Susceptibility testing

敏感性试验
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    粘菌素抗性测试方法如肉汤微量稀释(BMD)对于临床实验室而言是耗时且费力的。MALDIBiotyperSirius系统MBT脂质Xtract试剂盒(Bruker,Billerica,MA,USA)利用脂质组学分析来鉴定与粘菌素抗性相关的特定细胞壁修饰。我们将MBT与BMD(ComASP粘菌素,Liofilchem)跨36个革兰氏阴性分离株(非抗性MIC≤2µgml-1,抗性MIC≥4µgml-1)。所有样品在MBT上测试两次,在评估MBT和BMD之间的绝对一致性之前重复差异结果。44.4%(16/36)的分离株通过BMD对粘菌素耐药。MBT脂质Xtract与BMD有80.6%的一致性(29/36),5/7差异校正,以匹配重复测试。大肠杆菌分离株有100%的一致性(n=16)。对两个不同的肺炎克雷伯菌分离株进行了全基因组测序,已鉴定粘菌素抗性相关基因座内的变体(MIC0.5µgml-1:arnCS30T,pmrBT246A,lapBN212T,lpxMS253G,crrBQ287K和MIC>16µgml-1:arnCS30T,pmrBR90insRN,pmrBT246A,pmrAE57G,lpxMS253G)。进一步评估,特别是对于非E.大肠杆菌在临床实验室实施之前需要MBT。
    Colistin resistance testing methods such as broth microdilution (BMD) are time-consuming and labour intensive for clinical laboratories. MBT Lipid Xtract Kit on MALDI Biotyper Sirius System (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) utilizes lipidomic analysis to identify specific cell wall modifications associated with colistin resistance. We compared MBT to BMD (ComASP Colistin, Liofilchem) across 36 Gram-negative isolates (non-resistant MIC ≤2 µg ml-1, resistant MIC ≥4 µg ml-1). All samples were tested twice on MBT with discrepant results repeated before assessing categorical agreement between MBT and BMD. 44.4% (16/36) of isolates were colistin resistant via BMD. MBT Lipid Xtract had 80.6% agreement (29/36) with BMD, with 5/7 discrepancies corrected to match upon repeat testing. There was 100% agreement for Escherichia coli isolates (n=16). The whole-genome sequencing was completed on the two discrepant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, with variants within colistin resistance-associated loci identified (MIC 0.5 µg ml-1: arnC S30T, pmrB T246A, lapB N212T, lpxM S253G, crrB Q287K and MIC >16 µg ml-1: arnC S30T, pmrB R90insRN, pmrB T246A, pmrA E57G, lpxM S253G). Further evaluation, particularly for non-E. coli, of MBT is required prior to implementation in clinical laboratories.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尼日利亚本地家禽中沙门氏菌的信息很少。我们调查了本地家禽及其饮用水源中沙门氏菌的发生和特征,以加强对家禽感染的监测并促进公共卫生。我们收集了1208个样本,家禽粪便(n=1108),尼日利亚中北部15个市场的水(n=100)。沙门氏菌属。按照世界动物卫生组织的指导方针进行隔离。沙门氏菌属。,通过聚合酶链反应检测确认,是6.8%(75/1108)的粪便和3%(3/100)的水。对13种抗菌药物的敏感性测试显示,对所有测试的抗菌药物的敏感性为60.3%(47/78),而对多种药物的敏感性为14.1%(11/78)。对44个分离株进行了血清分型和全基因组测序,并鉴定了23种不同的血清变型。Luedinghausen血清型的基因组,拉雷多,Widemarsh,兰辛首次在非洲被记录在案。二十(20)种抗菌素抗性(AMR)基因标记,编码对氨基糖苷的抗性,四环素,磺酰胺,喹诺酮类药物,甲氧苄啶,发现了青霉素和酚。系统发育聚类分析表明,不同来源的分离株之间存在密切的联系。这项研究表明沙门氏菌患病率低,AMR低,但是由于不常见的血清型循环,建议持续监测,以确保食品安全和家禽健康。
    There is scant information on Salmonella in indigenous poultry in Nigeria. We investigated the occurrence and characterized Salmonella serovars in indigenous poultry and their drinking water sources to enhance the monitoring of the infection in poultry and to promote public health. We collected 1208 samples, poultry droppings (n = 1108), and water (n = 100) across 15 markets in North Central Nigeria. Salmonella spp. were isolated following World Organisation for Animal Health guidelines. Salmonella spp., confirmed through invA gene detection by a polymerase chain reaction assay, were 6.8% (75/1108) droppings and 3% (3/100) water. Susceptibility testing against 13 antimicrobials showed 60.3% (47/78) susceptibility to all the antimicrobials tested while 14.1% (11/78) were multidrug resistant. Serotyping and whole-genome sequencing were carried out on 44 of the isolates, and 23 different serovars were identified. Genomes of serovars Luedinghausen, Laredo, Widemarsh, and Lansing are being documented in Africa for the first time. Twenty (20) antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene markers encoding for resistance to aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, sulphonamides, quinolones, trimethoprim, penicillins and phenicols were found. Phylogenetic cluster analysis showed close relatedness among isolates from different sources. This study shows both low Salmonella prevalence and AMR, but since uncommon serovars are circulating, continuous monitoring is recommended so as to ensure food safety and poultry health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:头孢地洛是一种铁载体结合的头孢菌素,越来越多地用于治疗嗜酸性杆菌感染。头孢地洛敏感性测试具有挑战性,根据病原体提出了不同的建议。
    目的:我们评估了无色杆菌属中头孢地洛敏感性的商业测试的性能,并回顾了文献。
    方法:扩散(磁盘,MIC梯度测试条[MTS],Liofilchem)和肉汤微量稀释(BMD)方法(ComASP™,Liofilchem;UMIC®,根据EUCAST指南,对来自14个物种的143个无色杆菌属菌株的MIC50/90≤0.015/0.5mg/L,将Bruker)与BMD参考方法进行了比较。无论方法或物种如何,都进行了文献检索。
    结果:所测试的方法均未达到可接受的基本协议(EA)。MTS显示最低的EA(30.8%),仅次于UMIC®(49%)和ComASP™(76.9%)。所有方法都达到了可接受的偏差,中等收入国家要么使用MTS(-1.3%)和ComASP™(-14.2%)被低估,要么使用UMIC®(+9.1%)被高估。抑制区直径为6至38mm(IZD50/90=33/30mm)。与基于扩散的方法不同,UMIC®和ComASP™未能将本研究的一种或两种头孢地洛耐药菌株分类为耐药。文献综述强调了根据病原体和测试条件的可用方法的不同性能。
    结论:不鼓励将MTS用于无色杆菌属。通过设置30mm的阈值直径,可以使用圆盘扩散来筛选易感菌株。UMIC®和ComASP™不应被用作唯一的方法,而必须系统地与磁盘扩散相关联,以检测尚未被描述的头孢地洛耐药无色杆菌sp。菌株。
    BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin increasingly used in the management of Achromobacter infections. Testing for cefiderocol susceptibility is challenging with distinct recommendations depending on the pathogens.
    OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the performance of commercial tests for testing cefiderocol susceptibility in the Achromobacter genus and reviewed the literature.
    METHODS: Diffusion (disks, MIC gradient test strips [MTS], Liofilchem) and broth microdilution (BMD) methods (ComASP™, Liofilchem; UMIC®, Bruker) were compared with the BMD reference method according to the EUCAST guidelines on 143 Achromobacter strains from 14 species with MIC50/90 of ≤ 0.015/0.5 mg/L. A literature search was conducted regardless of method or species.
    RESULTS: None of the methods tested fulfilled an acceptable essential agreement (EA). MTS displayed the lowest EA (30.8%) after UMIC® (49%) and ComASP™ (76.9%). All methods achieved an acceptable bias, with MICs either underestimated using MTS (-1.3%) and ComASP™ (-14.2%) or overestimated with UMIC® (+ 9.1%). Inhibition zone diameters ranged from 6 to 38 mm (IZD50/90=33/30 mm). UMIC® and ComASP™ failed to categorize one or the two cefiderocol-resistant strains of this study as resistant unlike the diffusion-based methods. The literature review highlighted distinct performance of the available methods according to pathogens and testing conditions.
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of MTS is discouraged for Achromobacter spp. Disk diffusion can be used to screen for susceptible strains by setting a threshold diameter of 30 mm. UMIC® and ComASP™ should not be used as the sole method but have to be systematically associated with disk diffusion to detect the yet rarely described cefiderocol-resistant Achromobacter sp. strains.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:念珠菌属。是一种机会性病原体,在没有严格卫生规程的情况下,会引起表面和侵入性感染。在这里,我们评估了念珠菌的口腔定植。在2021年7月至2022年4月的209名重症监护病房(ICU)患者中,进行临床,流行病学,以及发展口腔或侵袭性念珠菌病的微生物学特征。
    方法:在ICU入院后24小时内收集初始口腔拭子,其次是第2、4、6和8天的收藏。从戴假牙的病人身上取出的棉签,非生物表面,医疗保健专业人员的手,还获得了耳后区域。使用MALDI-TOFMS和形态特征鉴定回收的酵母和丝状真菌,分别。念珠菌的遗传相似性。使用扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)评估分离株,通过肉汤微量稀释测定抗真菌药敏谱。
    结果:在研究中,64.11%的患者被念珠菌口腔定植。其中,80.59%在最初24小时内定植。口腔定植也发生在随后的几天:50%/第2天、26.92%/第4天和11.53%/第6天和第8天。在患者中,8.61%患有口腔念珠菌病,主要是假膜。在口腔定植患者中,2.23%发展为侵袭性念珠菌病。此外,接受评估的医疗专业人员中有89.47%被定植。MALDI-TOFMS鉴定了不同的酵母种类,白色念珠菌(45.34%),C.热带(15.7%),最普遍的是严格感觉梭菌(9.88%)。AFLP分析表明,从患者和专业人员中分离出的近感觉梭菌之间存在高度遗传相关性(≥97%)。还发现了三种抗性白色念珠菌分离株。
    结论:这项研究报道了ICU患者中酵母和丝状真菌的多样性,并强调了早期念珠菌。侵袭性念珠菌病的定植风险,以及医院环境中潜在的水平传播,强调需要有效的感染控制措施。
    OBJECTIVE: Candida spp. is an opportunistic pathogen that causes superficial and invasive infections with nosocomial outbreaks without strict hygiene protocols. Herein, we assessed oral colonisation by Candida spp. in 209 Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients between July 2021 and April 2022, conducting clinical, epidemiological, and microbiological characterisation of those developing oral or invasive candidiasis.
    METHODS: Initial oral swabs were collected within 24 h of admission in the ICU, followed by collections on Days 2, 4, 6 and 8. Swabs from denture-wearing patients, abiotic surfaces, healthcare professionals\' hands, and retroauricular regions were also obtained. Recovered yeasts and filamentous fungi were identified using MALDI-TOF MS and morphological characteristics, respectively. Genetic similarity of Candida spp. isolates was evaluated using Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and the antifungal susceptibility profile was determined by broth microdilution.
    RESULTS: In the study, 64.11% of patients were orally colonised by Candida spp. Of these, 80.59% were colonised within the first 24 h. Oral colonisation also occurred on subsequent days: 50%/Day 2, 26.92%/Day 4, and 11.53%/Days 6 and 8. Of the patients, 8.61% had oral candidiasis, mainly pseudomembranous. Among orally colonised patients, 2.23% developed invasive candidiasis. Besides, 89.47% of healthcare professionals evaluated were colonised. MALDI-TOF MS identified different yeast species, and C. albicans (45.34%), C. tropicalis (15.7%), and C. parapsilosis sensu stricto (9.88%) were the most prevalent. AFLP analysis indicated a high genetic correlation (≥97%) between C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates from patients and professionals. Three resistant C. albicans isolates were also found.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study reported a diversity of yeast and filamentous fungi species in ICU patients and highlighted early Candida spp. colonisation risks for invasive candidiasis, as well as the potential horizontal transmission in the nosocomial setting, emphasising the need for effective infection control measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    摘要本指南为临床微生物学实验室提供了处理囊性纤维化(pwCF)患者呼吸道样本的建议。呼吸道样本的适当处理对于检测细菌和真菌病原体至关重要,指导治疗,监测囊性纤维化(CF)病原体的流行病学,并评估治疗干预措施。由于CF跨膜电导调节调节疗法,pwCF的健康状况有所改善,但结果是,更少的pwCF自发咳痰。因此,痰样本的收集有所减少,而其他类型的呼吸道样本,如口咽部和支气管肺泡灌洗样本的收集有所增加。为了优化微生物的检测,包括铜绿假单胞菌,金黄色葡萄球菌,流感嗜血杆菌,和洋葱伯克霍尔德菌;其他不太常见的非乳糖发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌,例如,麦芽窄食单胞菌,Inquilinus,无色杆菌属,Ralstonia,和潘多拉物种;酵母和丝状真菌,非选择性和选择性培养基推荐用于所有类型的呼吸道样品,包括肺移植后从pwCF获得的样品。没有关于实验室实践检测的共识建议,表征,并报告金黄色葡萄球菌的小菌落变体(SCV),尽管研究正在进行中,以解决SCV的潜在临床影响。准确鉴定不太常见的革兰氏阴性杆菌,例如,S、麦芽酚,Inquilinus,无色杆菌属,Ralstonia,和潘多拉物种,以及酵母和丝状真菌,建议了解他们的流行病学和临床进口。
    SUMMARYThis guidance presents recommendations for clinical microbiology laboratories for processing respiratory samples from people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). Appropriate processing of respiratory samples is crucial to detect bacterial and fungal pathogens, guide treatment, monitor the epidemiology of cystic fibrosis (CF) pathogens, and assess therapeutic interventions. Thanks to CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulator therapy, the health of pwCF has improved, but as a result, fewer pwCF spontaneously expectorate sputum. Thus, the collection of sputum samples has decreased, while the collection of other types of respiratory samples such as oropharyngeal and bronchoalveolar lavage samples has increased. To optimize the detection of microorganisms, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, and Burkholderia cepacia complex; other less common non-lactose fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, e.g., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Inquilinus, Achromobacter, Ralstonia, and Pandoraea species; and yeasts and filamentous fungi, non-selective and selective culture media are recommended for all types of respiratory samples, including samples obtained from pwCF after lung transplantation. There are no consensus recommendations for laboratory practices to detect, characterize, and report small colony variants (SCVs) of S. aureus, although studies are ongoing to address the potential clinical impact of SCVs. Accurate identification of less common Gram-negative bacilli, e.g., S. maltophilia, Inquilinus, Achromobacter, Ralstonia, and Pandoraea species, as well as yeasts and filamentous fungi, is recommended to understand their epidemiology and clinical importance in pwCF. However, conventional biochemical tests and automated platforms may not accurately identify CF pathogens. MALDI-TOF MS provides excellent genus-level identification, but databases may lack representation of CF pathogens to the species-level. Thus, DNA sequence analysis should be routinely available to laboratories for selected clinical circumstances. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is not recommended for every routine surveillance culture obtained from pwCF, although selective AST may be helpful, e.g., for unusual pathogens or exacerbations unresponsive to initial therapy. While this guidance reflects current care paradigms for pwCF, recommendations will continue to evolve as CF research expands the evidence base for laboratory practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用快速圆盘扩散或改进的自动化抗微生物敏感性测试(AST)系统方法证明了直接来自血液培养物的革兰氏阴性生物体的出色性能。在最近的一项研究中,S.Khan,A.Das,A.米什拉,A.Vidyarthi,etal.(MicrobiolSpectr12:e03081-23,2024,https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03081-23)比较了三种直接来自血液的AST方法与护理盘扩散和自动AST标准的性能。结果表明,在三个协议中,高分类协议和低错误率。该研究表明,本地验证的直接来自血液的AST协议提供可靠和快速的结果,特别是对于资源有限的设置。然而,在实施快速AST协议之前,应考虑本地上下文和工作流程,需要对革兰氏阳性生物体的快速AST方案的性能进行更多的研究。
    The use of rapid disk diffusion or modified automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) system approaches demonstrates excellent performance for gram-negative organisms directly from blood cultures. In a recent study, S. Khan, A. Das, A. Mishra, A. Vidyarthi, et al. (Microbiol Spectr 12:e03081-23, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03081-23) compared the performance of three direct-from-blood AST methods against standard of care disk diffusion and automated AST. The results demonstrated high categorical agreements and low error rates across three protocols. The study suggests that locally validated direct-from-blood AST protocols offer reliable and fast results, particularly for resource-limited settings. However, local context and workflows should be considered prior to implementing rapid AST protocols, and more research is needed on the performance of rapid AST protocols for gram-positive organisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是评估在两家社区教学医院实施BioFire®FilmArray®血液培养鉴定小组后,由于选择的生物体而导致菌血症的最佳治疗时间(TTOT)的变化。与BCID1和BCID2相比,Pre-BCID的TTOT(天数)相似[(2.48vs.2.65,p=0.10);(2.48vs.2.37,p=0.27)]。两组之间有效抗菌治疗的时间没有显着差异。然而,与Pre-BCID组相比,BCID2组的革兰氏阴性菌在革兰氏染色结果后24小时内的治疗变化和适当的碳青霉烯使用明显更多.此外,与Pre-BCID组相比,BCID2组的革兰氏阳性菌万古霉素使用时间显著缩短.这些结果表明,BCID2小组的合并导致了处方实践的变化,导致在一部分患者中使用更合适的抗菌药物。
    The purpose of this study was to assess changes in time to optimal therapy (TTOT) for bacteremia due to select organisms after implementation of the BioFire® FilmArray® blood culture identification panels at two community teaching hospitals. TTOT (days) was similar in Pre-BCID compared to BCID1 and BCID2 [(2.48 vs. 2.65, p=0.10); (2.48 vs. 2.37, p=0.27)]. There were no significant differences in time to effective antimicrobial therapy between groups. However, there were significantly more therapy changes and appropriate carbapenem use within 24 hours of the Gram stain result for gram-negative organisms in the BCID2 arm compared to the Pre-BCID arm. Additionally, a significant reduction in the duration of vancomycin for gram-positive organisms was noted in the BCID2 arm compared to the Pre-BCID arm. These findings suggest that the incorporation of the BCID2 panel resulted in changes in prescribing practices, leading to more appropriate antimicrobial utilization in a subset of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自2002年成立以来,EUCAST抗真菌药敏试验小组委员会(AFST)已开发并完善了酵母药敏试验方法,霉菌和皮肤癣菌,并建立了抗真菌药的流行病学截止值和断点。对于酵母,解决了三个挑战。氟康唑药敏试验中拖尾生长的解释,这已被证明,如果低于50%终点,对疗效没有影响。由于实验室条件,rezafunginMIC测试的可变性,已通过在E.Def7.4中的生长培养基中添加Tween20来解决。第三,对没有断点的稀有酵母的MIC的解释,已经建立了基于MIC的临床建议。对于模具,改进包括验证烟曲霉的分光光度计读数,以促进客观MIC测定,对于皮肤癣菌,建立具有自动读数和选择性培养基的微量稀释方法,以最大程度地减少污染的风险。最近的举措涉及开发和验证基于琼脂的筛选测定法,以检测烟曲霉和曲霉种的潜在唑和棘白菌素抗性,分别,毛癣菌对特比萘芬的抗性。此外,EUCAST分子抗性测试指导文件的开发代表了一种进步,特别是用于鉴定与抗性相关的靶基因改变。总之,EUCASTAFST在标准化AFST和促进临床决策敏感性数据的准确解释方面继续发挥关键作用。采用EUCAST断点用于商业测试方法,然而,需要进行彻底验证,以确保与EUCAST参考测试特定物种的MIC分布保持一致。
    Since its inception in 2002, the EUCAST Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee (AFST) has developed and refined susceptibility testing methods for yeast, moulds and dermatophytes, and established epidemiological cut-off values and breakpoints for antifungals. For yeast, three challenges have been addressed. Interpretation of trailing growth in fluconazole susceptibility testing, which has been proven without impact on efficacy if below the 50% endpoint. Variability in rezafungin MIC testing due to laboratory conditions, which has been solved by the addition of Tween 20 to the growth medium in E.Def 7.4. And third, interpretation of MICs for rare yeast with no breakpoints, where recommendations have been established for MIC-based clinical advice. For moulds, refinements include the validation of spectrophotometer reading for A. fumigatus to facilitate objective MIC determination, and for dermatophytes the establishment of a microdilution method with automated reading and a selective medium to minimise the risk of contaminations. Recent initiatives involve development and validation of agar-based screening assays for detection of potential azole and echinocandin resistance in A. fumigatus and Aspergillus species, respectively, and of terbinafine resistance in Trichophyton species. Moreover, the development of a EUCAST guidance document for molecular resistance testing represents an advancement, particularly for identifying target gene alterations associated with resistance. In summary, EUCAST AFST continues to play a pivotal role in standardizing AFST and facilitating accurate interpretation of susceptibility data for clinical decision-making. Adoption of EUCAST breakpoints for commercial test methods, however, requires thorough validation to ensure concordance with EUCAST reference testing species-specific MIC distributions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    细菌是眼睛浅表感染的主要原因,尤其是儿童。本研究旨在(i)确定2020-2021年期间在20个实验室中回收的眼部细菌病原体的抗菌敏感性模式,以及(ii)将这些结果与2004年,2009年和2015年在德国进行的相同设计的三项研究进行比较。由EUCAST定义的截止值用作断点。总共收集了1366个细菌分离物。最常见的眼部标本是结膜涂片(54.3%)。金黄色葡萄球菌的敏感率(n=594),流感嗜血杆菌(n=178),和肺炎链球菌(n=149)氯霉素,庆大霉素,卡那霉素,新霉素,左氧氟沙星,氧氟沙星,和土霉素各>90%。总的来说,自2004年以来,仅观察到阻力水平的微小变化。因此,所有测试的抗菌药物仍可推荐用于眼表感染的局部治疗。
    Bacteria are a major cause of superficial eye infections, especially in children. The present study aimed to (i) determine the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of ocular bacterial pathogens recovered in 20 laboratories during the period 2020-2021 and (ii) compare these results to those from three studies of the same design conducted in 2004, 2009, and 2015 in Germany. Cut-off values defined by EUCAST were used as breakpoints. A total of 1366 bacterial isolates were collected. The most frequent ocular specimens were conjunctival smears (54.3%). Susceptibility rates of Staphylococcus aureus (n = 594), Haemophilus influenzae (n = 178), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 149) to chloramphenicol, gentamicin, kanamycin, neomycin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and oxytetracycline were >90% each. Overall, only minor changes in resistance levels were observed in the period since 2004. Therefore, all tested antimicrobials can still be recommended for local therapy of ocular surface infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用于评估癌症终生风险和致病变异风险的风险评估模型在西方人群中更常用。使用这些模型,没有验证,对于非西方人口已经被质疑。本研究旨在评估曼彻斯特评分系统作为阿曼人口风险评估模型的使用和一致性。回顾,我们对基因组学部门2年的乳腺癌患者进行了基于文件的分析.使用个人癌症史和家族史来分析409名乳腺癌和/或癌症患者的曼彻斯特评分。结果表明,总的来说,曼彻斯特的得分很低。如果使用此风险评估模型来确定先验服务和基因检测决策的资格,12例BRCA致病病例将被遗漏。此时,曼彻斯特评分系统似乎不是阿曼人口使用的最佳风险评估模型,除非使用≥6的资格阈值,这可以为阿曼人口提供更好的敏感性。我们建议使用曼彻斯特评分模型的概念来创建更适合阿曼和阿拉伯人口的评分系统。
    Risk assessment models that are applied to assess the lifetime risk of cancer and pathogenic variant risk are more commonly used in Western populations. Using these models, without validation, for non-Western populations has been questioned. This study aimed to evaluate the use and consistency of the Manchester Scoring System as a risk assessment model for the Omani population. A retrospective, file-based analysis was performed on breast cancer patients seen in a genomics department over a two-year period. Personal cancer history and family history were used to analyze the Manchester scores of 409 breast and/or cancer patients. The results show that, overall, the Manchester scores were low. If this risk assessment model had been used to determine eligibility for a priori service and genetic testing decisions, 12 BRCA pathogenic cases would have been missed. At this time, the Manchester Scoring System does not seem to be the best risk assessment model for use in the Omani population, unless the eligibility threshold of ≥6 is used, which could provide a better sensitivity for the Omani population. We propose using concepts of the Manchester Scoring model to create a scoring system that is more suitable for the Omani and Arabic population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号