School-based integrated care

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新南威尔士州(NSW)学龄儿童(5-18岁)未满足的身心健康需求,源于难以获得和参与医疗保健,可以通过基于学校的综合护理(SBIC)模式来解决。这项研究旨在了解卫生和教育部门之间为什么以及如何建立伙伴关系,在SBIC模型中,在为儿童提供护理方面很重要,并确定实施的促进因素和障碍。
    使用半结构化访谈和主题分析进行了定性研究。考虑了“以人为中心的综合卫生服务(IPCHS)”框架和Looman等人(2021年)的综合护理实施策略的原则。
    IPCHS框架内的主题:战略1:参与和赋予人民和社区权力-社区驱动的模型,改善获得医疗保健的机会,对儿童和家庭的积极成果,\'连接\',战略2:加强治理和问责制——系统集成和发展证据基础;战略3:重新调整护理模式——将医疗保健转移到学校减少不平等并提供文化安全的做法;战略4:协调部门内部和各个部门的服务——整合护理和稳定的劳动力;战略5:创造有利环境:领导,利益相关者的承诺,和充足的资源。
    在新南威尔士州实施SBIC模型的潜在策略包括社区咨询和共同设计;建立具有新能力和角色的多学科团队,例如接头和协调员;协作和共享领导;以及运营系统的一致性,同时在结构和灵活性之间保持平衡。
    SBIC模式需要跨部门和与社区的高层协作,以提供向以儿童和家庭为中心的护理转变,从而提高参与度。卫生服务的获取和结果。
    UNASSIGNED: The unmet physical and mental health needs of school-aged children (5-18 years) in New South Wales (NSW), stemming from poor access and engagement with healthcare, can be addressed by school-based integrated care (SBIC) models.This research aims to understand why and how partnerships between the health and education sector, in SBIC models, are important in providing care for children, and to identify the facilitating factors and barriers for implementation.
    UNASSIGNED: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. The principles of the \'Integrated People-Centred Health Service (IPCHS)\' framework and Looman et al\'s (2021) implementation strategies for integrated care were considered.
    UNASSIGNED: Themes within IPCHS framework: Strategy 1: Engaging and empowering people and communities - community-driven models, improved access to healthcare, positive outcomes for children and families, \'connection\', and service provision for marginalised populations; Strategy 2: Strengthening governance and accountability - system integration and developing evidence base; Strategy 3: Reorienting the model of care - shifting healthcare to schools reduces inequity and provides culturally safe practice; Strategy 4: Coordinating services within and across sectors - integrating care and stable workforce; Strategy 5: Creating an enabling environment: leadership, stakeholder commitment, and adequate resourcing.
    UNASSIGNED: Potential strategies for implementing SBIC models across NSW include community consultation and co-design; building multidisciplinary teams with new competencies and roles e.g. linkers and coordinators; collaborative and shared leadership; and alignment of operational systems while maintaining a balance between structure and flexibility.
    UNASSIGNED: SBIC models require high-level collaboration across sectors and with communities to provide a shift towards child and family centred care that improves engagement, access and outcomes in health delivery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    KalgalBurnbona是为在悉尼地方卫生区(SLHD)应用基于学校的综合护理(SBIC)而开发的框架。
    KalgalBurnbona是一个创新和综合的框架,旨在提供整体,集成,多学科的以儿童和家庭为中心的照顾来自SLHD优先人群的学龄儿童,例如属于土著社区的人。预期的结果包括改善健康,行为,教育和社会成果。本文将KalgalBurnbona框架的发展从一开始就作为健康房屋和邻里(HHAN)计划中名为NgaramadhiSpace(NS)的试点,通过其演变为新南威尔士州(NSW)卫生和教育部门之间的综合伙伴关系。描述了如何在SLHD内的其他设置中实现框架的示例。
    基于对NS的混合方法评估的证据,并与彩虹综合护理模型(RMIC)相一致,提出了一种跨SLHD的综合护理分层方法。KalgalBurnbona是通过合作伙伴关系改善健康的社区驱动反应的一个例子,教育和社会成果。所描述的框架为多部门团队提供了结构,认识到每个社区和学校都有自己的历史和需求。
    可以扩大KalgalBurnbona模型,以服务于整个SLHD的更广泛的学生网络。该模型的初步成功,其中包括改善身体健康未得到满足的儿童的获取和参与,精神卫生和社会需求在被社区接受的同时,为以跨部门合作伙伴关系为中心的政策变化和宣传提供了证据。
    UNASSIGNED: Kalgal Burnbona is a framework developed for applying school-based integrated care (SBIC) across Sydney Local Health District (SLHD).
    UNASSIGNED: Kalgal Burnbona is an innovative and integrative framework developed to provide holistic, integrated, multidisciplinary child and family centred care to school-aged children from priority populations within SLHD, such as those belonging to the Aboriginal community. The expected outcomes include improved health, behavioural, education and social outcomes. This article contextualises the development of the Kalgal Burnbona framework from its beginnings as a pilot site called Ngaramadhi Space (NS) within the Healthy Homes and Neighbourhoods (HHAN) initiative, through to its evolution to an integrated partnership between the New South Wales (NSW) health and education sector. An example of how the framework can be implemented in other settings within SLHD is described.
    UNASSIGNED: A tiered approach to integrated care across SLHD is postulated based on evidence from a mixed methods evaluation of NS and in line with the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC). Kalgal Burnbona is an example of a community-driven response through collaborative partnerships to improve health, education and social outcomes. The framework described provides structure for multisector teams to work within, recognising that each community and school has its own history and needs.
    UNASSIGNED: The Kalgal Burnbona model can be scaled up to serve a wider network of students across SLHD. The initial successes of the model, which include improving access and engagement for children with unmet physical health, mental health and social needs while being accepted by communities provide evidence for policy changes and advocacy that centre on collaborative cross-sector partnerships.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号