Subjective cognitive decline

主观认知衰退
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为阿尔茨海默氏症的潜在临床前阶段,主观认知功能下降(SCD)显示未来认知功能下降和转化为痴呆的风险更高.然而,目前尚不清楚SCD状态是否会增加淀粉样蛋白沉积背景下老年人的临床进展,脑血管疾病(CeVD),和精神症状。我们确定了99个正常对照(NC),15名SCD个体在未来2年内发展为轻度认知障碍(P-SCD),和ADNI数据库中54名SCD患者(S-SCD)的基线和2年随访数据。总白质高强度(WMH),深部(DWMH)和脑室周围(PWMH)区域的WMH,各组之间比较了逐体素灰质体积。此外,使用结构方程建模方法,我们构建了路径模型来纵向探索SCD相关的大脑变化,并确定基线SCD状态,年龄,抑郁症状影响参与者的临床结局。两组均显示较高的基线淀粉样蛋白PETSUVR,基线PWMH卷,与NC相比,PWMH体积随时间的增加更大。相比之下,与NC相比,仅P-SCD具有较高的基线DWMH体积和随时间增加较大的DWMH体积.在NC中没有观察到灰质体积和淀粉样蛋白的纵向差异,S-SCD,P-SCD我们的路径模型表明,SCD状态有助于未来的WMH进展。Further,基线SCD状态会增加未来认知能力下降的风险,由PWMH介导;基线抑郁症状直接影响临床结局。总之,S-SCD和P-SCD均表现出比NC更严重的CeVD。在P-SCD中CeVD负荷增加更为明显。与抑郁症状与痴呆严重程度进展的直接关联相反,SCD状态对未来认知功能减退的影响可能通过CeVD病理表现出来.我们的工作强调了多模态纵向设计在理解SCD轨迹异质性方面的重要性,为临床前阶段的分层和早期干预铺平了道路。实践要点:与NC相比,S-SCD和P-SCD在基线时表现出更严重的CeVD和更大的CeVD负荷增加,而P-SCD的负担更为明显。基线SCD状态增加了未来PWMH和DWMH体积累积的风险,由基线PWMH和DWMH体积介导,分别。基线SCD状态会增加未来认知能力下降的风险,由基线PWMH介导,而基线抑郁状态直接影响临床结局。
    As a potential preclinical stage of Alzheimer\'s dementia, subjective cognitive decline (SCD) reveals a higher risk of future cognitive decline and conversion to dementia. However, it has not been clear whether SCD status increases the clinical progression of older adults in the context of amyloid deposition, cerebrovascular disease (CeVD), and psychiatric symptoms. We identified 99 normal controls (NC), 15 SCD individuals who developed mild cognitive impairment in the next 2 years (P-SCD), and 54 SCD individuals who did not (S-SCD) from ADNI database with both baseline and 2-year follow-up data. Total white matter hyperintensity (WMH), WMH in deep (DWMH) and periventricular (PWMH) regions, and voxel-wise grey matter volumes were compared among groups. Furthermore, using structural equation modelling method, we constructed path models to explore SCD-related brain changes longitudinally and to determine whether baseline SCD status, age, and depressive symptoms affect participants\' clinical outcomes. Both SCD groups showed higher baseline amyloid PET SUVR, baseline PWMH volumes, and larger increase of PWMH volumes over time than NC. In contrast, only P-SCD had higher baseline DWMH volumes and larger increase of DWMH volumes over time than NC. No longitudinal differences in grey matter volume and amyloid was observed among NC, S-SCD, and P-SCD. Our path models demonstrated that SCD status contributed to future WMH progression. Further, baseline SCD status increases the risk of future cognitive decline, mediated by PWMH; baseline depressive symptoms directly contribute to clinical outcomes. In conclusion, both S-SCD and P-SCD exhibited more severe CeVD than NC. The CeVD burden increase was more pronounced in P-SCD. In contrast with the direct association of depressive symptoms with dementia severity progression, the effects of SCD status on future cognitive decline may manifest via CeVD pathologies. Our work highlights the importance of multi-modal longitudinal designs in understanding the SCD trajectory heterogeneity, paving the way for stratification and early intervention in the preclinical stage. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Both S-SCD and P-SCD exhibited more severe CeVD at baseline and a larger increase of CeVD burden compared to NC, while the burden was more pronounced in P-SCD. Baseline SCD status increases the risk of future PWMH and DWMH volume accumulation, mediated by baseline PWMH and DWMH volumes, respectively. Baseline SCD status increases the risk of future cognitive decline, mediated by baseline PWMH, while baseline depression status directly contributes to clinical outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:生殖激素可能影响认知功能减退的病程。我们研究了男性和女性内源性生殖激素与主观认知下降(SCD)评分之间的关系。
    方法:采用横断面研究设计,采用平阴队列研究的基线数据,涉及1943名45-70岁的参与者。雌激素(E2),睾丸激素,测量女性的卵泡刺激素(FSH)和黄体生成素(LH),测量男性的E2和睾丸激素。我们将荷尔蒙分为三个低水平,中级和高级。收集9项主观认知功能减退问卷(SCD-Q9)评分,评估SCD症状。多变量逻辑回归模型用于估计分类激素水平和SCD状态之间的比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CI)。还使用多变量线性回归模型。
    结果:总体而言,1943名参与者参与其中,1285名(66.1%)为女性。基线时的平均年龄为59.1(标准偏差7.1)岁。与低睾酮水平的女性相比,高睾酮水平的女性患SCD的可能性更高(OR1.43,95%CI1.01-2.05)。睾酮水平高(0.59,0.35-0.98)和睾酮/E2比值高(0.55,0.33-0.90)的男性与患SCD的几率降低有关。睾酮每增加一个单位与男性SCD评分降低相关[(β:-.029,95%CI(-0.052,-0.007)]。
    结论:激素水平与SCD异常之间存在性别特异性关系。女性睾丸激素水平较高的人可能会增加患SCD的可能性。睾酮水平较高和睾酮/E2比值较高的男性可能与SCD的可能性降低有关。内源性生殖激素水平及其动态变化在认知功能中的作用有待进一步研究。
    OBJECTIVE: Reproductive hormones might impact disease course in cognitive decline. We examined the association between male and female endogenous reproductive hormones and subjective cognitive decline (SCD) score.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used with baseline data from the Pingyin cohort study, involving 1943 participants aged 45-70 years. Oestrogen (E2), testosterone, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were measured in females and E2 and testosterone were measured in males. We categorised hormones into three levels of low, intermediate and high level. The 9-item subjective cognitive decline questionnaire (SCD-Q9) scores were collected to assess the symptoms of SCD. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between categorised hormone levels and SCD status. Multivariable linear regression models were also used.
    RESULTS: Overall, 1943 participants were involved and 1285 (66.1%) were female. The mean age at baseline was 59.1 (standard deviation 7.1) years. Women with high testosterone levels had a higher probability of having SCD compared with those with low testosterone levels (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.01-2.05). Men with a high level of testosterone (0.59, 0.35-0.98) and high testosterone/E2 ratio (0.55, 0.33-0.90) were related to decreased chances of having SCD. Each one-unit increase of testosterone was linked to reduced SCD score in males [(β: -.029, 95% CI (-0.052, -0.007)].
    CONCLUSIONS: There was sex-specific relationship between hormone levels and SCD abnormal. Those with higher testosterone levels in females may increase likelihood of experiencing SCD. Males with higher testosterone levels and higher testosterone/E2 ratio may be associated with reduced likelihood of SCD. The roles of endogenous reproductive hormone levels and their dynamic changes in cognitive function need further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:主观认知功能下降(SCD)的研究标准排除了轻度认知障碍(MCI),但不规定使用特定的MCI标准。本研究比较了不同的定义方法(即,排除)MCI在确定SCD期间,重点关注SCD对痴呆发病率的影响。
    方法:这项队列研究利用了1999年至2023年在埃塞克斯记忆诊所收集的常规医疗保健数据。使用SCD标准的两种不同操作将组群分类为两种SCD患者样品。一个样本基于当地临床实践-根据Winblad标准排除MCI(该样本称为SCDWinblad)。另一个样本是通过回顾性应用Jak/Bondi标准来排除MCI(称为SCDJak/Bondi)创建的。仅考虑纳入基线年龄≥55岁且随访时间≥12个月的患者。比较样品的初始临床/人口统计学特征。计算每个样本的痴呆发生率,计算未校正和Mantel-Haenszel校正的发病率比率,以比较SCD样本之间的痴呆发病率.
    结果:EssexMemoryClinic数据库共纳入2,233例患者。使用SCD和研究合格标准从数据库中选择SCDWinblad(n=86)和SCDJak/Bondi(n=185)样品。两个样本之间的中位随访时间(3年)没有差异。首次评估时,SCDJak/Bondi样本明显比SCDWinblad年龄大(平均年龄:74岁对70岁),并且在全球认知测试中得分较差,立即和延迟的口头召回,和类别流利。根据年龄调整后,痴呆发病率比率[95%置信区间]为3.7[1.5至9.3],表明SCDJak/Bondi的痴呆进展率明显更高。
    结论:本研究强调用于确定SCD的方法对SCD表型和预后都具有重要意义。这强调了如何在SCD研究中实施MCI的重要性。更广泛地说,这些发现增加了越来越多的工作,表明在SCD中不应该忽视客观认知,并为SCD预后文献中的异质性提供了潜在的解释。
    BACKGROUND: The research criteria for subjective cognitive decline (SCD) exclude mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but do not stipulate the use of specific MCI criteria. This study compared different approaches to defining (i.e., excluding) MCI during the ascertainment of SCD, focusing on the impact on dementia incidence rates in SCD.
    METHODS: This cohort study utilized routine healthcare data collected in the Essex Memory Clinic from 1999 to 2023. Two different operationalizations of the SCD criteria were used to categorize the cohort into two SCD patient samples. One sample was based on local clinical practice - MCI was excluded according to the Winblad criteria (this sample was termed SCDWinblad). The other sample was created via the retrospective application of the Jak/Bondi criteria for the exclusion of MCI (termed SCDJak/Bondi). Only patients aged ≥ 55 years at baseline with ≥ 12 months follow-up were considered for inclusion. The initial clinical/demographic characteristics of the samples were compared. Rates of incident dementia were calculated for each sample, and unadjusted and Mantel-Haenszel-adjusted incidence rate ratios were calculated to compare dementia incidence between the SCD samples.
    RESULTS: The Essex Memory Clinic database included 2,233 patients in total. The SCD and study eligibility criteria were used to select SCDWinblad (n = 86) and SCDJak/Bondi (n = 185) samples from the database. Median follow-up (3 years) did not differ between the two samples. The SCDJak/Bondi sample was significantly older than the SCDWinblad at first assessment (median age: 74 versus 70 years) and had poorer scores on tests of global cognition, immediate and delayed verbal recall, and category fluency. Following adjustment for age, the dementia incidence rate ratio [95% confidence interval] was 3.7 [1.5 to 9.3], indicating a significantly greater rate of progression to dementia in SCDJak/Bondi.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that the approach used to ascertain SCD has important implications for both SCD phenotypes and prognosis. This underscores the importance of how MCI is operationalized within SCD studies. More broadly, the findings add to a growing body of work indicating that objective cognition should not be overlooked in SCD, and offer a potential explanation for the heterogeneity across the SCD prognostic literature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抑郁症状与阿尔茨海默病(AD)有关,但它们的神经生物学和神经心理学相关性仍然知之甚少。我们调查抑郁症状是否与痴呆前AD的淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)病理和认知有关。
    我们包括主观认知能力下降(SCD,n=160)和轻度认知障碍(MCI,n=192)来自痴呆疾病起始队列。使用老年抑郁量表(GDS-15)评估抑郁症状。使用脑脊液(CSF)Aβ42/40比率确定Aβ病理学。抑郁症状和认知之间的关联用逻辑回归评估。
    只有Aβ阴性MCI组(MCI-Aβ-)与抑郁症状相关(比值比[OR]=2.65,p=0.005)。抑郁症状与MCI-Aβ-患者记忆力下降有关(OR=0.94,p=0.039),但在MCI-Aβ+中表现更好(OR=1.103,p=0.001)。
    我们的结果表明,MCI中的抑郁症状与Aβ病理无关,也没有AD相关的记忆障碍。然而,非ADMCI患者的记忆障碍可能与抑郁症状有关.
    UNASSIGNED: Depressive symptoms are associated with Alzheimer\'s disease (AD), but their neurobiological and neuropsychological correlates remain poorly understood. We investigate if depressive symptoms are associated with amyloid (Aβ) pathology and cognition in predementia AD.
    UNASSIGNED: We included subjective cognitive decline (SCD, n = 160) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 192) from the dementia disease initiation cohort. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15). Aβ pathology was determined using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/40 ratio. Associations between depressive symptoms and cognition were assessed with logistic regression.
    UNASSIGNED: Only the Aβ negative MCI group (MCI-Aβ-) was associated with depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR] = 2.65, p = 0.005). Depressive symptoms were associated with worse memory in MCI-Aβ- (OR = 0.94, p = 0.039), but with better performance in MCI-Aβ+ (OR = 1.103, p = 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Our results suggest that depressive symptoms in MCI are neither associated with Aβ pathology, nor AD-associated memory impairment. However, memory impairment in non-AD MCI may relate to depressive symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非药物干预具有无数可用的干预选择,并且包含多种成分。非药物干预或组合的特定成分是否优于其他成分尚不清楚。这项研究的主要目的是比较非药物干预措施的不同组合及其特定成分对主观认知能力下降的成年人与健康相关的结果的影响。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,科克伦,CINAHL,PsycINFO,中部,WebofScience,和中国最大的两个数据库,CNKI和万方,从开始到22日被搜索,2023年1月。包括使用非药物干预措施并报告主观认知能力下降的成年人的健康结果的随机对照试验。两名独立审稿人筛选了研究,提取的数据,并评估偏见的风险。成分网络荟萃分析采用加性成分模型进行网络荟萃分析。本研究遵循PRISMA报告指南,PRISMA清单见附加文件2。
    结果:共纳入39项试验,共2959名患者(平均年龄范围,58.79-77.41年)。抵抗运动可能是减少主观认知能力下降的成年人的记忆力抱怨的最佳干预措施;累积排名p得分下的表面为0.888,其次是平衡运动(p=0.859)。有氧运动(p=0.832),和认知干预(p=0.618)。音乐疗法,认知训练,经颅直流电刺激,正念疗法,和平衡练习可能是改善全球认知功能的最有效干预成分(iSMD,0.83;95%CI,0.36至1.29),语言(iSMD,0.31;95%CI,0.24至0.38),执行日常生活活动的能力(iSMD,0.55;95%CI,0.21至0.89),身体健康(iSMD,3.29;95%CI,2.57至4.00),和焦虑缓解(iSMD,0.71;95%CI,0.26至1.16),分别。
    结论:对于患有主观认知功能下降的成年人,进行的身体活动形式似乎比认知干预更有利于减少主观记忆投诉。这种差异反映在抵抗上,有氧,平衡练习。高质量和大规模的随机临床试验是必要的,以验证研究结果。
    背景:PROSPERO注册表号。CRD420223555363。
    BACKGROUND: Non-pharmacological interventions have a myriad of available intervention options and contain multiple components. Whether specific components of non-pharmacological interventions or combinations are superior to others remains unclear. The main aim of this study is to compare the effects of different combinations of non-pharmacological interventions and their specific components on health-related outcomes in adults with subjective cognitive decline.
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and China\'s two largest databases, CNKI and Wanfang, were searched from inception to 22nd, January 2023. Randomized controlled trials using non-pharmacological interventions and reporting health outcomes in adults with subjective cognitive decline were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Component network meta-analysis was conducted employing an additive component model for network meta-analysis. This study followed the PRISMA reporting guideline and the PRISMA checklist is presented in Additional file 2.
    RESULTS: A total of 39 trials with 2959 patients were included (range of mean ages, 58.79-77.41 years). Resistance exercise might be the optimal intervention for reducing memory complaints in adults with subjective cognitive decline; the surface under the cumulative ranking p score was 0.888, followed by balance exercise (p = 0.859), aerobic exercise (p = 0.832), and cognitive interventions (p = 0.618). Music therapy, cognitive training, transcranial direct current stimulation, mindfulness therapy, and balance exercises might be the most effective intervention components for improving global cognitive function (iSMD, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.29), language (iSMD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.38), ability to perform activities of daily living (iSMD, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.89), physical health (iSMD, 3.29; 95% CI, 2.57 to 4.00), and anxiety relief (iSMD, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.16), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The form of physical activity performed appears to be more beneficial than cognitive interventions in reducing subjective memory complaints for adults with subjective cognitive decline, and this difference was reflected in resistance, aerobic, and balance exercises. Randomized clinical trials with high-quality and large-scale are warranted to validate the findings.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO registry number. CRD42022355363.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:有人担心COVID-19大流行及其控制措施会影响老年人的认知健康。因此,我们检查了主观认知能力下降的患病率,及其相关的危险因素和健康后果,在瑞士大流行2年后的无痴呆症老年人中。
    方法:基于人群的队列研究。
    方法:使用2022年6月至9月对65岁以上的成年人进行的认知投诉问卷估计SCD的患病率(Specchio-COVID19队列,N=1414),并与2014年至2018年的流行前期值进行比较(CoLaus|PsyCoLaus队列,N=1181)。使用逻辑和/或线性回归评估相关的危险因素和健康后果。
    结果:2022年SCD的患病率(18.9%[95%CI,16.2-21.9])与2014-2018年的前流行水平(19.5%[17.2-22.1])相当。风险因素包括痴呆症的既定风险-即健康问题,健康行为,和抑郁症状。自我报告后COVID,自流行病开始以来,人们认为精神健康恶化,不太频繁的社交俱乐部出席,孤独感增加也是SCD的危险因素。反过来,SCD与较差的客观认知表现相关,执行日常生活的工具活动困难,跌倒的风险更大,在一年的随访中,幸福感较低。
    结论:虽然2022年SCD的总体患病率与流行前水平相当,我们确定了几种与大流行相关的SCD危险因素,包括自大流行开始以来人们认为的精神健康恶化和与世隔绝的加剧。这些发现强调了心理健康促进策略在减少认知抱怨和预防认知下降方面的重要性。
    OBJECTIVE: There have been concerns that the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures used to contain it impacted the cognitive health of older adults. We therefore examined the prevalence of subjective cognitive decline, and its associated risk factors and health consequencs, among dementia-free older adults 2 years into the pandemic in Switzerland.
    METHODS: Population-based cohort study.
    METHODS: Prevalence of SCD was estimated using the cognitive complaint questionnaire administered to adults aged ≥65 years in June-September 2022 (Specchio-COVID19 cohort, N = 1414), and compared to prepandemic values from 2014 to 2018 (CoLaus|PsyCoLaus cohort, N = 1181). Associated risk factors and health consequences were assessed using logistic and/or linear regression.
    RESULTS: Prevalence of SCD in 2022 (18.9% [95% CI, 16.2-21.9]) was comparable to prepandemic levels in 2014-2018 (19.5% [17.2-22.1]). Risk factors included established risks for dementia-namely health issues, health behaviours, and depressive symptoms. Self-reported post-COVID, perceived worsening of mental health since the start of the pandemic, less frequent social club attendance, and increased loneliness were also risk factors for SCD. In turn, SCD was associated with poorer objective cognitive performance, difficulty performing instrumental activities of daily living, greater risk of falls, and lower well-being at one-year follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: While the overall prevalence of SCD in 2022 was comparable to prepandemic levels, we identified several pandemic-related risk factors for SCD, including perceived worsening of mental health and increased isolation since the start of the pandemic. These findings highlight the importance of mental health promotion strategies in reducing cognitive complaints and preventing cognitive decline.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:准确识别主观认知功能减退(SCD)的个体对于神经退行性疾病的早期干预和预防至关重要。分形维数(FD)已经成为一种稳健和可复制的度量,超越传统的几何度量,在表征大脑结构的复杂分形几何特性中。然而,FD在确定SCD个体方面的有效性尚不清楚.可以建议使用3D区域FD方法来表征和量化精确灰质的空间复杂性,提供认知老化的见解,并帮助自动识别患有SCD的个体。
    方法:本研究引入了一种新颖的基于整数比率的3D盒计数分形分析(IRBCFA),以量化结构磁共振成像(MRI)数据中的区域分形维数(FD)。该创新方法通过适应任意的盒子尺寸,克服了传统的盒子计数技术的局限性,从而提高小FD估计的精度,然而在神经上意义重大,大脑区域。
    结果:将IRBCFA应用于两个公开可用的数据集,OASIS-3和ADNI,由520和180个科目组成,分别。该方法确定了主要在边缘系统内的区分性感兴趣区域(ROI),额顶区,枕上-颞区,和基底神经节-丘脑区。这些ROI与认知功能表现出显著的相关性,包括执行功能,记忆,社会认知,和感官知觉,提示它们作为SCD神经影像学标志物的潜力。在这些ROI上训练的识别模型表现出卓越的性能,在发现数据集上实现超过93%的准确率,在独立测试数据集上超过87%。此外,数据集之间的交换实验揭示了判别ROI的大量重叠,突出了我们方法在不同人群中的稳健性。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,IRBCFA可以作为量化灰质空间复杂性的有价值的工具,提供认知老化的见解,并帮助自动识别患有SCD的个体。该方法证明的通用性和鲁棒性使其成为神经退行性疾病研究的有前途的工具,并为临床应用提供了潜力。
    OBJECTIVE: Accurate identification of individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is crucial for early intervention and prevention of neurodegenerative diseases. Fractal dimensionality (FD) has emerged as a robust and replicable measure, surpassing traditional geometric metrics, in characterizing the intricate fractal geometrical properties of brain structure. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of FD in identifying individuals with SCD remains largely unclear. A 3D regional FD method can be suggested to characterize and quantify the spatial complexity of the precise gray matter, providing insights into cognitive aging and aiding in the automated identification of individuals with SCD.
    METHODS: This study introduces a novel integer ratio based 3D box-counting fractal analysis (IRBCFA) to quantify regional fractal dimensions (FDs) in structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. The innovative method overcomes limitations of conventional box-counting techniques by accommodating arbitrary box sizes, thereby enhancing the precision of FD estimation in small, yet neurologically significant, brain regions.
    RESULTS: The application of IRBCFA to two publicly available datasets, OASIS-3 and ADNI, consisting of 520 and 180 subjects, respectively. The method identified discriminative regions of interest (ROIs) predominantly within the limbic system, fronto-parietal region, occipito-temporal region, and basal ganglia-thalamus region. These ROIs exhibited significant correlations with cognitive functions, including executive functioning, memory, social cognition, and sensory perception, suggesting their potential as neuroimaging markers for SCD. The identification model trained on these ROIs demonstrated exceptional performance achieving over 93 % accuracy on the discovery dataset and exceeding 87 % on the independent testing dataset. Furthermore, an exchange experiment between datasets revealed a substantial overlap in discriminative ROIs, highlighting the robustness of our method across diverse populations.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that IRBCFA can serve as a valuable tool for quantifying the spatial complexity of gray matter, providing insights into cognitive aging and aiding in the automated identification of individuals with SCD. The demonstrated generalizability and robustness of this method position it as a promising tool for neurodegenerative disease research and offer potential for clinical applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一些研究报告了主观认知下降(SCD)的个体与正常认知的个体之间的认知细微差别。这项研究旨在(I)使用差异分数(例如,分类-音素言语流畅性能)来自三个认知领域的神经心理学测试(记忆:韦克斯勒的单词列表和数字;执行功能:Stroop和言语流畅性;以及语言:BNT和ECCO_Senior)和(ii)确定哪些差异分数对分类具有重要意义。包括75名老年人:32名被标记为SCD+(年龄71.50±5.29),会见杰森等人。\的标准,正常认知组43(SCD-;年龄69.81±4.62)。两组均完成了一项方案,包括筛查和指定的神经心理学测试。两组之间的年龄没有差异,教育,情景记忆,全球认知状态,或心情。在BNT(命名)和ECCO_Senior(句子理解)得出的差异得分方面,观察到两组之间的显着差异。这些分数准确地将参与者分类(71.6%),ECCO_Senior担任主要角色。ROC曲线指示差到一般的模型质量或诊断准确性(AUC_BNT=0.690;AUC_ECCO=0.722)。总之,语言领域的差异分数对于区分具有SCD和正常认知的个体很重要,补充了以前在这一领域的发现。然而,鉴于其诊断准确性相对较差,作为更详细的神经心理评估的一部分,应谨慎使用。
    Several studies have reported subtle differences in cognition between individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) compared to those with normal cognition. This study aimed to (i) identify these differences using discrepancy scores (e.g., categorial-phonemic verbal fluency performance) derived from neuropsychological tests in three cognitive domains (memory: Wechsler\'s Word List and Digits; executive functions: Stroop and verbal fluency; and language: BNT and ECCO_Senior) and (ii) determine which discrepancy scores are significant for classification. Seventy-five older adults were included: 32 who were labeled SCD+ (age 71.50 ± 5.29), meeting Jessen et al.\'s criteria, and 43 in the normal cognition group (SCD-; age 69.81 ± 4.62). Both groups completed a protocol including screening and the specified neuropsychological tests. No differences were found between the groups in their age, education, episodic memory, global cognitive state, or mood. Significant differences between the groups were observed regarding the discrepancy scores derived from BNT (naming) and ECCO_Senior (sentence comprehension). These scores accurately classified participants (71.6%), with ECCO_Senior having a primary role. ROC curves indicated a poor-to-fair model quality or diagnostic accuracy (AUC_BNT = 0.690; AUC_ECCO = 0.722). In conclusion, discrepancy scores in the language domain are important for distinguishing between individuals with SCD and normal cognition, complementing previous findings in this domain. However, given their relatively poor diagnostic accuracy, they should be used with caution as part of a more detailed neuro-psychological assessment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的研究强调了脑岛是人脑网络中的关键枢纽,也是最容易受到主观认知能力下降(SCD)影响的区域。然而,SCD患者岛叶亚区功能连接的变化仍然知之甚少.本研究旨在使用静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)阐明SCD患者岛状亚区域内功能连接模式的改变。
    在这项研究中,我们收集了30例SCD患者和28例健康对照(HCs)的rs-fMRI数据.通过定义脑岛的三个子区域,我们绘制了全脑静息状态功能连接(RSFC)图.我们确定了岛屿分区的几种不同的RSFC模式。具体来说,对于积极的连通性,在脑岛内确定了三种认知相关的RSFC模式,提示前后功能细分:(1)脑岛的背侧前区,显示RSFC与执行控制网络(ECN);(2)脑岛的腹侧前区,显示与显著性网络(SN)的功能连通性;(3)沿着脑岛的后部区,显示与感觉运动网络(SMN)的功能连通性.
    与对照相比,SCD患者在脑岛亚区表现出增加的RSFC阳性,表现出补偿性可塑性。此外,这些异常的岛叶亚区RSFCs与SCD患者的认知能力密切相关.
    我们的研究结果表明,不同的岛屿分区表现出具有不同功能网络的RSFC的不同模式,SCD患者受影响不同。
    UNASSIGNED: Recent research has highlighted the insula as a critical hub in human brain networks and the most susceptible region to subjective cognitive decline (SCD). However, the changes in functional connectivity of insular subregions in SCD patients remain poorly understood. The present study aims to clarify the altered functional connectivity patterns within insular subregions in individuals with SCD using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI).
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we collected rs-fMRI data from 30 patients with SCD and 28 healthy controls (HCs). By defining three subregions of the insula, we mapped whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC). We identified several distinct RSFC patterns of the insular subregions. Specifically, for positive connectivity, three cognitive-related RSFC patterns were identified within the insula, suggesting anterior-to-posterior functional subdivisions: (1) a dorsal anterior zone of the insula that shows RSFC with the executive control network (ECN); (2) a ventral anterior zone of the insula that shows functional connectivity with the salience network (SN); and (3) a posterior zone along the insula that shows functional connectivity with the sensorimotor network (SMN).
    UNASSIGNED: Compared to the controls, patients with SCD exhibited increased positive RSFC to the sub-region of the insula, demonstrating compensatory plasticity. Furthermore, these abnormal insular subregion RSFCs are closely correlated with cognitive performance in the SCD patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggest that different insular subregions exhibit distinct patterns of RSFC with various functional networks, which are affected differently in patients with SCD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于阿尔茨海默病(AD)的NIA-AA研究框架提出了一个过渡阶段(阶段2),其特征是微妙的认知能力下降,主观认知功能下降(SCD)和轻度神经行为症状(NPS)。
    根据第2阶段特征识别参与者集群,并评估其与认知未受损个体中淀粉样蛋白阳性的关联。
    我们纳入了来自DELCODE队列的N=338名认知未受损参与者的基线数据以及AD的脑脊液生物标志物数据。分类到AD连续体中(即,淀粉样蛋白阳性,A+)基于Aβ42/40状态。神经心理学测试数据用于评估细微的客观认知功能障碍(OBJ),主观认知衰退访谈(SCD-I)用于检测SCD,神经精神量表(NPI-Q)用于评估NPS。进行了两步聚类分析,并分析了聚类之间AD生物标志物的差异。
    我们根据呈现的症状确定了三个不同的参与者集群。在以OBJ和SCD为特征的集群中,A+参与者的比率最高(47.6%)。一组出现SCD和NPS的参与者(A+:26.6%)和一组总体症状很少的参与者(A+:19.7%)显示淀粉样蛋白阳性的范围不高于该年龄组的预期A+率。在整个样本中,与无SCD和OBJ的参与者相比,记忆域中SCD和OBJ组合的参与者显示出更低的Aβ42/ptau181比率.
    以OBJ和伴随SCD的参与者为特征的簇富含淀粉样蛋白病理学。
    UNASSIGNED: The NIA-AA Research Framework on Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) proposes a transitional stage (stage 2) characterized by subtle cognitive decline, subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild neurobehavioral symptoms (NPS).
    UNASSIGNED: To identify participant clusters based on stage 2 features and assess their association with amyloid positivity in cognitively unimpaired individuals.
    UNASSIGNED: We included baseline data of N = 338 cognitively unimpaired participants from the DELCODE cohort with data on cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for AD. Classification into the AD continuum (i.e., amyloid positivity, A+) was based on Aβ42/40 status. Neuropsychological test data were used to assess subtle objective cognitive dysfunction (OBJ), the subjective cognitive decline interview (SCD-I) was used to detect SCD, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) was used to assess NPS. A two-step cluster analysis was carried out and differences in AD biomarkers between clusters were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified three distinct participant clusters based on presented symptoms. The highest rate of A+ participants (47.6%) was found in a cluster characterized by both OBJ and SCD. A cluster of participants that presented with SCD and NPS (A+:26.6%) and a cluster of participants with overall few symptoms (A+:19.7%) showed amyloid positivity in a range that was not higher than the expected A+ rate for the age group. Across the full sample, participants with a combination of SCD and OBJ in the memory domain showed a lower Aβ42/ptau181 ratio compared to those with neither SCD nor OBJ.
    UNASSIGNED: The cluster characterized by participants with OBJ and concomitant SCD was enriched for amyloid pathology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号