Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB)

前锯肌平面阻滞 (SAPB)
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:右美托咪定(Dex)作为神经阻滞手术的局部麻醉佐剂可以提高患者的恢复质量。然而,目前尚不清楚使用Dex作为局部麻醉辅助治疗锯齿肌前平面阻滞(SAPB)手术对接受耳部重建术的儿童恢复质量的影响.
    方法:84例自体肋软骨(ACC)耳部重建患者随机分为两组(n=42/组),其中SAPB单用罗哌卡因(R组)和Dex和罗哌卡因(DR组)。主要结果是手术后第1天和第2天的患者15项恢复质量(QoR-15)量表评分。次要结果包括术后休息和咳嗽数字评定量表(NRS)胸痛评分,镇痛持续时间,口服救护镇痛药的用法,和阿片类药物相关的副作用。
    结果:每组40名患者完成研究。DR组术后第1天和第2天的QoR-15评分相对于R组显著增加(126.35±9.81vs.115.53±8.58和131.78±8.67vs.122.80±8.59,均P<0.001)。DR组术后2、4、8、12、24h休息和咳嗽NRS胸痛评分均显著低于R组(均P<0.05)。DR组的镇痛时间也明显延长(P<0.001),口服救护镇痛药使用率和阿片类药物相关副作用发生率显著降低(均P<0.05)。
    结论:将Dex和罗哌卡因联合应用于ACC耳部重建术儿童的SAPB可显著提高恢复质量,镇痛质量,和镇痛持续时间。
    BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (Dex) as a local anesthesia adjuvant for nerve block procedures can improve the quality of patient recovery. However, the impact of using Dex as a local anesthetic adjuvant for serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) procedures on recovery quality for children undergoing ear reconstruction remains unclear.
    METHODS: Eighty-four patients who underwent ear reconstruction with autogenous costal cartilage (ACC) were randomized into two groups (n = 42/group) in which SAPB was performed with ropivacaine alone (R group) and with Dex and ropivacaine (DR group). Primary outcomes were patient 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scale scores on days 1 and 2 post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative rest and coughing numerical rating scale (NRS) chest pain scores, duration of analgesia, oral rescue analgesic usage, and opioid-related side effects.
    RESULTS: Forty patients per group completed the study. QoR-15 scores on days 1 and 2 post-surgery in the DR group were significantly increased relative to the R group (126.35 ± 9.81 vs. 115.53 ± 8.58 and 131.78 ± 8.67 vs. 122.80 ± 8.59, all P < 0.001). Rest and coughing NRS chest pain scores at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively in the DR group were all significantly lower relative to the R group (all P < 0.05). The DR group also exhibited significantly longer analgesic duration (P < 0.001) and significantly reduced incidences of oral rescue analgesic usage and opioid-related side effect (all P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Combining Dex and ropivacaine for SAPB in children undergoing ear reconstruction with ACC can significantly improve the quality of recovery, quality of analgesia, and analgesic duration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肋软骨手术后的疼痛是耳廓重建(AR)最常见的主诉。麻醉医师一直在寻找一种有效的术后疼痛控制方法。
    方法:本研究于2022年4月10日至2022年6月10日进行。60名使用肋软骨接受AR的儿童被随机分配到肋软骨收获前进行的锯肌前平面阻滞(SAPB前队列;n=30)或SAPB后队列(肋软骨收获后队列:n=30)。主要终点指标是记录在1-,6-,12-,24-,和手术后48小时。术中麻醉和镇痛剂量,术后头24h舒芬太尼消耗量和抢救镇痛消耗量,拔管时咳嗽评分,拔管躁动评分,逗留时间,拔管时间,第一次住院时间,镇痛持续时间,阿片类药物相关不良反应和SAPB相关不良反应是次要终点.
    结果:与SAPB后队列相比,SAPB前队列术后6和12小时的休息和咳嗽NRS评分显着降低(休息6小时p=0.002,其他p<0.001)。两组NRSear评分差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。与SAPB-post组相比,在SAPB-pre-procedure期间用于全身麻醉的丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的使用显著减少,具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。SAPB前队列中的舒芬太尼消耗量和抢救镇痛消耗量显着降低(p=0.001,p=0.033)。SAPB前队列中的拔管时间和首次住院时间明显较短(均p<0.001)。SAPB前队列中的镇痛持续时间明显更长(p<0.001)。拔管期间咳嗽评分无显著差异,拔管躁动评分,两组之间的住院时间(均p>0.05)。阿片类药物相关的不良反应发生在SAPB后队列中更多,而没有统计学意义(16.7vs.36.7%;p=0.082)。在任一队列中均未观察到与阻断相关的并发症。
    结论:SAPB前队列的镇痛效果优于SAPB后队列,表明超前镇痛的有效性和可行性。
    方法:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
    OBJECTIVE: Pain following costal cartilage harvest surgery is the most common complaint of auricular reconstruction (AR). Anesthesiologists are continuously searching for an effective postoperative pain control method.
    METHODS: This study was conducted from 10 April 2022 to 10 June 2022. Sixty children undergoing AR using costal cartilage were randomly assigned to either a serratus anterior plane block performed before costal cartilage harvest (SAPB-pre-cohort; n = 30) or the SAPB-post-cohort (Post-costal cartilage Harvest Cohort: n = 30). The primary endpoint measures were the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores of the chest and ear pain degrees recorded at 1-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-h after surgery. Intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic dosages, sufentanil consumption and rescue analgesia consumption during the first 24 h post-operation, cough score during extubation, extubation agitation score, length of stay, the extubation time, first ambulatory time, analgesia duration, and opioid-related adverse effects and SAPB-related adverse effects were the secondary endpoints.
    RESULTS: The rest and coughing NRS scores were significantly reduced in the SAPB-pre-cohort 6 and 12 h post-operation in comparison with the SAPB-post-cohort (rest 6 h p = 0.002, others p < 0.001). No significant difference in the NRS ear scores existed between the two cohorts (p > 0.05). The use of propofol and remifentanil for general anesthesia during the SAPB-pre-procedure was significantly reduced compared to the SAPB-post-group, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). Sufentanil consumption and rescue analgesia consumption were significantly reduced in the SAPB-pre-cohort (p = 0.001, p = 0.033). The extubation time and first ambulatory time were markedly shorter in the SAPB-pre-cohort (all p < 0.001). Analgesia duration was markedly longer in the SAPB-pre-cohort (p < 0.001). No significant differences were noted in the cough score during extubation, extubation agitation score, length of stay between the two cohorts (all p > 0.05). Opioid-related adverse effects occurred more in the SAPB-post-cohort, while there was no statistical significance (16.7 vs. 36.7%; p = 0.082). There were no blockade-related complications observed in either cohort.
    CONCLUSIONS: The analgesic effect of the SAPB-pre-cohort was better than the SAPB-post-cohort suggesting both efficacy and feasibility of preemptive analgesia.
    METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这篇综述的目的是提供有关胸壁和腹部筋膜平面阻滞治疗围手术期疼痛的技术和临床应用的快速增长的文献的最新描述和概述。
    结果:临床证据表明,区域麻醉阻滞,包括筋膜平面块,比如胸肌,锯齿,直立脊髓,腹横肌,和腰方块,在为各种外科手术提供镇痛方面是有效的,并且与传统的神经轴技术相比具有更理想的副作用。它们提供了减少阿片类药物消耗等优势,改善疼痛控制,和减少阿片类药物相关的副作用。需要进一步的研究来建立这些区块的最佳技术和适应症。目前,它们是多模式镇痛选择中的重要工具,尤其是当神经轴和旁神经轴术有禁忌症时。最终,临床判断和提供者技能组合决定了应向任何患者提供单独或组合的阻断。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date description and overview of the rapidly growing literature pertaining to techniques and clinical applications of chest wall and abdominal fascial plane blocks in managing perioperative pain.
    RESULTS: Clinical evidence suggests that regional anesthesia blocks, including fascial plane blocks, such as pectoralis, serratus, erector spinae, transversus abdominis, and quadratus lumborum blocks, are effective in providing analgesia for various surgical procedures and have more desirable side effect profile when compared to traditional neuraxial techniques. They offer advantages such as reduced opioid consumption, improved pain control, and decreased opioid-related side effects. Further research is needed to establish optimal techniques and indications for these blocks. Presently, they are a vital instrument in a gamut of multimodal analgesia options, especially when there are contraindications to neuraxial or para-neuraxial procedures. Ultimately, clinical judgment and provider skill set determine which blocks-alone or in combination-should be offered to any patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:用自体肋软骨(ACC)进行鼻成形术后,胸部剧烈疼痛。超声引导下(USG)锯齿肌前平面阻滞(SAPB),结合胸骨旁阻滞(PSB),早些时候报道,在缓解与胸前外侧手术相关的疼痛方面非常有效。然而,尚不清楚ACC收获后是否有效缓解疼痛。
    方法:64名患者,18至60岁,接受ACC隆鼻手术,随机分为SAPB+PSB或SAPB组。两组的分析参数包括术后2、4、8、12、24和48小时胸部的休息和咳嗽数字评分(NRS)疼痛评分和鼻子的NRS疼痛评分,口服救护镇痛药的用法,副作用发生率和患者满意度,等。结果:每组30例患者纳入分析。SAPB+PSB组术后2、4、8、12h胸部休息和咳嗽NRS评分和鼻部NRS评分较低,与SAPB组比较(均P<0.05)。然而,术后24h和48h两组评分具有可比性(均P>0.05)。此外,相对于SAPB组,口服救护镇痛药使用率明显降低(P<0.05),术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率降低(P<0.05),SAPB+PSB组患者满意度明显高于对照组(P<0.001)。
    结论:USG-SAPB,结合改进的PSB,在缓解ACC隆鼻术后疼痛方面优于单纯SAPB。
    方法:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
    Rhinoplasty with autologous costal cartilage (ACC) is followed by severe pain in the chest. Ultrasound-guided (USG) serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), in combination with parasternal block (PSB), was earlier reported to be highly efficacious in relieving pain associated with thoracic anterior lateral surgery. However, it is unclear whether it is effective for pain relief after ACC harvest.
    Sixty-four patients, aged 18 to 60, who received rhinoplasty with ACC, were randomly separated into a SAPB+PSB or SAPB group. The analyzed parameters of both groups included the rest and coughing numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores of the chest and the NRS pain scores of the nose at postoperative 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours, oral rescue analgesic usage, side effect incidence and patient satisfaction, etc. RESULTS: Thirty patients per group were recruited for analysis. The rest and coughing NRS scores of the chest and the NRS scores of the nose at postoperative 2, 4, 8, 12 h were lower in the SAPB+PSB group, compared to the SAPB group (all P < 0.05). However, these scores were comparable between the two groups at postoperative 24 and 48 h (all P > 0.05). Additionally, relative to the SAPB group, the oral rescue analgesic usage was drastically lower (P < 0.05), the postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) incidence was diminished (P < 0.05), and the patient satisfaction was markedly higher (P < 0.001) in the SAPB+PSB group.
    USG-SAPB, in combination with improved PSB, is superior to SAPB alone in relieving pain after ACC harvest in rhinoplasty.
    This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:观察超声引导下前筋膜阻滞(SAPB)不同方法对胸腔镜下全麻联合胸椎旁神经阻滞的患者术后镇痛效果。
    方法:选择120例年龄18-65岁的患者进行电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)。将患者随机分为3组:患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)组,锯齿肌前平面阻滞(SPB)组和连续锯齿肌前平面阻滞(CSPB)组各40例。所有患者均采用全麻联合双点(T4、T7)胸椎旁阻滞。SPB组接受超声引导下的单个锯齿肌平面阻滞。CSPB组接受与SPB组相同的程序,插入了硬膜外导管。PCIA和SPB组均在手术后接受PCIA。CSPB组患者术后连接连续锯齿肌阻滞自动镇痛泵。
    结果:3组间一般情况无显著差异。与PCIA组相比,SPB组和CSPB组T2、T3、T4、T5时静息和运动VAS疼痛评分,T1、T4、T5时皮质醇水平均较低(P<0.05),第一次镇痛的时间明显延长,SPB和CSPB组按压PCA泵和阿片类药物使用次数明显减少,CSPB组未使用阿片类药物(P<0.05),SPB组和CSPB组术后首次活动时间较短,动员距离较长,住院天数明显较低(P<0.05)。SPB组和CSPB组术后并发症明显少,CSPB组术后并发症发生率更低(P<0.05)。与SPB组相比,CSPB组T4和T5时的活动性VAS疼痛评分较高(P<0.05)。与PCIA组相比,T6时的总QoR-40评分在SPB和CSPB组中显著较高,与SPB组相比,CSPB组高于对照组(P<0.05)。
    结论:单次超声引导下SAPB联合PCIA可以提供更好的镇痛效果。提高术后早期恢复的质量,加速ERAS。
    背景:中国临床试验注册ChiCTR2000041350。
    BACKGROUND: To observe the analgesic effect of different ultrasound-guided methods of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) after surgery in patients who have undergone thoracoscopic lobectomy with general anesthesia combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block.
    METHODS: A total of 120 patients aged 18-65 years old scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were selected. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) group, serratus anterior plane block (SPB) group and continuous serratus anterior plane block (CSPB) group (n=40 each). All patients were treated with general anesthesia combined with double-point (T4, T7) thoracic paravertebral block. The SPB group received an ultrasound-guided single serratus plane block. The CSPB group underwent the same procedure as the SPB group, with an epidural catheter inserted. Both the PCIA and SPB groups received PCIA after surgery. Patients in the CSPB group were connected to a continuous serratus block automatic analgesia pump after surgery.
    RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in terms of the general condition. Compared with the PCIA group, the resting and exercise VAS pain scores at T2, T3, T4, and T5, cortisol level at T1, T4 and T5 in SPB group and CSPB group were lower (P<0.05), the times of the first analgesia were significantly prolonged, and the times of pressing the PCA pump and opioid use were significantly less in the SPB and CSPB groups, and the CSPB group used no opioids (P<0.05), the SPB group and CSPB group had shorter times of the first postoperative activity, longer mobilization distance and the total number of days in hospital was significantly lower (P<0.05). Postoperative complications in the SPB and CSPB groups were significantly less and the CSPB group had an even lower incidence of postoperative complications (P<0.05). Compared with the SPB group, active VAS pain scores at T4 and T5 were higher in the CSPB group (P<0.05). Compared with the PCIA group, the total QoR-40 score at T6 was significantly higher in the SPB and CSPB groups, and compared with the SPB group, this data was higher in the CSPB group (P<0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Single ultrasound-guided SAPB combined with PCIA can provide a better analgesic effect, improve the quality of early postoperative recovery, and accelerate ERAS.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000041350.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)使用超声位于腋下中线和第五肋骨的水平,并将一定量的局部麻醉药从表面或深度注射到前锯齿肌中,阻断第三至第六肋间神经,长的胸神经和胸背神经。它主要用于乳房手术,肋骨骨折和开胸手术治疗前外侧胸壁疼痛。胸前外侧壁手术常伴有严重的术后疼痛,导致术后感染,肺不张和其他并发症,和长期住院。然而,有效的疼痛管理可减少术后肺部并发症的发生,促使病人尽快下床,加速患者的康复。最近,随着超声波技术和设备的发展,SAPB已经进入可视化时代,进一步提高作业的安全性和成功率。SAPB,作为一种新的区域区块技术,具有较高的定位精度,更高的成功率,并发症少,术后镇痛效果更简单有效。与胸椎硬膜外镇痛和胸椎旁阻滞相比,SAPB具有良好的超声解剖学基础;因此,在临床上有着广阔的应用前景。在本文中,综述了SAPB在临床中的应用。
    Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is located using ultrasound at the level of the midaxillary line and the fifth rib, and a certain amount of local anesthetics is injected either superficially or deeply into the serratus anterior muscle, blocking the third to sixth intercostal nerves, the long thoracic and thoracodorsal nerves. It is mainly used in breast surgeries, rib fractures and thoracotomy to manage the pain of the anterolateral chest wall. The surgery of anterolateral chest wall is often accompanied by severe postoperative pain, leading to postoperative infection, atelectasis and other complications, and prolonged hospitalization. However, effective pain management can reduce the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications, promote patients to get out of bed as soon as possible, and accelerate the recovery of patients. Recently, with the development of ultrasonic technology and equipment, SAPB has entered the era of visualization, further improving the safety and success rate of operations. SAPB, as a new technology of regional block, has a higher positioning accuracy, a higher success rate, lesser complications, and simpler and more effective postoperative analgesia effect. Compared with thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral block, SAPB has a good ultrasonic anatomical basis; thus, has a broad application prospect in clinics. In this paper, the SAPB in clinical application was reviewed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号