BACKGROUND: Although early hemivertebra (HV) resection and short fusion (within 4 segments) have been successful in treating congenital HV, there is limited research comparing the outcomes of the shortest-segment fusion (2 segments) versus 3 or 4 segments, particularly in young children. To evaluate the efficacy of posterior hemivertebrectomy combined with two or more segments fusion in children under the age of 10 years with a solitary simple lower thoracic or lumbar HV (T8-L5).
METHODS: This retrospective study included patients under the age of 10 with lower thoracic or lumbar solitary simple HV who underwent hemivertebra resection (HVR) and transpedicular short fusion and were divided into HV ± 1 group (2 segment fusion) and HV ± 2 group (3 or 4-segment fusion). The study recorded preoperative, postoperative (1 week), and the latest follow-up radiographic parameters and complications. The results of the coronal and sagittal planes were analyzed, and the main curve, segmental scoliosis curve, compensatory scoliosis curve, segmental kyphosis curve, and trunk shift were compared.
RESULTS: The study included 35 patients (15 in the HV ± 1 group and 20 in the HV ± 2 group) with a mean age of 5.26 ± 2.31 years and a mean follow-up of 22.54 months (12-68). The mean preoperative Cobb angle was 32.66° ± 7.339° (HV ± 1) and 29.31°±6.642° (HV ± 2). The final Cobb angle was 10.99°± 7.837° (HV ± 1) and 8.22° ± 4.295° (HV ± 2). The main curve corrected by 72% (HV ± 1), 75% (HV ± 2) postoperatively and 67% (HV ± 1), 72% (HV ± 2) at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the correction of the segmental scoliosis curve, compensatory scoliosis curve, segmental kyphosis curve, and trunk shift between the HV ± 1 and HV ± 2 groups (P > 0.05). The unplanned reoperation rate for HV in the thoracolumbar region (T11-L2) is significantly higher (P = 0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: In the context of solitary simple lower thoracic or lumbar HV (T8-L5), HV ± 1 segment fusion suffices and yields comparable correction outcomes in the midterm period when compared to HV ± 2. The reoperation rate exhibited a statistically significant increase in the thoracolumbar region.

Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is a surgical procedure for treating lumbar spinal stenosis and deformities. It removes a spinal disc and insert a cage or bone graft to promote solid fusion. Extensive research on LIF has been supported by numerous animal studies, which are being developed to enhance fusion rates and reduce the complications associated with the procedure. In particular, the anterior approach is significant in LIF research and regenerative medicine studies concerning intervertebral discs, as it utilizes the disc and the entire vertebral body. Several animal models have been used for anterior LIF (ALIF), each with distinct characteristics. However, a comprehensive review of ALIF models in different animals is currently lacking. Medium-sized and large animals, such as dogs and sheep, have been employed as ALIF models because of their suitable spine size for surgery. Conversely, small animals, such as rats, are rarely employed as ALIF models because of anatomical challenges. However, recent advancements in surgical implants and techniques have gradually allowed rats in ALIF models. Ambitious studies utilizing small animal ALIF models will soon be conducted. This review aims to review the advantages and disadvantages of various animal models, commonly used approaches, and bone fusion rate, to provide valuable insights to researchers studying the spine.

Scleroderma is a complex autoimmune disorder that primarily affects the connective tissue. Its key pathogenesis comprises vascular abnormalities, autoimmunity, and tissue fibrosis. While the exact etiology of the disease is unclear, patients may exhibit a wide array of symptoms. Scleroderma can rarely induce systemic effects that alter normal cervical spine anatomy. The effects on the cervical spine may be mediated through autoimmune phenomena or dystrophic calcinosis along the vertebral column. We discuss a rare case involving a 60-year-old female with a four-month history of scleroderma, who presented with cervical kyphosis, neck pain, impaired ambulation, dysphagia, edema, and reduced range of motion.

BACKGROUND The proper installation for pedicle screws by the traditional method of surgeons dependent on experience is not guaranteed, and educational solutions have progressed from chalkboards to electronic teaching platforms. We designed a case of 3-dimensional printing drill guide template as a surgical application, which can accurately navigate implantation of pedicle screws, and assessed its effect for simulative training. MATERIAL AND METHODS We randomly selected a set of computed tomography data for spondylolisthesis. A navigational template of pedicles and screws was designed by software Mimics and Pro-E, where trajectories of directions and angles guiding the nail way were manipulated for screwing based on anatomy, and its solid model was fabricated by a BT600 3D printer. The screws were integrated and installed to observe their stability. RESULTS The navigational model and custom spine implants were examined to be compatibly immobilized, because they are tolerant to radiation and stable against hydrolysis. The screw size and template were fit accurately to the vertebrae intraosseously, because the pilot holes were drilled and the trajectories were guided by cannulas with visible routes. During the surgical workflow, the patient reported appreciation and showed substantial compliance, while having few complications with this approach. Compared with fluoroscopy-assisted or free-hand techniques, the effect of simulative training during processing was excellent. CONCLUSIONS The surgical biomodel is practical for the procedural accuracy of surgical guides or as an educational drill. This fostering a style of \"practice substituting for teaching\" sets a paragon of keeping up with time and is worthy of recommendation.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to investigate whether multi-segment fusion or fusion-to-sacrum increases sacroiliac joint pathology, compared with single-segment fusion or a non-fused sacrum.
METHODS: This study included 116 patients who underwent lumbar or lumbosacral fusion and were followed up for 2 years. The patients were classified into single-segment fusion (n=46) and multi-segment fusion (more than two-levels, n=70) groups and then reclassified into the non-fused sacrum (n=68) and fusion-to-sacrum groups (n=48). Pre- and postoperative radiographs were used to evaluate radiographic parameters, and computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate sacroiliac joint degeneration. Low back pain (LBP) was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10). Baseline and postoperative values were compared using a paired sample t-test.
RESULTS: LBP VAS scores significantly differed at 6 months (single-segment fusion, 3.04±1.88; multi-segment fusion, 4.83±2.33; p<0.001) and 2 years postoperatively (single-segment fusion, 3.3±2.2; multi-segment fusion, 4.78±2.59; p=0.094). There was no significant difference in sacroiliac joint degeneration, as assessed by CT scan, between the two surgical groups: 14 (30%) and 19 (27%) patients in the single-segment and multi-segment (p=0.701) fusion groups, respectively. The LBP VAS scale showed comparable differences at 1 (non-fused sacrum, 3±2.18; fusion-to-sacrum, 3.74±2.28; p=0.090) and 2 years postoperatively (non-fused sacrum, 3.29±2.01; fusion-to-sacrum, 4.66±2.71; p=0.095). CT scan revealed that 18 (26%) and 15 (31%) patients in the non-fused sacrum and fusion-to-sacrum groups, respectively, developed sacroiliac joint arthritis; however, there was no significant inter-group difference (p=0.574).
CONCLUSIONS: Sacroiliac joint degeneration occurs independent of the number of fused segments or sacrum involvement.

OBJECTIVE:  It is important to protect the mobile segment in the lumbar region in scoliosis surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results of patients who underwent surgery for a diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at L3 or L4 level.
METHODS:  The study included 36 patients who underwent surgical treatment in our institution for a diagnosis of Lenke type 5 and 6 AIS with a follow-up period of at least 24 months. The patients were separated into 2 groups according to the LIV level of L3 (n=21) and L4 (n=15). These 2 groups were compared preoperatively (PO), early postoperative (EPO), and at the final follow-up examination (last control (LC)) with respect to radiological parameters in the coronal and sagittal planes, and the Scoliosis Research Society - 22 (SRS-22) questionnaire values.
RESULTS:  In both groups the mean age (L3: 16 ± 7.3; L4: 17 ± 6.1 years) and follow-up periods (L3: 44 ± 20; L4: 47 ± 18 months) were similar. Radiologically, the L4 group had a greater Cobb angle in the scoliosis main curves measured PO (P=.001). The Cobb angles measured at EPO (P=.767) and at LC (P=.674) were similar in both groups. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in respect of the LIV tilt values at PO (P=.469), EPO (P=.297), and LC (P=.065). When the groups were evaluated separately, the LIV tilt values at EPO and LC were similar in the L4 group (EPO: 6.93 ± 3.058; LC: 7.26 ± 2.313; P=.618). In the L3 patients, although there seemed to be a significant increase in LIV tilt values when EPO values were compared with LC values (EPO: 8.47 ± 3.970; LC: 9.57 ± 3.76; P=.030), this was within the error range of Cobb angle measurement. The results of the SRS-22 questionnaire showed significantly better results in the L3 group in the domains of pain, function/activity, mental health, and satisfaction with treatment (P=.011, P=.002, P=.019, P=.046, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS:  There was no radiological superiority between L3 and L4 LIV groups in the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve patients. However, according to the SRS-22 questionnaire, the results of patients with L3 level LIV were better in the areas of pain, function/activity, mental health, and satisfaction with treatment. Cite this article as: Baymurat AC, Tokgoz MA, Abdulaliyev F, Tosun MF, Can MM, Senkoylu A. Which lumbar vertebra should be the lowest level of fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of Lenke types 5 and 6? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2024;58(2):116-123.

Scoliosis is the most prevalent type of spinal deformity, with a 2-3% prevalence in the general population. Moreover, surgery for scoliotic deformity may result in severe blood loss and, consequently, the need for blood transfusions, thereby increasing surgical morbidity and the rate of complications. Several antifibrinolytic drugs, such as tranexamic acid, have been regarded as safe and effective options for reducing blood loss. Therefore, the present study aimed to analyse the effectiveness of this drug for controlling bleeding when used intraoperatively and in the first 48 h after surgery. A prospective randomized study of a cohort of patients included in a mass event for scoliosis treatment using PSF was performed. Twenty-eight patients were analysed and divided into two groups: 14 patients were selected for intraoperative and postoperative use of tranexamic acid (TXA), and the other 14 were selected only during the intraoperative period. The drainage bleeding rate, length of hospital stay, number of transfused blood units, and rate of adverse clinical effects were compared. All the patients involved had similar numbers of fusion levels addressed and similar scoliosis profiles. The postoperative bleeding rate through the drain did not significantly differ between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of transfused blood units between the groups (p = 0.473); however, in absolute numbers, patients in the control group received more transfusions. The length of hospital stay was fairly similar between the groups, with no statistically significant difference. Furthermore, the groups had similar adverse effects (p = 0.440), with the exception of nausea and vomiting, which were twice as common in the TXA group postoperatively than in the control group. No significant differences were found in the use of TXA during the first 48 postoperative hours or in postoperative outcomes.

Effective internal fixation with pedicle screw is a key factor in the success of lumbar fusion with internal fixation. Whether navigation robots can improve the efficacy and safety of screw placement is controversial. Thirty-eight patients who underwent oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion internal fixation from March 2022 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, 16 cases in the navigational robot group and 22 cases in the fluoroscopy group. Using visual analog score (VAS) for the low back and lower limbs, Oswestry Disability Index to compare the clinical efficacy of the 2 groups; using perioperative indexes such as the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and postoperative hospital stay to compare the safety of the 2 groups; and using accuracy of pedicle screws (APS) and the facet joint violation (FJV) to compare the accuracy of the 2 groups. Postoperative follow-up at least 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in the baseline data (P > .05). The navigational robot group\'s VAS-back was significantly lower than the fluoroscopy group at 3 days postoperatively (P < .05). However, the differences between the 2 groups in VAS-back at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and in VAS-leg and Oswestry Disability Index at 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively were not significant (P > .05). Although duration of surgery in the navigational robot group was significantly longer than in the fluoroscopy group (P > .05), the intraoperative blood loss and the intraoperative fluoroscopy times were significantly lower than in the fluoroscopy group (P < .05). The difference in the PHS between the 2 groups was not significant (P > .05). The APS in the navigation robot group was significantly higher than in the fluoroscopy group, and the rate of FJV was significantly lower than in the fluoroscopy group (P < .05). Compared with the traditional fluoroscopic technique, navigation robot-assisted lumbar interbody fusion with internal fixation provides less postoperative low back pain in the short term, with less trauma, less bleeding, and lower radiation exposure, as well as better APS and lower FJV, resulting in better clinical efficacy and safety.

Around a third of all cervical spine injuries occur in the upper cervical spine in the area between the occiput and the second cervical vertebra. The latter being the most common location of the injury with around 70%. But also atlas fractures, occipital condyle fractures, traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2, atypical fractures in the corpus area as well as atlantooccipital and atlantoaxial ligamentous lesions should be mentioned in connection with injuries in this area. In many cases, conservative therapy regimen is possible. In unstable or displaced injuries, however, surgical intervention is required, with various surgical procedures being used. The frequency, diagnostics, classification, and standard therapy of the individual entities are presented in detail in this continuing medical education article.

暂无摘要。