暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) metabolism plays an important role in the pathogenesis of Marfan syndrome (MFS). Accordingly, drug therapy uses TGFβ receptor blockade to slow down the cardiovascular manifestations, above all aortic root dilatation. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) have been shown to reduce TGFβ levels in adults. Data on childhood are lacking and are now being investigated in the TiGer For Kids study presented here.
UNASSIGNED: We examined 125 children without chronic disease and 31 pediatric Marfan patients with a proven FBN1 variant with regard to TGFβ levels. In addition, we measured TGFβ levels during the initiation of ARB therapy in pediatric Marfan patients.
UNASSIGNED: In children without chronic disease, TGFβ levels were found to decrease from childhood to adolescence (p < 0.0125). We could not measure a relevantly increased TGFβ level in pediatric Marfan patients. However, we showed a significant suppression of the TGFβ level after treatment with ARBs (p < 0.0125) and a renewed increase shortly before the next dose.
UNASSIGNED: The TGFβ level in childhood changes in an age-dependent manner and decreases with age. The TGFβ level drops significantly after taking ARBs. Based on our experience and data, a TGFβ receptor blockade in childhood seems reasonable. So far, TGFβ level cannot be used as an MFS screening biomarker.

OBJECTIVE: In genetic aortopathies (GA) particular attention is paid to aortic root dilatation which has an impact on morbidity and mortality. This study focuses on the effects of therapy with angiotensin-II-receptor-blockers (ARB) or beta-blockers (BB) on aortic root growth and the question which therapy should be initiated at which dosage and at what age.
METHODS: Since 1998 we diagnosed 208 patients with GA (170 FBN-1). 81 patients between 5 months and 18 years receiving either ARB or BB therapy were included. We retrospectively analyzed the progression of the dilatation of Sinus Valsalva aortae (SV) using calculated z-scores before and after therapy initiation and compared BB and ARB treatment.
RESULTS: Both ARB and BB (p < 0.05) therapy showed significant improvement in aortic root growth, while the effect is significantly more pronounced in ARB (p < 0.01) independent of age and genetic cause. A detailed comparison of the two drug groups showed a more sustained effect in limiting the progression of the dilatation of the aortic root in patients treated with ARB. Progression of dilatation of the SV was significantly lower in children treated with ARBs compared to BB (delta z-score, p < 0.05). In addition, ARBs were better tolerated and had a significantly lower discontinuation rate (3%) compared to BB (50%) (p < 0.01). Independently of age at initiation all children and adolescents were able to reach the target dose under ARB.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a significant change in both treatment options, with the effect of ARB being more pronounced while being better tolerated throughout the treatment period.

暂无摘要。

A genotoxic carcinogen, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), was detected as a synthesis impurity in some valsartan drugs in 2018, and other N-nitrosamines, such as N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), were later detected in other sartan products. N-nitrosamines are pro-mutagens that can react with DNA following metabolism to produce DNA adducts, such as O6 -alkyl-guanine. The adducts can result in DNA replication miscoding errors leading to GC>AT mutations and increased risk of genomic instability and carcinogenesis. Both NDMA and NDEA are known rodent carcinogens in male and female rats. The DNA repair enzyme, methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase can restore DNA integrity via the removal of alkyl groups from guanine in an error-free fashion and this can result in nonlinear dose responses and a point of departure or \"practical threshold\" for mutation at low doses of exposure. Following International recommendations (ICHM7; ICHQ3C and ICHQ3D), we calculated permissible daily exposures (PDE) for NDMA and NDEA using published rodent cancer bioassay and in vivo mutagenicity data to determine benchmark dose values and define points of departure and adjusted with appropriate uncertainty factors (UFs). PDEs for NDMA were 6.2 and 0.6 μg/person/day for cancer and mutation, respectively, and for NDEA, 2.2 and 0.04 μg/person/day. Both PDEs are higher than the acceptable daily intake values (96 ng for NDMA and 26.5 ng for NDEA) calculated by regulatory authorities using simple linear extrapolation from carcinogenicity data. These PDE calculations using a bench-mark approach provide a more robust assessment of exposure limits compared with simple linear extrapolations and can better inform risk to patients exposed to the contaminated sartans.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of adding Losartan to baseline therapy in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS).
RESULTS: A double-blind, randomized, multi-centre, placebo-controlled, add on trial comparing Losartan (50 mg when <50 kg, 100 mg otherwise) vs. placebo in patients with MFS according to Ghent criteria, age >10 years old, and receiving standard therapy. 303 patients, mean age 29.9 years old, were randomized. The two groups were similar at baseline, 86% receiving β-blocker therapy. The median follow-up was 3.5 years. The evolution of aortic diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva was not modified by the adjunction of Losartan, with a mean increase in aortic diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva of 0.44 mm/year (s.e. = 0.07) (-0.043 z/year, s.e. = 0.04) in patients receiving Losartan and 0.51 mm/year (s.e. = 0.06) (-0.01 z/year, s.e. = 0.03) in those receiving placebo (P = 0.36 for the comparison on slopes in millimeter per year and P = 0.69 for the comparison on slopes on z-scores). Patients receiving Losartan had a slight but significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure throughout the study (5 mmHg). During the study period, aortic surgery was performed in 28 patients (15 Losartan, 13 placebo), death occurred in 3 patients [0 Losartan, 3 placebo, sudden death (1) suicide (1) oesophagus cancer (1)].
CONCLUSIONS: Losartan was able to decrease blood pressure in patients with MFS but not to limit aortic dilatation during a 3-year period in patients >10 years old. β-Blocker therapy alone should therefore remain the standard first line therapy in these patients.

New preventive strategies for atherosclerosis are needed. In this study, we tested whether a new therapeutic approach consisting of low-dose treatment with a statin and sartan combination could prevent atherogenic diet-induced impairment of the arterial wall in guinea pigs. Twenty-five Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs were randomly assigned to five experimental groups: 1) normal diet; 2) atherogenic diet (AD); 3) AD + a low-dose atorvastatin and valsartan combination (5mg/kg/day and 2.4mg/kg/day, respectively); 4) AD + low-dose atorvastatin (5mg/kg/day); 5) AD + low-dose valsartan (2.4mg/kg/day). After 8 weeks of treatment, the animals were killed, blood samples collected and thoracic and abdominal aortas isolated. The atherogenic diet significantly impaired maximal thoracic aorta endothelium-dependent relaxation by 40.1% relative to the normal diet. The low-dose combination, compared to the separate drugs, completely preserved thoracic aorta endothelium-dependent relaxation at the level of the group receiving normal diet. This substantial effect was associated with a significant change in the expression of NOS3 (R=0.93; P=0.0002) and IL1b (R=-0.79; P=0.003) genes. In addition, treatment with the low-dose combination or the separate drugs also prevented atherosclerotic plaque formation. We found that treatment with the low-dose atorvastatin and valsartan combination has the capability to completely protect the arterial wall from atherogenic diet-induced damage in the guinea pig model. Further studies evaluating this new therapeutic approach are desirable.

Renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) activation plays a key role in the development of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Drugs that antagonize the RAS (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) have proven clinical efficacy in reducing blood pressure values and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. ACE inhibitors partially inhibit plasma ACE, and angiotensin II generation. Thus, ARBs, which block selectively type 1 angiotensin II receptor (AT(1)R), have been developed and used in the clinical management of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Experimental and clinical trials with ARBs indicate that this class of drug represents an effective, safe and well tolerated therapeutic option for the prevention and care of hypertension, even though there is no proven superiority as compared to ACE inhibitors except for the better tolerability. Most ARBs may not completely inhibit the AT(1)R at the approved clinical doses. Azilsartan medoxomil is a newly approved ARB for the management of hypertension. This ARB induces a potent and long-lasting antihypertensive effect and may have cardioprotective properties. This article reviews the current evidence on the clinical effectiveness of azilsartan in hypertension.