Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, with an estimated annual incidence of 27-69 million. TBI is a severe condition that can lead to high mortality rates and long-term cognitive, behavioral, and physical impairments in young adults. It is a significant public health concern due to the lack of effective treatments available. Quercetin, a natural flavonoid found in various fruits and vegetables, has demonstrated therapeutic potential with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective properties. Recently, some evidence has accentuated the ameliorating effects of quercetin on TBI. This review discusses quercetin\'s ability to reduce TBI-related damage by regulating many cellular and molecular pathways. Quercetin in vitro and in vivo studies exhibit promise in reducing inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and enhancing cognitive function post-TBI. Further clinical investigation into quercetin\'s therapeutic potential as a readily available adjuvant in the treatment of TBI is warranted in light of these findings. This review adds to our knowledge of quercetin\'s potential in treating TBI by clarifying its mechanisms of action.

BACKGROUND: A reduced knee extensor moment (KEM) in the involved limb and asymmetry in the KEM during landing tasks are observed after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is limited information about the association of kinetic and kinematic parameters with the KEM during landing after ACLR. This study investigated the association of the anterior-posterior center of pressure (AP-COP) position, vertical ground reaction force (VGRF), and lower limb joint angles with the KEM during landing in female athletes following ACLR.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Twenty-two female athletes who underwent ACLR performed a drop vertical jump at 7.9 (1.7) months after surgery. We evaluated the KEM, AP-COP position, VGRF, and sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle angles using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system with force plates.
RESULTS: The peak KEM in the involved limb was significantly smaller than that in the uninvolved limb during landing (1.43 [0.33] N·m/kg/m vs 1.84 [0.41] Nm/kg/m, P = .001). The VGRF in the involved limb was significantly smaller than that in the uninvolved limb (11.9 [2.3] N/kg vs 14.6 [3.5] N/kg, P = .005). The limb symmetry index of the KEM was predicted by that of the VGRF (P < .001, R2 = .621, β = 0.800). The KEM was predicted by the AP-COP position in the involved limb (P = .015, R2 = .227, β = 0.513) and by the VGRF in the uninvolved limb (P = .018, R2 = .213, β = 0.500). No significant correlation was noted between the KEM and the lower limb joint angles.
CONCLUSIONS: The AP-COP position and VGRF were associated with the KEM during landing. Evaluating the VGRF and AP-COP position, not the lower limb joint angles, may contribute to understanding the KEM during double-leg landing after ACLR in the clinical setting.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated differences between adolescent athletes who sustained a surgical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) re-injury, or contralateral ACL injury following return to sports bridge programme participation (Group 1) compared to those that did not (Group 2).
METHODS: At 19.9 ± 7 years of age, 198 athletes participated in this study. Groups were compared for time postsurgery, preprogramme and postprogramme Knee Outcome Survey Sports Activity Scale (KOS-SAS) and global rating of knee function (GRKF) during sports activities, postprogramme lower extremity physical function test performance and perceived sports performance compared to preinjury level.
RESULTS: By 6.0 ± 3.2 years postsurgery, 11 (5.6%) sustained another ACL injury. Group 1 was younger (17.3 ± 1.7 years vs. 20.1 ± 6.8 years, p < 0.001). Postprogramme re-evaluation revealed that Group 1 had a greater GRKF compared to their programme initiation GRKF than Group 2 (32.6 ± 38 vs. 20.0 ± 23, p = 0.04). Group 1 also had a greater mean preprogramme to postprogramme GRKF change than Group 2 (51.3 ± 31 vs. 35.5 ± 21, p = 0.02) (effect size = 0.73). More Group 1 subjects also had a GRKF difference that exceeded the overall mean than Group 2 (p = 0.04). Group 1 had moderately strong relationships between preprogramme and postprogramme GRKF score change and the postprogramme GRKF score (r = 0.65, p = 0.04) and between preprogramme and postprogramme KOS-SAS score change and postprogramme GRKF score (r = 0.60, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Global rating scores had a stronger influence among adolescent athletes that sustained either surgical ACL re-injury or contralateral ACL injury. Since group physical function and neuromuscular control factors were similar, clinicians need to increase their awareness and understanding of other factors that may influence surgical ACL re-injury or contralateral ACL injury risk.
METHODS: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Despite widespread use of return to sport testing following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, studies suggest inadequacy in current testing criteria, such as limb symmetry index calculations, to determine athletes\' readiness to return to play. Recurrence quantification analysis, an emerging non-linear data analysis tool, may reveal subtle neuromuscular differences between the injured and uninjured limb that are not captured by traditional testing. We hypothesized that isokinetic torque curve data of the injured limb would demonstrate lower determinism and entropy as compared to the uninjured limb.
102 patients (44 M, 58F, 10 ± 1 months post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction) underwent isokinetic quadriceps strength testing using a HumacNorm dynamometer. Patients completed maximum effort knee extension and flexion at 60°/sec. Data were post-processed with a MATLAB CRQA Graphical User Interface and determinism and entropy values were extracted. Paired-sample t-tests (α = 0.05) were used to compare data from the injured and uninjured limb.
Determinism and entropy values in the torque curves were lower in the injured limb than the uninjured limb (p < 0.001). Our findings indicate there is less predictability and complexity present in the torque signals of injured limbs.
Recurrence quantification analysis can be used to assess neuromuscular differences between limbs in patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Our findings offer further evidence that there are changes to the neuromuscular system which persist following reconstruction. Further investigation is needed to establish thresholds of determinism and entropy values needed for safe return to sport and to evaluate the utility of recurrence quantification analysis as a return to sport criterion.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is high in young, active populations. Failure to successfully meet return-to-sport (RTS) criteria may identify adult athletes at risk of future injury; however, these studies have yet to assess skeletally mature adolescent athletes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if failure to meet RTS criteria would identify adolescent and young adult athletes at risk for future ACL injury after ACLR and RTS. The tested hypothesis was that the risk of a second ACL injury after RTS would be lower in participants who met all RTS criteria compared with those who failed to meet all criteria before RTS.
METHODS: Prospective case-cohort (prognosis) study.
METHODS: Laboratory.
METHODS: A total of 159 individuals (age = 17.2 ± 2.6 years, males = 47, females = 112).
METHODS: Participants completed an RTS assessment (quadriceps strength, functional hop tests) and the International Knee Documentation Committee patient survey (0 to 100 scale) after ACLR and were then tracked for occurrence of a second ACL tear. Athletes were classified into groups that passed all 6 RTS tests at a criterion level of 90% (or 90 of 100) limb symmetry and were compared with those who failed to meet all criteria. Crude odds ratios and 95% CIs were calculated to determine if passing all 6 RTS measures resulted in a reduced risk of second ACL injury in the first 24 months after RTS.
RESULTS: Thirty-five (22%) of the participants sustained a second ACL injury. At the time of RTS, 26% achieved ≥90 on all tests, and the remaining athletes scored less than 90 on at least 1 of the 6 assessments. The second ACL injury incidence did not differ between those who passed all RTS criteria (28.6%) and those who failed at least 1 criterion (19.7%, P = .23). Subgroup analysis by graft type also indicated no differences between groups (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Current RTS criteria at a 90% threshold did not identify active skeletally mature adolescent and young adult athletes at high risk for second ACL injury.

UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to analyze the biomechanical outcomes of patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) deficiency or insufficiency and ACL reconstruction and to determine if they follow a biomechanical \"Rule of Thirds.\"
UNASSIGNED: The Cincinnati Group reported nearly four decades ago that approximately one-third of patients do not experience a decline in biomechanical function in the absence of an ACL, one-third adapt their biomechanics to avoid knee symptoms, and one-third of patients do not adapt biomechanically to the loss of their ACL in order to function during activities of daily living without pain, swelling and giving way episodes. Subsequently, three decades ago the San Diego Group developed the Surgical Risk Factor (SURF) algorithm, which was designed to prospectively classify the biomechanics of patients who are ACL deficient. These classification systems have also delineated patient function into three categories. Currently, especially over the last decade, a growing body of work has documented that the incidence of second ACL injuries is consistent with the division of patient function by thirds. Approximately one-third of young, active individuals who return to high intensity sports sustain a second injury to either the ipsi- or contralateral knee.
UNASSIGNED: In this Biomechanics focused article in the Journal of Orthopedics, the authors describe differential patient outcomes with a Rule of Thirds concept, including the original study performed by our former group in Cincinnati and the SURF algorithm out of San Diego, the authors also present second ACL injury rates and how they are consistent with the Rule of Thirds, as well as the biomechanical implications for patient care.

This study investigated the relationship between quadriceps strength and knee kinematics during a drop vertical jump (DVJ) at 6, 9 and 12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in 9 male and 22 female athletes (16.6 ± 2.1 years old). Isokinetic quadriceps strength was measured by a dynamometer (Biodex System 3). Knee flexion excursion was assessed using two-dimensional analysis. Knee flexion excursion at 6 months was significantly smaller in the involved limb than in the uninvolved limb independent of quadriceps strength (56.7° ± 9.3°, 63.4° ± 11.4°, P < 0.001). At 9 months, only the low quadriceps strength group demonstrated a similar interlimb difference (57.2°± 12.3°, 63.3° ± 10.5°, P < 0.001). At 12 months, there was no significant interlimb difference in knee flexion excursion regardless of quadriceps strength. These findings indicate that restoration in symmetrical knee flexion excursion during a DVJ requires rehabilitation as well as quadriceps strength.

This systematic review aimed to investigate whether the use of a knee brace when returning to sport (RTS) could prevent a second injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study was registered with the PROSPERO database and followed PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, Ovid Medline, Ovid All EBM Reviews, Ovid Embase, EBSCO Sportdiscus and ISI Web of Science databases for meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies published before July 2020 was undertaken. The inclusion criteria were: (1) Comparing with and without a brace at RTS, (2) follow up of at least 18 months after ACLR, (3) reinjury rates included in the outcomes. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Quality appraisal analyses were performed for each study using the Cochrane Collaboration tools for randomized and nonrandomized trials. A total of 1196 patients in three studies were included. One study showed a lower rate of reinjury when wearing a knee brace at RTS. One study found the knee brace to have a significant protective effect for younger patients (≤17 years). The effectiveness of knee bracing when RTS remains ambiguous. Current data cannot support that using a knee brace when RTS will decrease the rate of reinjury after ACL reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of Tibial Plateau Slope (TPS) as risk factor for early Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure and contralateral ACL injury in a population of patients with less than 18 years of age and operated on with the same surgical technique.
METHODS: Ninety-four consecutive patients (mean age 15.7 ± 1.5 years) with at least 2 years of follow-up, who underwent ACL reconstruction with a single-bundle plus lateral-plasty hamstring technique in the same centre were included. Subsequent ACL injuries (ipsilateral ACL revision or contralateral ACL reconstruction) were assessed within the first 2 years after surgery. Anterior, central, posterior TPS of medial compartment were measured on lateral radiographs and compared between patients with intact graft and those with a second injury. Cut-off values with sensitivity and specificity were calculated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Survival analysis for second ACL injuries and multivariate analysis were performed.
RESULTS: Eight patients (9%) had ipsilateral ACL Revision and eight patients (9%) had contralateral ACL reconstruction. Patients with contralateral injury had a higher Central TPS with respect to those without second injury (12.6° ± 2.8° vs 9.3° ± 3.7°, p = 0.042). No differences were present in patients with ipsilateral ACL revision. Sensitivity and specificity for central TPS slope ≥ 12° to detect a contralateral rupture were 63% and 75% (p = 0.0092), for Anterior TPS were 100% and 52% (p = 0.0009). Patients with TPS values exceeding these cut-offs had higher rate of contralateral ACL injuries (19%vs4%, p = 0.0420) and lower 2-year survival (p = 0.0049). Multivariate analysis identified pre-operative sport level and TPS (either anterior or central) as risk factors for contralateral injuries.
CONCLUSIONS: Steep tibial plateau slope ≥ 12° is associated with a higher risk of contralateral ACL injury within 2 years after ACL reconstruction in patients less than 18 years of age. However, TPS has no role in early ipsilateral re-injury after combined ACL reconstruction and lateral plasty. The clinical relevance is that both the surgeon and the patient should be aware of this higher risk and consider it in the rehabilitation phase to reduce the incidence of such injuries.
METHODS: III.

Failure of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction or an injury to the ACL in the contralateral knee represents a devastating event for patients, especially those young and physically active. However, controversies are still present regarding long-term failure rates and risk factors.
To assess the long-term rate of ipsilateral graft failure and contralateral ACL injuries after ACL reconstruction performed at a single center using the same surgical technique with a hamstring autograft and to investigate the effect of sex, age, and preinjury activity level as predictors of second ACL injuries.
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
The study cohort consisted of 244 consecutive patients (mean age, 30.7 years) who underwent ACL reconstruction with a single bundle plus lateral plasty technique using the hamstring tendon between November 2007 and May 2009. The number of subsequent ACL injuries (ipsilateral ACL revision or contralateral ACL reconstruction) was determined at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Survivorship of either knee and subgroup analysis included sex, age, preoperative Tegner activity level, timing of ACL reconstruction, body mass index, and smoking status.
Ipsilateral ACL revision was performed in 8 (3.4%) patients and contralateral ACL reconstruction in 19 (7.8%) patients. Only 1 patient had both ipsilateral and contralateral injuries. No predictors were found for ipsilateral ACL revision, while age <18 years and preoperative Tegner level ≥7 had a higher risk of contralateral ACL reconstruction. The highest rate of a second ACL reconstruction procedure was in young (<18 years) and active (Tegner ≥7) patients, in whom the 10-year survival of either knee was 61.1%. Six years after primary ACL reconstruction, the rate of contralateral ACL reconstruction was significantly higher than that of ipsilateral ACL revision (hazard ratio, 2.4-3.6).
In the long term, a second injury to either the ipsilateral or the contralateral knee in young and active populations could reach 40%, with a more than double-fold risk of contralateral ACL reconstruction compared with ipsilateral ACL revision.