SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

系统审查
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤患者关节软骨的相关损伤是一个公认的现象;然而,关于不同治疗技术和结果的文献相对缺乏.这项系统评价的目的是确定接受急性ACL断裂和相关软骨损伤治疗的患者。对这些软骨损伤的手术管理以及患者报告的结果测量(PROM)不同技术的任何差异感兴趣。
    方法:对ACL重建时国际软骨修复协会3级或4级关节软骨损伤的治疗或管理进行了系统评价。
    结果:17项研究符合标准,共纳入892名患者,64.6%为男性,平均年龄33.7岁,平均随访时间41.7个月。68.2%的病变位于股骨内侧髁(MFC)上,平均病变大小为3.9cm2。确定了六种不同的治疗软骨病变的手术方法,两种技术之间的PROM没有显着差异,尽管术前和术后预后指标之间存在显着差异。
    结论:系统评价发现MFC上的软骨缺损在伴随ACL损伤中更为常见,尽管据文献报道,股骨外侧髁上的骨瘀伤更为常见。它还发现,针对ACL重建和软骨缺损的伴随管理确定的六种不同技术之间的PROM没有显着差异。
    方法:二级。
    OBJECTIVE: The associated damage to articular cartilage in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured patients is a well-recognized phenomenon; however, there is a relative paucity in the literature regarding the different treatment techniques and outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify patients treated for acute ACL rupture and associated cartilage injury, with interest in the surgical management of these chondral injuries and any difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differing techniques.
    METHODS: A systematic review was performed looking for treatment or management of International Cartilage Repair Society grade 3 or 4 articular cartilage injury at the time of ACL reconstruction.
    RESULTS: Seventeen studies fit the criteria, a total of 892 patients were included, 64.6% were male with a mean age of 33.7 and the average time to follow-up was 41.7 months. 68.2% of the lesions were on the medial femoral condyle (MFC) with a mean lesion size of 3.9 cm2. Six different operative methods of dealing with chondral lesions were identified, there was no significant difference in PROMs between the techniques, although there was a significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative outcome measures.
    CONCLUSIONS: The systematic review found that chondral defects on the MFC are more common in concomitant ACL injuries, despite the pattern of bone bruising being more common on the lateral femoral condyle as reported in the literature. It also found no significant difference in the PROMs between the six different techniques identified for the concomitant management of ACL reconstruction and chondral defects.
    METHODS: Level II.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:衰弱和低蛋白血症在老年人中很常见。尽管有证据表明虚弱和低蛋白血症之间存在相关性,住院/危重患者和老年社区居民的虚弱和低蛋白血症之间的关系尚未明确.因此,我们的荟萃分析的目的是评估不同类型患者的虚弱与低蛋白血症之间的关联.
    方法:对PubMed上发表的文章进行系统检索,Embase,Medline,WebofScience,科克伦,万方,从建立到2024年4月的CNKI数据库被用来搜索关于老年人体弱多病严重程度和低蛋白血症之间关联的研究.纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和医疗保健研究与质量量表用于评估研究质量。
    结果:纳入了22项研究,包括90,351名虚弱的老年人。荟萃分析显示,虚弱或早弱与低蛋白血症之间存在关联(OR=2.37,95%CI:1.47,3.83;OR=1.62,95%CI:1.23,2.15),重度衰弱患者与轻度或中度衰弱患者的低蛋白血症风险无显著差异(OR=0.62,95%CI:0.44,0.87).衰弱对低蛋白血症发生的影响在住院患者/危重患者中比在手术患者中更明显(OR=3.75,95%CI:2.36,5.96),其次是老年社区居民(OR=2.30,95%CI:1.18,4.49)。
    结论:脆弱与手术患者的低蛋白血症有关,住院老年患者和老年社区居民。未来的研究应集中在白蛋白补充在预防或减轻虚弱和相关结局方面的益处。
    OBJECTIVE: Frailty and hypoproteinaemia are common in older individuals. Although there is evidence of a correlation between frailty and hypoproteinaemia, the relationship between frailty and hypoproteinaemia in hospitalized/critically ill and older community residents has not been clarified. Therefore, the aim of our meta-analysis was to evaluate the associations between frailty and hypoproteinaemia in different types of patients.
    METHODS: A systematic retrieval of articles published in the PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, Wanfang, and CNKI databases from their establishment to April 2024 was performed to search for studies on the associations between severity of frailty or prefrailty and hypoproteinaemia in older adults. The Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Scale were used to assess study quality.
    RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included including 90,351 frail older people were included. Meta-analysis revealed an association between frailty or prefrailty and hypoproteinaemia (OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.47, 3.83; OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.23, 2.15), there was no significant difference in the risk of hypoproteinaemia between patients with severe frailty and those with low or moderate frailty (OR = 0.62, 95% CI:0.44, 0.87). The effect of frailty on the occurrence of hypoproteinaemia was more obvious in hospitalized patients/critically ill patients than in surgical patients (OR = 3.75, 95% CI: 2.36, 5.96), followed by older community residents (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.18, 4.49).
    CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is associated with hypoproteinaemia in surgical patients, hospitalized older patients and older community residents. Future studies should focus on the benefits of albumin supplementation in preventing or alleviating frailty and related outcomes in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经济制裁被定义为其他国家对个人施加的限制,groups,或其他国家的政府。这些制裁对各国的经济产生不利影响,并可能限制人们获得医疗保健服务,这是次要后果。本研究旨在系统地回顾文献,通过叙事综合来研究经济制裁对健康的直接和间接影响。
    方法:本系统文献综述仅限于1990年1月至2023年7月之间发表的论文。在Cochrane图书馆等数据库中搜索了以英语和波斯语出版的相关文件,PubMed,Embase,Scopus,WebofScience,SID,马吉兰,伊朗医生使用世界卫生组织(WHO)提出的两个框架对制裁对健康的直接和间接影响进行了分类:卫生系统构建块和“健康的社会决定因素”。
    结果:在总共18,219篇文章中,根据纳入标准选择了59名。制裁的效果分为直接组和间接组。直接影响包括七个主要主题:获得基本药物,医疗产品,疫苗和技术;融资;卫生人力;服务提供;研究和卫生信息系统;健康结果;和财务风险保护。间接影响也分为六个主要主题:社会经济地位;食品和农产品;压力;早期生活条件;高风险行为和成瘾;和运输。大多数研究集中在药物的获取上,食物,经济和社会地位。
    结论:经济制裁对医疗保健系统的各个方面都产生了深远的负面影响。国际社会必须解决这些对健康的影响,并采取必要措施预防或减轻这些影响,特别是在确保为个人和社区提供基本和基本的医疗保健需求方面。
    BACKGROUND: Economic sanctions are defined as restrictions imposed by other countries against individuals, groups, or governments of other countries. These sanctions have a detrimental impact on the economies of countries and can also limit access to healthcare services for people as a secondary consequence. This study aims to systematically review the literature to examine the direct and indirect effects of economic sanctions on health through a narrative synthesis.
    METHODS: This systematic literature review was limited to papers published between January 1990 and July 2023. Relevant documents published in English and Persian were searched for in databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SID, Magiran, and Irandoc. The direct and indirect effects of sanctions on health were classified using two frameworks proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO): the Health System Building Blocks and \"Social Determinants of Health\".
    RESULTS: Out of a total of 18,219 articles, 59 were selected based on inclusion criteria. The effects of sanctions were divided into direct and indirect groups. Direct effects encompassed seven main themes: access to essential medicine, medical products, vaccines and technologies; financing; health workforce; service delivery; research and health information systems; health outcomes; and financial risk protection. Indirect effects also were classified into six main themes: socioeconomic status; food and agricultural products; stress; early life conditions; high-risk behaviors and addiction; and transport. Most studies focused on the access to medicines, food, economic and social status.
    CONCLUSIONS: Economic sanctions have had profoundly negative impacts on all aspects of the healthcare system. The international community must address these effects on health and take necessary measures to prevent or mitigate them, particularly in ensuring the provision of basic and essential healthcare needs for individuals and communities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们试图描述和评估药师主导的AMS干预措施在改善围手术期抗菌药物使用和随后手术部位感染(SSI)方面的有效性。
    方法:通过搜索PubMed,Embase和CINAHL。两名独立的审阅者使用药剂师干预表征工具的描述性要素提取数据,并使用CroweCriticalAssessment进行质量评估。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
    结果:本综述包括11项研究。药剂师被发现在AMS中扮演各种角色,包括教育会议,查房,审计和反馈,和指导方针的发展。关于干预措施的讨论缺乏关于发展的细节。一项荟萃分析显示,在围手术期环境中,药剂师主导的AMS计划与抗生素选择的显着改善相关(OR4.29;95%CI2.52-7.30),给药时间(OR4.93;95%CI2.05-11.84),持续时间(OR5.27;95%CI1.58-17.55),和SSI(OR0.51;95%CI0.34-0.77)。
    结论:药剂师主导的AMS项目可有效改善抗菌药物处方,同时降低SSI;然而,大多数研究质量中等。研究缺乏利用理论来发展干预措施,因此,目前尚不清楚基于理论的干预措施是否比没有理论因素的干预措施更有效。高品质,多组分,理论推导,使用适当方法和标准化数据收集的介入研究,是需要的。
    OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize and evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacist-led AMS interventions in improving antimicrobial use and subsequent surgical site infections (SSI) in perioperative settings.
    METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase and CINAHL. Two independent reviewers extracted the data using the Descriptive Elements of Pharmacist Intervention Characterization Tool and undertook quality assessment using the Crowe Critical Appraisal. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effect model.
    RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in this review. Pharmacists were found to have various roles in AMS, including educational sessions, ward rounds, audits and feedback, and guidelines development. The discussion of interventions lacked details on the development. A meta-analysis revealed that pharmacist-led AMS programs in perioperative settings was associated with a significant improvement in antibiotic selection (OR 4.29; 95 % CI 2.52-7.30), administration time (OR 4.93; 95 % CI 2.05-11.84), duration (OR 5.27; 95 % CI 1.58-17.55), and SSI (OR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.34-0.77).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist-led AMS programs were effective in improving antimicrobial prescribing while reducing SSI; however most studies were of moderate quality. Studies lacked the utilization of theory to develop interventions, therefore, it is not clear whether theory-derived interventions are more effective than those without a theoretical element. High-quality, multicomponent, theory-derived, interventional studies using appropriate methodology and standardized data collection, are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于COVID-19的爆发,学校不得不上网。随着大学简化面对面(F2F)教育,混合式教学和学习(BTL)可以持续提供教育。然而,向BTL的突然过渡给学生和教师带来了挑战,特别是对于需要动手实践经验的健康科学计划。一些研究通过学生的反馈和评估来评估F2F教学和学习环境。然而,需要更可靠和有效的自我报告问卷,侧重于学生体验BTL的感知和经验。这项研究将批判性地评估,根据健康科学大学生的心理测量学特性,比较和总结评估BTL的自我报告问卷的质量。
    方法:将使用系统综述和荟萃分析设计。本审查将遵循系统审查和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目,并遵循基于概念的健康测量指标选择标准(COSMIN)标准化指南。将在13个数据库中搜索报告BTL自我报告问卷作为具有各自心理测量特性的评估工具的研究。两名独立审稿人将使用COSMIN偏见风险清单评估论文,相关问卷的心理测量特性的证据质量将使用修改后的建议评估等级评估,开发和评估方法。根据他们的心理测量特性,这些评估将全面总结并为BTL评估提供最合适的自我报告问卷的最佳建议。
    背景:菲律宾大学研究资助管理办公室免除了该研究方案的伦理审查评估(方案编号UPMREB2022-0259-EX),因为该研究不会收集个人数据。该研究方案已在PROSPERO注册。结果将通过同行评审的期刊和会议进行传播,以帮助健康教育领域的研究人员和专业人员谨慎选择有效的自我报告问卷来评估混合学习。CRD42022372362。
    BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 outbreak, schools had to switch online. As universities ease face-to-face (F2F) schooling, blended teaching and learning (BTL) enables the continuous delivery of education. However, the sudden transition to BTL poses challenges for students and teachers, especially for health sciences programmes that require hands-on practical experience. Several studies have evaluated F2F teaching and learning contexts through student feedback and evaluations. However, there needs to be more reliable and valid self-report questionnaires that focus on the perceptions and experiences of students experiencing BTL. This study will critically appraise, compare and summarise the quality of self-report questionnaires evaluating BTL among health science university students based on their psychometric properties.
    METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis design will be used. This review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols and follow the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) standardised guidelines. 13 databases will be searched for studies reporting BTL self-report questionnaires as evaluation tools with their respective psychometric properties. Two independent reviewers will appraise the paper using the COSMIN risk of bias checklist and the quality of evidence of the psychometric properties of the relevant questionnaires will be assessed using the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Based on their psychometric properties, these assessments will comprehensively summarise and present the best recommendations for the most appropriate self-report questionnaires for BTL evaluation.
    BACKGROUND: The University of the Philippines\' Research Grants Administration Office exempted this research protocol from ethics review evaluation (protocol number UPMREB 2022-0259-EX) since this study will not collect individual data. The research protocol was registered with PROSPERO. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences to aid researchers and professionals in the field of health education to prudently choose effective self-report questionnaires evaluating blended learning.CRD42022372362.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)期间避免小主动脉瓣环(SAA)患者的患者-假体不匹配(PPM)仍然是一个具有挑战性的手术问题。在可用的手术选择中,主动脉根部扩大(ARE)和无支架瓣膜植入(SVI)是两种最常用的治疗策略.本系统综述将根据这两种选择之间的比较研究来寻找优势证据。
    方法:本系统综述将包括1946年1月1日至2024年3月31日发表的所有相关文章,以及Medline(Ovid)提供的全文,Embase,Cochrane图书馆和WebofScience数据库,没有任何语言限制。将筛选比较ARE与SVI在小主动脉根部患者中用于AVR的手术结果的观察性研究和随机对照试验。研究将分为三组:第1组,用于报告SVI或其他组织瓣膜结局而未将其与ARE结局进行比较的研究;第2组,用于报告ARE结局而未将其与SVI结局进行比较的研究;第3组,用于将ARE结局与SVI结局进行比较的研究。每个研究的证据质量将根据牛津循证医学中心标准进行评估。
    背景:不需要道德批准,因为没有收集主要数据。研究结果将在科学会议上发表和/或在同行评审的科学期刊上报告。
    背景:PROSPERO,CRD42023383793。
    BACKGROUND: Avoiding patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) in patients with small aortic annulus (SAA) during aortic valve replacement (AVR) is still a challenging surgical problem. Among surgical options available, aortic root enlargement (ARE) and stentless valve implantation (SVI) are the two most commonly used strategies. This systematic review will be conducted searching for superiority evidence based on comparative studies between these two options.
    METHODS: This systematic review will include all relevant articles published from 1 January 1946 to 31 March 2024, with available full texts from Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases, without any language restriction. Observational studies and randomised controlled trials comparing surgical results of ARE versus SVI for AVR in patients with small aortic root will be screened. Studies will be classified into three groups: group 1 for studies that reported SVI or other tissue valve outcomes without comparing them with ARE outcomes; group 2 for studies that reported ARE outcomes without comparing them with SVI outcomes; and group 3 for studies that compared ARE outcomes with SVI outcomes. The quality of the evidence of each study will be evaluated according to Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria.
    BACKGROUND: Ethical approval is not required because no primary data are collected. The findings will be presented at scientific conferences and/or reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO, CRD42023383793.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胰腺癌的早期发现是通过为患者提供治愈性治疗来降低死亡率的重要步骤。已对风险人群中的筛查策略以及通过不同的检测方法进行了经济评估。然而,尚未进行筛查研究的综合,以告知资源分配,以便在疾病区域内进行早期发现。因此,评估胰腺癌筛查成本效益和成本的研究应进行系统回顾.
    方法:将对报告胰腺癌筛查的成本效益或成本的经济学评价进行系统评价。电子数据库Medline,WebofScience和EconLit将不受地理或时间限制进行搜索。两名独立审核员将根据预定义的标准选择符合条件的研究。将使用综合卫生经济评估报告标准声明和经济评估清单中的偏差来评估研究质量。一个审阅者将提取相关数据,第二个审阅者将交叉检查与提取表的合规性。关键项目将包括筛选个体的特征,使用的筛查策略,和成本,健康影响和成本效益作为研究产出。审稿人之间的意见分歧将通过咨询第三位审稿人来解决。
    背景:本研究不需要伦理批准,因为不会收集原始数据。结果将通过在会议上的演讲和在同行评审的期刊上发表来传播。系统评价的结果将为未来胰腺筛查的经济评估提供信息,为医疗资源优先级的决策提供指导。
    CRD42023475348。
    BACKGROUND: The early detection of pancreatic cancer is an important step in reducing mortality by offering patients curative treatment. Screening strategies in risk populations and by means of different detection methods have been economically evaluated. However, a synthesis of screening studies to inform resource allocation towards early detection within the disease area has not been done. Therefore, studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness and costs of screening for pancreatic cancer should be systematically reviewed.
    METHODS: A systematic review of economic evaluations reporting the cost-effectiveness or costs of pancreatic cancer screening will be conducted. The electronic databases Medline, Web of Science and EconLit will be searched without geographical or time restrictions. Two independent reviewers will select eligible studies based on predefined criteria. The study quality will be assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement and the Bias in Economic Evaluation checklist. One reviewer will extract relevant data and a second reviewer will cross-check compliance with the extraction sheet. Key items will include characteristics of screened individuals, the screening strategies used, and costs, health effects and cost-effectiveness as study outputs. Differences of opinion between the reviewers will be solved by consulting a third reviewer.
    BACKGROUND: Ethics approval is not required for this study since no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through presentations at conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The results of the systematic review will inform future economic evaluations of pancreatic screening, which provide guidance for decision-making in healthcare resource prioritisation.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42023475348.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本文旨在探讨耳鸣再训练治疗(TRT)对耳鸣患者的影响。
    方法:PubMed,MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,PEDro,Scopus,和WebofScience进行了随机对照试验(RCT)的筛选,这些试验探讨了从开始到2024年6月30日TRT对耳鸣患者的影响。使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表评估纳入的RCT的方法学质量。
    结果:15项研究符合我们的资格标准。共有2069名耳鸣患者(平均年龄52.93岁;66%为男性)参与本综述。所选研究的质量在PEDro量表上从5到8,中位数为7分。与耳鸣掩蔽(TM)相比,TRT在治疗耳鸣患者方面没有提供更好的效果,耳鸣教育咨询(TED),带开耳助听器的TRT,量身定制的缺口音乐训练(TMNMT),部分TRT,日常护理,聪明的TRT
    结论:TRT干预被认为是耳鸣患者的治疗选择。将TRT与其他干预措施相结合,比如认知行为疗法,药物治疗,或tDS,可能会显示出更大的功效。强烈需要额外的研究来认识到TRT对耳鸣的长期影响,确定谁最有可能从耳鸣类型和严重程度的干预中受益,并确定最佳治疗方案。
    OBJECTIVE: This review aims to explore the influences of tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) on patients with tinnitus.
    METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were screened for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that explored the effects of TRT on patients with tinnitus from inception to June 30, 2024. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was evaluated using the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale.
    RESULTS: Fifteen studies met our eligibility criteria. A total of 2069 patients with tinnitus (mean age 52.93 years; 66% male) were involved in the present review. The quality of the selected studies ranged from 5 to 8 on the PEDro scale, with a median score of 7. TRT did not provide superior effects in treating patients with tinnitus compared to tinnitus masking (TM), tinnitus educational counselling (TED), TRT with open ear hearing aids, Tailor-made notched music training (TMNMT), partial TRT, usual care, and smart TRT.
    CONCLUSIONS: TRT intervention is considered a treatment option for patients with tinnitus. Combining TRT with other interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy, or tDS, may show even greater efficacy. Additional studies are strongly required to recognize the long-term effects of TRT on tinnitus, determine who most likely would benefit from the intervention regarding tinnitus type and severity, and identify the optimal treatment protocol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骶神经刺激(SNS)现已被用作治疗大便失禁(FI)的方法超过20年。本系统评价的目的是确定SNS治疗FI的长期疗效。
    方法:对MEDLINE的全面搜索,Embase,和CochraneCentral数据库进行了查找出版物,不包括病例报告,报告随访时间≥36个月的成人SNS治疗FI的结局.使用非随机干预研究工具中的偏差风险评估偏差。根据报告的FI相关结果对症状严重程度和生活质量的数据进行总结。
    结果:总计,确定了3326种出版物,36项研究纳入3770名受试者.所有研究都有严重的偏倚风险。每个出版物对成功的定义各不相同,符合方案分析的成功率为59.4%至87.5%,意向治疗分析的成功率为20.9%至87.5%。所有报告肠道日记数据的研究,圣马克的分数,和克利夫兰临床尿失禁评分表明SNS治疗的长期明显改善。评估生活质量结果的研究也都显示了通过大便失禁生活质量量表测量的生活质量的改善。总量修正率为35.2%,出苗率为19.7%。
    结论:在≥36个月时客观和主观结果的改善支持使用SNS长期治疗FI。由于缺乏比较试验和纳入研究的异质性,对这些数据的解释受到限制。
    BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has now been used as a treatment for fecal incontinence (FI) for >20 years. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the long-term efficacy of SNS on the treatment of FI.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central data bases was performed to find publications, excluding case reports, reporting outcomes of SNS treatment for FI in adults with ≥36 months of follow-up. Bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tool. Data were summarized per reported FI-related outcomes for symptom severity and quality of life.
    RESULTS: In total, 3326 publications were identified, and 36 studies containing 3770 subjects were included. All studies had a serious risk of bias. Success was variably defined by each publication and ranged from 59.4% to 87.5% for per-protocol analyses and 20.9% to 87.5% for intention-to-treat analyses. All studies reporting bowel diary data, St Mark\'s scores, and Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Scores indicated significant improvement with SNS treatment in the long term. Studies that evaluated quality-of-life outcomes also all showed improvements in quality of life as measured by the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. The aggregate revision rate was 35.2%, and the explantation rate was 19.7%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in objective and subjective outcomes at ≥36 months support using SNS for the long-term treatment of FI. Interpretation of these data is limited by a lack of comparative trials and heterogeneity of the included studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景酒渣鼻是一种以面部红斑为特征的皮肤慢性炎症性疾病,水肿,毛细血管扩张,丘疹,脓疱和结节。治疗酒渣鼻的有效治疗方法很少。强脉冲光(IPL),一种方式,其中闪光灯安装在光学治疗装置(头部或尖端)中,带有反射镜以反射光,最近在这种情况的管理中越来越受欢迎。目的本系统综述旨在评估疗效,IPL治疗酒渣鼻的安全性和不良反应。方法根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目进行系统评价。搜索的电子数据库是Medline,PubMed和Scopus数据库。非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)和随机试验的偏倚风险工具(RoB-2)用于评估偏倚风险。结果在Medline检索到的233篇文章中,Scopus和PubMed数据库,14项研究符合最终分析条件。这些研究包括FitzpatrickI至IV型皮肤患者,年龄从15到78岁不等。尽管纳入的研究显示所使用的参数之间存在异质性,大多数研究表明,IPL治疗对酒渣鼻毛细血管扩张和红斑有积极作用,并且所呈现的不良反应是短暂的.限制纳入研究的方法学质量较差。结论虽然大部分研究显示IPL治疗酒渣鼻的疗效,研究质量差令人担忧.
    Background Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin characterised by facial erythema, oedema, telangiectasias, papules, pustules and nodules. There is a paucity of effective therapeutic modalities for the management of rosacea. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), a modality in which flash lamps installed in an optical treatment device (head or tip) with mirrors to reflect light, has in recent times gained popularity in the management of this condition. Aim This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and adverse effects of IPL treatment for rosacea. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. The electronic databases searched were Medline, PubMed and Scopus databases. The Risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) and risk-of-bias tools for randomised trials (RoB-2) was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results Of a total of 233 articles retrieved from Medline, Scopus and PubMed databases, 14 studies qualified for final analysis. The studies included patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I to IV, with ages ranging from 15 to 78 years. Although the included studies showed heterogeneity between the parameters used, most studies demonstrated positive effects of IPL treatment on telangiectasia and erythema in rosacea and that the adverse effects presented were transitory. Limitation The methodological quality of the included studies was poor. Conclusion Although most studies showed the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of rosacea, the poor quality of the studies was of concern.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号