Rumination, Cognitive

Rumination,Cognitive
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通过手机应用程序提供预防性干预措施提供了一种有效且可访问的方式来解决改善青少年和年轻人心理健康的全球优先事项。焦虑和抑郁的一个被证明的风险因素是增加的担忧和沉思,也被称为重复消极思维(RNT)。
    目的:这是一项预防机制试验,旨在调查针对RNT的自助手机应用程序(MyMoodCoach)是否可以减少居住在英国的年轻人的担忧和沉思。第二个目标是测试该应用程序是否可以减轻焦虑和抑郁症状并改善幸福感。
    方法:基于Web的,单盲,对236名年龄在16至24岁之间的人进行了双臂平行组随机对照试验,自我报告高度担忧或沉思的人。符合条件的参与者被随机分配到积极干预组(通常做法,加上长达6周的使用RNT定位移动应用程序,n=119)或waitlist控制组(通常的做法是在6周后无法访问该应用程序,n=117)。主要结果是随机分组后6周担忧和沉思的变化。次要结果包括6周后的幸福感以及焦虑和抑郁症状的变化,以及12周后所有指标的变化。
    结果:随机分配使用RNT靶向自助应用程序的参与者在6周的随访中表现出明显较低的沉思水平(平均差异-2.92,95%CI-5.57至-0.28;P=.03;ηp2=0.02)和担忧水平(平均差异-3.97,95%CI-6.21至-1.73;P<.n001;p2=0.06)相对于waitlist控件。幸福感观察到类似的差异(P<.001),焦虑(P=0.03),和抑郁(P=.04)。等待列表对照组在6周后访问应用程序时也显示出改善。在使用该应用程序6周后,干预组观察到的改善在12周的随访点保持不变。
    结论:MyMoodCoach应用程序对担忧和沉思有显著的积极作用,幸福,焦虑,年轻人的抑郁症,相对于waitlist控件,提供无指导的自助应用程序可以有效降低RNT的原理证明。这个app,因此,尽管需要直接评估对发病率的长期影响,但仍有预防焦虑和抑郁的潜力。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04950257;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04950257.
    RR2-10.1186/s12888-021-03536-0。
    BACKGROUND: Delivery of preventative interventions via mobile phone apps offers an effective and accessible way to address the global priority of improving the mental health of adolescents and young adults. A proven risk factor for anxiety and depression is elevated worry and rumination, also known as repetitive negative thinking (RNT).
    OBJECTIVE: This was a prevention mechanism trial that aimed to investigate whether an RNT-targeting self-help mobile phone app (MyMoodCoach) reduces worry and rumination in young adults residing in the United Kingdom. A secondary objective was to test whether the app reduces symptoms of anxiety and depression and improves well-being.
    METHODS: A web-based, single-blind, 2-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted with 236 people aged between 16 and 24 years, who self-reported high levels of worry or rumination. Eligible participants were randomized to an active intervention group (usual practice, plus up to 6 weeks of using the RNT-targeting mobile app, n=119) or a waitlist control group (usual practice with no access to the app until after 6 weeks, n=117). The primary outcome was changes in worry and rumination 6 weeks after randomization. Secondary outcomes included changes in well-being and symptoms of anxiety and depression after 6 weeks and changes in all measures after 12 weeks.
    RESULTS: Participants randomly allocated to use the RNT-targeting self-help app showed significantly lower levels of rumination (mean difference -2.92, 95% CI -5.57 to -0.28; P=.03; ηp2=0.02) and worry (mean difference -3.97, 95% CI -6.21 to -1.73; P<.001; ηp2=0.06) at 6-week follow-up, relative to the waitlist control. Similar differences were observed for well-being (P<.001), anxiety (P=.03), and depression (P=.04). The waitlist control group also showed improvement when given access to the app after 6 weeks. Improvements observed in the intervention group after 6 weeks of using the app were maintained at the 12-week follow-up point.
    CONCLUSIONS: The MyMoodCoach app had a significant positive effect on worry and rumination, well-being, anxiety, and depression in young adults, relative to waitlist controls, providing proof-of-principle that an unguided self-help app can effectively reduce RNT. This app, therefore, has potential for the prevention of anxiety and depression although longer-term effects on incidence need to be directly evaluated.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04950257; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04950257.
    UNASSIGNED: RR2-10.1186/s12888-021-03536-0.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    智能手机分心(SD)与抑郁症密切相关,护理专业学生SD患病率逐渐上升。然而,SD对护生抑郁影响的潜在机制尚不清楚。使用智能手机分心量表对574名护生进行了评估,反思反应量表,Hikikomori问卷,和患者健康问卷-9。结果表明,护理专业学生的SD通过四个途径对抑郁产生影响:(1)SD与抑郁呈正相关(β=0.353,P<0.001);(2)沉思(β=0.199,95%CI:0.081至0.162)和社交退缩(β=0.061,95%CI:0.034至0.091)介导了SD对抑郁的影响。(3)沉思和社交退缩在SD对护生抑郁的影响中起着连锁中介作用(β=0.027,95%CI:0.015至0.042)。SD对护生心理健康的负面影响不容忽视。学校和医院要引导护生正确使用智能手机,包括提供心理健康教育和专业心理咨询;家庭可以发挥监督作用,定期沟通,了解护生的心理状态和学习情况。这些措施可以帮助护生应对压力,降低抑郁风险。
    Smartphone distraction (SD) is closely related to depression, and the prevalence of SD among nursing students is gradually increasing. However, the potential mechanism of the effect of SD on nursing students\' depression is unclear. A total of 574 nursing students were assessed using Smartphone Distraction Scale, Ruminative Response Scale, Hikikomori Questionnaire, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The results indicated that SD among nursing students had an impact on depression through four pathways: (1) SD was positively associated with depression (β = 0.353, P < 0.001); (2) Rumination (β = 0.199, 95% CI: 0.081 to 0.162) and social withdrawal (β = 0.061, 95% CI: 0.034 to 0.091) mediated the effects of SD on depression, respectively; and (3) Rumination and social withdrawal played a chain mediating role in the effect of SD on nursing students\' depression (β = 0.027, 95% CI: 0.015 to 0.042). The negative impact of SD on nursing students\' mental health should not be taken lightly. Schools and hospitals should guide nursing students to use smartphones correctly, including providing mental health education and professional psychological counselling; families could play a supervisory role and communicate regularly to understand the psychological state and learning of nursing students. These measures can help nursing students cope with stress and reduce the risk of depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:行为激活作为抑郁症的有效治疗方法已引起越来越多的关注。然而,行为激活组疗法(BAGT)在受控条件下与其自助方案相比的有效性需要更多的调查.本研究旨在比较它们对抑郁症状的有效性,重复性消极思维(RNT),重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者的表现。
    方法:在这项随机临床试验中,根据DSM-5(SCID-5)的结构化临床访谈,招募了40名诊断为重度抑郁症(MDD)的患者。参与者被分配到BAGT(n=20)和自助行为激活(SBA;n=20)组。BAGT每周接受十次会议(90分钟),而SBA组遵循与自助干预相同的方案。参与者在治疗前进行评估,治疗后,以及使用贝克抑郁量表-II(BDI-II)进行的2个月随访,重复思维问卷(RTQ-31),以及工作和社会调整量表(WSAS)。
    结果:混合方差分析的结果显示,接受BAGT的参与者的抑郁症得到了显着改善,沉思,工作,治疗后和2个月随访时的社会功能。然而,SBA组未显示任何结局的显著变化.研究还发现,基于临床意义,68%的BAGT参与者对治疗有反应,在2个月的随访中,有31%的人获得了较高的最终表现。
    结论:在MDD患者中,BAGT比SBA更有效。讨论了参与者参与自助治疗的问题。
    背景:本试验已在伊朗临床试验中心注册(IRCTID:IRCT20181128041782N1||http://www。irct.ir/)(注册日期:04/03/2019)。
    BACKGROUND: Behavioral activation has gained increasing attention as an effective treatment for depression. However, the effectiveness of Behavioral Activation Group Therapy (BAGT) in controlled conditions compared to its self-help programs requires more investigation. The present study aimed to compare their effectiveness on depressive symptoms, repetitive negative thinking (RNT), and performance in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).
    METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 40 patients diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) were recruited based on a structured clinical interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5). Participants were allocated to BAGT (n = 20) and self-help behavioral activation (SBA; n = 20) groups. BAGT received ten weekly sessions (90 min), while the SBA group followed the same protocol as the self-help intervention. Participants were evaluated at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and the 2-month follow-up using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), repetitive thinking questionnaire (RTQ-31), and work and social adjustment scale (WSAS).
    RESULTS: The results of a Mixed ANOVA analysis revealed that participants who underwent BAGT showed significant improvement in depression, rumination, work, and social functioning post-treatment and at the 2-month follow-up. However, the SBA group did not show significant changes in any outcome. The study also found that, based on clinical significance, 68% of the BAGT participants were responsive to treatment, and 31% achieved a high final performance status at the 2-month follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: BAGT was more effective than SBA in MDD patients. Participants\' engagement with self-help treatment is discussed.
    BACKGROUND: The present trial has been registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials Center (IRCT ID: IRCT20181128041782N1|| http://www.irct.ir/ ) (Registration Date: 04/03/2019).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管特质和状态反省在负面影响的加剧中起着核心作用,有证据表明,他们是弱相关的,并发挥不同的影响对压力源的情绪反应。性状和状态反省是否共享共同或不同的神经底物尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们利用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)结合基于连接体的预测模型(CPM)来鉴定与性状和状态反省相关的神经指纹.CPM确定了独特的功能连通性(FC)概况,这些概况有助于预测性状反思性,主要涉及默认模式网络(DMN)和背侧注意网络(DAN)内的FC以及DMN之间的FC,控制网络(CN),丹,和显著性网络(SN)。相反,状态反省主要与DMN和CN之间的FC相关。此外,特征沉思的预测特征可以被鲁棒地推广来预测状态沉思,反之亦然。总之,这项研究阐明了DMN和非DMN系统在反刍动物的出现和持久性中的重要性。虽然特质反省与更强、更宽的FC相关,但与状态反省相关,预测特征的泛化性强调了两种形式的反思之间存在共享的神经机制。这些已识别的连接指纹可能有望成为旨在减轻与沉思相关的负面影响的创新治疗干预措施的目标。
    Although trait and state rumination play a central role in the exacerbation of negative affect, evidence suggests that they are weakly correlated and exert distinct influences on emotional reactivity to stressors. Whether trait and state rumination share a common or exhibit distinct neural substrate remains unclear. In this study, we utilized functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) combined with connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) to identify neural fingerprints associated with trait and state rumination. CPM identified distinctive functional connectivity (FC) profiles that contribute to the prediction of trait rumination, primarily involving FC within the default mode network (DMN) and the dorsal attention network (DAN) as well as FC between the DMN, control network (CN), DAN, and salience network (SN). Conversely, state rumination was predominantly associated with FC between the DMN and CN. Furthermore, the predictive features of trait rumination can be robustly generalized to predict state rumination, and vice versa. In conclusion, this study illuminates the importance of both DMN and non-DMN systems in the emergence and persistence of rumination. While trait rumination was associated with stronger and broader FC than state rumination, the generalizability of the predictive features underscores the presence of shared neural mechanisms between the two forms of rumination. These identified connectivity fingerprints may hold promise as targets for innovative therapeutic interventions aimed at mitigating rumination-related negative affect.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在这项研究中,我们重新检查了先前一项随机对照试验的数据,该试验调查了“技术支持的正念”(TSM)-一项针对强迫症患者的为期8周的治疗干预措施.当前的分析涉及检查反推之间的纵向关系,正念治疗期间的担忧和强迫症症状变化,与waitlist控件相比。
    方法:经历OCD的参与者(n=71)被随机分配到(1)TSM或(2)等待列表控制的8周。我们测试了在急性期治疗期间,沉思(使用反思反应量表)和担忧(使用宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷)与强迫症症状变化相关的程度,同时(即,在同一纵向模型内)。
    结果:广义线性模型(GLM)结果表明时间显着(第1周与第8周)通过条件相互作用,涉及TSM条件下的沉思减少:F(1,61)=13.37,p=0.001,部分η2=0.18,观察功率=0.94。在TSM条件下,第二个GLM显示出减少的担忧:F(1,69)=37.34,p=0.001,部分η2=0.35,观察功率=0.83。纵向“潜在差异”结构方程分析表明,担忧(但不是沉思)与强迫症症状变化之间存在交叉滞后的关联。
    结论:与等待名单对照相比,在TSM治疗的8周期间,TSM患者的沉思和担忧减少更多。减少的担忧预示着随后的强迫症症状的减少。
    BACKGROUND: In this study, we re-examined data from a previous randomized controlled trial investigating \'technology supported mindfulness\' (TSM)-an 8-week treatment intervention for individuals experiencing OCD. The current analysis involves an examination of the longitudinal relationships between rumination, worry and OCD symptom changes during mindfulness treatment, in comparison to a waitlist control.
    METHODS: Participants experiencing OCD (n = 71) were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of (1) TSM or (2) waitlist control. We tested the extent to which rumination (using the Ruminative Response Scale) and worry (using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire) are associated with OCD symptom changes during the acute phase of treatment, concurrently (i.e., within the same longitudinal model).
    RESULTS: Generalized linear model (GLM) results indicated a significant time (week 1 vs. week 8) by condition interaction involving decreased rumination in the TSM condition: F(1, 61) = 13.37, p = 0.001, partial η2 = 0.18 and observed power = 0.94. A second GLM demonstrated decreased worry in the TSM condition: F(1, 69) = 37.34, p = 0.001, partial η2 = 0.35 and observed power = 0.83. Longitudinal \'latent difference\' structural equation analyses demonstrated a cross-lagged association between worry (but not rumination) and OCD symptom changes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Individuals in the TSM condition experienced greater reductions in rumination and worry during 8 weeks of TSM treatment compared to the waitlist control, and reduced worry predicted subsequent OCD symptom reduction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    认知功能障碍(CD),包括特定的认知内容(例如,绝望,难以忍受)或受损的认知过程(例如,对自杀的关注,Rumination),是自杀意念(SI)的关键风险因素。本研究旨在使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)评估多种形式的CD,以确定CD对并发和前瞻性SI的独特贡献。55名具有SI或非自杀性自伤史的大学生完成了EMA调查,测量了瞬时CD和被动SI(“希望死亡”[WTD],\“希望保持活力\”[WTL])每天四次,共14天(共2149次观察)。被动SI和CD变量显示出显着的人内变异性。在具有随机截距和固定斜率的多级模型中同时检查时,多个CD变量是并发观念的重要预测因子,当参与者在其他人身边时,协会会更强。控制并发被动SI,人与人之间的沉思是前瞻性WTD的重要预测因子,人内难以忍受和人之间绝望都是前瞻性WTL的预测因素。这些发现为特定类型的CD在赋予被动SI风险中的作用提供了证据,并强调了可以通过有针对性的干预措施改变的潜在延展性因素。
    Cognitive dysfunction (CD), inclusive of specific cognitive content (e.g., hopelessness, unbearability) or impaired cognitive processes (e.g., attentional fixation on suicide, rumination), is a key risk factor for suicidal ideation (SI). This study aimed to evaluate multiple forms of CD using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to determine the unique contributions of CD to concurrent and prospective SI. Fifty-five college students with a history of SI or non-suicidal self-injury completed EMA surveys measuring momentary CD and passive SI (\"Wish to Die\" [WTD], \"Wish to Stay Alive\" [WTL]) four times a day for 14 days (2149 total observations). Passive SI and CD variables showed notable within-person variability. Multiple CD variables were significant predictors of concurrent ideation when examined simultaneously in multilevel models with random intercepts and fixed slopes, and associations were stronger when participants were around others. Controlling for concurrent passive SI, between-person rumination was a significant predictor of prospective WTD, and both within-person unbearability and between-person hopelessness were each predictive of prospective WTL. These findings provide evidence for the roles of specific types of CD in conferring risk for passive SI and highlight potentially malleable factors that can be changed through targeted interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非恢复性睡眠(NRS)是失眠的核心症状,对日常生活具有相当大的影响。然而,NRS与精神病样经历(PLE)之间的关联尚不清楚.本研究旨在探讨NRS与PLE之间的关系,以及反思和韧性在中国大学生中的中介/调节作用。
    方法:从9月21日至10月26日,从华南两所大学招募了3060名大学生,2022年。非恢复性睡眠量表,社区心理体验评估的8项积极子量表,反思反应量表,并采用10项Connor-Davidson弹性量表。进行了潜在概况分析和适度调解分析。
    结果:11.3%的参与者在过去1个月内报告了频繁的PLE。确定了三个反光性轮廓,并将其命名为“低反光性”组(27.7%),“中等反刍动物”组(55.3%),和“高度反省”组(16.9%)。NRS直接预测的PLE,反思性在NRS和PLEs之间起着重要的中介作用。弹性显着减弱了NRS与反思性之间的关联以及NRS与PLE之间的关联。
    结论:NRS,反思和弹性是PLE的重要预测因子。增加恢复性睡眠的策略,减少沉思,增强恢复力对预防PLE具有重要意义。
    BACKGROUND: Non-restorative sleep (NRS) is a core symptom of insomnia that has considerable consequences for daily life. However, the association between NRS and psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) remains unclear. The current study was designed to explore the relationship between NRS and PLEs as well as the mediation/moderation role of rumination and resilience among college students in China.
    METHODS: 3060 college students were recruited from two universities in South China from September 21st to October 26th, 2022. Non-restorative Sleep Scale, 8-item Positive Subscale of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences, Ruminative Response Scale, and 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale were administered. Latent profile analysis and moderated mediation analysis were performed.
    RESULTS: 11.3 % participants reported frequent PLEs in the past one month. Three profiles of rumination were identified and named as \"low rumination\" group (27.7 %), \"medium rumination\" group (55.3 %), and \"high rumination\" group (16.9 %). NRS directly predicted PLEs, and rumination played a significant mediation role between NRS and PLEs. Resilience significantly moderated the association between NRS and rumination as well as the association between NRS and PLEs.
    CONCLUSIONS: NRS, rumination and resilience are important predictors to PLEs. Strategies on increasing restorative sleep, decreasing rumination, and enhancing resilience are of great significance in the prevention of PLEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究探索了具有学术天赋的高中生所经历的复杂的症状网络,专注于拖延,沉思,完美主义,和认知灵活性。这些有天赋的青少年的幸福仍然是一个关键的问题,了解这些症状的动态是至关重要的。
    方法:来自马什哈德的207名具有学术天赋的高中生的不同样本,伊朗,参与了这项研究。使用方便采样,来自10、11和12年级的参与者被包括在内,通过测量上述症状的问卷进行详细评估。
    结果:我们的网络分析揭示了对这些症状相互作用的令人信服的见解:拖延,虽然中等中央,在网络中发挥重大影响,强调其相关性。认知灵活性,虽然位于中心,奇怪地表现出负面影响,潜在的保护因素。消极完美主义作为梯形症状出现,具有高中心性和积极影响。沉思显示出相当的中心性和积极的影响,表明其在症状恶化中的作用。积极的完美主义,中等中央,对其他症状缺乏直接影响。
    结论:这种网络分析提供了对拖延之间关系的细微理解,沉思,完美主义,和认知灵活性在学术天赋的青少年。消极完美主义和认知灵活性成为旨在增强这一独特群体福祉的干预措施中值得关注的关键因素。进一步的研究应该探索因果关系,以完善有针对性的干预措施。
    BACKGROUND: This study explores the intricate web of symptoms experienced by academically gifted high school students, focusing on procrastination, rumination, perfectionism, and cognitive flexibility. The well-being of these gifted adolescents remains a pivotal concern, and understanding the dynamics of these symptoms is vital.
    METHODS: A diverse sample of 207 academically gifted high school students from Mashhad, Iran, participated in this study. Using convenience sampling, participants from grades 10, 11, and 12 were included, with detailed assessments conducted through questionnaires measuring the mentioned symptoms.
    RESULTS: Our network analysis uncovers compelling insights into the interplay of these symptoms: Procrastination, though moderately central, exerts significant influence within the network, underscoring its relevance. Cognitive flexibility, while centrally positioned, curiously exhibits a negative influence, potentially serving as a protective factor. Negative perfectionism emerges as the keystone symptom, with both high centrality and a positive influence. Rumination displays substantial centrality and a positive influence, indicating its role in symptom exacerbation. Positive perfectionism, moderately central, lacks direct influence on other symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: This network analysis provides a nuanced understanding of the relationships among procrastination, rumination, perfectionism, and cognitive flexibility in academically gifted adolescents. Negative perfectionism and cognitive flexibility emerge as critical factors deserving attention in interventions aimed at enhancing the well-being of this unique group. Further research should explore causal relationships to refine targeted interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)引言:癌症诊断与抑郁症有关,焦虑,和痛苦,以及创伤后成长(PTG)。情绪反应的中介变量之一是思维方式(沉思,认知回避,和认知参与)。(2)目的:明确思维方式与癌症情绪反应之间的关系。次要目的是确定情绪反应与炎症免疫生物标志物之间的关系。(3)方法:共115例癌症患者纳入研究。在开始癌症治疗之前,患者使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)进行评估,遇险温度计,和创伤后增长清单(PTGI)。患者提供了他们最新的血液生物特征。(4)结果:沉思与焦虑相关,抑郁症,和痛苦。认知回避与PTG(-0.240)和痛苦(-0.209)相关。认知投入与PTG相关(0.393)。关于思维方式和生物标志物,绝对中性粒细胞与认知回避(-0.271)和反思性(0.305)呈负相关.关于生物标志物和情绪反应,PTG与绝对淋巴细胞呈负相关(-0.291)。PTG与中性粒细胞(0.357)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)(0.295)之间也存在相关性。(5)结论:思维方式与癌症诊断的情绪反应有关;沉思与抑郁有关,苦恼,和焦虑;认知投入与PTG有关。PTG与炎症和免疫学生物标志物有关。
    (1) Introduction: Cancer diagnosis has been related to depression, anxiety, and distress, as well as to post-traumatic growth (PTG). One of the mediating variables for emotional response is thought style (rumination, cognitive avoidance, and cognitive engagement). (2) Aim: To identify the relationship between thought style and emotional responses to cancer. A secondary aim was to identify the relationship between emotional responses and inflammatory immunological biomarkers. (3) Method: A total of 115 patients with cancer were included in the study. Before initiating cancer treatment, patients were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), distress thermometer, and Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). Patients provided their most recent blood biometry. (4) Results: Rumination correlated with anxiety, depression, and distress. Cognitive avoidance correlated with PTG (-0.240) and distress (-0.209). Cognitive engagement correlated with PTG (0.393). Regarding thought style and biomarkers, a negative correlation was observed for absolute neutrophils with cognitive avoidance (-0.271) and rumination (0.305). Regarding biomarkers and emotional responses, there was a negative correlation between PTG and absolute lymphocytes (-0.291). There was also a correlation between PTG and neutrophils (0.357) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (0.295). (5) Conclusions: Thought style is related to the emotional response to a cancer diagnosis; rumination is related to depression, distress, and anxiety; and cognitive engagement is related to PTG. PTG is related to inflammation and immunological biomarkers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号