Sound therapy

声音疗法
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耳鸣患者声音治疗结果差异的神经影像学机制尚不清楚。我们假设异常分层结构是治疗结果解释的神经生物标志物。我们对干预前获得的静息状态功能MRI图像进行了功能连接体梯度分析,以调查有效治疗患者之间的差异(ET,n=27),无效治疗(IT,n=41),和健康对照(HC,n=59)。一般线性模型用于分析组间差异区域与临床特征之间的关联。采用偏最小二乘回归来揭示与基因表达的相关性。与HC相比,ET和IT组在默认模式网络中显示出显著差异。此外,ET组表现出更宽的梯度范围和更大的梯度方差。此外,ET和HC组间差异区域的梯度得分与焦虑自评量表和抑郁自评量表得分显著相关,并与抑郁和焦虑相关基因的转录谱呈正相关。我们的结果表明,ET异常组,可能与精神疾病更相关,由于神经系统的可塑性,带来了更高的治疗潜力。具有遗传证据的Connectome梯度功能障碍可以作为确定耳鸣患者在治疗前声音疗法的不同治疗结果的指标。
    The neuroimaging mechanisms underlying differences in the outcomes of sound therapy for tinnitus patients remain unclear. We hypothesize that abnormal hierarchical architecture is the neuro-biomarker for treatment outcome explanation. We conducted functional connectome gradient analyses on resting-state functional MRI images that acquired before intervention to investigate differences among the patients with effective treatment (ET, n = 27), ineffective treatment (IT, n = 41), and healthy controls (HC, n = 59). General linear models were used to analyze the associations between intergroup differential regions and clinical characteristics. Partial least squares regression was employed to reveal correlations with gene expression. Compared to HC, both ET and IT groups displayed significant differences in the default mode network. Moreover, the ET group exhibited wider gradient range and greater gradient variance. Also, the gradient scores of the differential regions between the ET and HC groups were significantly correlated with Self-rating Anxiety Scale and Self-rating Depression Scale scores, and exhibited positive correlations with the transcriptional profiles of genes related to depression and anxiety. Our results indicated that the abnormalities of ET group, may be more relevant to psychiatric disorders, bringing a higher possible therapeutic potential due to the plasticity of the nervous system. Connectome gradient dysfunction with genetic evidence may serve as an indicator for identifying diverse treatment outcomes of the sound therapy for tinnitus patients before treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:声音治疗方法的普及激增,在所有类型的声音刺激中,主要关注音乐。有大量证据证明音乐疗法对心理情绪和生理结果的综合影响,使其有利于解决与压力相关的疾病,如疼痛综合征,抑郁症,和焦虑。尽管取得了这些进步,声音的治疗方面,以及其功效背后的机制,仍然不完全理解。现有的关于音乐作为一种整体文化现象的研究往往忽视了声音治疗机制的关键方面,特别是那些与语音声学或所谓的“语音音乐”有关的声音。\"
    目的:本研究旨在提供有关合理干预措施的实证研究概述,以阐明其积极作用的潜在机制。具体来说,我们将重点确定与合理干预措施相关的治疗因素和变化机制.我们的分析将比较临床研究和实验中报告的最普遍的声音干预类型。此外,我们将探索音乐之外的声音的治疗效果,包括自然的人类语言和中间形式,如传统的诗歌表演。
    方法:本审查遵循JoannaBriggs研究所的方法学指导,并遵循PRISMA-ScR(系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析扩展)清单,用于报告审查研究,它改编自Arksey和O\'Malley框架。我们的搜索策略包括PubMed,WebofScience,Scopus,和PsycINFO或EBSCOhost,涵盖1990年至今的文学。在不同的研究类型中,随机对照试验,临床试验,实验室实验,并包括现场实验。
    结果:数据收集于2022年10月开始。我们共发现2027个项目。我们最初的搜索发现了研究分布的不对称性,与那些在口头干预如引导冥想或催眠中探索韵律的人相比,更多的人专注于音乐疗法。我们使用Rayyan软件(Rayyan)提取和选择论文,并在标题和摘要筛选后确定了41篇合格论文。预计到2024年10月完成范围审查,关键步骤包括在2024年5月之前分析研究结果,在2024年7月之前起草和修订研究报告,并在2024年10月提交论文发表。
    结论:在下一步中,我们将对论文进行质量评估,然后对从中提取的治疗因素进行图表和分组。这一过程旨在揭示现有研究中的概念差距。灰色文献来源,比如谷歌学者,ClinicalTrials.gov,非索引会议,以及检索到的研究的参考列表搜索,将被添加到我们的搜索策略中,以增加我们涵盖的相关论文的数量。
    DERR1-10.2196/54030。
    BACKGROUND: Sound therapy methods have seen a surge in popularity, with a predominant focus on music among all types of sound stimulation. There is substantial evidence documenting the integrative impact of music therapy on psycho-emotional and physiological outcomes, rendering it beneficial for addressing stress-related conditions such as pain syndromes, depression, and anxiety. Despite these advancements, the therapeutic aspects of sound, as well as the mechanisms underlying its efficacy, remain incompletely understood. Existing research on music as a holistic cultural phenomenon often overlooks crucial aspects of sound therapy mechanisms, particularly those related to speech acoustics or the so-called \"music of speech.\"
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide an overview of empirical research on sound interventions to elucidate the mechanism underlying their positive effects. Specifically, we will focus on identifying therapeutic factors and mechanisms of change associated with sound interventions. Our analysis will compare the most prevalent types of sound interventions reported in clinical studies and experiments. Moreover, we will explore the therapeutic effects of sound beyond music, encompassing natural human speech and intermediate forms such as traditional poetry performances.
    METHODS: This review adheres to the methodological guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute and follows the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist for reporting review studies, which is adapted from the Arksey and O\'Malley framework. Our search strategy encompasses PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO or EBSCOhost, covering literature from 1990 to the present. Among the different study types, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, laboratory experiments, and field experiments were included.
    RESULTS: Data collection began in October 2022. We found a total of 2027 items. Our initial search uncovered an asymmetry in the distribution of studies, with a larger number focused on music therapy compared with those exploring prosody in spoken interventions such as guided meditation or hypnosis. We extracted and selected papers using Rayyan software (Rayyan) and identified 41 eligible papers after title and abstract screening. The completion of the scoping review is anticipated by October 2024, with key steps comprising the analysis of findings by May 2024, drafting and revising the study by July 2024, and submitting the paper for publication in October 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the next step, we will conduct a quality evaluation of the papers and then chart and group the therapeutic factors extracted from them. This process aims to unveil conceptual gaps in existing studies. Gray literature sources, such as Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, nonindexed conferences, and reference list searches of retrieved studies, will be added to our search strategy to increase the number of relevant papers that we cover.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/54030.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估δ频率双耳搏动刺激治疗具有正常听力敏感性的耳鸣患者的疗效。
    方法:将24名在听力正常的情况下报告令人烦恼的耳鸣的个体分成两组(I和II)。为该组提供δ频率双耳搏动,并为II提供白噪声刺激(持续时间均为20分钟),持续30天。30天后,耳鸣障碍的重新评估,抑郁症,焦虑,和生活质量参数进行比较,并与治疗前评分进行比较。
    结果:耳鸣障碍评分显著降低,观察两组的抑郁和焦虑水平,除了寿命质量参数。然而,少数参与者在治疗后表现出有限或可忽略的改善.在比较各组观察到的分数下降的情况下,与II组相比,I组的评分降低更多.
    结论:本研究是初步尝试研究双耳搏动对听力正常的耳鸣患者的疗效。除了少数人,在听力正常的患者中,δ波刺激可作为改善耳鸣传播的困扰症状的有用工具。本研究的结果提出了适应双耳搏动刺激的范围,用于治疗具有正常听力敏感性的耳鸣的个体。在涉及对更大人群的延长治疗持续时间的广泛研究之后,该技术可用于临床实践。
    OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of delta frequency binaural beats stimulation in treatment of individuals with tinnitus having normal hearing sensitivity.
    METHODS: Twenty-four individuals who reported bothersome tinnitus in the presence of clinically normal hearing were grouped into two (I and II). The group was provided with delta frequency binaural beats and II was provided with white noise stimulation (both of 20 min duration) for 30 days. Post 30 days, the re-assessment of tinnitus handicap, depression, anxiety, and quality of life parameters were performed and compared with that of pre-treatment scores.
    RESULTS: A considerable reduction of tinnitus handicap scores, depression and anxiety levels were observed for both the groups, except for the quality-of-life parameters. However, few of the participants showed limited or negligible improvement post-treatment. On comparison of reduction of scores observed across the groups, there was a higher reduction of scores observed for group I when compared to group II.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current study was an initial attempt to study the efficacy of binaural beats in treatment of individuals with tinnitus having normal hearing. Apart from a few individuals, the delta wave stimulation acted as a helpful tool in improving tinnitus borne distress symptoms in such patients with normal hearing. The results of the present study put forward the scope of adapting binaural beats stimulation for the treatment of individuals presenting with tinnitus having normal hearing sensitivity. This technique could be adopted into clinical practice after extensive research involving an extended treatment duration on a larger population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    特发性耳鸣是一种常见且复杂的疾病,尚无治愈方法。CAABT(耳蜗交替声束治疗CAABT),是一种个性化的声音疗法,旨在针对特定的耳鸣频率,并根据临床耳鸣评估有效干预耳鸣。这项研究旨在比较CAABT和传统声音疗法(TST)在治疗慢性特发性耳鸣方面的有效性。这是一个随机的,双盲,平行组,单中心前瞻性研究。招募了60名成年耳鸣患者,并使用计算机生成的随机化以1:1的比例随机分配到CAABT或TST组。治疗持续12周,参与者使用耳鸣障碍清单(THI)进行评估,视觉模拟量表(VAS),耳鸣响度测量,和静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)。两组均显示THI评分显着降低,VAS评分,治疗后耳鸣响度。然而,CAABT在THI功能方面优于TST(p=0.018),THIEmotional(p=0.015),THI灾难性的(p=0.022),THI总分(p=0.005)以及VAS评分(p=0.022)。更有趣,CAABT在THI分数的变化方面表现出优于TST的优势,和基线的VAS评分。rs-fMRI结果显示,两组治疗前后前肌均有明显变化。此外,与TST相比,CAABT组的脑区变化更多.没有观察到副作用。这些结果表明,CAABT可能是慢性特发性耳鸣的一种有希望的治疗选择,提供显著改善耳鸣相关症状和大脑活动。试用注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02774122。
    Idiopathic tinnitus is a common and complex disorder with no established cure. The CAABT (Cochleural Alternating Acoustic Beam Therapy CAABT), is a personalized sound therapy designed to target specific tinnitus frequencies and effectively intervene in tinnitus according to clinical tinnitus assessment. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the CAABT and Traditional Sound Therapy (TST) in managing chronic idiopathic tinnitus. This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, single-center prospective study. Sixty adult patients with tinnitus were recruited and randomly assigned to the CAABT or TST group in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated randomization. The treatment lasted for 12 weeks, and participants underwent assessments using the tinnitus handicap inventory (THI), visual analog scale (VAS), tinnitus loudness measurements, and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Both groups showed significant reductions in THI scores, VAS scores, and tinnitus loudness after treatment. However, CAABT showed superiority to TST in THI Functional (p = 0.018), THI Emotional (p = 0.015), THI Catastrophic (p = 0.022), THI total score (p = 0.005) as well as VAS score (p = 0.022). More interesting, CAABT showed superiority to TST in the changes of THI scores, and VAS scores from baseline. The rs-fMRI results showed significant changes in the precuneus before and after treatment in both groups. Moreover, the CAABT group showed more changes in brain regions compared to the TST. No side effects were observed. These findings suggest that CAABT may be a promising treatment option for chronic idiopathic tinnitus, providing significant improvements in tinnitus-related symptoms and brain activity.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02774122.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经提出了各种基于刺激的康复方法来减轻耳鸣。这项研究旨在确定同时为耳鸣缓解提供微电流和声音刺激的康复方法的功效。根据康复方法,将28名患有慢性感觉神经性耳鸣的参与者随机分为两组(仅声音治疗组和微电流和声音治疗联合组)。每位参与者每天接受声音治疗或同时刺激约2小时,持续3个月。康复方法的有效性是根据韩国版本的耳鸣主要功能问卷(K-TPFQ)和基线时的视觉响度模拟量表(VAS-L)评分的变化确定的。1.5个月,和3个月。对于K-TPFQ分数,两组都表现出很大的康复效果;然而,对于VAS-L分数,同时刺激组表现出很大的康复效果,而声音治疗组表现出很小的效果。因此,将声音刺激与微电流刺激相结合的康复方法可以改善耳鸣的反应和感知。
    Various stimulation-based rehabilitation approaches have been proposed to alleviate tinnitus. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of a rehabilitation approach that simultaneously provides microcurrent and sound stimulation for tinnitus relief. Twenty-eight participants with chronic sensorineural tinnitus were randomly assigned to one of two groups based on the rehabilitation approaches (sound therapy-only group and combined microcurrent and sound therapy group). Each participant underwent sound therapy or simultaneous stimulation for approximately 2 h daily for 3 months. The effectiveness of the rehabilitation approaches was determined based on changes in the Korean version of the tinnitus primary function questionnaire (K-TPFQ) and visual analog scale for loudness (VAS-L) scores at baseline, 1.5 months, and 3 months. For the K-TPFQ scores, both groups exhibited a large effect of rehabilitation; however, for the VAS-L scores, the simultaneous stimulation group demonstrated a large effect of rehabilitation, whereas the sound therapy group exhibited a small effect. Therefore, a rehabilitation approach that combines sound stimulation with microcurrent stimulation can improve response and perception in tinnitus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耳鸣声学治疗被定义为声音的任何使用,其中意图是以临床上有益的方式改变耳鸣感知和/或对耳鸣的反应。可能导致有益效果的声音参数,然而,目前只有有限的数据支持它们的有效性。残余抑制是通常在适当的听觉刺激后观察到的耳鸣的暂时抑制或消除。我们的初步研究调查了单独定制的治疗性声刺激的效果,以最大程度地抑制耳鸣的残留并延长其持续时间,以确定是否可以持续抑制耳鸣信号(即,耳鸣响度降低)和对耳鸣的心理和情绪反应减少。这项初步研究有两个目标:(1)通过日常使用助听器来评估残留抑制技术治疗的可行性;(2)通过用耳鸣功能指数(TFI)测量耳鸣的反应性变化和耳鸣响度的感知变化来确定其效果。共有20名成年人(14名男性,6名女性;平均年龄:58岁,SD=12.88)慢性耳鸣患者参加了一项四次访视研究,该研究包括:(1)基线访视和干预期的开始,(2)干预后1个月的访问,(3)2个月的干预后访问和开始一个清洗期,和(4)3个月的访问,以评估冲洗期和干预措施的任何持续效果。干预措施包括安装双侧助听器并创建个性化的残留抑制刺激,该刺激通过蓝牙从智能手机应用程序流式传输到助听器。在2个月的干预期内,参与者被指示佩戴助听器并在所有醒着的时间内传输残留的抑制刺激。在清洗期间,参与者被指示使用助听器进行放大,但剩余的抑制刺激已停止。在所有访问中,参与者完成了TFI,针对研究的自我报告措施,以记录耳鸣的感知,由耳鸣响度和音调匹配组成的心理声学测试电池,和由最小掩蔽和最小残留抑制水平组成的残留抑制测试电池。审判结束时,参与者接受了关于残留抑制治疗技术的研究经验和可接受性的访谈.在所有四次访问中对两个主要结果(TFI总分和耳鸣响度)进行重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)。结果显示访视对TFI总分有显著的主要影响(p<0.0001)。具体来说,结果表明,从基线到干预后1个月,TFI总分显着降低,在干预后的2个月和冲洗期保持稳定。ANOVA结果没有显示耳鸣响度作为访问函数的显著变化(p=0.480)。大多数参与者在退出面试时报告了研究干预的积极经验。这项初步研究表明,残余抑制作为耳鸣的良好疗法,特别是通过日常使用助听器,对于患有慢性耳鸣的个体来说是可行和可接受的。此外,参与者对耳鸣的反应有所改善,这表现为在治疗期间TFI评分平均持续降低.实现残余抑制还可以为患者提供控制耳鸣的感觉,这可能在减少与耳鸣相关的心理和情绪困扰方面具有协同作用。残留抑制治疗导致的长期耳鸣响度没有显着降低;但是,目前的试点研究可能没有足够的权力来检测这种变化。耳鸣抑制和改善对耳鸣的心理社会/情绪反应的组合可能导致短期和长期的更好的生活质量。需要进行更大规模的研究来确定使用残留抑制作为临床治疗选择的有效性,并确定对耳鸣的感知和反应的任何影响。
    Tinnitus acoustic therapy is defined as any use of sound where the intent is to alter the tinnitus perception and/or the reactions to tinnitus in a clinically beneficial way. The parameters of sound that may cause beneficial effects, however, are currently only theorized with limited data supporting their effectiveness. Residual inhibition is the temporary suppression or elimination of tinnitus that is usually observed following appropriate auditory stimulation. Our pilot study investigated the effects of a therapeutic acoustic stimulus that was individually customized to maximize residual inhibition of tinnitus and extend its duration to determine if there could be a sustained suppression of the tinnitus signal (i.e., reduced tinnitus loudness) and a reduction in the psychological and emotional reactions to tinnitus. This pilot study had two objectives: (1) to evaluate the feasibility of residual inhibition technique therapy through daily use of hearing aids and (2) to determine its effects by measuring reactionary changes in tinnitus with the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) and perceptual changes in tinnitus loudness. A total of 20 adults (14 males, 6 females; mean age: 58 years, SD = 12.88) with chronic tinnitus were enrolled in a four-visit study that consisted of the following: (1) baseline visit and initiation of the intervention period, (2) a 1-month postintervention visit, (3) 2-month postintervention visit and initiation of a wash-out period, and (4) a 3-month visit to assess the wash-out period and any lasting effects of the intervention. The intervention consisted of fitting bilateral hearing aids and creating an individualized residual inhibition stimulus that was streamed via Bluetooth from a smartphone application to the hearing aids. The participants were instructed to wear the hearing aids and stream the residual inhibition stimulus all waking hours for the 2-month intervention period. During the wash-out period, the participants were instructed to use the hearing aids for amplification, but the residual inhibition stimulus was discontinued. At all visits, the participants completed the TFI, study-specific self-report measures to document perceptions of tinnitus, a psychoacoustic test battery consisting of tinnitus loudness and pitch matching, and a residual inhibition test battery consisting of minimum masking and minimum residual inhibition levels. At the end of the trial, participants were interviewed about the study experience and acceptability of the residual inhibition treatment technique. Repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted on the two main outcomes (TFI total score and tinnitus loudness) across all four visits. The results showed a significant main effect of visit on the TFI total score ( p  < 0.0001). Specifically, the results indicated a significant reduction in TFI total scores from baseline to the 1-month post-intervention period, which remained stable across the 2-month post-intervention period and the wash-out period. The ANOVA results did not show a significant change in tinnitus loudness as a function of visit ( p  = 0.480). The majority of the participants reported a positive experience with the study intervention at their exit interview. This pilot study demonstrated that residual inhibition as a sound therapy for tinnitus, specifically through the daily use of hearing aids, was feasible and acceptable to individuals suffering from chronic tinnitus. In addition, participants showed improvement in reactions to tinnitus as demonstrated by sustained reduction in TFI scores on average over the course of the treatment period. Achieving residual inhibition may also provide patients a feeling of control over their tinnitus, and this may have a synergistic effect in reducing the psychological and emotional distress associated with tinnitus. There was no significant reduction in long-term tinnitus loudness resulting from the residual inhibition treatment; however, the current pilot study may not have had sufficient power to detect such a change. The combination of tinnitus suppression and improved psychosocial/emotional reactions to tinnitus may result in a better quality of life in both the short and long term. A larger-scale study is needed to determine the validity of using residual inhibition as a clinical therapy option and to ascertain any effects on both perception and reactions to tinnitus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多在线视频可用于声音疗法作为耳鸣的治疗方式,但是不确定这些视频是否足以对患者进行教育。这项研究旨在评估YouTube上用于患者教育的耳鸣声音治疗视频的质量和可靠性。
    使用与“耳鸣声音疗法”相关的关键字搜索YouTube视频。在排除那些重复的视频后,对排名前100位的视频进行了分析,无关紧要,少于3分钟,或者不是英语。根据作者身份和内容对视频进行分类后,视频功率指数(VPI)来确定它们的受欢迎程度。DISCERN问卷(DISCERN),全球质量评分(GQS),美国医学会杂志基准标准(JAMA),并利用患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)来评估质量,透明度,和病人的教育。
    超过一半(56%)的视频是由专业机构发布的。总共有93%只包含声音。只有17%遵循耳鸣临床管理指南的建议,3%的人提供了视频引用的文献。使用了各种类型的声音,其中音乐占35%。这些视频非常受欢迎,平均观看次数为7,335,003.28±24,174,764.02,平均VPI为4,610.33±11,531.10。然而,他们的质量很差(中位数:38/80的DISCERN,GQS的2/5,JAMA的1/4,PEMAT为50%/100%)。视频的受欢迎程度和质量之间存在负相关,PEMAT:-0.207,DISCERN:-0.307,GQS:-0.302,JAMA:-0.233。视频的几个维度需要改进,尤其是可操作性,治疗方案,缺乏100%的透明度,63%,分别为75%。
    YouTube上提供的耳鸣声音治疗视频质量低下。然而,如果完善和适当利用,它们也具有健康教育的潜力。
    UNASSIGNED: Numerous online videos are available on sound therapy as a treatment modality for tinnitus, but it is uncertain if these videos are adequate for patient education. This study aims to evaluate the quality and reliability of tinnitus sound therapy videos on YouTube for patient education.
    UNASSIGNED: YouTube videos were searched using keywords related to \"tinnitus sound therapy\". The top 100 videos were analyzed after excluding those were repetitive, irrelevant, less than 3 min, or not in English. After categorising the videos based on their authorship and content, the video power index (VPI) was relied to determine their popularity. The DISCERN questionnaire (DISCERN), the Global Quality Score (GQS), the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria (JAMA), and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) were utilized to evaluate the quality, transparency, and patient education.
    UNASSIGNED: Over half (56%) of the videos were published by professional organizations. A total of 93% of them contained sound only. Only 17% followed the recommendations of the Clinical Management of Tinnitus Guidelines, and 3% provided literature referenced by the video. A variety types of sound were used, among which music accounting for 35%. The videos were highly popular with an average views of 7,335,003.28 ± 24,174,764.02 and an average VPI of 4,610.33 ± 11,531.10. However, their quality was poor (the median scores: 38/80 for DISCERN, 2/5 for GQS, 1/4 for JAMA, and 50%/100% for PEMAT). There was a negative correlation between the popularity of the videos and their quality, indicated by PEMAT: -0.207, DISCERN: -0.307, GQS: -0.302, and JAMA: -0.233. Several dimensions of the videos require improvement, especially actionability, treatment options, and transparency with lacks of 100%, 63%, and 75% respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: The tinnitus sound therapy videos available on YouTube exhibit low quality. Nevertheless, they also hold potential for health education if refined and utilized suitably.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:耳鸣是许多患者的负担。声音放大和掩蔽治疗对一些患者是有用的。
    方法:回顾性图表回顾在一个学术医疗中心治疗耳鸣12个月的患者。收集并分析有关治疗过程和结果的信息。使用配对均值的t检验进行统计比较。
    结果:2021年,在我们的医疗中心对141名患者进行了耳鸣声音放大和掩蔽治疗评估。就诊时的平均年龄为55.2岁。平均发病前6-7年。接受放大和掩蔽治疗试验的患者耳鸣感知降低,从基线时的20分中的9.2分到初次访视时的6.1次扩增和3.2次扩增和掩蔽。这些值中的每一个的差异在统计学上是显著的。9名患者记录了耳鸣障碍指数(THI),测量耳鸣负担,在进行扩增和掩蔽治疗之前和之后。这9名患者的THI从39.6/100降至19.1/100,这也具有统计学意义。
    结论:本研究有几个局限性。我们的数据来自一个诊所超过一年的随访信息有限,这是一项回顾性研究。
    结论:我们的数据显示,声音放大和掩蔽治疗对耳鸣的治疗有益。在办公室演示期间,接受放大和掩蔽疗法治疗的患者对耳鸣的感知在统计学上显着降低。仍然需要长期数据。我们的数据有助于有关耳鸣的正确治疗过程和最有效措施的更广泛讨论。
    BACKGROUND: Tinnitus is burdensome to many patients. Sound amplification and masking therapy has been useful for some patients.
    METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients treated for tinnitus at a single academic medical center over a 12-month period. Information on treatment course and outcomes was collected and analyzed. Statistical comparisons were made using a t-test for paired means.
    RESULTS: In 2021, 141 patients were evaluated for tinnitus sound amplification and masking therapy at our medical center. Average age at presentation was 55.2. Average onset was 6-7 years before presentation. Tinnitus perception was decreased in patients who received a trial of amplification and masking therapy, from 9.2 out of 20 at baseline to 6.1 with amplification and 3.2 with amplification and masking at the initial visit. The difference in each of these values is statistically significant. Nine patients recorded a Tinnitus Handicap Index (THI), which measures tinnitus burden, before and after being treated with amplification and masking therapy. These nine patients saw a decrease in THI from 39.6/100 to 19.1/100, which was also statistically significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study has several limitations. Our data are from a single clinic over one year with limited follow up information, and it is a retrospective study.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed benefit in sound amplification and masking therapy for the treatment of tinnitus. Patients treated with amplification and masking therapy showed a statistically significant decrease in perception of their tinnitus during their in-office demonstration. Long term data are still needed. Our data contribute to the broader discussion on the proper treatment course of tinnitus and the most effective measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在开发一种改良的耳鸣缓解声音系统,并建立预测其治疗效果的模型。
    方法:回顾性研究。
    方法:眼科耳鼻喉科医院耳鸣专科诊所,复旦大学。
    方法:我们在2020年8月至2021年5月期间招募了107名接受改良耳鸣缓解音的患者。患者以7:3的比例分为训练组(n=75)和验证组(n=32)。治疗结果为耳鸣障碍量表评分。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子推导的逻辑回归模型建立了特征,其中选择的临床危险因素包括在多变量逻辑回归中,并根据模型建立了列线图。使用Hosmer-Lemeshow测试和校准曲线评估了列线图的辨别和校准能力。决策曲线分析(DCA)用于评估预测疗效的净收益。
    结果:多变量逻辑分析表明,初始耳鸣障碍量表得分(比值比[OR]:1.13[1.07-1.19],P<.001)和治疗持续时间(OR:3.4[1.34-8.62],P<.001)是改善耳鸣的积极因素。包括基线耳鸣障碍量表评分和治疗持续时间的列线图模型达到了0.880的更好的一致性指数。DCA显示,列线图模型可以带来净收益,并显示出更广泛的阈值概率来预测治疗效果。
    结论:我们的研究表明,列线图模型,包括基线耳鸣障碍量表评分和治疗持续时间,可以在术前预测改良耳鸣缓解音的治疗效果方面达到最佳表现。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a modified tinnitus-relieving sound system and establish a model for predicting its treatment effects.
    METHODS: Retrospective study.
    METHODS: Tinnitus Specialist Clinic of Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University.
    METHODS: We recruited 107 patients undergoing modified tinnitus-relieving sounds between August 2020 and May 2021. Patients were divided into training (n = 75) and validation (n = 32) cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. The treatment outcome was Tinnitus Handicapped Inventory scores. Features were established using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-derived logistic regression model, where the selected clinical risk factors were included in the multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram was established based on the model. The discrimination and calibration abilities of the nomogram were evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curves. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the net benefit of predictive efficacy.
    RESULTS: Multivariate logistic analysis indicated that the initial Tinnitus Handicapped Inventory score (odds ratio [OR]: 1.13 [1.07-1.19], P < .001) and treatment duration (OR: 3.4 [1.34-8.62], P < .001) were positive factors for improved tinnitus. The nomogram model that included baseline Tinnitus Handicapped Inventory score and treatment duration achieved a better concordance index of 0.880. DCA revealed that the nomogram model could lead to net benefits and exhibited a wider range of threshold probabilities for the prediction of therapeutic effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the nomogram model, including baseline Tinnitus Handicapped Inventory score and treatment duration, could achieve optimal performance in the preoperative prediction of the therapeutic effect of modified tinnitus-relieving sound.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:大部分接受结肠镜检查的个体在手术前报告压力和焦虑。在先前的研究中,尚未研究白噪声作为非药物干预对等待结肠镜检查的个体的状态焦虑和生命体征的功效。本研究旨在分析白噪声对接受结肠镜检查的老年人术前焦虑和生命体征的影响。
    方法:前测/后测准实验研究。
    方法:受试者(N=60)是结肠镜检查单元中的老年人,分为实验组(n=30)和对照组(n=30)。实验组受试者通过双耳耳机听白噪声20分钟,对照组接受常规内镜前护理。使用状态-特质焦虑量表和生命体征监测器评估干预前后的状态焦虑和生命体征。分别。数据采用SPSS-25软件进行分析。
    结果:两组在人口统计学特征上无统计学差异,状态焦虑,收缩压和舒张压,脉搏率,干预前的呼吸频率(P>0.05)。干预后,实验组和对照组在状态焦虑(P=.00)和脉搏率(P=.003)方面存在显着差异。两组在收缩压方面无显著差异(P=0.69)。舒张压(.59),干预后的呼吸频率(P=.164)。
    结论:这项研究提供了初步证据,支持在接受结肠镜检查的老年人中使用白噪声来减轻焦虑。作者建议这种干预,作为一种非药物和易于管理的方法,是为了减少结肠镜前检查的焦虑。建议继续调查白噪声对生命体征的影响。
    OBJECTIVE: A significant portion of individuals undergoing colonoscopy report stress and anxiety before the procedure. The efficacy of white noise as a nonpharmacological intervention on state anxiety and vital signs of individuals waiting for colonoscopy has not been investigated in previous studies. The current study aimed to analyze the effect of white noise on preprocedural anxiety and vital signs among older adults undergoing colonoscopy.
    METHODS: A pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental study.
    METHODS: Subjects (N = 60) were older adults in the colonoscopy unit and divided into experimental (n = 30) and control groups (n = 30). The subjects in the experimental group listened to the white noise via binaural headphones for 20 minutes, while the control group received routine pre-endoscopic care. State anxiety and vital signs were assessed before and after intervention using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and vital signs monitor, respectively. The data were analyzed using SPSS-25 software.
    RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups on demographic characteristics, state-anxiety, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and respiratory rate before the intervention (P > .05). A significant difference was found between the experimental and control groups in terms of state-anxiety (P = .00) and pulse rate (P = .003) after the intervention. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of systolic blood pressure (P = .69), diastolic blood pressure (.59), and respiratory rate (P = .164) after the intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the use of white noise in older adults undergoing colonoscopy to reduce anxiety. The authors recommend that this intervention, as a nonpharmacological and easily administered approach, is adopted to reduce precolonoscopy anxiety. Continued investigation into the effect of white noise on vital signs is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号