Sound therapy

声音疗法
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高音是一种以对正常日常声音过敏或声音耐受性降低为特征的疾病,并可能以令人痛苦的方式影响患者。声音疗法是用于使患者脱敏的治疗干预。然而,到目前为止,对它如何在临床实践中使用缺乏了解,不同类型的设备,或者如何使用它们。这项范围审查的目的是确定目前在患有高音障碍的成年人中使用声音疗法,并确定可能影响治疗的任何因素。方法:使用已建立的方法框架来制定研究问题并指导搜索策略和报告。纳入标准是报告成人(>18岁)人群的研究,这些人群以任何语言发表。电子数据库的搜索(CINAHL,科克伦图书馆,Medline(EBSCO),Scopus,PsycINFO)确定了31项符合纳入标准的研究(于2024年4月完成)。对纳入记录的数据进行了整理和描述性总结。
    Hyperacusis is a condition that is characterized by hypersensitivity to normal everyday sounds or reduced sound tolerance and can affect patients in distressing ways. Sound therapy is a treatment intervention that is used to desensitize patients. However, as yet, there is a lack of understanding on how it is used in clinical practice, the different types of devices, or how to use them. The aim of this scoping review was to establish the current use of sound therapy in adults with hyperacusis and identify any factors that may influence treatment. Methodology: An established methodological framework was used to formulate the research question and guide the search strategy and reporting. The inclusion criteria were studies reporting adult (>18 years) populations with hyperacusis and sound therapy treatments which were published in any language. Searches of electronic databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Medline (EBSCO), Scopus, PsycINFO) identified 31 studies that met the inclusion criteria (completed in April 2024). Data from included records were collated and summarized descriptively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:声音治疗方法的普及激增,在所有类型的声音刺激中,主要关注音乐。有大量证据证明音乐疗法对心理情绪和生理结果的综合影响,使其有利于解决与压力相关的疾病,如疼痛综合征,抑郁症,和焦虑。尽管取得了这些进步,声音的治疗方面,以及其功效背后的机制,仍然不完全理解。现有的关于音乐作为一种整体文化现象的研究往往忽视了声音治疗机制的关键方面,特别是那些与语音声学或所谓的“语音音乐”有关的声音。\"
    目的:本研究旨在提供有关合理干预措施的实证研究概述,以阐明其积极作用的潜在机制。具体来说,我们将重点确定与合理干预措施相关的治疗因素和变化机制.我们的分析将比较临床研究和实验中报告的最普遍的声音干预类型。此外,我们将探索音乐之外的声音的治疗效果,包括自然的人类语言和中间形式,如传统的诗歌表演。
    方法:本审查遵循JoannaBriggs研究所的方法学指导,并遵循PRISMA-ScR(系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析扩展)清单,用于报告审查研究,它改编自Arksey和O\'Malley框架。我们的搜索策略包括PubMed,WebofScience,Scopus,和PsycINFO或EBSCOhost,涵盖1990年至今的文学。在不同的研究类型中,随机对照试验,临床试验,实验室实验,并包括现场实验。
    结果:数据收集于2022年10月开始。我们共发现2027个项目。我们最初的搜索发现了研究分布的不对称性,与那些在口头干预如引导冥想或催眠中探索韵律的人相比,更多的人专注于音乐疗法。我们使用Rayyan软件(Rayyan)提取和选择论文,并在标题和摘要筛选后确定了41篇合格论文。预计到2024年10月完成范围审查,关键步骤包括在2024年5月之前分析研究结果,在2024年7月之前起草和修订研究报告,并在2024年10月提交论文发表。
    结论:在下一步中,我们将对论文进行质量评估,然后对从中提取的治疗因素进行图表和分组。这一过程旨在揭示现有研究中的概念差距。灰色文献来源,比如谷歌学者,ClinicalTrials.gov,非索引会议,以及检索到的研究的参考列表搜索,将被添加到我们的搜索策略中,以增加我们涵盖的相关论文的数量。
    DERR1-10.2196/54030。
    BACKGROUND: Sound therapy methods have seen a surge in popularity, with a predominant focus on music among all types of sound stimulation. There is substantial evidence documenting the integrative impact of music therapy on psycho-emotional and physiological outcomes, rendering it beneficial for addressing stress-related conditions such as pain syndromes, depression, and anxiety. Despite these advancements, the therapeutic aspects of sound, as well as the mechanisms underlying its efficacy, remain incompletely understood. Existing research on music as a holistic cultural phenomenon often overlooks crucial aspects of sound therapy mechanisms, particularly those related to speech acoustics or the so-called \"music of speech.\"
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide an overview of empirical research on sound interventions to elucidate the mechanism underlying their positive effects. Specifically, we will focus on identifying therapeutic factors and mechanisms of change associated with sound interventions. Our analysis will compare the most prevalent types of sound interventions reported in clinical studies and experiments. Moreover, we will explore the therapeutic effects of sound beyond music, encompassing natural human speech and intermediate forms such as traditional poetry performances.
    METHODS: This review adheres to the methodological guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute and follows the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist for reporting review studies, which is adapted from the Arksey and O\'Malley framework. Our search strategy encompasses PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO or EBSCOhost, covering literature from 1990 to the present. Among the different study types, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, laboratory experiments, and field experiments were included.
    RESULTS: Data collection began in October 2022. We found a total of 2027 items. Our initial search uncovered an asymmetry in the distribution of studies, with a larger number focused on music therapy compared with those exploring prosody in spoken interventions such as guided meditation or hypnosis. We extracted and selected papers using Rayyan software (Rayyan) and identified 41 eligible papers after title and abstract screening. The completion of the scoping review is anticipated by October 2024, with key steps comprising the analysis of findings by May 2024, drafting and revising the study by July 2024, and submitting the paper for publication in October 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the next step, we will conduct a quality evaluation of the papers and then chart and group the therapeutic factors extracted from them. This process aims to unveil conceptual gaps in existing studies. Gray literature sources, such as Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, nonindexed conferences, and reference list searches of retrieved studies, will be added to our search strategy to increase the number of relevant papers that we cover.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/54030.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    特发性耳鸣是一种常见且复杂的疾病,尚无治愈方法。CAABT(耳蜗交替声束治疗CAABT),是一种个性化的声音疗法,旨在针对特定的耳鸣频率,并根据临床耳鸣评估有效干预耳鸣。这项研究旨在比较CAABT和传统声音疗法(TST)在治疗慢性特发性耳鸣方面的有效性。这是一个随机的,双盲,平行组,单中心前瞻性研究。招募了60名成年耳鸣患者,并使用计算机生成的随机化以1:1的比例随机分配到CAABT或TST组。治疗持续12周,参与者使用耳鸣障碍清单(THI)进行评估,视觉模拟量表(VAS),耳鸣响度测量,和静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)。两组均显示THI评分显着降低,VAS评分,治疗后耳鸣响度。然而,CAABT在THI功能方面优于TST(p=0.018),THIEmotional(p=0.015),THI灾难性的(p=0.022),THI总分(p=0.005)以及VAS评分(p=0.022)。更有趣,CAABT在THI分数的变化方面表现出优于TST的优势,和基线的VAS评分。rs-fMRI结果显示,两组治疗前后前肌均有明显变化。此外,与TST相比,CAABT组的脑区变化更多.没有观察到副作用。这些结果表明,CAABT可能是慢性特发性耳鸣的一种有希望的治疗选择,提供显著改善耳鸣相关症状和大脑活动。试用注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02774122。
    Idiopathic tinnitus is a common and complex disorder with no established cure. The CAABT (Cochleural Alternating Acoustic Beam Therapy CAABT), is a personalized sound therapy designed to target specific tinnitus frequencies and effectively intervene in tinnitus according to clinical tinnitus assessment. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the CAABT and Traditional Sound Therapy (TST) in managing chronic idiopathic tinnitus. This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, single-center prospective study. Sixty adult patients with tinnitus were recruited and randomly assigned to the CAABT or TST group in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated randomization. The treatment lasted for 12 weeks, and participants underwent assessments using the tinnitus handicap inventory (THI), visual analog scale (VAS), tinnitus loudness measurements, and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Both groups showed significant reductions in THI scores, VAS scores, and tinnitus loudness after treatment. However, CAABT showed superiority to TST in THI Functional (p = 0.018), THI Emotional (p = 0.015), THI Catastrophic (p = 0.022), THI total score (p = 0.005) as well as VAS score (p = 0.022). More interesting, CAABT showed superiority to TST in the changes of THI scores, and VAS scores from baseline. The rs-fMRI results showed significant changes in the precuneus before and after treatment in both groups. Moreover, the CAABT group showed more changes in brain regions compared to the TST. No side effects were observed. These findings suggest that CAABT may be a promising treatment option for chronic idiopathic tinnitus, providing significant improvements in tinnitus-related symptoms and brain activity.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02774122.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经提出了各种基于刺激的康复方法来减轻耳鸣。这项研究旨在确定同时为耳鸣缓解提供微电流和声音刺激的康复方法的功效。根据康复方法,将28名患有慢性感觉神经性耳鸣的参与者随机分为两组(仅声音治疗组和微电流和声音治疗联合组)。每位参与者每天接受声音治疗或同时刺激约2小时,持续3个月。康复方法的有效性是根据韩国版本的耳鸣主要功能问卷(K-TPFQ)和基线时的视觉响度模拟量表(VAS-L)评分的变化确定的。1.5个月,和3个月。对于K-TPFQ分数,两组都表现出很大的康复效果;然而,对于VAS-L分数,同时刺激组表现出很大的康复效果,而声音治疗组表现出很小的效果。因此,将声音刺激与微电流刺激相结合的康复方法可以改善耳鸣的反应和感知。
    Various stimulation-based rehabilitation approaches have been proposed to alleviate tinnitus. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of a rehabilitation approach that simultaneously provides microcurrent and sound stimulation for tinnitus relief. Twenty-eight participants with chronic sensorineural tinnitus were randomly assigned to one of two groups based on the rehabilitation approaches (sound therapy-only group and combined microcurrent and sound therapy group). Each participant underwent sound therapy or simultaneous stimulation for approximately 2 h daily for 3 months. The effectiveness of the rehabilitation approaches was determined based on changes in the Korean version of the tinnitus primary function questionnaire (K-TPFQ) and visual analog scale for loudness (VAS-L) scores at baseline, 1.5 months, and 3 months. For the K-TPFQ scores, both groups exhibited a large effect of rehabilitation; however, for the VAS-L scores, the simultaneous stimulation group demonstrated a large effect of rehabilitation, whereas the sound therapy group exhibited a small effect. Therefore, a rehabilitation approach that combines sound stimulation with microcurrent stimulation can improve response and perception in tinnitus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耳鸣声学治疗被定义为声音的任何使用,其中意图是以临床上有益的方式改变耳鸣感知和/或对耳鸣的反应。可能导致有益效果的声音参数,然而,目前只有有限的数据支持它们的有效性。残余抑制是通常在适当的听觉刺激后观察到的耳鸣的暂时抑制或消除。我们的初步研究调查了单独定制的治疗性声刺激的效果,以最大程度地抑制耳鸣的残留并延长其持续时间,以确定是否可以持续抑制耳鸣信号(即,耳鸣响度降低)和对耳鸣的心理和情绪反应减少。这项初步研究有两个目标:(1)通过日常使用助听器来评估残留抑制技术治疗的可行性;(2)通过用耳鸣功能指数(TFI)测量耳鸣的反应性变化和耳鸣响度的感知变化来确定其效果。共有20名成年人(14名男性,6名女性;平均年龄:58岁,SD=12.88)慢性耳鸣患者参加了一项四次访视研究,该研究包括:(1)基线访视和干预期的开始,(2)干预后1个月的访问,(3)2个月的干预后访问和开始一个清洗期,和(4)3个月的访问,以评估冲洗期和干预措施的任何持续效果。干预措施包括安装双侧助听器并创建个性化的残留抑制刺激,该刺激通过蓝牙从智能手机应用程序流式传输到助听器。在2个月的干预期内,参与者被指示佩戴助听器并在所有醒着的时间内传输残留的抑制刺激。在清洗期间,参与者被指示使用助听器进行放大,但剩余的抑制刺激已停止。在所有访问中,参与者完成了TFI,针对研究的自我报告措施,以记录耳鸣的感知,由耳鸣响度和音调匹配组成的心理声学测试电池,和由最小掩蔽和最小残留抑制水平组成的残留抑制测试电池。审判结束时,参与者接受了关于残留抑制治疗技术的研究经验和可接受性的访谈.在所有四次访问中对两个主要结果(TFI总分和耳鸣响度)进行重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)。结果显示访视对TFI总分有显著的主要影响(p<0.0001)。具体来说,结果表明,从基线到干预后1个月,TFI总分显着降低,在干预后的2个月和冲洗期保持稳定。ANOVA结果没有显示耳鸣响度作为访问函数的显著变化(p=0.480)。大多数参与者在退出面试时报告了研究干预的积极经验。这项初步研究表明,残余抑制作为耳鸣的良好疗法,特别是通过日常使用助听器,对于患有慢性耳鸣的个体来说是可行和可接受的。此外,参与者对耳鸣的反应有所改善,这表现为在治疗期间TFI评分平均持续降低.实现残余抑制还可以为患者提供控制耳鸣的感觉,这可能在减少与耳鸣相关的心理和情绪困扰方面具有协同作用。残留抑制治疗导致的长期耳鸣响度没有显着降低;但是,目前的试点研究可能没有足够的权力来检测这种变化。耳鸣抑制和改善对耳鸣的心理社会/情绪反应的组合可能导致短期和长期的更好的生活质量。需要进行更大规模的研究来确定使用残留抑制作为临床治疗选择的有效性,并确定对耳鸣的感知和反应的任何影响。
    Tinnitus acoustic therapy is defined as any use of sound where the intent is to alter the tinnitus perception and/or the reactions to tinnitus in a clinically beneficial way. The parameters of sound that may cause beneficial effects, however, are currently only theorized with limited data supporting their effectiveness. Residual inhibition is the temporary suppression or elimination of tinnitus that is usually observed following appropriate auditory stimulation. Our pilot study investigated the effects of a therapeutic acoustic stimulus that was individually customized to maximize residual inhibition of tinnitus and extend its duration to determine if there could be a sustained suppression of the tinnitus signal (i.e., reduced tinnitus loudness) and a reduction in the psychological and emotional reactions to tinnitus. This pilot study had two objectives: (1) to evaluate the feasibility of residual inhibition technique therapy through daily use of hearing aids and (2) to determine its effects by measuring reactionary changes in tinnitus with the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) and perceptual changes in tinnitus loudness. A total of 20 adults (14 males, 6 females; mean age: 58 years, SD = 12.88) with chronic tinnitus were enrolled in a four-visit study that consisted of the following: (1) baseline visit and initiation of the intervention period, (2) a 1-month postintervention visit, (3) 2-month postintervention visit and initiation of a wash-out period, and (4) a 3-month visit to assess the wash-out period and any lasting effects of the intervention. The intervention consisted of fitting bilateral hearing aids and creating an individualized residual inhibition stimulus that was streamed via Bluetooth from a smartphone application to the hearing aids. The participants were instructed to wear the hearing aids and stream the residual inhibition stimulus all waking hours for the 2-month intervention period. During the wash-out period, the participants were instructed to use the hearing aids for amplification, but the residual inhibition stimulus was discontinued. At all visits, the participants completed the TFI, study-specific self-report measures to document perceptions of tinnitus, a psychoacoustic test battery consisting of tinnitus loudness and pitch matching, and a residual inhibition test battery consisting of minimum masking and minimum residual inhibition levels. At the end of the trial, participants were interviewed about the study experience and acceptability of the residual inhibition treatment technique. Repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted on the two main outcomes (TFI total score and tinnitus loudness) across all four visits. The results showed a significant main effect of visit on the TFI total score ( p  < 0.0001). Specifically, the results indicated a significant reduction in TFI total scores from baseline to the 1-month post-intervention period, which remained stable across the 2-month post-intervention period and the wash-out period. The ANOVA results did not show a significant change in tinnitus loudness as a function of visit ( p  = 0.480). The majority of the participants reported a positive experience with the study intervention at their exit interview. This pilot study demonstrated that residual inhibition as a sound therapy for tinnitus, specifically through the daily use of hearing aids, was feasible and acceptable to individuals suffering from chronic tinnitus. In addition, participants showed improvement in reactions to tinnitus as demonstrated by sustained reduction in TFI scores on average over the course of the treatment period. Achieving residual inhibition may also provide patients a feeling of control over their tinnitus, and this may have a synergistic effect in reducing the psychological and emotional distress associated with tinnitus. There was no significant reduction in long-term tinnitus loudness resulting from the residual inhibition treatment; however, the current pilot study may not have had sufficient power to detect such a change. The combination of tinnitus suppression and improved psychosocial/emotional reactions to tinnitus may result in a better quality of life in both the short and long term. A larger-scale study is needed to determine the validity of using residual inhibition as a clinical therapy option and to ascertain any effects on both perception and reactions to tinnitus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多在线视频可用于声音疗法作为耳鸣的治疗方式,但是不确定这些视频是否足以对患者进行教育。这项研究旨在评估YouTube上用于患者教育的耳鸣声音治疗视频的质量和可靠性。
    使用与“耳鸣声音疗法”相关的关键字搜索YouTube视频。在排除那些重复的视频后,对排名前100位的视频进行了分析,无关紧要,少于3分钟,或者不是英语。根据作者身份和内容对视频进行分类后,视频功率指数(VPI)来确定它们的受欢迎程度。DISCERN问卷(DISCERN),全球质量评分(GQS),美国医学会杂志基准标准(JAMA),并利用患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)来评估质量,透明度,和病人的教育。
    超过一半(56%)的视频是由专业机构发布的。总共有93%只包含声音。只有17%遵循耳鸣临床管理指南的建议,3%的人提供了视频引用的文献。使用了各种类型的声音,其中音乐占35%。这些视频非常受欢迎,平均观看次数为7,335,003.28±24,174,764.02,平均VPI为4,610.33±11,531.10。然而,他们的质量很差(中位数:38/80的DISCERN,GQS的2/5,JAMA的1/4,PEMAT为50%/100%)。视频的受欢迎程度和质量之间存在负相关,PEMAT:-0.207,DISCERN:-0.307,GQS:-0.302,JAMA:-0.233。视频的几个维度需要改进,尤其是可操作性,治疗方案,缺乏100%的透明度,63%,分别为75%。
    YouTube上提供的耳鸣声音治疗视频质量低下。然而,如果完善和适当利用,它们也具有健康教育的潜力。
    UNASSIGNED: Numerous online videos are available on sound therapy as a treatment modality for tinnitus, but it is uncertain if these videos are adequate for patient education. This study aims to evaluate the quality and reliability of tinnitus sound therapy videos on YouTube for patient education.
    UNASSIGNED: YouTube videos were searched using keywords related to \"tinnitus sound therapy\". The top 100 videos were analyzed after excluding those were repetitive, irrelevant, less than 3 min, or not in English. After categorising the videos based on their authorship and content, the video power index (VPI) was relied to determine their popularity. The DISCERN questionnaire (DISCERN), the Global Quality Score (GQS), the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria (JAMA), and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) were utilized to evaluate the quality, transparency, and patient education.
    UNASSIGNED: Over half (56%) of the videos were published by professional organizations. A total of 93% of them contained sound only. Only 17% followed the recommendations of the Clinical Management of Tinnitus Guidelines, and 3% provided literature referenced by the video. A variety types of sound were used, among which music accounting for 35%. The videos were highly popular with an average views of 7,335,003.28 ± 24,174,764.02 and an average VPI of 4,610.33 ± 11,531.10. However, their quality was poor (the median scores: 38/80 for DISCERN, 2/5 for GQS, 1/4 for JAMA, and 50%/100% for PEMAT). There was a negative correlation between the popularity of the videos and their quality, indicated by PEMAT: -0.207, DISCERN: -0.307, GQS: -0.302, and JAMA: -0.233. Several dimensions of the videos require improvement, especially actionability, treatment options, and transparency with lacks of 100%, 63%, and 75% respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: The tinnitus sound therapy videos available on YouTube exhibit low quality. Nevertheless, they also hold potential for health education if refined and utilized suitably.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    声音疗法是一种常见的耳鸣治疗方法,耳鸣感知被外部声音完全或部分掩盖。一些耳鸣患者在使用声音疗法后经历耳鸣相关痛苦的减少。对声音治疗的神经反应的差异可以形成对耳鸣患者进行分类的基础。
    在这项研究中,在慢性耳鸣患者中,研究了声音疗法对振荡脑活动和耳鸣相关困扰的长期(2个月)影响。还将耳鸣参与者组中的基线振荡活动与匹配的对照组进行了比较。
    当比较耳鸣组与对照组时,振荡活动没有发现差异。当比较使用声音疗法前后的耳鸣组时,发现27.5和41.5Hz之间的频率范围存在差异,对应于高β和γ功率。此外,长期使用声音疗法后,发现与耳鸣有关的痛苦减少。然而,振荡活动的变化与耳鸣相关困扰的减少之间没有相关性。
    总的来说,耳鸣相关痛苦的变化与动力活动的变化之间缺乏相关性,这阻碍了研究结果的可解释性,并削弱了将振荡活动用作声音疗法治疗效果的生物标志物的效用.
    UNASSIGNED: Sound therapy is a common tinnitus treatment, where the tinnitus percept is either fully or partially masked by an external sound. Some tinnitus patients experience a decrease in tinnitus related distress after the use of sound therapy. Differences in the neural response to sound therapy may form a basis for classifying tinnitus patients.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, the long-term (2 months) effects of sound therapy on the oscillatory brain activity and tinnitus related distress were investigated in chronic tinnitus patients. Baseline oscillatory activity in the group of tinnitus participants was also compared to a matched control group.
    UNASSIGNED: No differences were found in the oscillatory activity when comparing the tinnitus group to the control group. Differences were found for the frequency range between 27.5 and 41.5 Hz corresponding to high beta and gamma power when comparing the tinnitus group before and after the use of sound therapy. Furthermore, a reduction of the tinnitus-related distress was found after the long-term use of sound therapy. However, there was no correlation between the changes in the oscillatory activity and the reductions of the tinnitus-related distress.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, the lack of correlation between the changes in tinnitus-related distress and changes in power activity hampers the interpretability of the findings and undermines the utility of using oscillatory activity as a biomarker for the effect of sound therapy treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究使用多模态磁共振成像(MRI)系统研究了丘脑及其亚区域的结构和功能改变,并研究了其在声音治疗(窄带噪声)后不同结局的耳鸣患者中的临床意义。
    方法:总共,招募了60名持续性耳鸣患者和57名健康对照(HCs)。根据治疗效果,28例患者分为有效组,32例分为无效组。对丘脑及其七个亚区域进行了五次MRI测量,包括灰质体积,分数各向异性,低频波动的小振幅,和功能连接(FC),为每个参与者获得并在组间进行比较。
    结果:两组患者在整个丘脑和几个亚区域都表现出广泛的功能和扩散异常,在有效组中观察到更明显的变化。所有耳鸣患者与HCs相比,FC异常;两组患者之间的FC差异仅在纹状体网络中观察到,听觉相关皮层,和边缘系统的核心区域。我们结合了多模态定量丘脑改变,并将其用作影像学指标来评估合理治疗前的预后,并获得了71.9%的敏感性和85.7%的特异性。
    结论:在不同结局的耳鸣患者中发现类似的丘脑改变模式,在有效组中观察到更明显的变化。我们的发现支持额纹状体门控系统功能障碍的耳鸣产生假说。多模态定量丘脑特性的组合可以用作在合理治疗之前预测耳鸣预后的指标。
    This study systematically investigated structural and functional alterations in the thalamus and its subregions using multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and examined its clinical relevance in tinnitus patients with different outcomes after sound therapy (narrowband noise).
    In total, 60 patients with persistent tinnitus and 57 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. Based on treatment efficacy, 28 patients were categorized into the effective group and 32 into the ineffective group. Five MRI measurements of the thalamus and its seven subregions, including gray matter volume, fractional anisotropy, fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation, and functional connectivity (FC), were obtained for each participant and compared between the groups.
    Patients in both the groups exhibited widespread functional and diffusion abnormalities in the whole thalamus and several subregions, with more obvious changes observed in the effective group. All tinnitus patients had abnormal FC compared with the HCs; FC differences between the two patient groups were only observed in the striatal network, auditory-related cortex, and the core area of the limbic system. We combined the multimodal quantitative thalamic alterations and used it as an imaging indicator to evaluate prognosis before sound therapy and achieved a sensitivity of 71.9% and a specificity of 85.7%.
    Similar patterns of thalamic alterations were identified in tinnitus patients with different outcomes, with more obvious changes observed in the effective group. Our findings support the tinnitus generation hypothesis of frontostriatal gating system dysfunction. A combination of multimodal quantitative thalamic properties may be used as indicators to predict tinnitus prognosis before sound therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:耳鸣是一种非常普遍的听力障碍,耳鸣诊断和治疗的负担非常重,尤其是在中国。为了更好地造福广大耳鸣患者,我们开发了一个新的移动应用程序基于我们的专利发明-名为复旦耳鸣缓解系统(FTRS)-耳鸣管理。FTRS应用程序旨在使用定制的声音疗法缓解患者的耳鸣症状,为了评估治疗效果,提供一个医患沟通的平台,并支持耳鸣康复和听觉健康。
    方法:在本研究中,我们介绍了FTRS应用程序的主要功能,分析了中国各地用户的地理分布,并对耳鸣患者的人口统计学和临床特征进行了分析,包括年龄和耳鸣位置,持续时间,频率,根据FTRS收集的用户信息,男性和女性的严重程度。统计分析包括22,867名参与者(男性:13,715;女性:9,152)的数据。
    结果:自2018年5月推出以来,FTRS应用程序一直受到耳鸣患者的欢迎,其集成的音高匹配测试,个性化声音治疗,后续评估,并提供易于理解的耳鸣科学和教育。用户遍布中国大陆,但主要集中在上海,江苏,浙江,广东,和山东省。我们观察到年龄和耳鸣频率的性别差异,严重程度,和应用程序的用户之间的位置。FTRS不仅促进了患者在方便的时间和地点获得治疗,还提供了基于用户反馈的大量数据,以支持临床耳鸣研究。
    结论:与传统的面对面医疗相比,FTRS大大降低了医疗费用,并使耳鸣患者能够安排自己的治疗时间。同时,FTRS提供了标准化的耳鸣数据,为耳鸣的临床研究奠定了基础。然而,由于智能设备的普及和利用率不同,FTRS用户数据可能仅反映能够有效使用智能设备的耳鸣患者的情况。因此,本研究的结果需要谨慎解释.
    Tinnitus is a highly prevalent hearing disorder, and the burden of tinnitus diagnosis and treatment is very heavy, especially in China. In order to better benefit the majority of tinnitus patients, we developed a new mobile app based on our patented invention - named the Fudan Tinnitus Relieving System (FTRS) - for tinnitus management. The FTRS app aims to alleviate patients\' tinnitus symptoms using customized sound therapy, to evaluate the treatment effect, to provide a doctor-patient communication platform, and to support tinnitus rehabilitation and auditory health.
    In this study, we introduced the major functions of the FTRS app, analyzed the geographical distribution of users around China, and performed an analysis on the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with tinnitus, including age and tinnitus position, duration, frequency, and severity in both men and women based on the user information collected by the FTRS. The data for 22,867 participants (males: 13,715; females: 9,152) were included in the statistical analysis.
    The FTRS app has been popular with tinnitus patients since its launch in May 2018 with its integrated pitch-matching test, individualized sound therapy, follow-up assessment, and provision of easy-to-understand science and education for tinnitus. The users were located throughout Mainland China but primarily concentrated in Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Shandong provinces. We observed gender differences regarding age and tinnitus frequency, severity, and position among the app\'s users. The FTRS has not only facilitated patients\' access to treatment at times and places that are convenient for them, but also provides a large amount of data based on user feedback in order to support clinical tinnitus research.
    Compared with traditional face-to-face medical treatment, the FTRS greatly reduced medical costs and enabled patients with tinnitus to arrange their own treatment times. At the same time, the FTRS has provided standardized tinnitus data that have laid a foundation for clinical research on tinnitus. However, because of differences in the popularity and utilization of smart devices, FTRS user data might only reflect the situation of tinnitus patients who can effectively use smart devices. Therefore, the findings of this study need to be interpreted with caution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究调查了声音治疗联合药物治疗(SDT)对突发性感音神经性耳聋(SSNHL)患者的间隙检测阈值和语音识别得分的影响。
    将SSNHL患者随机分为SDT和药物治疗(DT)组。所有患者均接受标准药物治疗,SDT组患者对患耳额外接受声音刺激6天。纯音听力图,在安静和嘈杂的条件下,以正常和时间压缩的速率进行语音识别得分,比较SDT和DT组治疗前及治疗后第6天和第30天的间隙检测阈值。
    SDT组20例,DT组24例。在125和250Hz时,SDT组在治疗后第6天的受影响耳朵的纯音阈值显着低于DT组。在治疗后第6天和第30天,在正常和时间压缩速率下,SDT组比DT组观察到明显更低的间隙检测阈值和更高的语音识别分数。在第6天和第30天以正常和时间压缩的速率在嘈杂的环境中观察到间隙阈值与语音识别得分之间的显着相关性。
    SDT可以改善听力恢复,例如噪声阈值的差距和噪声中的语音识别,在SSNHL的情况下。
    ChiCTR-IOR-17012262。
    This study investigated the effect of sound therapy combined with drug therapy (SDT) on gap detection threshold and speech recognition scores in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).
    Patients with SSNHL were grouped randomly into SDT and drug therapy (DT) groups. All patients received standard drug treatment and patients in the SDT group additionally received sound stimulation for the affected ears for 6 days. Pure tone audiogram, speech recognition scores at normal and time-compressed rates under quiet and noisy conditions, and the gap detection threshold of the SDT and DT groups before treatment and on day 6 and 30 after treatment were compared.
    There were 20 patients in the SDT group and 24 in the DT group. The pure tone thresholds of affected ears were significantly lower in the SDT group on day 6 after treatment than those in the DT group at 125 and 250 Hz. Significantly lower gap detection thresholds and higher speech recognition scores under noisy conditions were observed at the normal and time-compressed rates in the SDT group than those in the DT group on day 6 and 30 after treatment. Significant correlations were observed between the gap thresholds and speech recognition scores in a noisy environment at normal and time-compressed rates on day 6 and 30.
    SDT may improve the recovery of hearing abilities, such as the gap in noise thresholds and speech recognition in noise, in the case of SSNHL.
    ChiCTR-IOR-17012262.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号