The field of endoscopic endonasal surgery is in a constant state of advancement, with an expanding range of applications. Improvement in the diversity of instruments available, along with the increasing proficiency of surgical teams, has enabled the successful endoscopic treatment of complex sinonasal and skull base malignancies. Not only is the overall complication rate reduced by endoscopic approaches, but survival outcomes have also shown promising results when compared to traditional open approaches.

As the indications for endoscopic skull base approaches have increased, so has the need for more versatile vascularized flaps for skull base reconstruction. Here, we describe a novel lateral based nasopharyngeal flap (LNPF). Two cadaver heads were dissected to elucidate flap anatomy, dimensions, and technique. A retrospective review was performed on two cases where LNPF was used to repair CSF leaks in the nasopharyngeal area, and outcomes reported. The LNPF is an ascending pharyngeal artery myomucosal flap that includes the nasopharyngeal mucosa and the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle. The flap was 1.2 × 2.2 cm in greatest dimensions. The LNPF was used for salvage CSF leak repair in two cases: one clival and one tubal. Both patients had resolution of leak at 7 months follow-up. The LNPF is a novel flap with reconstruction potential for the nasopharynx, including the lower clivus and the eustachian tube.

The goal of this American Rhinologic Society expert practice statement (EPS) is to summarize the best available evidence regarding postoperative precautions for patients following endoscopic skull base surgery for intradural pathology. These topics include the administration of postoperative nasal hygiene; patient mobilization and activity level; the resumption of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea; and the timing and capacity with which a patient may be subjected to barotrauma, such as air travel postoperatively. This EPS was developed following the recommended methodology and approval process as previously outlined. Given the diverse practices and limited agreement on the accepted principles regarding postoperative precautions for patients following skull base surgery, this EPS seeks to summarize the existing literature and provide clinically relevant guidance to bring clarity to these differing practice patterns. Following a modified Delphi approach, four statements were developed, all of which reached consensus. Because of the paucity of literature on these topics, these statements represent a summation of the limited literature and the experts\' opinions. These statements and the accompanying evidence are summarized below, along with an assessment of future needs.

OBJECTIVE: Various nonvascularized or vascularized techniques have been adopted in endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) for repairing intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks after tumor resection. Vascularized nasoseptal flaps, free nasoseptal grafts, free turbinate grafts, and fascia lata and mashed muscle are frequently used. Outcomes of those grafts applied in the defects of different regions need to be clarified.
METHODS: The data from a series of 162 patients with skull base tumor who underwent EES that had intraoperative CSF leak between Jan 2012 and Jan 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The regions included anterior skull base, sellar region, clivus and infratemporal fossa. Repair failure rate (RFR), meningitis rate, and associated risk factors were assessed.
RESULTS: In total, 172 reconstructions were performed in 162 patients for the 4 sites of the skull base. There were 7 cases (4.3%) that had postoperative CSF leaks, which required second repair. The RFR for anterior skull base, sellar region, clivus, and infratemporal fossawas 2.6%, 2.2%, 16.7%, and 0%, respectively. The clivus defect was an independent risk factor for repair failure (P < 0.01). The postoperative meningitis rate was 5.6%. Repair failure was an independent risk factor for meningitis (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Vascularized nasoseptal flap, free nasoseptal graft, free turbinate graft, and fascia lata and mashed muscle are reliable autologous materials for repairing the dural defects in different regions during EES. Clivus reconstruction remains a great challenge, which had a higher RFR and meningitis rate. Repair failure is significantly associated with postoperative meningitis.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak remains a concerning complication of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for skull base pathology. Signs and symptoms suggesting CSF leak often trigger additional workup during the postoperative course. We systematically evaluate associations between subjectively reported clinical signs/symptoms noted during the immediate postoperative period and incidence of postoperative CSF leaks.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary academic medical centre including 137 consecutive patients with intraoperative CSF leak during EEA with primary repair between July 2018 and August 2022. Postoperative CSF leak associations with clinical signs and symptoms were evaluated using positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), sensitivity, specificity and odds ratio (OR) via univariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients (57.7%) had high-flow leaks repaired and 5 (3.6%) developed CSF leaks postoperatively. Of reported symptoms, rhinorrhea was most common (n = 52, 38.0%; PPV [95% CI] = 7.6% [4.8%, 11.9%]), followed by severe headache (n = 47, 34.3%; 6.3% [3.1%, 12.5%]), dizziness (n = 43, 31.4%; 2.3% [0.4%, 12.1%]), salty or metallic taste (n = 20, 14.6%; 9.9% [3.3%, 25.8%]), and throat drainage (n = 10, 7.3%; 9.9% [1.7%, 41.4%]). Nausea or vomiting constituted the most reported sign concerning for CSF leak (n = 73, 53.3%; PPV [95% CI] = 4.1% [2.0%, 8.1%]). On univariate regression, no sign or symptom, including rhinorrhea (OR [95% CI] = 7.00 [0.76-64.44]), throat drainage (3.42 [0.35-33.86]), salty/metallic taste (4.22 [0.66-27.04]), severe headache (3.00 [0.48-18.62]), dizziness (0.54 [0.06-4.94]), fever (3.16 [0.50-19.99]), and nausea/vomiting (1.33 [0.22-8.21]), associated with postoperative CSF leak.
CONCLUSIONS: A range of subjectively reported symptoms and signs failed to predict postoperative CSF leak. Further investigation is warranted to inform appropriate attention and response.

Background: Postoperative imaging after nasopharyngeal endoscopic resection (NER) and skull base reconstruction is quite challenging due to the complexity of the post-surgical and regional anatomy. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we included patients treated with NER from 2009 to 2019 and submitted to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) 6 and 12 months after surgery. A radiologist with 15 years of experience analyzed all MRI scans. Results: A total of 50 patients were considered in this study, 18 of whom were excluded due to imaging unavailability, and 16 of whom were not considered due to major complications and/or persistent disease. Sixteen patients were evaluated to identify the expected findings. Inflammatory changes were observed in 16/64 subsites, and regression of these changes was observed in 8/64 at 1 year. Fibrosis was observed in 5/64 subsites and was unmodified at 1 year. The nasoseptal flap showed homogeneous enhancement at 6 months (100%) and at 1 year. The temporo-parietal fascia flap (TPFF) showed a decrease in the T2- signal intensity of the mucosal layer in 57% of the patients at 1 year and a decrease in enhancement in 43%. Conclusions: Identifying the expected findings after NER and skull base reconstruction has a pivotal role in the identification of complications and recurrence.

Data from patients with post-ablative dural defects reconstructed using a free temporalis muscle fascia graft (FTFG) after resection of anterior or central skull base tumors were retrospectively analyzed.
The primary predictor and outcome variables were the reconstructive methods for dural repair and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage rate, respectively.
Eighty patients were included, and 94 postoperative dural reconstructions were performed using FTFG. The postoperative CSF leakage rate was 3.19%. The postoperative CSF leakage rates did not significantly differ between open and endonasal endoscopic surgeries (1.92% vs. 4.88%; p > 0.05). In cases completed using the endonasal endoscopic approach, the postoperative CSF leakage rate was significantly associated with the intraoperative CSF leak flow (p < 0.05).
Post-ablative dural defect reconstruction using FTFG resulted in low postoperative CSF leakage and complication rates comparable to those of free fascia lata graft from available literature.

The goal of this American Rhinologic Society expert practice statement (EPS) is to summarize the best available evidence for technical factors that optimize outcomes in skull base reconstruction following endoscopic skull base surgery for intradural pathologies. These topics include the use of free mucosal grafts versus vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flaps; the use of autologous versus synthetic grafts; and the roles of lumbar drains, dural sealants, and nasal packing. This EPS was developed following the recommended methodology and approval process as previously outlined. As there are a myriad of techniques and limited agreement on the accepted principles of skull base reconstruction, this EPS aims to summarize the existing evidence and provide clinically meaningful guidance on these divergent practices. Following a modified Delphi approach, five statements were developed, four of which reached consensus and one of which reached near consensus. These statements and the accompanying evidence are summarized along with an assessment of future needs.

UNASSIGNED: Skull base pathologies in the paediatric population are rare and require treatment by multiple qualified specialists. The endoscopic endonasal approach has revolutionized surgical treatment because it is less invasive than existing treatments.The goal of this study was to retrospectively review our experience with the reconstruction of paediatric skull middle base defects and associated complications.
UNASSIGNED: We analysed medical records from patients aged ≤ 18 years who were treated at our centre between 2013 and 2021. Patients treated with an endoscopic skull base approach and reconstruction, and who had complete clinical and radiological documentation and a minimum follow-up of 12 months, were included in the analysis. Personal data, reconstructive techniques, and complications were analysed.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 78 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Of these patients, 32 were male and 46 were female, and the mean age was 11.5 years. The main signs and symptoms were as follows: bitemporal hemianopsia in 53 cases, visual impairment in 23 cases, and headache in 30 cases. The most frequent aetiologies were craniopharyngioma (38 cases), pituitary adenoma (23 cases), and clivus chordoma (4 cases). All patients were treated via a pure endoscopic approach. For reconstruction, a multilayer technique was used in 18 cases, naso-septal flap in 43 cases, Gasket-Seal technique in 12 cases, and heterologous reconstruction in 5 cases. Only six patients presented a major complication: two had a postoperative cerebral spinal fluid leak, one developed a brain abscess, and three had diabetes insipidus.The mean follow-up period was 23.4 months.There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative CSF leak in relation to different reconstructive techniques.
UNASSIGNED: Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery is a safe and effective treatment for paediatric middle skull base pathologies. Reconstruction techniques have a high success rate of 96.5-100%, and the rate of associated complications is < 3%.

OBJECTIVE: Though the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is a widely accepted treatment for skull base tumors, the specific use of EEA for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) is debated, with variable outcomes reported in the literature. We review the surgical results of OGM resections for one surgeon including the operative approach, surgical nuances, and outcomes, with a focus on factors relating to patient selection which favor EEA over transcranial approaches.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed thirteen cases of endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningiomas. Patient characteristics, clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Extent of resection was determined based on volumetric analysis of pre- and postoperative MRI.
RESULTS: Anatomic characteristics that render a tumor difficult to access fully are lateral extension beyond the mid-orbit and anterior extension to the falx. Simpson Grade I resection was achieved in 11/13 (84.6 %) cases. Mean pre-operative tumor volume was 8.99 cm3 (range 2.19-16.79 cm3), and 92 % of tumors were WHO grade I. We demonstrate 2 cases of smell preservation, possible with small unilateral tumors and tumors that are confined to either the anterior or posterior portion of the cribriform plate. The post-operative CSF leak rate was 7.7 %, without prophylactic lumbar CSF drainage. The mortality rate was 7.7 % (n = 1) after infectious complications following CSF leak.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningiomas is an effective and safe operative method with outcomes and complication rates comparable to transcranial approaches. Key considerations include careful patient selection and familiarity with technical nuances of endoscopic endonasal approach for this specific tumor type.