在多项研究中已经观察到新兴污染物之间的竞争吸附和互补吸附。研究污染物对不同类型吸附位点的偏好可以为理解互补吸附提供补充视角。在这项研究中,同时吸附两种典型的新兴污染物,磺胺甲恶唑(SMX)和双酚A(BPA),对磁性生物炭(MBC-1)进行了研究。结果表明,氯化铁改性优化了生物炭的表面性质(芳香性,疏水性,和含氧官能团,等。),并通过各种相互作用帮助去除SMX和BPA。在混合溶质体系中,两种吸附剂的平衡吸附能力受到竞争吸附的抑制。这是由于相同的吸附机制。当pH=7时,SMX和BPA的吸附主要涉及孔隙充填,疏水效应,π-πEDA,和氢键。此外,静电力,表面协调,和离子交换也被证明与SMX和BPA的吸附有关。在共吸附系统中,双酚A的竞争优势可能是由于其优越的疏水性,chargeproperty,和分子直径。在竞争吸附实验中,竞争溶质的总吸附量(Qi)超过了主要溶质的吸附抑制作用(△Qi),表明这两种溶质占据了它们优选的吸附位点,证实了互补吸附现象。互补吸附可以通过SMX和BPA对不同类型的吸附位点的偏好来解释。BPA优先占据共吸附系统中的高能位点,如π-πEDA相互作用,离子交换,表面协调。同时,SMX倾向于通过疏水相互作用和氢键作用被去除。
Competitive adsorption and complementary adsorption between emerging pollutants has been observed in multiple studies. Investigation of the preference of pollutants for different types of adsorption sites can provide a supplementary perspective for understanding complementary adsorption. In this study, the simultaneous adsorption of two typical emerging pollutants, sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and bisphenol A (BPA), on magnetic biochar (MBC-1) was investigated. The results showed that the modification with ferric chloride optimized the surface properties of biochar (aromaticity, hydrophobicity, and oxygen-containing functional groups, etc.), and helped to remove SMX and BPA through various interactions. The equilibrium adsorption capacity of the two adsorbents was inhibited by competitive adsorption in the mixed solute systems, which was due to the same adsorption mechanism. When pH = 7, the SMX and BPA adsorption mainly involved pore filling, hydrophobic effect, π-π EDA, and hydrogen bonding. In addition, electrostatic force, surface coordination, and ion exchange have also been proven to be related to the adsorption of SMX and BPA. In the co-adsorption system, BPA\'s competitive advantage might be due to its superior hydrophobicity, charge property, and molecular diameter. In the competitive adsorption experiment, the total adsorption capacity (Qi) of the competitive solute exceeded the adsorption inhibition (△Qi) of the main solute, indicating that the two solutes occupied their preferred adsorption sites, which confirmed the complementary adsorption phenomenon. Complementary adsorption can be explained by the preference of SMX and BPA for different types of adsorption sites. BPA preferentially occupied high-energy sites in the co-adsorption system, such as π-π EDA interaction, ion exchange, and surface coordination. At the same time, SMX tended to be removed by hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen bonding.