暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Common magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in adhesive capsulitis are not often evident in rotator cuff tear concomitant with shoulder stiffness. This study aimed to determine the most predictive MRI finding of rotator cuff tear with shoulder stiffness to differentiate from that without stiffness.
UNASSIGNED: The data of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between January 2014 and October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Stiffness was defined as forward flexion <120°, external rotation at side <30°, and internal rotation at back UNASSIGNED: Anterior capsular thickness, glenoid capsular thickness in the axillary recess, and anterior and axillary capsular hyperintensities were significantly more dominant in the stiff group (all P < .05) than in the control group. Anterior capsular thickness and anterior capsular abnormal hyperintensity could be used to differentiate between the stiff and control groups (P < .05). Anterior capsular thickness showed high diagnostic performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.993. The cut-off value for stiffness was 3.07 mm (sensitivity, 96.1%; specificity, 100%).
UNASSIGNED: Anterior capsular thickening and abnormal hyperintensity were the most predictive MRI findings for stiffness in patients with rotator cuff tear and stiffness to differentiate from patients with rotator cuff tear without stiffness.

BACKGROUND: One-stage treatment involving rotator cuff repair and shoulder capsule release is mainly used to treat patients with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and concomitant shoulder stiffness. Despite the increasing attention to the efficacy and safety of one-stage treatment, controversy still remains. Therefore, this systematic review aims to summarize the indications, operation procedure and rehabilitation protocol, and compare the range of motions (ROMs), functional outcomes and retear rates of one-stage treatment for RCTs in stiff shoulders and non-stiff shoulders.
METHODS: Multiple databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and MEDLINE) were searched for studies that investigated outcomes after one-stage treatment for RCTs concomitant with shoulder stiffness compared with rotator cuff repair for RCTs alone, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. Descriptive statistics, including range of motion, patient-reported outcome and retear rate, are presented without meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity and low levels of evidence.
RESULTS: A total of 9 cohort studies were included, with 305 patients treated with one-stage treatment involving rotator cuff repair and simultaneous shoulder capsular release and 1059 patients treated with rotator cuff repair alone. Patients in both groups had significant symptom improvement and functional recovery after the one-stage treatment for the stiffness group and standard repair for the non-stiffness group, and most patients could return to normal life and work within 6 months after the operation. The retear rate in the one-stage treatment group was not higher than that in the rotator cuff repair group. No statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed in terms of range of motion and patient-reported outcomes in the vast majority of studies at the final follow-up, including the visual analog scale for pain, the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score, the Oxford shoulder score and the Simple Shoulder Test.
CONCLUSIONS: One-stage treatment for RCTs in stiff shoulders provides comparable ROM and patient-reported clinical outcomes as rotator cuff repair for non-stiff RCTs. In addition, the rate of postoperative retear in stiff shoulder treated with one-stage treatment was not higher than in non-stiff shoulders.

UNASSIGNED: Range of motion (ROM) limitations can result in restricted activities of daily living (ADL) due to shoulder dysfunction, suggesting that evaluation of complex shoulder movements is necessary in clinical practice. Here, we present a new physical examination, the elbow forward translation motion (T-motion) test for measuring the position of the elbow when both dorsal hands are placed on the iliac crest in a sitting position and the elbow is moving forward. We examined the relationships between T-motion and shoulder function to identify the significance of this test in clinical practice.
UNASSIGNED: Preoperative patients with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) were eligible for this cross-sectional study. Active ROM and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were measured as shoulder function. The degree of internal rotation was based on the Constant-Murley Score. We defined a positive T-motion test result as an elbow positioned posterior to the body on the sagittal plane. Group comparisons and logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the relationships between the availability of T-motion and shoulder function.
UNASSIGNED: Sixty-six patients with RCTs participated in this cross-sectional study. The values of the JOA total score (P < .001), subscale of function and ADL (P < .001), active range of forward flexion (P = .006), abduction (P < .001), and external rotation (P < .001) were lower in the positive group than in the negative group. In addition, a significant correlation was found between the availability of T-motion and internal rotation by the chi-square test (P < .001). Logistic regression analyses showed that internal rotation (odds ratio 2.69; 95% confidence interval 1.47-4.93; P < .01) and external rotation (odds ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.14; P = .04) were related to the availability of T-motion after adjustments for covariates, and the cutoff points were 4 points for internal rotation (area under the curve 0.833, sensitivity 53.3%, specificity 86.1%, P < .001) and 35° for external rotation (area under the curve 0.788, sensitivity 60.0%, specificity 88.9%, P < .001).
UNASSIGNED: The positive T-motion group exhibited low shoulder function, including a less active ROM and JOA shoulder score. T-motion, which is a quick and simple movement, may be a new indicator for a complex shoulder motion and contribute to evaluating the decreased ADL and limited shoulder motion in patients with RCTs.

Vaccination against mRNA SARS-CoV-2 has been administered on a very large scale and various side effects have been described. The increased risk of myopericarditis is known, and only a few cases of shoulder capsulitis have been reported after vaccination. These two pathologies have never been reported in the same patient after vaccination. Our article presents the history of a man in his 40s who presented with myopericarditis a few days after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with mRNA(Messenger RNA) Moderna® vaccine and who at the same time developed shoulder capsulitis. His cardiovascular symptoms resolved rapidly, and his shoulder symptoms improved/resolved within 1 year. This case should make physicians aware of the possibility of several concomitant side effects following vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.

UNASSIGNED: Although the classic open Latarjet has a low recurrence rate in unstable shoulders, this advantage may be offset by the higher number of complications. We aimed to report the safety-driven nuanced steps and the resulting short-term complications of the Latarjet-Walch technique.
UNASSIGNED: Between 2016 and 2022, 150 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure following the key safety-driven technical steps were retrospectively evaluated for intraoperative and short-term (3 months) complications. The complications were divided into 3 types: Any adverse event that did not need a change in the treatment protocol was a type 1 complication. An event that resulted in a prolongation of rehabilitation protocol or an additional medical line of treatment was classified as type 2, and an event that resulted in readmission, a resurgery, or one that affected the outcome was classified as a type 3 complication.
UNASSIGNED: There were 12 (8%) short-term complications in 9 patients. Neurological complications were noted in 3 (2%) patients (1 axillary nerve injury, 1 suprascapular nerve injury, and 1 musculocutaneous nerve injury). Type 1 complications were noted in 2 patients: 2 patients had hematoma that was detected as superficial swelling, but no surgical drainage was needed, and both resolved at their 1-month follow-up. Type 2 complications were noted in 4 patients. One patient had surgical site infection and a second patient had superficial wound dehiscence in the lower part of the wound. The third patient had suprascapular nerve paresis and the fourth had musculocutaneous nerve paresis and shoulder stiffness. Both nerve injuries recovered completely after 6 months of rehabilitation. Type 3 complications were noted in 3 patients. One patient had axillary nerve paresis and shoulder stiffness. The axillary nerve palsy had recovered partially by 8 months. One patient had an intraoperative graft fracture and postoperative shoulder stiffness, and the third patient had shoulder stiffness.
UNASSIGNED: Following the safety-driven nuanced steps in the Latarjet-Walch procedure, the short-term complication rate was 8%, and the neurological complication was 2% (n = 3). The musculocutaneous and suprascapular nerves completely recovered, and the axillary nerve had partially recovered.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has begun to challenge the place of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) as a primary procedure for certain indications. One purported benefit of aTSA is improved postoperative range of motion (ROM) compared to rTSA especially in internal rotation; however, it is unclear whether aTSA can provide patients with significant preoperative stiffness superior ROM compared to rTSA. Our purpose was to compare clinical outcomes of aTSA and rTSA performed in stiff vs. non-stiff shoulders for rotator cuff intact (RCI) glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA).
METHODS: A retrospective review of an international shoulder arthroplasty database identified 1608 aTSAs and 600 rTSAs performed for RCI GHOA with minimum 2-year follow-up. Defining preoperative stiffness as ≤ 0° of passive external rotation (ER), we matched: (1) stiff aTSAs (n = 257) 1:3 to non-stiff aTSAs, (2) stiff rTSAs (n = 87) 1:3 to non-stiff rTSAs, and (3) stiff rTSAs (n = 87) 1:1 to stiff aTSAs. We compared ROM, outcome scores, and the rate of complications and revision surgery at latest follow-up.
RESULTS: Despite stiff aTSAs having poorer preoperative ROM and functional outcome scores for all measures assessed (P < .001 for all), only poorer postoperative active abduction (113 ± 27° vs. 128 ± 35°; P < .001), active ER (39 ± 18° vs. 50 ± 20°; P < .001), and passive ER (45 ± 17° vs. 56 ± 18°; P < .001) persisted postoperatively compared to the non-stiff cohort. Similarly, stiff rTSAs had poorer preoperative ROM and functional outcome scores for all measures assessed compared to non-stiff rTSAs (P ≤ .044), but only poorer active abduction (108 ± 24° vs. 128 ± 29°, P < .001), active ER (28 ± 17° vs. 42 ± 17°, P < .001), and passive ER (36 ± 15° vs. 48 ± 17°, P < .001) persisted. When comparing stiff rTSAs to matched stiff aTSAs, no significant differences in preoperative ROM or functional outcome scores were found. However, stiff aTSAs had greater postoperative active internal rotation score (4.8 ± 1.5 vs. 4.2 ± 1.7, P = .022), active ER (40 ± 19° vs. 28 ± 17°, P < .001), and passive ER (46 ± 18° vs. 36 ± 15°, P = .001). Postoperative outcome scores were similar across all matched cohort comparisons despite motion differences. The rate of complications and need for revision surgery did not differ between any group comparisons.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RCI GHOA who have preoperative rotational stiffness have poorer postoperative ROM compared with non-stiff patients following both aTSA and rTSA, but similar functional outcome scores. Notably, preoperative limitations in passive ER do not appear to be a limitation to utilizing aTSA. Indeed, patients with limited preoperative ER treated with aTSA had greater postoperative internal rotation and ER compared to those treated with rTSA.

BACKGROUND: Adhesive capsulitis (AC) of the shoulder, also known as frozen shoulder, causes substantial pain and disability. In cases of secondary AC, the inflammation and fibrosis of the synovial joint can be triggered by trauma or surgery to the joint followed by extended immobility. However, for primary AC the inciting trigger is unknown. The burden of the disorder among the elderly is also unknown leading to this age group being left out of therapeutic research studies, potentially receiving delayed diagnoses, and unknown financial costs to the Medicare system. The purpose of this analysis was to describe the epidemiology of AC in individuals over the age of 65, an age group little studied for this disorder. The second purpose was to investigate whether specific medications, co-morbidities, infections, and traumas are risk factors or triggers for primary AC in this population.
METHODS: We used Medicare claims data from 2010-2012 to investigate the prevalence of AC and assess comorbid risk factors and seasonality. Selected medications, distal trauma, and classes of infections as potential inflammatory triggers for primary AC were investigated using a case-control study design with patients with rotator cuff tears as the comparison group. Medications were identified from National Drug codes and translated to World Health Organization ATC codes for analysis. Health conditions were identified using ICD9-CM codes.
RESULTS: We found a one-year prevalence rate of AC of approximately 0.35% among adults aged 65 years and older which translates to approximately 142,000 older adults in the United States having frozen shoulder syndrome. Diabetes and Parkinson\'s disease were significantly associated with the diagnosis of AC in the elderly. Cases were somewhat more common from August through December, although a clear seasonal trend was not observed. Medications, traumas, and infections were similar for cases and controls.
CONCLUSIONS: This investigation identified the burden of AC in the US elderly population and applied case-control methodology to identify triggers for its onset in this population. Efforts to reduce chronic health conditions such as diabetes may reduce seemingly unrelated conditions such as AC. The inciting trigger for this idiopathic condition remains elusive.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the effects of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for primary stiff shoulder when different comorbidities are present are lacking. Our aim was to assess how comorbidities influence the recovery speed and clinical outcomes after MUA.
METHODS: Between April 2013 and September 2018, 281 consecutive primary stiff shoulders in the frozen phase treated with MUA were included in this study. We investigated the comorbidities of patients and divided them into the control (n = 203), diabetes mellitus (DM) (n = 32), hyperlipidemia (n = 26), and thyroid disorder (n = 20) groups. The range of motion (ROM) and clinical scores for each group before MUA and 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months after MUA were comparatively analyzed. We identified the ROM recovery time after MUA and the responsiveness to MUA. Then, subjects were subdivided into early and late recovery groups based on their recovery time and into successful and nonsuccessful MUA groups based on their responsiveness to MUA.
RESULTS: Significant improvements in ROM and clinical scores at 3 months after MUA were observed in all groups. Significant differences in ROM among the 4 groups were also observed during follow-up (P < .05). The DM group had significantly lower ROM values, even at 3 months after MUA, compared with the control group. The ROM recovery speed after MUA was slowest in the DM group, followed by the thyroid disorder, hyperlipidemia, and control groups. Most (90.6%) of the DM group experienced late recovery. The proportion of nonsuccessful MUA was higher in the DM and thyroid disorder groups than that in the control and hyperlipidemia groups (P = .004). During follow-up, there were no differences among groups regarding the visual analog scale, University of California at Los Angeles shoulder, and Constant scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The ROM recovery speed and responsiveness to MUA for primary stiff shoulder were poorer for the DM and thyroid disorder groups than for the control group. In particular, compared with any other disease, outcomes were poorer when the comorbidity was DM. If patients have comorbidities, then they should be informed before MUA that the comorbidity could affect the outcomes of treatment.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate the relationship between stiff shoulder in patients with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear and MRI findings, especially joint capsule abnormality. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study included 106 patients with small to large (≤ 5 cm) full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Joint capsule edema and thickness in the axillary recess, obliteration of the subcoracoid fat triangle, fatty degeneration of the torn rotator cuff muscle, and degree of retraction were assessed by two radiologists. The size and location of tears were determined by MRI findings and operative report. Associations between MRI findings and preoperative passive range of motion (ROM) were assessed by simple and multiple linear regression analyses and proportional odds logistic regression analysis. RESULTS. There was a significant, negative linear correlation between limited ROM at forward elevation and thickness of the joint capsule in the glenoid portion of the axillary recess (p = 0.018), external rotation and joint capsule edema in the humeral portion of the axillary recess (p = 0.011), and internal rotation and joint capsule edema in the glenoid portion of the axillary recess (p = 0.007). Male sex (p = 0.041) and posterosuperior rotator cuff tear (p = 0.030) were independent predictors of shoulder ROM on external rotation. Degree of fatty degeneration (p = 0.003) was another independent predictor of shoulder ROM on internal rotation. CONCLUSION. MRI findings-especially joint capsule edema and thickness at the axillary recess-can be useful in predicting shoulder stiffness in patients with rotator cuff tear.