{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Prophylactic effect of angiotensin receptor blockers in children with genetic aortopathies: the early bird catches the worm.
{Author}: Olfe J;Kanitz JJ;Stark VC;Stute F;von Kodolitsch Y;Biermann D;Huebler M;Kozlik-Feldmann R;Mir TS;
{Journal}: Clin Res Cardiol
{Volume}: 112
{Issue}: 11
{Year}: 2023 Nov 9
{Factor}: 6.138
{DOI}: 10.1007/s00392-023-02221-4
{Abstract}: OBJECTIVE: In genetic aortopathies (GA) particular attention is paid to aortic root dilatation which has an impact on morbidity and mortality. This study focuses on the effects of therapy with angiotensin-II-receptor-blockers (ARB) or beta-blockers (BB) on aortic root growth and the question which therapy should be initiated at which dosage and at what age.
METHODS: Since 1998 we diagnosed 208 patients with GA (170 FBN-1). 81 patients between 5 months and 18 years receiving either ARB or BB therapy were included. We retrospectively analyzed the progression of the dilatation of Sinus Valsalva aortae (SV) using calculated z-scores before and after therapy initiation and compared BB and ARB treatment.
RESULTS: Both ARB and BB (p < 0.05) therapy showed significant improvement in aortic root growth, while the effect is significantly more pronounced in ARB (p < 0.01) independent of age and genetic cause. A detailed comparison of the two drug groups showed a more sustained effect in limiting the progression of the dilatation of the aortic root in patients treated with ARB. Progression of dilatation of the SV was significantly lower in children treated with ARBs compared to BB (delta z-score, p < 0.05). In addition, ARBs were better tolerated and had a significantly lower discontinuation rate (3%) compared to BB (50%) (p < 0.01). Independently of age at initiation all children and adolescents were able to reach the target dose under ARB.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a significant change in both treatment options, with the effect of ARB being more pronounced while being better tolerated throughout the treatment period.