Social Isolation

社会孤立
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在调查社区居住老年人的社会脆弱与认知障碍之间的纵向关系。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究基于韩国老龄化纵向研究(2006-2020)的第一至第八波。
    方法:参与者是2006年的2106名65岁或65岁以上且无认知障碍的社区老年人。
    方法:用社会支持、社会活动,社交网络,孤独,独自生活(0=社会不脆弱,1=社会偏好,2或更多=社会脆弱)。使用韩国人简易精神状态检查评估认知功能,得分低于24表示认知障碍。我们使用广义估计方程来评估社交脆弱与认知障碍之间的纵向关系。
    结果:在2106名参与者中,515人(24.4%)有社会脆弱,669人(31.8%)有社会缺陷,根据基线评估,922例(43.8%)为社会不虚弱.相对于社会不脆弱群体,认知障碍的社交脆弱和社交脆弱组的比值比分别为1.30(95%CI1.10-1.54)和1.41(95%CI1.16-1.71),分别,在后续行动中。亚组分析显示,社会活动不活跃和孤独感与认知障碍显著相关。
    结论:这些发现突出表明,医疗保健提供者需要为有社会脆弱的老年人引入和使用可用的社会资源,以增加个人和社会环境之间的关系。社会活动不活跃和孤独是与认知障碍相关的主要领域,孤独可以通过参与社会活动来解决。因此,医疗保健提供者特别为社会活动提供机会,例如社区中基于小组的计划,减少社交脆弱和认知障碍。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the longitudinal relationship between social frailty and cognitive impairment among community-dwelling older adults.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study is based on the first to eighth waves of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing (2006-2020).
    METHODS: The participants were 2106 community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older and without cognitive impairment in 2006.
    METHODS: Social frailty was assessed with 5 items including social support, social activity, social network, loneliness, and living alone (0 = social nonfrailty, 1 = social prefrailty, 2 or more = social frailty). Cognitive function was assessed using the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination, and scores below 24 indicated cognitive impairment. We used the generalized estimating equation to assess the longitudinal relationship between social frailty and cognitive impairment.
    RESULTS: Of the 2106 participants, 515 (24.4%) had social frailty, 669 (31.8%) had social prefrailty, and 922 (43.8%) were social nonfrailty based on the baseline assessments. Relative to the social nonfrailty group, the odds ratios of the social prefrailty and social frailty groups for cognitive impairment were 1.30 (95% CI 1.10-1.54) and 1.41 (95% CI 1.16-1.71), respectively, during the follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed that social inactivity and loneliness were significantly associated with cognitive impairment.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need for health care providers to introduce and use available social resources for older adults with social frailty to increase the relationships between individual and social context. Social inactivity and loneliness were the major domains associated with cognitive impairment, and loneliness can be resolved by participating in social activities. Therefore, health care providers especially provide opportunities for social activities, such as group-based programs in the community, to reduce social frailty and cognitive impairment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    青春期是出现心理健康问题的时期。研究表明,COVID-19封锁可能使情绪和行为健康恶化。
    研究在COVID-19大流行期间,社会经济地位是否与青少年的心理健康结果相关。
    青少年大脑认知发育(ABCD)研究是一项针对美国青少年神经认知发育的多站点10年纵向研究。招募是交错的,基线访问(9至10岁)发生在2016年至2018年,并且每年进行一次访问。在为期2年的随访(年龄11至12岁)期间,COVID-19封锁停止了研究收集,但最终恢复。由于一些年轻人在封锁前已经接受了两年的探访,这就允许了类似自然实验设计来比较流行前和流行内的组.因此,数据来自1年的随访(所有年轻人在COVID-19之前被封锁)和2年的随访,其中一部分年轻人在封锁开始后收集了数据,比较接近社会隔离的时期是否与年轻人的心理健康症状有关。大流行组由在2020年3月11日之前收集的2年随访的年轻人组成,大流行组在解除封锁限制后进行了2年随访。
    评估包括收入与需求比率(INR;来自家庭总收入),儿童行为检查表(一种心理健康症状学的衡量标准),和家庭环境规模。
    最终样本包括10399名年轻人;3947(52.3%)为男性;2084(20.3%)为拉丁裔/西班牙裔;6765(66.0%)为白人;4600(44.2%)报告的看护者教育水平低于4年制大学学位;2475(26.2%)的INR低于100%(表明贫困)或在100%和以下(接近贫困在大流行群体的年轻人中,更糟糕的心理健康症状(例如,更多的问题,更大的抑郁,和更大的焦虑)随着时间的推移与来自社会经济地位较高的家庭有关(例如,在比较1年至2年随访期间,在流行前和流行内组之间INR差异为1个单位的个体时,他们在总问题评分中的预期差异为0.79[95%CI,0.37-1.22];错误发现率校正P<.001).
    这项队列研究发现,在具有较高社会经济地位背景的年轻人中,COVID-19封锁与不成比例的负面心理健康结果相关。虽然这项研究没有揭示驱动这些关联的直接机制,它确实为年轻人的积极成果提供了一些支持。未来的研究需要了解这些关联是否会持续更长的时间。
    UNASSIGNED: Adolescence is a period in which mental health problems emerge. Research suggests that the COVID-19 lockdown may have worsened emotional and behavioral health.
    UNASSIGNED: To examine whether socioeconomic status was associated with mental health outcomes among youths during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study is a multisite 10-year longitudinal study of youth neurocognitive development in the US. Recruitment was staggered where the baseline visit (ages 9 to 10 years) occurred from 2016 to 2018, and visits occurred yearly. The COVID-19 lockdown halted research collection during the 2-year follow-up visits (ages 11 to 12 years), but eventually resumed. As some youths already underwent their 2-year visits prior to lockdown, this allowed for a natural experiment-like design to compare prepandemic and intrapandemic groups. Thus, data were gathered from the 1-year follow-up (pre-COVID-19 lockdown for all youths) and the 2-year follow-up, of which a portion of youths had data collected after the lockdown began, to compare whether a period of near social isolation was associated with mental health symptoms in youths. The prepandemic group consisted of youths with a 2-year follow-up visit collected prior to March 11, 2020, and the intrapandemic group had their 2-year follow-up visit after lockdown restrictions were lifted.
    UNASSIGNED: Assessments included measures on income-to-needs ratio (INR; derived from total household income), the Child Behavior Checklist (a measure of mental health symptomology), and the Family Environmental Scale.
    UNASSIGNED: The final sample included 10 399 youths; 3947 (52.3%) were male; 2084 (20.3%) were Latinx/Hispanic; 6765 (66.0%) were White; 4600 (44.2%) reported caregiver education levels below a 4-year college degree; and 2475 (26.2%) had INR either below 100% (indicating poverty) or between 100% and less than 200% (near poverty). Among youths in the intrapandemic group, worse mental health symptoms (eg, more total problems, greater depression, and greater anxiety) over time were associated with being from a household with higher socioeconomic status (eg, when comparing individuals who differed by 1 unit on INR between prepandemic and intrapandemic groups from 1-year to 2-year follow-up, their expected difference in total problems score was 0.79 [95% CI, 0.37-1.22]; false discovery rate-corrected P < .001).
    UNASSIGNED: This cohort study found that the COVID-19 lockdown was associated with disproportionately negative mental health outcomes among youths from higher socioeconomic status backgrounds. Although this study does not shed light on the direct mechanisms driving these associations, it does provide some support for positive outcomes for youths. Future studies are needed to understand whether these associations persist over longer periods of time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景慢性病可能会限制老年人的社会参与和福祉。社交联系减少会导致孤独和社会孤立。本研究旨在探索慢性病患者的社会联系体验。以及影响其社会参与的因素。方法对19名患有一种或多种慢性疾病的社区居住的澳大利亚老年人(平均年龄75.5岁)的故意样本进行了定性描述性研究。半结构化访谈探讨了参与者对其社会关系的看法以及慢性病的潜在影响。讨论了关于一般实践在支持老年人福祉方面的作用的观点。数据采用专题分析法进行归纳分析。结果确定了五个主题:(1)孤独体验,(2)管理日益减少的社会交往,(3)长期生活,(4)社会联系的障碍,和(5)社会联系的促进者。与会者认为,慢性衰老导致功能和独立性丧失,限制了社会关系,增加了孤独和社会孤立。社会关系的障碍包括流动性问题,运输和形成新的网络。家庭是主要的支持,持续的社区参与和一般实践支持对保持良好的社会联系至关重要。结论了解老年人的经历,社会关系的障碍和促进者可以指导临床医生的干预。一般做法是一个有希望的干预点,因为它被那些患有慢性疾病的人使用得很好。全科护士有能力合作解决老年人在维持社会关系方面面临的障碍。
    Background Chronic conditions may limit older peoples\' social engagement and wellbeing. Reduced social connections can result in loneliness and social isolation. This study aimed to explore the experience of social connection in older people living with chronic conditions, and the factors influencing their social participation. Methods A purposive sample of 19 community-dwelling older Australians (mean age 75.5years) with one or more chronic conditions participated in a qualitative descriptive study. Semi-structured interviews explored participants\' perceptions of their social connections and the potential impact of their chronic conditions. Views about the role of general practice in supporting older persons\' wellbeing were discussed. Data were analysed inductively using thematic analysis. Results Five themes were identified: (1) the experience of loneliness, (2) managing diminishing social contacts, (3) living with chronic conditions, (4) barriers to social connection, and (5) facilitators of social connection. Participants felt that ageing with chronic conditions contributed to loss of function and independence, which limited social connections, and increased loneliness and social isolation. Barriers to social connections included issues with mobility, transport and forming new networks. Families were a primary support, with continued community engagement and general practice support crucial to staying well and socially connected. Conclusions Understanding older peoples\' experiences, and the barriers and facilitators of social connections can guide clinicians\' interventions. General practice is a promising intervention point because of its high use by those with chronic conditions to stay well. General practice nurses are well-placed to collaboratively address the barriers older people face in maintaining social connections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着所有年龄段的互联网使用趋势的增加,互联网使用是否可以预防中老年人的虚弱仍不清楚。
    方法:五个队列,包括健康与退休研究(HRS),中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS),健康调查,欧洲的老龄化和退休(SHARE),英国衰老纵向研究(ELSA),墨西哥健康与老龄化研究(MHAS)在这项研究中使用。互联网使用,社会孤立,使用类似的问题评估虚弱状态。广义估计方程模型,随机效应荟萃分析,COX回归,并利用调解分析。
    结果:在多队列研究中,共有155,695名参与者被纳入主要分析.互联网使用的比例因国家而异,从中国的5.56%(CHARLS)到丹麦的83.46%(份额)不等。根据广义估计方程模型和荟萃分析,互联网使用与脆弱成反比,合并OR(95CIs)为0.72(0.67,0.79)。COX回归还显示,使用互联网的参与者的虚弱发生率风险较低。此外,这种关联部分是由社会隔离介导的,在65岁及以上的参与者中略有明显,男性,不为付款而工作,没有结婚或伴侣,不吸烟,饮酒,而不是与孩子共同居住。
    结论:我们的研究结果强调了使用互联网在预防虚弱方面的重要作用,并建议更多参与社会交往和活动,以避免中老年人的社会隔离。
    BACKGROUND: With increasing trend of internet use in all age groups, whether internet use can prevent frailty in middle-aged and older adults remains unclear.
    METHODS: Five cohorts, including Health and Retirement Study (HRS), China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA), and Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), were used in this study. Internet use, social isolation, and frailty status was assessed using similar questions. The Generalized estimating equations models, random effects meta-analysis, COX regression, and mediation analysis were utilized.
    RESULTS: In the multicohort study, a total of 155,695 participants were included in main analysis. The proportion of internet use was varied across countries, ranging from 5.56% in China (CHARLS) to 83.46% in Denmark (SHARE). According to the generalized estimating equations models and meta-analysis, internet use was inversely associated with frailty, with the pooled ORs (95%CIs) of 0.72 (0.67,0.79). The COX regression also showed that participants with internet use had a lower risk of frailty incidence. Additionally, the association was partially mediated by social isolation and slightly pronounced in participants aged 65 and over, male, not working for payment, not married or partnered, not smoking, drinking, and not co-residence with children.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the important role of internet use in preventing frailty and recommend more engagements in social communication and activities to avoid social isolation among middle-aged and older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管全球范围内的不确定期(COVID-19)已经结束,在有明显外观问题(SAC)的人中存在适应不良经历的遗产,需要照顾和注意。
    使用Giddens\'本体安全的概念,我们探索了人们以前是如何经历SAC的,期间和“自”COVID-19。定性调查使我们能够从跨国的个人中捕捉到不同的观点,以本体论安全为理论基础,采用演绎反身主题分析进行分析。
    名为“更多镜像(ed)时间”和“锁定”的主题,关闭,和“拒之门外”通过社会限制时代,为该群体的具体经历提供了背景依据,主题“重新定义相关性”探讨了COVID-19的持续遗产-以及持续的全球不确定性,如经济困难和战争-影响SAC人民的福祉。
    拥有SAC的人仍然无法获得基本的医疗保健支持,因为提供医疗保健的人工作过度,资源不足,依赖有效的互动方法,如远程医疗,这可能是SAC患者的触发因素。护理提供者可能会考虑扩大对外观的关注,希望让可信赖的其他人参与到寻求护理的过程中,并利用数字健康以外的方式来支持SAC的人们。
    UNASSIGNED: Though a worldwide period of uncertainty (COVID-19) has \'ended\', there exists a legacy of maladaptive experiences among people with significant appearance concerns (SAC) that requires care and attention.
    UNASSIGNED: Using Giddens\' concept of ontological security, we explored how people experienced their SAC before, during and \"since\" COVID-19. Qualitative surveys allowed us to capture diverse perspectives from individuals transnationally, analysed with deductive reflexive thematic analysis using ontological security as our theoretical foundation.
    UNASSIGNED: Themes named \"More Mirror(ed) Time\" and \"Locked Out, Shut Down, and Shut Out\" gave a contextual grounding for the embodied experiences of this group through times of social restrictions, and the theme \"Redefining Relevance\" explored the continued legacy of COVID-19 - and continued global uncertainties such as economic hardship and warfare - that impact the wellbeing of people with SAC.
    UNASSIGNED: People with SAC are still \'locked out\' from essential healthcare support as those providing healthcare are overworked, under-resourced and rely on efficient interactive methods such as tele-health that may be triggers for people with SAC. Care providers may consider expanding appearance concerns verbiage, look to involve trusted others in the care-seeking process, and utilize modalities beyond digital health to support people with SAC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:孤独和社会隔离与不良健康结局相关,特别是在老年人群中,强调需要有效的干预措施。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在总结有关孤独感和社会隔离干预措施有效性的所有可用证据。来规划他们的工作机制,并对政策和实践产生影响。
    方法:系统文献综述和荟萃分析。
    方法:老年人(≥65岁)。
    方法:在MEDLINE中进行了系统搜索,PsycINFO,和CINAHL用于定量或定性评估老年人孤独感和社会隔离干预措施的影响的研究,遵循预定义的选择标准。评估了偏倚风险和微小的研究效果,在适当的地方,有关使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总的单个研究的效应大小的信息。研究间异质性的来源使用meta回归进行了探索。
    结果:在n=2223个确定的文章中,n=67最终被纳入叙事合成。在一定比例的研究中报告了显着的干预效果(孤独和社会孤立分别为55.9%和50.0%,分别)和包括随访措施(n=29)在内的57.6%的研究报告了持续的干预效果。n=27项研究的荟萃分析,代表n=1756名参与者,表明孤独感干预的总体效果中等(d=-0.47;95%CI,-0.62至-0.32)。研究之间的异质性很大,不能用研究设计的差异来解释,出版年份,结果衡量标准,干预长度,参与者人口统计,设置,孤独的基线水平,或地理位置。然而,非基于技术的干预报告平均效应大小较大(Δd=-0.35;95%CI,-0.66~-0.04;P=0.029),且通常更显著.对潜在干预机制的定性评估导致了3组有效组成部分:“促进社会接触,\"\"转移知识和技能,\"和\"解决社会认知\"。
    结论:对孤独和社会隔离的干预通常是有效的,尽管研究之间仍然存在一些无法解释的异质性。需要进一步研究干预措施在不同环境和国家的适用性,还考虑到它们的成本效益。
    OBJECTIVE: Loneliness and social isolation are associated with adverse health outcomes, especially within the elderly population, underlining the need for effective interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize all available evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions for loneliness and social isolation, to map out their working mechanisms, and to give implications for policy and practice.
    METHODS: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: Older adults (≥65 years).
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for studies quantitively or qualitatively assessing effects of interventions for loneliness and social isolation in older adults, following predefined selection criteria. Risk of bias as well as small study effects were assessed and, wherever appropriate, information about effect sizes of individual studies pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Sources for between-study heterogeneity were explored using meta-regression.
    RESULTS: Of n = 2223 identified articles, n = 67 were eventually included for narrative synthesis. Significant intervention effects were reported for a proportion of studies (55.9% and 50.0% for loneliness and social isolation, respectively) and 57.6% of studies including a follow-up measure (n = 29) reported sustained intervention effects. Meta-analysis of n = 27 studies, representing n = 1756 participants, suggested a medium overall effect of loneliness interventions (d = -0.47; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.32). Between-study heterogeneity was substantial and could not be explained by differences in study design, year of publication, outcome measures, intervention length, participant demographics, setting, baseline level of loneliness, or geographic location. However, non-technology-based interventions reported larger effect sizes on average (Δd = -0.35; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.04; P = .029) and were more often significant. Qualitative assessment of potential intervention mechanisms resulted in 3 clusters of effective components: \"promoting social contact,\" \"transferring knowledge and skills,\" and \"addressing social cognition\".
    CONCLUSIONS: Interventions for loneliness and social isolation can generally be effective, although some unexplained between-study heterogeneity remains. Further research is needed regarding the applicability of interventions across different settings and countries, also considering their cost-effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    Communication is considered as one of the basic human needs. For a long time, loneliness and social isolation were mainly considered as a psychosocial problem. However, in the recent years, there has been increasing evidence of the possible impact of loneliness and social isolation on the development and clinical course of somatic diseases. Research objectives were studying and analysis of current literature data about the medical consequences of loneliness and social isolation in the elderly cases. An analysis of the literature data shows that loneliness and social isolation affect not only the psycho-emotional status of elderly patients, but also their physical health. It has been shown that the number of available social connections affects the development and clinical course of diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and outcomes of the brain stroke, immune system reactions, average life expectancy, and the risk of death caused by any causes. It has been established that the influence of social ties on the risk and clinical course of chronic non-communicable diseases is comparable to the effect of such generally accepted risk factors like smoking, alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, hypertension, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, environmental pollution, as well as various medical interventions (vaccination, drug therapy, etc.). Social isolation affects the risk of hospitalization and the frequency of outpatient care, poor socialization increases the risk of death from a heart attack. The results of the study show that loneliness and social isolation of the elderly cases have certain medical consequences that need to be taken into account when managing such patients.
    Общение считается одной из базовых потребностей человека. Долгое время одиночество и социальная изоляция считались преимущественно психосоциальной проблемой. Однако в последние годы появляется все больше свидетельств о возможном влиянии одиночества и социальной изоляции на развитие и клиническое течение соматических заболеваний. Цель работы — изучение современных данных литературы о медицинских последствиях одиночества и социальной изоляции у лиц пожилого возраста. Анализ данных показал, что одиночество и социальная изоляция влияют не только на психоэмоциональный статус пожилых пациентов, но и на состояние физического здоровья. Показано, что количество имеющихся социальных связей влияет на развитие и течение сахарного диабета, болезней сердца и сосудов, исходы инсульта мозга, реакции иммунной системы, среднюю продолжительность жизни, риск смерти, вызванной любыми причинами. Установлено, что уменьшение объема социальных связей влияет на риск возникновения и течение хронических неинфекционных заболеваний, что сопоставимо с действием таких общепризнанных факторов риска, как курение, употребление алкогольных напитков, гиподинамия, артериальная гипертензия, ожирение, гиперхолестеринемия, загрязнение окружающей среды, а также различные медицинские вмешательства (вакцинация, медикаментозная терапия и т. п.). Социальная изоляция влияет на риск госпитализации и частоту обращений за амбулаторной помощью, плохая социализация увеличивает риск смерти от сердечного приступа. Результаты исследования показывают, что одиночество и социальная изоляция пожилых пациентов имеют определенные медицинские последствия, которые нужно учитывать при ведении данной категории лиц.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    婚姻因素与痴呆症和阿尔茨海默病有关,但是随着时间的推移,关于整体婚姻史的影响的证据有限。
    本研究旨在探讨婚姻史与认知的关系。
    该研究包括来自中国纵向健康长寿研究(CLHLS)的24,596名无痴呆参与者。在基线时收集整体婚姻史,将参与者分为五组:寡妇单身,寡妇再婚,离婚-单身,离婚-根据前两次婚姻再婚和结婚。痴呆症在随访时通过自我报告收集,如果参与者死亡,则从代表那里收集。对于15,355名参与者,在基线和随访期间进行中国简易精神状态检查(CMMSE).认知障碍定义为随访CMMSE评分低于18,认知变化率计算为连续访问之间CMMSE评分的变化除以持续时间。
    与已婚老年人相比,寡妇-单身组痴呆的风险明显更高(HR1.28,95%CI1.05,1.54),认知障碍(HR1.31,95%CI1.17,1.47)和MMSE评分明显更快的下降(β-0.09,95%CI-0.17,-0.01)。同时,寡妇再婚组患痴呆症的风险明显降低,认知障碍和MMSE评分下降速度低于寡妇-单身组,尽管差异仅在女性而非男性之间显着。
    在这个前瞻性队列中,已婚的老年人和丧偶但有第二次婚姻的人比没有再婚的丧偶者的认知能力明显更好。
    UNASSIGNED: Marital factor has been associated with dementia and Alzheimer\'s disease, but there is limited evidence on the impact of holistic marital history over time.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to examine association of marital history with cognition.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 24,596 dementia-free participants from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study (CLHLS). Holistic marital history was collected at baseline, categorizing participants into five groups: widow-single, widow-remarried, divorce-single, divorce-remarried and married based on the first two marriages. Dementia was collected at follow-up through self-report or from a delegate if the participant was deceased. For 15,355 participants, the Chinese Mini-Mental Status Examination (CMMSE) was administered at both baseline and follow-ups. Cognitive impairment was defined as a follow-up CMMSE score below 18, and rate of cognitive change was calculated as the change in CMMSE score between consecutive visits divided by the duration.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with married older adults, widow-single group had significantly higher risk of dementia (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.05, 1.54), cognitive impairment (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.17, 1.47) and significantly faster decline of MMSE score (β -0.09, 95% CI -0.17, -0.01). Meanwhile, widow-remarried group had significantly lower risk of dementia, cognitive impairment and slower MMSE score decline than widow-single group, although the differences were only significant among female but not male.
    UNASSIGNED: In this prospective cohort, married older adults and those widowed but with a second marriage had significantly better cognition than widowed individuals who did not remarry.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:社会隔离和孤独感(SIL)与吸烟一样,使老年人的死亡率和其他结局恶化。我们先前测试了HOWRU?使用类似年龄志愿者的同伴支持进行干预的影响,并证明了从急诊科(ED)出院的老年人的SIL降低。生成性,定义为“建立和指导下一代的兴趣,“可以为通过年轻一代和老一辈成员之间的代际计划减少SIL提供替代的理论基础。当前的方案将检查年轻的代际志愿者提供HOWRU的影响?
    方法:
    方法:在这项随机临床试验中,我们将比较以下三个分支:(1)标准的同代对等支持如何RU?干预,(2)RU如何?代际志愿者提供的干预,和(3)公共等待列表控制组。结果评估员将对干预措施视而不见。训练有素的志愿者将每周拨打12次电话支持电话。我们将从两个ED中招募年龄≥70岁的参与者,这些参与者的基线孤独感(六项DeJong孤独感得分为2或更高)。研究人员将评估SIL,抑郁症,生活质量,功能状态,生成性,和基线时的感知收益,在12周,干预后24周。
    结论:我们假设与对照组相比,接受代际干预的参与者将显示出改善的结果,并且同伴支持HOWRU?
    方法:我们还假设,对生成性感知较高的参与者将比对生成性较低的参与者具有更大的SIL降低。衰老经历多样,与相关SIL作斗争的社会干预应反映这种多样性。作为肥胖相关行为干预试验(ORBIT)模型研究计划的一部分,本RCT的结果将用于确定哪些干预特征对降低SIL最有效.
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05998343协议ID:21-0074E。2023年7月24日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Social isolation and loneliness (SIL) worsens mortality and other outcomes among older adults as much as smoking. We previously tested the impact of the HOW R U? intervention using peer support from similar-aged volunteers and demonstrated reduced SIL among older adults discharged from the emergency department (ED). Generativity, defined as \"the interest in establishing and guiding the next generation,\" can provide an alternative theoretical basis for reducing SIL via intergenerational programs between members of younger and older generations. The current protocol will examine the impact of younger intergenerational volunteers providing the HOW RU?
    METHODS:
    METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, we will compare the following three arms: (1) the standard same-generation peer support HOW R U? intervention, (2) HOW R U? intervention delivered by intergenerational volunteers, and (3) a common wait-list control group. Outcome assessors will be blinded to the intervention. Trained volunteers will deliver 12 weekly telephone support calls. We will recruit participants ≥ 70 years of age with baseline loneliness (six-item De Jong loneliness score of 2 or greater) from two EDs. Research staff will assess SIL, depression, quality of life, functional status, generativity, and perceived benefit at baseline, at 12 weeks, and 24 weeks post-intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesize participants receiving the intergenerational intervention will show improved outcomes compared to the control group and peer support HOW R U?
    METHODS: We also hypothesize that participants with higher perceptions of generativity will have greater reductions in SIL than their lower generativity counterparts. Aging is experienced diversely, and social interventions combatting associated SIL should reflect that diversity. As part of a program of research following the Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials (ORBIT) model, the findings of this RCT will be used to define which intervention characteristics are most effective in reducing SIL.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05998343 Protocol ID:21-0074E. Registered on 24 July 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在英国,对社区痴呆症患者的支持既不健全也不一致,往往得到第三部门/基层举措的支持,这些举措在长期维持方面面临巨大挑战。“通过会议中心获得真实”项目探讨了维持这种形式的基于社区的支持所涉及的因素。这是两篇相关文章中的第二篇,概述了对痴呆症患者和照顾者的会议中心(MC)的现实评估中的学习。专注于有关其运营和战略运行的调查结果。
    对英格兰和威尔士三个MC站点的77名参与者进行了半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论,包括痴呆症患者,非正式的照顾者,工作人员,志愿者,受托人,和支持专业人员/从业人员。数据以主题为主题,然后使用软系统方法和现实主义逻辑进行分析。
    生成了42个“上下文机制结果”语句,解释背景情况如何触发响应/过程,以产生关于MC可持续性的三个关键领域的想要或不想要的结果:外部关系和协作;内部关系和实践;以及财务和资金。
    协作对于维持基于社区的计划至关重要,例如MC,特别是在当地社区和地区层面之间。MC需要警惕减轻造成“任务漂移”的压力,因为针对护理途径中的差距和保持以人为本的精神是MC吸引力的核心。稳定,稳定需要持续的资金,持续的社区痴呆症支持。更正式地认识到基于社区的社会模式倡议的价值,在改进数据收集的帮助下,将鼓励更强大和一致的社区痴呆症支持。
    UNASSIGNED: Support for people with dementia in their communities is neither robust nor consistent in the UK, often bolstered by third sector/grass-roots initiatives facing formidable challenges in sustaining long-term. The Get Real with Meeting Centres project explored factors involved in sustaining one such form of community-based support. This is the second of two linked articles outlining learning from this realist evaluation of Meeting Centres (MCs) for people with dementia and carers, which focusses on findings regarding their operational and strategic running.
    UNASSIGNED: Semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with 77 participants across three MC sites in England and Wales, including people living with dementia, informal carers, staff, volunteers, trustees, and supporting professionals/practitioners. Data were themed, then analysed using soft systems methodology and realist logic of analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-two \'context-mechanism-outcome\' statements were generated, explaining how background circumstances might trigger responses/processes to produce wanted or unwanted outcomes regarding three key areas for MC sustainability: External relationships and collaboration; Internal relationships and practices; and Finances and funding.
    UNASSIGNED: Collaboration is essential to sustaining community-based initiatives such as MCs, particularly between local community and regional level. MCs need to be vigilant in mitigating pressures that create \'mission drift\', as targeting a gap in the care pathway and maintaining a person-centred ethos are central to MCs\' appeal. Stable, ongoing funding is needed for stable, ongoing community dementia support. More formal recognition of the value of social model community-based initiatives, helped by improved data collection, would encourage more robust and consistent community dementia support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号