Sufentanil

舒芬太尼
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:胃镜检查是上消化道疾病最常用的诊断方法之一。苯磺酸雷莫唑仑,一种新型的超短作用苯二氮卓类药物,在胃镜检查中研究较少。在这项研究中,我们研究了瑞马唑仑联合丙泊酚用于无痛胃镜检查的有效性和安全性。
    方法:这是一个单中心,安慰剂对照随机对照试验。
    方法:本研究纳入接受无痛胃镜检查的100例患者,随机分为2组(每组50例):对照组(Con组)和瑞马佐兰组(Rem组)。舒芬太尼,remazolam,异丙酚用于麻醉患者,然后,对比分析不同方案对这些患者的影响。病人的一般情况,不同时间的生命体征,异丙酚的剂量(mg)和额外的时间,并发症,胃镜检查时间(分钟),恢复时间(分钟),在恢复室停留的时间(分钟),并记录不良反应。
    结果:Rem组收缩压更稳定(P<0.05)。Rem组的丙泊酚用量较少(P<0.05)。低血压的发生率,心动过缓,Rem组头晕较低,苏醒时间和在恢复室的停留时间均较短(P<0.05)。
    结论:雷唑仑复合舒芬太尼和丙泊酚在无痛胃镜检查中对血流动力学影响较小,患者的觉醒时间更短。
    OBJECTIVE: Gastroscopy is one of the most commonly used diagnostic modalities for upper gastrointestinal disorders. Remazolam besylate, a new type of ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine drug, has been less studied in gastroscopy. In this study, we studied the efficacy and safety of remazolam combined with propofol for painless gastroscopy.
    METHODS: This was a single-center, placebo-controlled randomized trial.
    METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing painless gastroscopy were included in this study and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 50 per group): the control group (Con group) and the remazolam group (Rem group). Sufentanil, remazolam, and propofol were used to anesthetize the patients, and then, the effects of different solutions on these patients were compared and analyzed. The patient\'s general condition, vital signs at different times, the dosage of propofol (mg) and additional times, complications, duration of gastroscopy (minutes), recovery time (minutes), length of stay in the recovery room (minutes), and adverse reactions were recorded.
    RESULTS: Rem group systolic blood pressure was more stable (P < .05). The amount of additional propofol in Rem group was less (P < .05). The incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and dizziness was lower in Rem group, as well as the time of awakening and stay in the recovery room were shorter (P < .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Remazolam combined with sufentanil and propofol has less effect on hemodynamics in painless gastroscopy, and the patients have shorter awakening times.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:雷马唑仑,一种最近开发的麻醉药,其特点是快速和超短效的特性,表现出药理属性,使其可能适合无痛手术流产程序。本研究的目的是确定瑞马唑仑与舒芬太尼联合给药时的有效剂量。目的是在手术流产期间抑制身体运动。此外,次要目标是评估全身麻醉后的恢复情况.
    方法:这项研究共招募了25名年龄在20至40岁之间的健康女性,她们的体重指数在18至28kg/m2之间,处于怀孕的头三个月(长达12周)。和美国麻醉医师协会的地位I和II。通过以0.1μg/kg的剂量施用舒芬太尼开始麻醉诱导。采用改良的Dixon上下法确定每位患者的瑞马唑仑诱导剂量。
    结果:使用中心等渗回归估计,雷米马唑仑对身体运动的抑制作用的50%和95%有效剂量为0.145mg/kg(95%CI:0.115,0.207),和0.242mg/kg(95%CI:0.232,0.620),分别。25人中有5人(20%)经历过打嗝,1名患者持续打嗝,直到手术结束。第一次睁眼的平均时间为51.4±20.5秒,服从口头命令的时间为54.5±20.6秒。到达麻醉后监护室后,95.7%的患者达到改良Aldrete评分≥9。
    结论:当与0.1μg/kg舒芬太尼联合使用时,瑞咪唑安定在手术流产期间抑制身体运动的50%和95%有效剂量为0.145mg/kg和0.242mg/kg,分别。
    BACKGROUND: Remimazolam, a recently developed anesthetic characterized by its rapid and ultra-short-acting properties, exhibits pharmacological attributes that make it potentially suitable for painless surgical abortion procedures. The objective of this study was to determine the effective dose of remimazolam when administered in combination with sufentanil, with the intention of inhibiting body movement during surgical abortion. Additionally, a secondary objective was to assess the recovery profile from general anesthesia.
    METHODS: The study enrolled a total of 25 healthy women aged 20 to 40, with a body mass index between 18 and 28 kg/m2, in their first trimester of pregnancy (up to 12 weeks), and American Society of Anesthesiologists status I and II. Anesthesia induction was initiated by administering sufentanil at a dose of 0.1 μg/kg. The modified Dixon up-and-down method was employed to determine the induction dose of remimazolam for each patient.
    RESULTS: The 50% and 95% effective dose of remimazolam for inhibitory effects of body movement was estimated using centered isotonic regression to be 0.145 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.115, 0.207), and 0.242 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.232, 0.620), respectively. Five out of 25 (20%) experienced hiccups, with 1 patient having persistent hiccups until the end of the surgery. The mean time to first eye-opening was 51.4 ± 20.5 seconds, and the time to obey verbal command was 54.5 ± 20.6 seconds. Upon arrival at the postanesthesia care unit, 95.7% of the patients achieved a Modified Aldrete score ≥ 9.
    CONCLUSIONS: The 50% and 95% effective dose of remimazolam for inhibiting body movement during surgical abortion when used in combination with 0.1 μg/kg of sufentanil were 0.145 mg/kg and 0.242 mg/kg, respectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:丙泊酚是无痛胃肠镜检查的主要镇静剂,有降低血压和呼吸抑制的高风险。雷马唑仑(一种短效苯二氮卓类药物)由于起效迅速,有望广泛用于无痛胃肠镜检查,快速代谢和轻微的呼吸和循环抑制。
    方法:随机,单盲,平行,对照研究,123例门诊患者接受无痛结肠镜检查,随机分为A组,B和C,杭州市第一人民医院,2021年7月-12月。所有患者均静脉注射5µg舒芬太尼进行镇痛预处理。A组由0.2mg/kg的苯磺酸瑞米唑仑诱导。B组采用0.25mg/kg的苯磺酸瑞咪唑安定诱导。C组采用丙泊酚2.0mg/kg诱导。如果患者肢体运动或MOAA/S评分>3等,A组和B组分别以2.5mg/次的剂量加入苯磺酸瑞米唑仑,C组以0.5mg/kg/次的剂量加入丙泊酚乳剂注射液,根据实际情况,在实验组中,每添加2.5mg的雷米唑仑,对照组丙泊酚为0.5mg/kg。心率(HR)无创血压(BP),呼吸频率(RR),脉搏氧饱和度(SpO2),并记录患者从进入内镜室到离开麻醉恢复室的提高的警惕性/镇静评分(MOAA/S),还包括围手术期不良事件,其他药物或治疗,患者醒来离开医院的时间。
    结果:3组诱导成功率为100%。三组间镇静完成率无显著性差异(A组:90.2%,B组:92.7%,C组:92.7%,P=1.000)。给药后不良事件发生率:A组(27.0%)、B组(36.8%)均低于C组(71.0%),P<0.001;A组与B组比较差异无统计学意义,P>0.744;三组受试者从最后一次给药达到出院标准的平均时间如下:A组(16.2min)和B组(16.5min)的平均时间均短于C组(19.6min),P=0.001;A组与B组比较差异无统计学意义。P=0.742。
    结论:这项研究表明,瑞米唑仑是一种安全有效的结肠镜镇静药物,雷米唑仑的安全性优于异丙酚,初始剂量为0.25mg/kg的瑞马唑仑的镇静效果最佳。
    背景:中国临床试验中心,注册号:2100052615,02/11/2021。
    BACKGROUND: The main sedative which is propofol in painless gastroenteroscopy, has a high risk of reducing blood pressure and respiratory depression. Remimazolam (a short-acting benzodiazepine) is expected to be widely used in painless gastroenteroscopy due to its rapid onset, rapid metabolism and light respiratory and circulation inhibition.
    METHODS: A randomized, single-blind, parallel, controlled study, 123 outpatients who were undergoing painless colonoscopy and ramdomly divided into group A, B and C, in Hangzhou First People\'s Hospital, July-December 2021. All patients were intravenously injected with 5 µg sufentanil for analgesic preconditioning. The group A was induced by 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam besylate. The group B was induced by 0.25 mg/kg remimazolam besylate. And the group C was inducted by 2.0 mg /kg propofol. If the patients had limb movement or MOAA/S score > 3 and so on, remimazolam besylate was added at 2.5 mg/ time in group A and B, and propofol emulsion injection was added at 0.5 mg/kg/ time in group C. During the operation, according to the actual situation, remimazolam was per added 2.5 mg in the experimental group, and propofol was 0.5 mg/kg in the control group. Heart rate (HR), non-invasive blood pressure (BP), respiratory rate (RR), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), and improved vigilance/sedation score (MOAA/S) of patients was recorded from entering endoscopy room to get out of the anesthesia recovery room, also including perioperative adverse events, other medications or treatments, the time of patients waking up and leaving the hospital.
    RESULTS: The successful rate of induction in three groups was 100%. There was no significant difference in the sedation completion rate among the three groups (Group A:90.2%, Group B: 92.7%, Group C: 92.7%, P = 1.000). The rate of adverse events after administration: group A(27.0%) and B(36.8%) both lower than group C(71.0%),P < 0.001;There was no significant difference between group A and group B, P > 0.744;The average time from the last drug administration to meet the discharge criteria of the subjects in three groups was as follows: The average time of group A(16.2 min) and Group B(16.5 min) both shorter than group C(19.6 min), P = 0.001; There was no significant difference between group A and group B, P = 0.742.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that remimazolam is a safe and effective medication for colonoscopy sedation, the security of remimazolam is better than propofol, and the sedative effect with the initial dose of 0.25 mg/kg of remimazolam is optimal.
    BACKGROUND: China Clinical Trial Center with registration number: 2100052615,02/11/2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评价瑞芬太尼预处理对全身麻醉诱导时舒芬太尼诱发咳嗽的影响。
    方法:这项实验研究是以单中心为中心进行的,随机化,平行组试验。
    方法:将120例择期手术患者随机分为两组(瑞芬太尼和对照组)。记录两组患者在全身麻醉诱导期间给予舒芬太尼后咳嗽的发生率和严重程度。平均动脉压,心率,在T1(注射瑞芬太尼或生理盐水之前)记录脉搏氧饱和度,T2(瑞芬太尼给药后1分钟),T3(插管前),和T4(插管后1分钟)。此外,不良事件的发生率,包括头晕,恶心,呼吸暂停,截断刚度,心动过缓,或其他不良反应也被记录。
    结果:与对照组相比,瑞芬太尼组舒芬太尼诱发咳嗽的发生率明显降低(5.0%vs35.0%,分别;P<.001)。平均动脉压没有发现统计学差异,心率,脉搏氧饱和度,两组在T1,T2,T3和T4时其他副作用的发生率(P>.05)。
    结论:使用0.5mcg/kg剂量的瑞芬太尼预处理可以有效和安全地抑制舒芬太尼引起的咳嗽的发生率和严重程度,为全麻诱导过程中的用药提供参考。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of remifentanil pretreatment on sufentanil-induced cough during general anesthesia induction.
    METHODS: This experimental research was conducted as a single-center, randomized, parallel-group trial.
    METHODS: A total of 120 patients scheduled for elective surgery were equally randomized into two groups (remifentanil and control). The incidence and severity of coughing in both groups were recorded after sufentanil administration during general anesthesia induction. The mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and pulse oxygen saturation were recorded at T1 (before the injection of remifentanil or normal saline), T2 (1 minute after remifentanil administration), T3 (before intubation), and T4 (1 minute after intubation). Additionally, the incidences of adverse events, including dizziness, nausea, apnea, truncal rigidity, bradycardia, or other adverse effects were also recorded.
    RESULTS: The incidence of sufentanil-induced cough in the remifentanil group was significantly decreased when compared with the control group (5.0% vs 35.0%, respectively; P < .001). No statistical differences were found in mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation, and the incidences of other side effects between the two groups at T1, T2, T3, and T4 (P > .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with remifentanil at a dose of 0.5 mcg/kg can effectively and safely suppress the incidence and severity of sufentanil-induced coughing, providing a reference for medication during general anesthesia induction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:术后疼痛管理和认知功能保留对于接受胸腔镜肺癌(LC)手术的患者至关重要。这是使用胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)或基于舒芬太尼(SUF)的多模式镇痛来实现的。然而,两者联合使用对术后疼痛和术后认知功能障碍(POCD)的疗效和影响尚不清楚.
    目的:探讨TPVB联合SUF为基础的多模式镇痛在胸腔镜根治术LC患者中的镇痛效果及对POCD的影响,以优化术后疼痛管理,改善患者预后。
    方法:本回顾性分析纳入郑州大学附属肿瘤医院和河南省肿瘤医院2021年5月至2023年1月行胸腔镜下LC根治术的107例患者。将接受基于SUF的多模式镇痛的患者(n=50)和接受基于TPVB+SUF的多模式镇痛的患者(n=57)分为对照组和TPVB组,分别。我们比较了两组患者在术后2、12和24h休息和咳嗽时的Ramsay镇静量表和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。血清肾上腺素水平(E),血管紧张素II(AngII),去甲肾上腺素(NE),超氧化物歧化酶(SOD),血管内皮生长因子(VEGF),转化生长因子-β1(TGF-β1),肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α),术前和术后24h测定S-100钙结合蛋白β(S-100β)。在手术前1天以及手术后3天和5天进行简易精神状态检查(MMSE),术后5天监测POCD的发生情况。还记录了不良反应。
    结果:没有明显的时间点,组间,两组Ramsay镇静评分及交互作用(P>0.05)。重要的是,有显著的时间点效应,组间差异,静息和咳嗽时VAS评分的交互作用(P<0.05)。术后12、24h静息及咳嗽时的VAS评分均低于术后2h,且随着术后时间的增加而逐渐降低(P<0.05)。TPVB组术后2、12、24h的VAS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。TPVB组术后第1天和第3天的MMSE评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。术后5d内TPVB组POCD发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组均有血清E升高,AngII,术后24h血清SOD水平与术前相比降低,TPVB组各项指标均较好(P<0.05)。血清VEGF水平显著升高,TGF-β1,TNF-α,两组术后24h观察S-100β,TPVB组低于对照组(P<0.05)。
    结论:TPVB联合SUF为基础的多模式镇痛进一步缓解了胸腔镜下LC根治术患者的疼痛,增强镇痛效果,减少术后应激反应,并抑制术后血清VEGF的增加,TGF-β1,TNF-α,和S-100β水平。该方案还降低了POCD并具有高安全性。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management and cognitive function preservation are crucial for patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer (LC). This is achieved using either a thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) or sufentanil (SUF)-based multimodal analgesia. However, the efficacy and impact of their combined use on postoperative pain and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) remain unclear.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the analgesic effect and the influence on POCD of TPVB combined with SUF-based multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for LC to help optimize postoperative pain management and improve patient outcomes.
    METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 107 patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for LC at The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital between May 2021 and January 2023. Patients receiving SUF-based multimodal analgesia (n = 50) and patients receiving TPVB + SUF-based multimodal analgesia (n = 57) were assigned to the control group and TPVB group, respectively. We compared the Ramsay Sedation Scale and visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and with cough between the two groups at 2, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Serum levels of epinephrine (E), angio-tensin II (Ang II), norepinephrine (NE), superoxide dismutase (SOD), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and S-100 calcium-binding protein β (S-100β) were measured before and 24 h after surgery. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was administered 1 day before surgery and at 3 and 5 days after surgery, and the occurrence of POCD was monitored for 5 days after surgery. Adverse reactions were also recorded.
    RESULTS: There were no significant time point, between-group, and interaction effects in Ramsay sedation scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). Significantly, there were notable time point effects, between-group differences, and interaction effects observed in VAS scores both at rest and with cough (P < 0.05). The VAS scores at rest and with cough at 12 and 24 h after surgery were lower than those at 2 h after surgery and gradually decreased as postoperative time increased (P < 0.05). The TPVB group had lower VAS scores than the control group at 2, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). The MMSE scores at postoperative days 1 and 3 were markedly higher in the TPVB group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of POCD was significantly lower in the TPVB group than in the control group within 5 days after surgery (P < 0.05). Both groups had elevated serum E, Ang II, and NE and decreased serum SOD levels at 24 h after surgery compared with the preoperative levels, with better indices in the TPVB group (P < 0.05). Marked elevations in serum levels of VEGF, TGF-β1, TNF-α, and S-100β were observed in both groups at 24 h after surgery, with lower levels in the TPVB group than in the control group (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: TPVB combined with SUF-based multimodal analgesia further relieves pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical surgery for LC, enhances analgesic effects, reduces postoperative stress response, and inhibits postoperative increases in serum VEGF, TGF-β1, TNF-α, and S-100β levels. This scheme also reduced POCD and had a high safety profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    支气管镜检查是一种常见的临床诊断方法。然而,由于其独特的操作特点,该程序通常会引起患者的不适和疼痛。舒芬太尼和纳美芬的联合使用在有效逆转阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制而不损害镇痛效果方面具有优势。然而,关于在支气管镜检查中联合使用不同剂量舒芬太尼和纳美芬的综合分析报告尚未报道。本课题旨在探讨不同剂量舒芬太尼复合纳美芬在支气管镜检查中的应用效果。
    使用基于计算机和手动的方法检索相关关键字,我们搜索了PubMed的数据库,Embase,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),和万方自始至今寻找评价不同剂量舒芬太尼联合纳美芬在支气管镜检查中应用效果的研究。对纳入研究的质量进行了评估,采用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。
    总共六篇英语文章,包括随机对照试验和综述,由774名参与者组成,最终被包括在内。对照组采用常规治疗,干预组采用不同剂量舒芬太尼联合纳美芬。Meta分析结果表明,与常规治疗相比,这种方法显着改善了生命体征,如收缩压[SBP;平均差异(MD)=21.44,P<1×10-5]和舒张压(DBP;MD=22.52,P<1×10-5),心率(HR;MD=25.16,P<1×10-5),和氧饱和度(SpO2;MD=30.16,P<1×10-5)。共有4项研究集中在镇静作用上,舒芬太尼联合纳美芬明显优于常规治疗(P<1×10-5)。不良事件分析表明,与对照组相比,联合治疗在高血压和心动过速发生率方面具有更好的效果(P<0.001,P<1×10-5)。Riker镇静-躁动评分(SAS评分)显著降低(P<0.05)。然而,其他不良事件比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。亚组分析显示,与0.2和0.8µg/kg相比,舒芬太尼浓度为0.4µg/kg时的不良反应较少,只有高血压有显著差异。
    在临床实践中,考虑使用舒芬太尼联合纳美芬可以改善患者在支气管镜检查期间的体验。然而,应该注意的是,这种方法可能不适合所有患者,临床医生需要根据患者情况和个体差异选择合适的镇痛和镇静方法进行支气管镜检查。此外,重要的是要认识到这项研究有一些局限性,需要进一步的研究来评估这种方法在其他类型的内窥镜检查中的有效性和安全性,以及比较不同药物组合的效果和安全性。
    UNASSIGNED: Bronchoscopy examination is a common clinical diagnostic method. However, due to its unique operational characteristics, the procedure often induces discomfort and pain in patients. The combined use of sufentanil and nalmefene offers advantages in effectively reversing opioid-induced respiratory depression without compromising analgesic effects. However, a comprehensive analysis report on the combined use of different doses of sufentanil and nalmefene in bronchoscopy examinations has not been reported. The aim of this subject is to investigate the application effects of different doses of sufentanil combined with nalmefene in bronchoscopy.
    UNASSIGNED: Using computer-based and manual methods to retrieve relevant keywords, we searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang from inception to the present to find studies evaluating the application effects of different doses of sufentanil combined with nalmefene in bronchoscopy examinations. The quality of the included studies was assessed, and meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of six English-language articles, involving randomized controlled trials and reviews, and comprising 774 participants, were finally included. The control group used conventional therapy, whereas the intervention group used different doses of sufentanil combined with nalmefene. Meta-analysis results indicated that compared to conventional therapy, this approach significantly improved vital signs such as systolic blood pressure [SBP; mean difference (MD) =21.44, P<1×10-5] and diastolic blood pressure (DBP; MD =22.52, P<1×10-5), heart rate (HR; MD =25.16, P<1×10-5), and oxygen saturation (SpO2; MD =30.16, P<1×10-5). A total of 4 studies focused on sedative effects, and that of sufentanil combined with nalmefene was significantly superior to conventional therapy (P<1×10-5). Analysis of adverse events showed that the combined therapy had better outcomes in terms of hypertension and tachycardia incidence compared to the control group (P<0.001, P<1×10-5), and Riker sedation-agitation scale (SAS score) was significantly reduced (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in other adverse events (P>0.05). Subgroup analysis showed fewer adverse reactions at 0.4 µg/kg sufentanil concentration compared to 0.2 and 0.8 µg/kg, with only hypertension differing significantly.
    UNASSIGNED: In clinical practice, considering the use of sufentanil combined with nalmefene can improve patients\' experience during bronchoscopy examinations. However, it should be noted that this approach may not be suitable for all patients, and clinicians need to choose appropriate analgesic and sedative methods for bronchoscopy examinations based on patients\' conditions and individual differences. Furthermore, it is important to recognize that this study has some limitations and further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this approach in other types of endoscopic examinations, as well as to compare the effects and safety of different drug combinations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高剂量的长效阿片类药物用于促进非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术,这可能导致术后阿片类药物相关的不良事件。据报道,经皮穴位电刺激(TEAS)可有效减少手术过程中阿片类药物的消耗。这项研究的目的是评估不同穴位的TEAS是否可以减少阿片类镇痛药的剂量。
    方法:这是一个多中心,随机化,控制,双盲审判.纳入在全身麻醉下接受非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者。符合条件的患者被随机平均分组为假针刺组(n=105),区域穴位组合组(n=105),或远端-近端穴位组合组(n=105)使用集中的计算机生成的随机系统。麻醉诱导前应用经皮穴位电刺激30min。主要结果是麻醉期间舒芬太尼的剂量。次要结果包括24小时内最高的术后血管活性-正性肌力评分,术中丙泊酚消耗,机械通气的长度,心脏监护病房的持续时间和术后住院时间,术后并发症的发生率,手术后30天内死亡率。
    结果:在315名随机患者中,313完成了审判。在修改后的意向治疗分析中,远端-近端穴位组的舒芬太尼剂量为303.9(10.8)μg,明显低于假手术组,平均差为-34.9(-64.9至-4.9)μg,p=0.023。远端-近端组的舒芬太尼消耗量低于区域组(303.9vs.339.5),平均差异为-35.5(-65.6至-5.5)μg,p=0.020。与区域组和假手术组相比,远端-近端组的阿片类药物消耗量减少了10%。三组之间的次要结果具有可比性。
    结论:经皮穴位电刺激与远端-近端穴位组合,与局部穴位组合和假针刺相比,在接受非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者中,舒芬太尼的消耗量显著减少.
    BACKGROUND: High doses of long-acting opioids were used to facilitate off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting procedure, which may result in opioid-related adverse events after surgery. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) had been reported to be effective in reducing intraoperative opioids consumption during surgery. The aim of this study is to assess whether TEAS with difference acupoints can reduce the doses of opioid analgesics.
    METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Patients underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting under general anesthesia were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomly and equally grouped into sham acupuncture group (n = 105), regional acupoints combination group (n = 105), or distal-proximal acupoints combination group (n = 105) using a centralized computer-generated randomization system. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation was applied for 30 min before anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the doses of sufentanil during anesthesia. Secondary outcomes included the highest postoperative vasoactive-inotropic scores within 24 h, intraoperative propofol consumption, length of mechanical ventilation, duration of cardiac care unit and postoperative hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and mortality within 30 days after surgery.
    RESULTS: Of the 315 randomized patients, 313 completed the trial. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, the doses of sufentanil were 303.9 (10.8) μg in the distal-proximal acupoints group, significantly lower than the sham group, and the mean difference was - 34.9 (- 64.9 to - 4.9) μg, p = 0.023. The consumption of sufentanil was lower in distal-proximal group than regional group (303.9 vs. 339.5), and mean difference was - 35.5 (- 65.6 to - 5.5) μg, p = 0.020. The distal-proximal group showed 10% reduction in opioids consumption comparing to both regional and sham groups. Secondary outcomes were comparable among three groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation with distal-proximal acupoints combination, compared to regional acupoints combination and sham acupuncture, significantly reduced sufentanil consumption in patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨不同剂量右美托咪定复合舒芬太尼对儿童Salter截骨术后发育性髋关节脱位的镇痛效果。
    98例发育性髋关节脱位患儿的临床资料,在2020年1月至2023年2月期间在我们中心接受了Salter截骨术的患者入选.根据应用自控静脉镇痛(舒芬太尼+格拉司琼±右美托咪定)将患儿随机分为4组。所有儿童接受1µg/kg/天的舒芬太尼和3mg格拉司琼。A组未接受右美托咪定,B组,C,D接受0.5、0.75和1.0µg/kg/天的右美托咪定,分别。比较各组患儿疼痛指标及免疫因子水平。
    C、D组术后2h心率(HR)和呼吸频率(RR)均显著低于A、B组(P<0.05)。所有组的疼痛评分在治疗后随时间下降。当在同一时间点比较时,D组儿童疼痛评分最低,显著低于其他三组(P<0.05)。C、D组舒芬太尼总消耗量明显低于A组(P<0.05)。手术后的第一天,D组儿童血清促肾上腺皮质激素水平较低,白细胞介素-6、皮质酮高于A组(P<0.05)。
    右美托咪定联合舒芬太尼1.0µg/kg/天用于Salter截骨术后静脉自控镇痛对儿童发育性髋关节脱位有较好的镇痛效果,减少舒芬太尼的消耗,阿片类药物不良反应发生率低。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil on postoperative analgesia in developmental hip dislocation in children after Salter osteotomy.
    UNASSIGNED: The clinical data of 98 children with developmental hip dislocation, who underwent Salter osteotomy in our center between January 2020 and February 2023, were selected. The children were randomly divided into four groups based on the application of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (sufentanil + granisetron ± dexmedetomidine). All children received 1 µg/kg/day of sufentanil and 3 mg of granisetron. Group A did not receive dexmedetomidine, and Groups B, C, and D received 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 µg/kg/day of dexmedetomidine, respectively. The pain indicators and immune factor levels of children in each group were compared.
    UNASSIGNED: The heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) 2 h after operation in Groups C and D were significantly lower than those in Groups A and B (P < 0.05). The pain scores decreased over time after treatment in all groups. When compared at the same time point, children in Group D had the lowest pain scores, which were significantly lower than the other three groups (P < 0.05). The total consumption of sufentanil in Groups C and D was significantly lower than that in Group A (P < 0.05). On the first day after surgery, the children in Group D had lower levels of serum adrenocorticotropic hormone, interleukin-6, and corticosterone than those in Group A (P < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Administration of 1.0 µg/kg/day of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil in intravenous controlled analgesia after Salter osteotomy for developmental hip dislocation in children has a better analgesic effect, less consumption of sufentanil, and low incidence of opioid adverse reactions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非小细胞癌(NSCLC)是世界上最常见的癌症,但其有效的治疗方法有限。Tilianin和舒芬太尼缓解了各种人类肿瘤。本研究旨在阐明替立宁和舒芬太尼在非小细胞肺癌中的作用及机制。Tilianin和舒芬太尼对NSCLC细胞活力的作用,凋亡,线粒体功能障碍,使用细胞计数试剂盒-8测定法检查体外免疫,流式细胞术,活性氧水平分析,CD8+T细胞百分比分析,蛋白质印迹,和酶联免疫吸附测定,分别。用Westernblot方法评估替立宁和舒芬太尼在非小细胞肺癌中调节的分子机制,和免疫荧光分析。同时,替立宁和舒芬太尼在非小细胞肺癌肿瘤生长中的作用,凋亡,并通过建立肿瘤异种移植小鼠模型测定体内免疫力,免疫组织化学,和蛋白质印迹分析。当舒芬太尼浓度接近2nM时,NSCLC细胞活力抑制率为50%。A549细胞的IC50为2.36nM,H1299细胞的IC50为2.18nM。Tilianin对A549细胞的IC50为38.7μM,Tilianin对H1299细胞的IC50为44.6μM。功能上,0.5nM舒芬太尼和10μMTilianin以剂量依赖性方式降低NSCLC细胞(A549和H1299)活力。此外,0.5nM舒芬太尼和10μMTilianin增强NSCLC细胞凋亡,然而,这种影响在Tilianin和舒芬太尼联合使用后得到加强.此外,0.5nM舒芬太尼和10μMTilianin抑制NSCLC细胞线粒体功能障碍和免疫,这些影响在Tilianin和舒芬太尼联合用药后得到增强.机械上,0.5nM舒芬太尼和10μMTilianin抑制NSCLC细胞中的NF-κB通路,而这种抑制在联合使用Tilianin和舒芬太尼后得到加强。体内实验数据进一步阐明,1µg/kg舒芬太尼和10mg/kgTilianin降低了NSCLC的生长,豁免权,和NF-κB通路相关蛋白水平,然而,在Tilianin和舒芬太尼联合用药后,这些趋势得到了增强.Tilianin增强舒芬太尼对NSCLC的抗肿瘤作用。
    Non-small cell cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cancer in the world, but its effective therapeutic methods are limited. Tilianin and sufentanil alleviate various human tumors. This research aimed to clarify the functions and mechanisms of Tilianin and sufentanil in NSCLC. The functions of Tilianin and sufentanil on NSCLC cell viability, apoptosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, and immunity in vitro were examined using Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, flow cytometry, reactive oxygen species level analysis, CD8+ T cell percentage analysis, Western blot, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. The molecular mechanism regulated by Tilianin and sufentanil in NSCLC was assessed using Western blot, and immunofluorescence assays. Meanwhile, the roles of Tilianin and sufentanil in NSCLC tumor growth, apoptosis, and immunity in vivo were determined by establishing a tumor xenograft mouse model, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot assays. When sufentanil concentration was proximity 2 nM, the inhibition rate of NSCLC cell viability was 50%. The IC50 for A549 cells was 2.36 nM, and the IC50 for H1299 cells was 2.18 nM. The IC50 of Tilianin for A549 cells was 38.7 μM, and the IC50 of Tilianin for H1299 cells was 44.6 μM. Functionally, 0.5 nM sufentanil and 10 μM Tilianin reduced NSCLC cell (A549 and H1299) viability in a dose-dependent manner. Also, 0.5 nM sufentanil and 10 μM Tilianin enhanced NSCLC cell apoptosis, yet this impact was strengthened after a combination of Tilianin and Sufentanil. Furthermore, 0.5 nM sufentanil and 10 μM Tilianin repressed NSCLC cell mitochondrial dysfunction and immunity, and these impacts were enhanced after a combination of Tilianin and Sufentanil. Mechanistically, 0.5 nM sufentanil and 10 μM Tilianin repressed the NF-κB pathway in NSCLC cells, while this repression was strengthened after a combination of Tilianin and Sufentanil. In vivo experimental data further clarified that 1 µg/kg sufentanil and 10 mg/kg Tilianin reduced NSCLC growth, immunity, and NF-κB pathway-related protein levels, yet these trends were enhanced after a combination of Tilianin and Sufentanil. Tilianin strengthened the antitumor effect of sufentanil in NSCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管阿片类药物广泛用于治疗严重疼痛,其全身给药导致副作用。在为应对不良反应而开发的皮下和透皮给药系统中,微针由于动作迅速而引起了人们的注意,高药物生物利用度,和改善的渗透性。SUF是用于治疗严重疼痛的有效的可注射阿片类药物。在这项研究中,我们使用可溶性微针研究了SUF的镇痛作用。
    SUF聚合物可溶性微针通过模具铸造方法构造,并通过SEM和FTIR分析表征。还使用质构分析仪研究了其机械强度。体外应用荧光显微术测量微针阵列的穿透深度。刺激和微通道关闭时间,药物释放概况,和血液相容性试验进行微针效率的验证。还使用热板测试来研究微针在动物模型中的镇痛作用。
    通过溶解微针局部施用SUF具有有效的镇痛作用。给药后一小时,皮下和微针组之间没有显着差异,和机械性能在可接受的范围内。
    与传统方法相比,Microneedling是立即缓解疼痛的有效策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite the widespread use of opioids to manage severe pain, its systemic administration results in side effects. Among the subcutaneous and transdermal drug delivery systems developed to deal with adverse effects, microneedles have drawn attention due to their rapid action, high drug bioavailability, and improved permeability. SUF is an effective injectable opioid for treating severe pain. In this study, we investigated the analgesic effects of SUF using dissolvable microneedles.
    UNASSIGNED: SUF polymeric dissolvable microneedles were constructed through the mold casting method and characterized by SEM and FTIR analysis. Its mechanical strength was also investigated using a texture analyzer. Fluorescence microscopy was applied in vitro to measure the penetration depth of microneedle arrays. Irritation and microchannel closure time, drug release profile, and hemocompatibility test were conducted for the validation of microneedle efficiency. Hot plate test was also used to investigate the analgesic effect of microneedle in an animal model.
    UNASSIGNED: Local administration of SUF via dissolving microneedles had an effective analgesic impact. One hour after administration, there was no significant difference between the subcutaneous and the microneedle groups, and the mechanical properties were within acceptable limits.
    UNASSIGNED: Microneedling is an effective strategy in immediate pain relief compared to the traditional methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号