UNASSIGNED: Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia have a high incidence and fatality rates due to pneumonia. Sarcopenia is a contributing factor to the development of pneumonia in patients with schizophrenia. In this study, we examine the effectiveness of three simple screening questionnaires, namely SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and SARC-F + EBM, in predicting the occurrence of pneumonia in stable patients with schizophrenia who are experiencing sarcopenia.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective study.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with stable schizophrenia patients aged ≥50 years in two psychiatric hospitals in western China.
UNASSIGNED: Medical data from patients were collected from September 1 to September 30, 2020. Data specifically from patients diagnosed with pneumonia were collected for a period of one year, from October 2020 to October 2021. Three hundred thirty-five stable schizophrenia patients, among whom 229 were males (68.36 %.), were enrolled in the prospective study. The risk of sarcopenia was evaluated using the SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and SARC-F + EBM scores, with values of ≥4, 11, and 12 indicating an elevated risk of sarcopenia. The collected data were analyzed using logistic regression analysis to establish the association between the scores of these screening tools and the risk of pneumonia in individuals with stable schizophrenia.
UNASSIGNED: The rate of pneumonia in stable schizophrenia individuals was 24.48 %. Among the included stable schizophrenia patients, the incidence of pneumonia in individuals with SARC-CalF scores ≥11 was higher than in those with SARC-CalF scores less than 11 (29.91 % vs 14.88 %, P = 0.002). In individuals with SARC-F + EBM scores ≥12, the pneumonia occurrence was higher than that in those with SARC-F + EBM scores less than 12 (37.33 % vs 20.77 %, P = 0.003). However, this pattern was not found in patients with stable schizophrenia who had SARC-F scores of 4 or above and less than 4. Following the implementation of logistic regression data analysis, it has been discovered that persons with SARC-CalF scores greater than or equal to 11 were at a significantly increased risk of having pneumonia compared to patients with SARC-CalF scores less than 11 (OR = 2.441, 95 % CI: 1.367-4.36). After adjusting the possible confounders, patients with SARC-CalF scores ≥11 had a greater danger of pneumonia (OR = 2.518, 95%CI: 1.36-4.665). As a result, it was found that individuals with SACR-F+EBM scores ≥12 were more likely to acquire pneumonia (OR = 2.273, 95%CI: 1.304-3.961) when compared to those with scores <12 (OR = 2.273, 95%CI: 1.304-3.961). The results of this study, which controlled for potential confounders, indicated that patients with SARC-F + EBM scores ≥12 were more inclined to acquire pneumonia (OR = 2.181, 95%CI: 1.182-4.026). However, in stable schizophrenia patients with SARC-F scores ≥4 and < 4, this study has not yet observed a similar pattern for pneumonia risk.
UNASSIGNED: These results demonstrate, in stable adults with schizophrenia, a relationship between pneumonia risk and SARC-F + EBM and SARC-CalF scores. It is, therefore, advised to use these scores to determine whether these patients have pneumonia, especially in hospitals that cannot diagnose sarcopenia.

UNASSIGNED: Functional dependency may serve as a marker for positive SARC-F screen among older adults at the Emergency Department (ED). We compared functional dependency between SARC-F- (<4) and SARC-F+ (≥4) groups at the ED.
UNASSIGNED: A secondary analysis of cohorts from two quasi-experimental studies among patients aged ≥65 years old presenting to the ED of a 1700-bed tertiary hospital. We compared both groups for baseline characteristics using univariate analyses, and performed multiple linear regression to examine the association between Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and Lawton\'s instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) against SARC-F, and binary logistic regression to examine the associations between individual ADL domains and SARC-F+. We compared the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) to detect SARC-F+ for MBI, IADL, frailty, age, cognition and comorbidity.
UNASSIGNED: SARC-F+ patients were older (86.4±7.6 years), predominantly female (71.5%) and frail (73.9%), more dependent on walking aids (77.2%), and had lower premorbid MBI[90.0(71.0-98.0)] and IADL[4.0(2.0-5.0)] (both p<.001). MBI (β -0.07, 95%CI:-0.086 to -0.055] and IADL (β -0.533,95%CI:-0.684 to -0.381) were significantly associated with SARC-F. Dependency in finances [Odds Ratio(OR):14.7,95%CI:3.57-60.2, p<.001], feeding (OR:12.4,95%CI:1.45-106, p=0.022), and stair-climbing (OR:10.49,95%CI:4.96-22.2, p<.001) were the top 3 functional items associated with SARC-F. MBI (AUC:0.82,95%CI:0.77-0.84) and IADL (AUC:0.78,95%CI:0.72-0.84) showed superior discrimination for SARC-F+ compared to other measures (AUC:0.58-0.70).
UNASSIGNED: Functional dependency is strongly associated with positive SARC-F screen among older adults at the ED. This highlights the need for increased vigilance, especially in the presence of dependency in relevant domains such as managing finances, feeding, and stair-climbing.

OBJECTIVE: The updated World Health Organization 2020 guidelines strongly recommend an optimal physical activity level of 150-300 min/week for older adults. However, few studies have examined the relationship between different levels of physical activity and sarcopenia. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the cross-sectional associations between overall physical activity levels, gender, intensity, and the risk of sarcopenia among older Taiwanese adults.
METHODS: A nationwide cross-sectional telephone survey of older adults (≥ 65 years) was conducted in Taiwan from October 2019 to January 2020. Participants were interviewed to collect self-reported data on their level of physical activity (measured by the Taiwanese version of the IPAQ-SF), sarcopenia risk (measured by the SARC-F questionnaire), and sociodemographics.
RESULTS: A total of 1068 older adults were surveyed. Compared with the optimal physical activity level recommendations in the WHO guidelines and after adjusting for potential confounders and proposing an association independent of sedentary behavior, older adults with insufficient physical activity levels (< 150 min/week) were more likely to have a higher risk of sarcopenia (OR: 3.24; CI: 1.67-6.27), whereas older adults who exceeded physical activity guidelines (> 300 min/week) were more likely to have a lower risk of sarcopenia (OR: 0.39; CI: 0.20-0.78). Maintaining moderate-intensity physical activity is essential for older adults, as physical activity that exceeds the guidelines can significantly lower the risk of sarcopenia; meanwhile, insufficient physical activity can greatly increase it. Also, there seems to be a similar association between sarcopenia risk across different physical activity levels in vigorous-intensity physical activities in older adults. However, due to the small number of sarcopenia-risk participants who met or exceeded vigorous-intensity physical activity levels, further comparisons between different vigorous-intensity physical activity levels did not show significant differences in sarcopenia risk. Additionally, insufficient physical activity was found to be an important risk factor for sarcopenia in both genders, while physical activity that exceeded the guidelines prevented sarcopenia in females.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study highlight the potential dose-response relationship related to physical activity. The 2020 WHO guidelines provide the public with minimum recommendations for physical activity. However, exceeding these recommended levels appears to be more effective in preventing sarcopenia in older adults and may offer even greater health benefits. Future research should further explore whether exceeding these guidelines could result in additional health benefits.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of the SARC-F questionnaire to identify sarcopenia in patients with Parkinson\'s disease (PD).
METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients with PD who had a score of 3 or lower on the Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM), hand grip strength, and the SARC-F were used to assess sarcopenia. The cutoffs for the ASM index and hand grip strength to diagnose sarcopenia were based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 consensus. A score ≥4 on the SARC-F was considered at risk for sarcopenia.
RESULTS: A total of 365 patients with PD were included (mean age, 71.1 years; men, 53.2 %), and 73 (20.0 %) were diagnosed with sarcopenia. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the SARC-F was 0.702 (95 % confidence interval, 0.634-0.770). Using the recommended cutoff score of ≥4, the SARC-F showed a sensitivity of 38.4 %, specificity of 85.6 %, positive predictive value (PPV) of 40.0 %, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.7 %. The Youden\'s index was the highest at a cutoff score of ≥2, in which the SARC-F showed a sensitivity of 67.1 %, specificity of 65.4 %, PPV of 32.7 %, and NPV of 88.8 %. These predictive values were similar to those obtained using a cutoff score of ≥2.5 or 3 on the H&Y scale.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of the SARC-F to the mild-to moderate PD population is not appropriate as a first-step screening tool to diagnose sarcopenia. Given the comparable predictive values of the SARC-F and H&Y scale, this questionnaire may be considered only for ruling out sarcopenia in patients with similar disease severity.

(1) Background: The goal of this study was to analyze the reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the SARC-F in older adults. (2) Methods: A total of 100 participants (77.1 ± 7.36 years, 73% women) were included in the study. In a first phase, the Portuguese SARC-F was adapted following the standardized forward-backward translation procedure, and internal consistency as well as inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Portuguese SARC-F were analyzed. Secondly, clinical validation was evaluated by comparing the SARC-F total score with five operational definitions of sarcopenia and with other sarcopenia-related measurements. Discriminant validity, with respect to low muscle mass and strength and physical function were analyzed. (3) Results: The Portuguese SAR-F showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.82), excellent inter-rater reliability (total score), and substantial to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.891 for the total score). Specificity ranged from 72.5% (FNIH) to 73.4 (IGWS), and negative predictive values went from 91.8% (EWGSOP1) to 97.3% (FNIH), but low sensitivity and positive predictive value were observed. The Portuguese SARC-F showed a moderate ability to discriminate people with low muscle strength (AUC = 0.78) and gait speed (AUC = 0.89). (4) Conclusions: The Portuguese SARC-F is a valid and reliable tool for ruling out sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults and can discriminate between people with low handgrip strength and gait speed.

Sarcopenia screening tools have a low capacity to predict adverse outcomes that are consequences of sarcopenia in the elderly population. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of a new sarcopenia screening tool SARC-GLOBAL to predict negative clinical outcomes in the elderly. A total of 395 individuals were evaluated in a 42-month period. The screening tools SARC-GLOBAL, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF and the diagnosis of sarcopenia according to European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older Persons (EWGSOP2) were performed at the beginning of the study. Logistic and Poisson regression models were applied to assess the predictive value of the tools for the odds and risks of negative clinical outcomes, respectively. The most common negative clinical outcome in the followed population was falls (12.9%), followed by infections (12.4%), hospitalizations (11.8%), fractures (4.3%), and deaths (2.7%). Both SARC-GLOBAL and SARC-F were similar in predicting the odds of falls and hospitalizations during the follow up period, however SARC-CalF only predicted the odds of hospitalizations at 42 months.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia has been reported to be associated with short-term outcomes after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The \"strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls\" (SARC-F) questionnaire has been widely used as a screening tool for sarcopenia; however, SARC-F combined with body mass index and age (SARC-F+EBM) has recently been reported to be more useful than SARC-F alone. This study aimed to investigate the association between sarcopenia, measured using SARC-F+EBM, and short-term outcomes after gastric ESD.
METHODS: Patients who underwent gastric ESD at our institution between May 2020 and June 2023 were included, and their medical records were reviewed retrospectively. A SARC-F+EBM score ≥ 12 indicated sarcopenia. We evaluated the incidence of adverse events and the length of hospital stay in the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups.
RESULTS: Overall, 263 patients (64 and 199 in the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups, respectively) were investigated. The incidence of adverse events with a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 3 was not significantly different between the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups (6.2% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.791). The proportion of patients with an extended hospital stay (≥ 10 days) was significantly higher in the sarcopenia group than that in the non-sarcopenia group (12.5% [8/64] vs. 3.5% [7/199], p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis showed that sarcopenia and lesions that present technical difficulty in ESD were independent risk factors for extended hospital stays (≥ 10 days). Of the eight cases having extended hospital stays in the sarcopenia group, four were due to the management after gastric ESD, three were due to family circumstances, and one was due to decreased activities of daily living.
CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia is not a predictor of adverse events associated with gastric ESD. However, patients with sarcopenia may be hospitalized for longer owing to non-ESD-related factors.

This study aimed to investigate the ecological system factors that influence discrimination of sarcopenia among older individuals living in contemporary society. Data analysis included information from 618 older adults individuals aged 65 years or older residing in South Korea. To assess variations in ecological system factors related to SARC-F scores, we conducted correlation analysis and t-tests. Discriminant analysis was used to identify factors contributing to group discrimination. The key findings are summarized as follows. First, significant differences at the p < 0.001 level were observed between the SARC-F score groups in various aspects, including attitudes toward life, wisdom in life, health management, social support, media availability, sports environment, collectivist values, and values associated with death. Further, service environment differences were significant at p < 0.01 level, while social belonging and social activities exhibited significance at p < 0.05. Second, factors influencing group discrimination based on the SARC-F scores were ranked in the following order: health management, attitudes toward life, fear of own death, wisdom in life, physical environment, sports environment, media availability, social support, fear of the own dying, collectivist values, service environment, social activities, and social belonging. Notably, the SARC-F tool, which is used for sarcopenia discrimination, primarily concentrates on physical functioning and demonstrates relatively low sensitivity. Therefore, to enhance the precision of sarcopenia discrimination within a score-based group discrimination process, it is imperative to incorporate ecological system factors that exert a significant influence. These modifications aimed to enhance the clarity and precision of the text in an academic context.

OBJECTIVE: It is recommended by Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia to early identify people at risk for sarcopenia using simple screening tools like SARC-F. The modified version SARC-F+EBM showed higher diagnostic performance. However, this cut-off value of body mass index (BMI) remained uncertain to be used in Chinese population. In this study, we used appropriate BMI recommended for Chinese older population and further modified SARC-F+EBM by combining calf circumference.
METHODS: Diagnostic tests were performed and the receiver operating characteristics analyses were conducted between the SARC-F, SARC-F+EBM (cut-off of BMI: ≤ 21 kg/m2), SARC-F+EBM (CN) (cut-off of BMI: ≤ 22 kg/m2), SARC-CalF and SARC-CalF+EBM (CN) (cut-off of BMI: ≤ 22 kg/m2) in 1660 community-dwelling participants aged ≥ 65 years from China.
RESULTS: The participants had an average age of 71.7±5.1 years, of which 56.8% were women. All the modified models could enhance the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of original SARC-F (all p<0.001). The SARC-F+EBM (CN) also showed a significantly higher sensitivity of 47.4% (p<0.001) and an AUC of 0.809 (p=0.005) than SARC-F+EBM. SARC-CalF+EBM (CN) was validated to be of great diagnostic value of the highest AUC of 0.88 among these sarcopenia screening tools, including SARC-F, SARC-CalF and SARC-F+EBM (CN) (all p<0.001). Using this study population as a reference, the optimal cut-off value of SARC-CalF+EBM (CN) is ≥12 points, with a sensitivity of 79.3% and a specificity of 80.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: The SARC-F+EBM (CN) and SARC-CalF+EBM (CN) could enhance the diagnostic performance of SARC-F and SARC-F+EBM and are suitable sarcopenia screening tools for Chinese population.

Pulmonary tuberculosis is a severe disease with a high mortality rate. However, whether sarcopenia is a risk factor for in-hospital mortality remains unclear. The SARC-F (five items: strength, assistance in walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls) is a questionnaire developed to screen for sarcopenia. This study aimed to determine whether the high risk of sarcopenia, assessed using the SARC-F questionnaire, affects in-hospital mortality in older patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.
This was a retrospective, observational study. We included patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis aged ≥65 years who required inpatient treatment between 30 April 2021 and 30 November 2022. We assessed sarcopenia using SARC-F, and SARC-F ≥ 4 points at admission was defined as a high risk of sarcopenia. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during hospitalisation. We extracted information on age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, blood and biochemical tests, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, calf circumference, geriatric nutritional risk index, physiotherapy, and length of hospital stay from medical records.
We included 147 patients (mean age: 83.0 ± 7.8 years; males: 61.9%). Ninety-three (63.3%) patients had a high risk of developing sarcopenia. Patients with a high risk of sarcopenia were significantly older (mean: 85.0 ± 7.1 years), had a lower body mass index (median: 18.1 kg/m2, range: 16.1-20.5 kg/m2), had a higher modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (median: 2, range: 2-2), and had a lower calf circumference (mean: 26.8 ± 3.6 cm), had a lower geriatric nutritional risk index (mean: 72.2 ± 12.9) than those without high-risk sarcopenia. More patients with a high risk of sarcopenia underwent physiotherapy (93.5%) than those without high-risk sarcopenia (P < 0.01, all). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients with a high risk of sarcopenia had significantly lower overall survival than those without high-risk sarcopenia (log-rank test, P = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis for in-hospital mortality showed that a high risk of sarcopenia significantly affected in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 6.425, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.399-47.299). In addition, logistic regression analysis for each item of SARC-F showed that assistance in walking (OR: 3.931, 95% CI: 1.816-9.617) and rising from a chair (OR: 2.458, 95% CI: 1.235-5.330) significantly affected in-hospital mortality.
A high risk of sarcopenia, as assessed using SARC-F at admission, was a risk factor for in-hospital mortality in older patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Among the SARC-F items, assistance in walking and rising from a chair were the risk factors for in-hospital mortality.