrieved data. The first dataset [2] contains the metadata of the retrieved publications according to the phases of the PRISMA statement. The second dataset [3] contains the characteristics of these publications according to the DESLOCIS framework. The data offer the possibility to develop new longitudinal studies and meta-analyzes in the field of immersive journalism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    我们评估了从一种速效胰岛素类似物到另一种速效胰岛素类似物的潜在转变,或者他们的生物仿制药,帮助更好更快的糖尿病管理决策。
    根据PRISMA报告指南进行了系统文献综述。搜索MEDLINE/EMBASE/COCHRANE数据库,以比较Aspart/lispro在1型(T1D)和2型(T2D)糖尿病中的随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入研究的方法学质量采用CochraneCollaboration的偏倚风险评估标准进行评估。
    在检索到的754条记录中,6个选定的疗效/安全性RCT和另外3个手工搜索的药代动力学/药效学RCT在连续变量的表示中显示出一定的异质性;然而,集体,结果显示,在T1D和T2D成年患者中,lispro和aspart具有相当的疗效和安全性.两种治疗都产生了类似的HbA1c下降,并有类似的剂量和体重变化,与类似的TEAE和SAE报告,在T1D和T2D人群中相似的低血糖发作,高血糖症没有临床显著差异,闭塞或其他输注部位/设置并发症。
    Aspart和lispro在T1D/T2D患者中具有相对的安全性和有效性。由于两者被认为同样适合控制餐时血糖波动,并且两者都具有相似的安全属性,它们在临床实践中可以互换使用.
    CRD42023376793。
    UNASSIGNED: We evaluated a potential move from one rapid-acting insulin analog to another, or their biosimilars, to aid better and faster decisions for diabetes management.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature review was performed according to PRISMA reporting guidelines. The MEDLINE/EMBASE/COCHRANE databases were searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing aspart/lispro in type-1 (T1D) and type-2 (T2D) diabetes. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration\'s risk of bias assessment criteria.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 753 records retrieved, the six selected efficacy/safety RCTs and the additional three hand-searched pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics RCTs showed some heterogeneity in the presentation of the continuous variables; however, collectively, the outcomes demonstrated that lispro and aspart had comparable efficacy and safety in adult patients with T1D and T2D. Both treatments yielded a similar decrease in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and had similar dosing and weight changes, with similar treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and serious adverse event (SAE) reporting, similar hypoglycemic episodes in both T1D and T2D populations, and no clinically significant differences for hyperglycemia, occlusions or other infusion site/set complications.
    UNASSIGNED: Aspart and lispro demonstrate comparative safety and efficacy in patients with T1D/T2D. Since both are deemed equally suitable for controlling prandial glycemic excursions and both have similar safety attributes, they may be used interchangeably in clinical practice.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42023376793.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管对教育中的心理健康和福祉的调查显示,在国际范围内呈指数级增长,主要关注学生,让教师福祉的概念相对被忽视。现有文献提供了许多不同的描述,一些学者甚至避免对该术语进行明确的定义。因此,在理解教师幸福作为一个独特的结构方面存在局限性和不一致之处。本研究的目的是三个方面:(1)评估现有研究在多大程度上反映了教师福利一词的多维性质,(2)确定教师福祉的整体建构是否合理,(3)评价所确定研究的方法学质量。根据PRISMA声明进行的系统审查适用于2016年至2021年之间发表的同行评审论文。在筛选了1676项研究之后,本文报告了从61篇概念化教师福祉文章的最终样本中得出的结果。研究是由他们的主要话语组织的,即消极/不足,积极/繁荣,和/或专业性。研究结果表明,教师福祉主要是通过专业方法概念化的(其中18项确定的研究仅采用这种观点)。这与以前的工作不完全一致,专注于压力和倦怠(消极/缺陷方法),同时探索教师的心理健康和福祉。更重要的是,只有6项研究将所有三种话语一起考虑。本文认为,忽略替代镜头会丢失重要信息,需要进一步关注,以全面解决教师的福祉。这种努力对于制定干预措施和策略至关重要,这些干预措施和策略不仅旨在提高教师的福祉,而且还旨在改善学生的成绩,最终,教育的整体质量。系统审查注册:https://www。crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021278549PROSPERO,CRD42021278549。
    Although the investigation of mental health and wellbeing in education has shown an exponential increase on an international scale, attention has primarily been paid to students, leaving the concept of teacher wellbeing comparatively overlooked. Extant literature offers numerous divergent descriptions, with some academics even avoiding an explicit definition of the term. Thus, there are limitations and inconsistencies in understanding teacher wellbeing as a unique construct. The aim of the current study was three-fold; (1) to assess the extent to which existing research reflects the multidimensional nature of the term teacher wellbeing, (2) to determine whether a holistic construct of teacher wellbeing could be justified, and (3) to evaluate the methodological quality of studies identified. A systematic review following the PRISMA statement was applied to peer-reviewed papers published between 2016 and 2021. Following the screening of 1,676 studies, this paper reports on findings drawn from a final sample of 61 articles conceptualizing teacher wellbeing. Studies were organized by their dominant discourses, namely negativity/ deficiency, positivity/ flourishing, and/or professionalism. Findings illustrate that teacher wellbeing was primarily conceptualized with a professionalism approach (with 18 of the identified studies taking solely this perspective). This is not completely consistent with the prior work that focused on stress and burnout (negativity/ deficiency approach) while exploring teachers\' mental health and wellbeing. More importantly, there were only 6 studies that considered all three discourses together. This paper argues that important information is lost through neglecting alternative lenses, requiring further attention in order to address teacher wellbeing comprehensively. Such an endeavor is essential for shaping interventions and strategies aimed not only at enhancing teacher wellbeing but also at improving student outcomes and, ultimately, the overall quality of education. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021278549PROSPERO, CRD42021278549.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:卫生技术评估(HTA)机构在评估两种或更多种治疗方法的比较疗效时,对随机对照试验表现出明显的偏好。然而,间接治疗比较(ITC)通常是必要的,如果直接比较是不可用的,或者,在某些情况下,不可能。文献中描述了许多ITC技术。进行了系统的文献综述(SLR),以确定有关现有ITC技术的所有相关文献,提供每种技术的全面描述,并从HTA的角度评估它们的优势和局限性,以便为在不同场景中使用的最合适的方法制定指导。
    方法:Embase和PubMed的电子数据库搜索,以及灰色文献搜索,于2021年11月15日进行。符合条件的文章是经过同行评审的论文,这些论文专门描述了用于不同ITC技术的方法,并用英语编写。审查是根据系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行的。
    结果:SLR共收录了73篇文章,报告七种不同的ITC技术。所有报道的技术都是经调整的ITC形式。网络荟萃分析(NMA)是描述最频繁的技术(在79.5%的文章中),其次是匹配调整间接比较(MAIC)(30.1%),网络元回归(24.7%),Bucher方法(23.3%),模拟处理比较(STC)(21.9%),倾向评分匹配(4.1%)和治疗加权的逆概率(4.1%).ITC技术的适当选择至关重要,应基于连接网络的可行性,研究之间和研究内异质性的证据,相关研究的总数和个体患者水平数据(IPD)的可用性。MAIC和STC被发现是单臂研究的常见技术,越来越多地在肿瘤学和罕见疾病中进行,而Bucher方法和NMA在没有IPD可用的情况下提供合适的选项。
    结论:ITC可以提供替代证据,其中可能缺少直接的比较证据。ITC目前由HTA机构逐案审议;然而,他们的可接受性仍然很低。需要就不同ITC技术的使用方法达成更清晰的国际共识和指导,以提高提交给HTA机构的ITC的质量。ITC技术继续快速发展,和更有效的技术可能会在未来变得可用。
    BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) agencies express a clear preference for randomized controlled trials when assessing the comparative efficacy of two or more treatments. However, an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) is often necessary where a direct comparison is unavailable or, in some cases, not possible. Numerous ITC techniques are described in the literature. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify all the relevant literature on existing ITC techniques, provide a comprehensive description of each technique and evaluate their strengths and limitations from an HTA perspective in order to develop guidance on the most appropriate method to use in different scenarios.
    METHODS: Electronic database searches of Embase and PubMed, as well as grey literature searches, were conducted on 15 November 2021. Eligible articles were peer-reviewed papers that specifically described the methods used for different ITC techniques and were written in English. The review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
    RESULTS: A total of 73 articles were included in the SLR, reporting on seven different ITC techniques. All reported techniques were forms of adjusted ITC. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was the most frequently described technique (in 79.5% of the included articles), followed by matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) (30.1%), network meta-regression (24.7%), the Bucher method (23.3%), simulated treatment comparison (STC) (21.9%), propensity score matching (4.1%) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (4.1%). The appropriate choice of ITC technique is critical and should be based on the feasibility of a connected network, the evidence of heterogeneity between and within studies, the overall number of relevant studies and the availability of individual patient-level data (IPD). MAIC and STC were found to be common techniques in the case of single-arm studies, which are increasingly being conducted in oncology and rare diseases, whilst the Bucher method and NMA provide suitable options where no IPD is available.
    CONCLUSIONS: ITCs can provide alternative evidence where direct comparative evidence may be missing. ITCs are currently considered by HTA agencies on a case-by-case basis; however, their acceptability remains low. Clearer international consensus and guidance on the methods to use for different ITC techniques is needed to improve the quality of ITCs submitted to HTA agencies. ITC techniques continue to evolve quickly, and more efficient techniques may become available in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    本文系统地,批判性地回顾了有关循环经济实践(CEP)和可持续性绩效(SP)交叉的文献。我们综合和分析现有文献,以发现知识差距,突出矛盾的观点,并提供该领域的全面概述。在详细的数据库搜索之后,我们选择了发表在同行评审期刊上的104项实证研究进行分析.我们的评论报告了出版趋势,顶级出版期刊网点,研究方法,和经验背景。我们概述了理论基础,确定不同的循环经济实践和影响循环经济实践和可持续绩效的关键因素。该评论显示,大多数作者倾向于重用已建立的理论或根本不使用理论,揭示了理论发展的必要性。此外,我们的分析表明,研发和创新,数字技术,组织能力/资源,利益相关者和机构压力会对CEP-SP关系产生重大影响。通过我们对现有文献的详细评估,我们确定并提出了几个主题和未来研究的途径。
    This paper systematically and critically reviews the literature on the intersection of circular economy practices (CEPs) and sustainability performance (SP). We synthesize and analyze the extant literature to uncover the knowledge gaps, highlight the contradictory views, and provide a comprehensive overview of the field. Following a detailed database search, we selected 104 empirical studies published in peer-reviewed journals for analysis. Our review reports the publication trends, top publishing journal outlets, research methodologies, and empirical contexts. We outline the theoretical underpinnings, identify the diverse circular economy practices and the key factors that impact circular economy practices and sustainable performance. The review shows a propensity for most authors to reuse established theories or not use theory at all, revealing the need for theory development. Furthermore, our analysis revealed that R&D and innovation, digital technologies, organizational capabilities/resources, and stakeholder and institutional pressure substantially influence the CEPs - SP relationship. Through our detailed assessment of the existing literature, we identified and proposed several themes and avenues for future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    在本研究中,进行了系统的文献综述(SLR)收集,compile,并以有意义和系统的方式总结了以往研究的发现。这篇综述的重点是理想的混合比,混合参数,和身体,热,废塑料改性沥青的流变性能。它突出了关于相分离等挑战的最重要的研究成果,低温性能,废塑料改性沥青的可加工性和该领域的进展。结果指出,使用化学和物理添加剂可以帮助减少相分离。此外,本文对沥青的老化特性进行了讨论,发现废塑料在沥青中的整合已表明可以减缓粘合剂的老化过程。评论文章提出了全球利用废塑料的各种现场项目的细节。审查最后提出了关键发现,确定研究差距,并提出未来的方向,以推进知识和充分理解废塑料改性沥青在可持续道路建设中的可能应用。
    In the present study, a systematic literature review (SLR) is conducted to collect, compile, and summarize the findings of previous studies in a meaningful and systematic way. This review focuses on the ideal blending ratios, mixing parameters, and the physical, thermal, and rheological performance of waste plastic-modified asphalt. It highlights the most significant research results about the challenges like phase separation, low-temperature performance, and workability for waste plastic-modified asphalt and progress in this domain. The results point out that the use of chemical and physical additives can help in the reduction of phase separation. Furthermore, this paper debates the aging characteristics and it was seen that the integration of waste plastic in asphalt has shown to slow down the aging process of the binder. The review article put forward details of various field projects across the globe utilizing waste plastic. The review concludes by presenting key findings, identifying research gaps, and suggesting future directions to advance the knowledge and to fully comprehend the possible application of waste plastic-modified bitumen in sustainable road construction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是生殖女性身体中最常见的内分泌异常之一,对健康造成严重危害。解释这种情况的正确性在很大程度上取决于广泛的相关症状和医生的专业知识,使实时临床检测相当具有挑战性。因此,最近,世界各地的一些研究人员探索了计算机辅助PCOS检测系统的调查,作为人工评估的潜在替代品。本综述研究的目的是通过系统文献综述(SLR)方法分析计算机辅助自动识别PCOS的相关研究工作,并调查研究局限性并探索该领域未来潜在的研究范围。根据一套纳入-排除标准,使用PRISMA方法选择了28篇文章进行审查。已使用六个数据探索主题对选定文章进行了数据综合。作为结果,SLR探索了研究之间的主题关联;他们的研究概况;目标;数据大小,type,和来源;用于检测PCOS的方法;最后是研究结果及其评估措施和性能。该研究还强调了未来研究方向的领域,研究了研究差距,以加强当前自主PCOS识别的努力;例如将先进技术与当前方法相结合;开发交互式软件系统;探索深度学习和无监督机器学习技术;增强数据集和国家背景;并调查PCOS背后的更多未知因素。因此,该SLR提供了最先进的自主PCOS检测范式,将支持显著有效的临床评估,PCOS的诊断和治疗.
    Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is among the most prevalent endocrinological abnormalities seen in reproductive female bodies posing serious health hazards. The correctness of interpreting this condition depends heavily on the wide spectrum of associated symptoms and the doctor\'s expertise, making real-time clinical detection quite challenging. Thus, investigations on computer-aided PCOS detection systems have recently been explored by several researchers worldwide as a potential replacement for manual assessment. This review study\'s objective is to analyze the relevant research works on computer-assisted methods for automatically identifying PCOS through a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology as well as investigate the research limitations and explore potential future research scopes in this domain. 28 articles have been selected using the PRISMA approach based on a set of inclusion-exclusion criteria for conducting the review. The data synthesis of the selected articles has been conducted using six data exploration themes. As outcomes, the SLR explored the topical association between the studies; their research profiles; objectives; data size, type, and sources; methodologies applied for the detection of PCOS; and lastly the research outcomes along with their evaluation measures and performances. The study also highlights areas for future research directions examining the study gaps to enhance the current efforts for autonomous PCOS identification; such as integrating advanced techniques with the current methods; developing interactive software systems; exploring deep learning and unsupervised machine learning techniques; enhancing datasets and country context; and investigating more unknown factors behind PCOS. Thus, this SLR provides a state-of-the-art paradigm of autonomous PCOS detection which will support significantly efficient clinical assessment, diagnosis and treatment of PCOS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着COVID-19大流行的到来,对员工数字能力的关注程度显着增加。几项研究提供了不同的调查,但是他们无法描述数字自主性和创新工作行为之间的关系,涉及员工数字能力的影响。因此,有必要进行一项调查,以更深入地了解这些问题,并为其他研究人员提出合适的研究建议。使用科学出版物数据库并遵守PRISMA声明,这篇系统的文献综述旨在提供2015年至2022年员工数字能力对数字自治与创新工作行为之间关系的影响的最新概述,涵盖定义,研究目的,方法论,结果,和限制。审阅选定的文章时,在关系主题下检查了18篇文章,和12篇文章报告了不同任务下的影响主题。主要发现强调了数字能力和自主性在促进员工创造力方面的重要性,学习,分享知识。根据审查结果,拥有更大数字自主权的员工更有可能从事创新工作,提高工作绩效和赋权。因此,数字自治的发展通过提供对数字工具的访问来优先考虑组织,培训,和支持性的工作环境。总的来说,当前的审查表明,数字自治之间存在很强的正相关关系,创新的工作行为,和员工影响。这强调了组织不仅要参与数字能力和技能的重要性,还要创造一种重视自治的文化,创造力,以及员工的创新。
    With the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, the level of concern regarding employee digital competence has increased significantly. Several studies provide different surveys, but they cannot describe the relationship between digital autonomy and innovative work behaviour concerning the impact of employee digital competence. Hence, it is necessary to conduct a survey that provides a deeper understanding of these concerns and suggests a suitable study for other researchers. Using scientific publication databases and adhering to the PRISMA statement, this systematic literature review aims to offer a current overview of employee digital competence impact on the relationship between digital autonomy and innovative work behaviour from 2015 to 2022, covering definitions, research purposes, methodologies, outcomes, and limitations. When reviewing the selected articles, 18 articles were examined under relationship topics, and 12 articles reported on impact topics under different tasks. The main findings highlight the significance of digital competence and autonomy in promoting employee creativity, learning, and sharing knowledge. According to the review findings, employees with greater digital autonomy are more likely to engage in innovative work, leading to improved job performance and empowerment. Therefore, the development of digital autonomy prioritizes organizations by providing access to digital tools, training, and a supportive work environment. Overall, the current review indicates a strong positive correlation between digital autonomy, innovative work behaviour, and employee impact. This underscores the importance for organizations to not only participate in digital competence and skills, but also to create a culture that values autonomy, creativity, and innovation among its employees.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    软件定义网络(SDN)是网络技术的革命性创新,具有许多理想的功能,包括灵活性和可管理性。尽管有这些优势,SDN容易受到分布式拒绝服务(DDoS)的攻击,由于其对SDN网络的影响,构成了重大威胁。尽管有许多安全方法可以检测DDoS攻击,它仍然是一个开放的研究挑战。因此,本研究提出了系统的文献综述(SLR),以系统地研究和批判性地分析现有的基于机器学习(ML)的DDoS攻击方法,深度学习(DL),或在2014年至2022年之间发布的混合方法。我们在八个在线数据库上分为两个阶段遵循了预定义的SLR协议,以全面涵盖相关研究。这两个阶段涉及自动和手动搜索,导致70项研究被确定为确定的主要研究。趋势表明,在过去几年中,有关SDNDDoS攻击的研究数量急剧增加。分析表明,现有的检测方法主要利用集合,混合动力车,和单个ML-DL。私人合成数据集,紧随其后的是不切实际的数据集,最常用于评估这些方法。此外,该综述认为,有限的文献研究需要更多的重点来解决本SLR中提出的剩余挑战和悬而未决的问题。
    Software-defined networking (SDN) is a revolutionary innovation in network technology with many desirable features, including flexibility and manageability. Despite those advantages, SDN is vulnerable to distributed denial of service (DDoS), which constitutes a significant threat due to its impact on the SDN network. Despite many security approaches to detect DDoS attacks, it remains an open research challenge. Therefore, this study presents a systematic literature review (SLR) to systematically investigate and critically analyze the existing DDoS attack approaches based on machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), or hybrid approaches published between 2014 and 2022. We followed a predefined SLR protocol in two stages on eight online databases to comprehensively cover relevant studies. The two stages involve automatic and manual searching, resulting in 70 studies being identified as definitive primary studies. The trend indicates that the number of studies on SDN DDoS attacks has increased dramatically in the last few years. The analysis showed that the existing detection approaches primarily utilize ensemble, hybrid, and single ML-DL. Private synthetic datasets, followed by unrealistic datasets, are the most frequently used to evaluate those approaches. In addition, the review argues that the limited literature studies demand additional focus on resolving the remaining challenges and open issues stated in this SLR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着新信息技术(大数据分析、网络物理系统,如物联网,云计算和人工智能),数字孪生越来越多地用于智能制造。尽管它们在工业中的使用吸引了许多从业者和研究人员的注意,仍然需要一个用于可重构制造系统的集成和全面的数字孪生框架。为了缩小研究差距,我们从系统的文献综述中提供证据,包括来自高质量期刊的76篇论文。本文介绍了当前可重构制造系统中评估和数字孪生的研究趋势,突出应用领域和关键方法和工具。本文的独创性在于为将来研究数字孪生在RMS评估中的集成提供了有趣的途径。数字孪生的好处是多方面的,例如评估RMS在其生命周期中的当前和未来功能,早期发现系统性能缺陷和生产优化。这个想法是实现一个连接虚拟和物理环境的数字孪生。最后,强调了文献中的重要问题和新兴趋势,以鼓励研究人员和从业人员在这一领域开展与工业4.0环境密切相关的研究。
    With the rapid advent of new information technologies (Big Data analytics, cyber-physical systems, such as IoT, cloud computing and artificial intelligence), digital twins are being used more and more in smart manufacturing. Despite the fact that their use in industry has attracted the attention of many practitioners and researchers, there is still a need for an integrated and comprehensive digital twin framework for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. To close this research gap, we present evidence from a systematic literature review, including 76 papers from high-quality journals. This paper presents the current research trends on evaluation and the digital twin in reconfigurable manufacturing systems, highlighting application areas and key methodologies and tools. The originality of this paper lies in its proposal of interesting avenues for future research on the integration of the digital twin in the evaluation of RMS. The benefits of digital twins are multiple such as evaluation of current and future capabilities of an RMS during its life cycle, early discovery of system performance deficiencies and production optimization. The idea is to implement a digital twin that links the virtual and physical environments. Finally, important issues and emerging trends in the literature are highlighted to encourage researchers and practitioners to develop studies in this area that are strongly related to the Industry 4.0 environment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号