Robotic-assisted

机器人辅助
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:不稳定是(全膝关节置换术)TKA失败的常见原因,这可以通过在手术过程中实现适当的间隙平衡来防止。对于TKA的理想差距平衡没有共识,和不同的对齐理念导致不同的软组织紧密度。传统的TKA旨在实现对称的隔间平衡,而运动学对齐(KA)恢复解剖结构并接受不对称的屈曲间隙。本研究评估了这些理念对屈曲间隙平衡和临床结果的影响。方法:对167例接受真实或限制性KA机器人辅助TKA并至少随访一年的患者进行回顾性分析。两组基于术中屈曲间隙差异:对称(0-1mm)(n=94)和不对称(2-5mm)(n=73)。结果:比较了术前人口统计学和术后临床和功能评分。两组的人口统计学和术前评分相似。真正的KA对齐更有可能导致不对称的屈曲间隙,而限制KA产生对称间隙。结论:研究发现生理不对称屈曲间隙没有不良影响,临床和功能结果与对称间隙相当。内侧和外侧间隙宽度之间的5毫米差异不会对结果产生负面影响。真正的KA更频繁地导致生理上不对称的屈曲间隙。
    Background: Instability is a common cause of (total knee arthroplasty) TKA failure, which can be prevented by achieving proper gap balance during surgery. There is no consensus on the ideal gap balance in TKA, and different alignment philosophies result in varying soft-tissue tightness. Traditional TKA aims for symmetric compartment balance, while kinematic alignment (KA) restores anatomy and accepts asymmetric flexion gaps. This study evaluated the impact of these philosophies on the flexion gap balance and clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of 167 patients who received true or restricted KA robotic-assisted TKA with at least one year of follow-up was conducted. The groups were based on intraoperative flexion gap differences: symmetric (0-1 mm) (n = 94) and asymmetric (2-5 mm) (n = 73). Results: Preoperative demographics and postoperative clinical and functional scores were compared. Both groups were similar in demographics and preoperative scores. True KA alignment was more likely to result in an asymmetric flexion gap, while restricted KA produced symmetric gaps. Conclusions: The study found no adverse effects from the physiological asymmetric flexion gap, with clinical and functional outcomes comparable to symmetric gaps. A 5 mm difference between the medial and lateral gap width did not negatively impact the outcomes. True KA more frequently results in a physiological asymmetric flexion gap.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)是治疗下尿路症状(LUTS)的前列腺肥大的手术选择之一。在这群老年患者中,伴随的前列腺癌并不少见。然而,之前的TURP导致的前列腺解剖结构纤维化和扭曲可能会阻碍机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)的手术疗效.我们的目标是评估功能,和RARP的肿瘤学结果在有和没有以前的TURP患者。
    方法:231名既往TURP患者接受了RARP(TURP组)。这些男性使用临床病理特征与没有进行RARP的先前TURP的男性(对照组)进行了倾向评分匹配。分析了围手术期和术后变量在组间结果上的显著差异。分析的变量包括估计失血量(EBL),手术时间,导管时间,住院时间,术后并发症,手术切缘阳性(PSM)率,癌症状态,生化复发(BCR),效力,效力和节制率。
    结果:TURP组患者在手术安全性措施(包括中位EBL)方面无统计学差异,手术时间,导管时间,住院时间或术后并发症。两组之间在效能率和节制率方面没有显着差异。此外,肿瘤结局没有统计学上的显著差异,包括PSM率(15%对18%,P=0.3)和BCR。
    结论:在TURP后的RARP中,通常会出现明显的手术解剖结构变形。对于经验丰富的团队,该程序是安全的,并且在没有先前TURP的患者中提供与RARP相似的肿瘤控制和功能结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is one of the surgical options for treating enlarged prostates with lower urinary symptoms (LUTS). In this older group of patients, concomitant prostate cancer is not uncommon. However, the fibrosis and distortion of the prostate anatomy by prior TURP can potentially hinder surgical efficacy at robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We aim to evaluate functional, and oncologic outcomes of RARP in patients with and without previous TURP.
    METHODS: 231 men with previous TURP underwent RARP (TURP group). These men were propensity score matched using clinicopathological characteristics to men without previous TURP who underwent RARP (Control group). Perioperative and postoperative variables were analysed for significant differences in outcomes between groups. Variables analysed included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, catheter time, hospitalization time, postoperative complications, positive surgical margins (PSM) rates, cancer status, biochemical recurrence (BCR), potency, and continence rates.
    RESULTS: Patients in the TURP group showed no statistically significant differences in operative safety measures including median EBL, operative time, catheter time, hospitalization time or postoperative complications. No significant difference between the groups in terms of potency rates and continence rates. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences in oncological outcomes, including PSM rates (15% vs 18%, P = 0.3) and BCR.
    CONCLUSIONS: In RARP after TURP there is often noticeable distortion of the surgical anatomy. For an experienced team the procedure is safe and provides similar oncologic control and functional outcomes to RARP in patients without previous TURP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在过去的几十年中,机器人辅助手术(RAS)已迅速融入外科手术实践中。RAS手术室中的设置与开放式或腹腔镜手术的设置不同,因此手术外科医生坐在与手术团队的其余部分和患者分开的控制台处。由于机器人设备施加的这种物理分离和视觉障碍,沟通和团队动态发生了变化。然而,构成RAS团队成员之间有效沟通的因素以及促进或抑制RAS中有效沟通的背景因素仍然未知。
    目的:我们的目标是开发影响RAS团队沟通的沟通行为和情境因素的分类法。我们还旨在研究基于性别的沟通行为模式。
    方法:我们将首先对RAS中的通信进行范围界定审查,以根据现有文献开发通信的初步分类法。然后,我们将与RAS团队成员进行半结构化访谈,包括外科医生,协助外科医生或受训者,床边或第一助手,护士,还有麻醉师.参与者将代表不同的学科,包括泌尿科,普外科,和妇科,并有一系列的RAS经验。我们将使用反身性主题分析来分析数据并进一步完善分类法。我们还将在爱尔兰皇家外科医学院(RCSI)附属医院观察现场机器人手术。我们将观察RAS程序的不同长度和条件,以捕获广泛的通信行为和上下文因素,以帮助最终确定分类法。虽然我们预计会进行30次采访和30次观察,我们将收集数据,直到实现数据充足。我们将与数据分析同时进行数据收集,这样如果我们在面试中发现了新的行为,我们将在其他访谈和/或观察中跟进与该行为相关的问题。
    结果:此项目的分类将包括可操作的沟通行为列表,上下文因素,他们的描述,和例子。截至2024年5月,该项目已获得RCSI研究与伦理委员会的批准。数据收集始于2024年6月,并将持续全年。我们计划在2024年和2025年的数据分析中出现有意义的结果时发布调查结果。
    结论:该项目的结果将用于在模拟环境中观察和培训手术团队,以有效地相互沟通并防止沟通中断。制定的分类法还将增加关于性别在RAS交流中的作用的知识库,并提出可以纳入培训的建议。总的来说,该项目将有助于提高外科团队的沟通技巧以及患者护理的质量和安全性。
    PRR1-10.2196/54910。
    BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has been rapidly integrated into surgical practice in the past few decades. The setup in the operating theater for RAS differs from that for open or laparoscopic surgery such that the operating surgeon sits at a console separate from the rest of the surgical team and the patient. Communication and team dynamics are altered due to this physical separation and visual barriers imposed by the robotic equipment. However, the factors that might comprise effective communication among members of RAS teams and the contextual factors that facilitate or inhibit effective communication in RAS remain unknown.
    OBJECTIVE: We aim to develop a taxonomy of communication behaviors and contextual factors that influence communication in RAS teams. We also aim to examine the patterns of communication behaviors based on gender.
    METHODS: We will first perform a scoping review on communication in RAS to develop a preliminary taxonomy of communication based on the existing literature. We will then conduct semistructured interviews with RAS team members, including the surgeon, assisting surgeon or trainee, bedside or first assistant, nurses, and anesthetists. Participants will represent different disciplines, including urology, general surgery, and gynecology, and have a range of experiences in RAS. We will use a reflexive thematic analysis to analyze the data and further refine the taxonomy. We will also observe live robotic surgeries at Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI)-affiliated hospitals. We will observe varying lengths and conditions of RAS procedures to a capture a wide range of communication behaviors and contextual factors to help finalize the taxonomy. Although we anticipate conducting 30 interviews and 30 observations, we will collect data until we achieve data sufficiency. We will conduct data collection in parallel with data analysis such that if we identify a new behavior in an interview, we will follow up with questions related to that behavior in additional interviews and/or observations.
    RESULTS: The taxonomy from this project will include a list of actionable communication behaviors, contextual factors, their descriptions, and examples. As of May 2024, this project has been approved by the RCSI Research and Ethics Committee. Data collection started in June 2024 and will continue throughout the year. We plan to publish the findings as meaningful results emerge in our data analysis in 2024 and 2025.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results from this project will be used to observe and train surgical teams in a simulated environment to effectively communicate with each other and prevent communication breakdowns. The developed taxonomy will also add to the knowledge base on the role of gender in communication in RAS and produce recommendations that can be incorporated into training. Overall, this project will contribute to the improvement of communication skills of surgical teams and the quality and safety of patient care.
    UNASSIGNED: PRR1-10.2196/54910.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中越来越多地使用机器人辅助(RA)和个性化对准技术。这项研究的假设是RATKA会导致更少的软组织释放,减少软组织释放与改善临床结局相关.
    方法:从2014年1月1日起,通过2022年11月4日的数据库提取日期,对所有主要TKAs进行了公司内部注册回顾性审查。根据在手术期间是否进行了有意的软组织释放(STR)(NSTR)以及是否使用了RA来对这些进行分组。比较了RA-TKAs和使用手动仪器进行的STR的发生率。6个月时收集膝关节社会评分(KSS)和膝关节社会功能评分(KSFS),1年和2年。进行Kaplan-Meier生存。
    结果:RA与RA相比,STR的发生率明显降低手动(43.81%vs86.62%,p<0.0001)。与具有STR的TKA相比,具有NSTR的TKA在6个月时具有更高的KSFS(84.73Vs。77.51,p<0.0001),1年(89.87Vs。83.54,p<0.0001)和2年(90.09Vs。82.65,p<0.0001)。生存率没有差异,或KSS在任何时间点。然而,NSTR组在2年时KSS疼痛亚评分有所改善.
    结论:这项观察的结果,回顾性分析发现RA-TKA的软组织松解术发生率较低。Further,无论是否使用RA,避免释放与术后2年KSFS和KSS疼痛评分改善相关.
    BACKGROUND: There is increasing use of Robotic-Assisted (RA) and personalized alignment techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis of this study was that RA TKA would result in fewer soft-tissue releases, and that fewer soft-tissue releases would be associated with improved clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of an internal company registry was conducted for all primary TKAs performed from Jan 1, 2014, through a database extract date of Nov 4, 2022. These were grouped by whether there was an intentional soft-tissue release performed (STR) during the surgery or not (NSTR) and whether RA was utilized. The incidence of STR was compared between RA-TKAs and those performed with manual instrumentation. Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee Society Function Scores (KSFS) were collected at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was performed.
    RESULTS: The incidence of STR was significantly lower for RA vs. Manual (43.81% Vs 86.62%, p < 0.0001). The TKAs with NSTR had higher KSFS compared to those with STR at 6 months (84.73 Vs. 77.51, p < 0.0001), 1 year (89.87 Vs. 83.54, p < 0.0001) and 2 years (90.09 Vs. 82.65, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in survivorship, or KSS at any time point. However, the NSTR group had improved KSS pain sub score at 2 years.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this observational, retrospective analysis found that the incidence of soft-tissue release was lower with RA-TKA. Further, regardless of if RA was used, avoiding releases was associated with improved KSFS and KSS pain scores through 2 years post-operatively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是公认的良性胆囊疾病治疗的金标准。然而,机器人胆囊切除术仍有争议。因此,我们旨在比较非恶性胆囊疾病患者LC和机器人辅助胆囊切除术(RAC)的术中和术后结局.PubMed,Scopus,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience进行了系统搜索,以比较良性胆囊疾病患者的RAC与LC的研究。仅包括具有倾向评分匹配的随机试验和非随机研究。计算连续结果的平均差(MD)和二元终点的比值比(OR),95%置信区间(CI)。用I2统计量评估异质性。使用软件R进行统计分析,版本4.2.3。共纳入13项研究,包括22,440名患者,其中10,758例(47.94%)患者接受了RAC。平均年龄为48.5岁,女性占65.2%。与LC相比,RAC显著延长手术时间(MD12.59min;95%CI5.62-19.55;p<0.01;I2=79%)。然而,两组住院时间无显著差异(MD-0.18天;95%CI-0.43-0.07;p=0.07;I2=89%),术中并发症(OR0.66;95%CI0.38-1.15;p=0.14;I2=35%)和胆管损伤(OR0.99;95%CI0.64,1.55;p=0.97;I2=0%)的发生。与LC相比,RAC与手术时间增加相关,而不增加住院时间或术中并发症的发生率。这些发现表明RAC是治疗良性胆囊疾病的安全方法。
    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the established gold standard treatment for benign gallbladder diseases. However, robotic cholecystectomy is still controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in LC and robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) in patients with nonmalignant gallbladder conditions. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies comparing RAC to LC in patients with benign gallbladder disease. Only randomized trials and non-randomized studies with propensity score matching were included. Mean differences (MDs) were computed for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Statistical analysis was performed using Software R, version 4.2.3. A total of 13 studies comprising 22,440 patients were included, of whom 10,758 patients (47.94%) underwent RAC. The mean age was 48.5 years and 65.2% were female. Compared with LC, RAC significantly increased operative time (MD 12.59 min; 95% CI 5.62-19.55; p < 0.01; I2 = 79%). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in hospitalization time (MD -0.18 days; 95% CI - 0.43-0.07; p = 0.07; I2 = 89%), occurrence of intraoperative complications (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.38-1.15; p = 0.14; I2 = 35%) and bile duct injury (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.64, 1.55; p = 0.97; I2 = 0%). RAC was associated with an increase in operative time compared with LC without increasing hospitalization time or the incidence of intraoperative complications. These findings suggest that RAC is a safe approach to benign gallbladder disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着机器人辅助关节成形术的使用增加,需要对与机器人手术相关的实施和持续成本进行经济评估。这项研究的目的是描述机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(RA-TKA)和机器人辅助单室膝关节置换术(RA-UKA)的住院成本,并确定患者特征和手术结果对成本的影响。这项前瞻性队列研究包括接受原发性单侧RA-TKA和RA-UKA的成年患者(≥18岁),2017年4月至2021年6月在悉尼的一家三级医院就诊。患者特征,手术结果,并从医院病历中提取住院成本变量.使用独立样本t检验比较RA-TKA和RA-UKA结果之间的差异。进行Logistic回归以确定成本的驱动因素。在308个机器人辅助程序中,247例为RA-TKA,61例为RA-UKA。手术时间,在手术室的时间,RA-UKA患者的住院时间显著缩短(p<0.001);而RA-TKA患者年龄较大(p=0.002),更有可能接受住院康复治疗(p=0.009).RA-TKA病例的住院总费用明显更高(18580.02澳元vs13275.38澳元;p<0.001)。TKA的机器人系统和维护成本为3867.00澳元,UKA为5008.77澳元。海外出生的患者和较低容量的机器人外科医生与RA-UKA的较高总成本显着相关。年龄和男性性别的增加与RA-TKA的总费用增加显着相关。RA-TKA的总成本明显高于RA-UKA。与RA-TKA相比,RA-UKA的机器人系统成本因软件成本相对于案件量而膨胀。在未来的研究中评估机器人辅助膝关节置换术的长期收益时,成本是一个重要的考虑因素,为这种做法的经济可持续性提供证据。
    As uptake of robotic-assisted arthroplasty increases there is a need for economic evaluation of the implementation and ongoing costs associated with robotic surgery. The aims of this study were to describe the in-hospital cost of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) and robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) and determine the influence of patient characteristics and surgical outcomes on cost. This prospective cohort study included adult patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing primary unilateral RA-TKA and RA-UKA, at a tertiary hospital in Sydney between April 2017 and June 2021. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, and in-hospital cost variables were extracted from hospital medical records. Differences between outcomes for RA-TKA and RA-UKA were compared using independent sample t-tests. Logistic regression was performed to determine drivers of cost. Of the 308 robotic-assisted procedures, 247 were RA-TKA and 61 were RA-UKA. Surgical time, time in the operating room, and length of stay were significantly shorter in RA-UKA (p < 0.001); whereas RA-TKA patients were older (p = 0.002) and more likely to be discharged to in-patient rehabilitation (p = 0.009). Total in-hospital cost was significantly higher for RA-TKA cases (AU$18580.02 vs $13275.38; p < 0.001). Robotic system and maintenance cost per case was AU$3867.00 for TKA and AU$5008.77 for UKA. Patients born overseas and lower volume robotic surgeons were significantly associated with higher total cost of RA-UKA. Increasing age and male gender were significantly associated with higher total cost of RA-TKA. Total cost was significantly higher for RA-TKA than RA-UKA. Robotic system costs for RA-UKA are inflated by the software cost relative to the volume of cases compared with RA-TKA. Cost is an important consideration when evaluating long term benefits of robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty in future studies to provide evidence for the economic sustainability of this practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:全膝关节置换术(TKA)是一种常见的骨科手术,然而,术后不满持续存在约20%的病例。机器人全膝关节置换术(rTKA)有望提高精度,但与传统TKA相比,其对患者满意度的影响仍存在争议(cTKA)。本系统评价旨在评估rTKA后患者的满意度,并将结果与cTKA进行比较。
    方法:确定并审查了来自以下数据库的论文:PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,和Cochrane在线图书馆,使用诸如“膝关节置换”之类的关键词,全膝关节置换术,\"\"机器人,\"和\"患者满意度。“提取的数据包括患者满意度测量,膝盖社会得分,牛津膝盖得分,被遗忘的联合得分,SF-36、HSS、还有KOOS.统计分析,包括比值比和95%CI使用R软件进行.使用Cochrane的Q检验评估异质性。
    结果:系统综述包括17篇文章,涉及1148名患者(rTKA组571名,cTKA组577名),评估rTKA后患者的满意度。比例分析显示rTKA满意率为95%,而对于cTKA,是91%。比较rTKA和cTKA的荟萃分析发现,患者满意度无统计学差异。此外,检查了各种患者报告的结果指标(PROM),在不同的研究和随访期间显示混合的结果。
    结论:这项研究的结果发现,与常规方法相比,rTKA在短期至中期的患者满意度结果没有差异。这项研究没有断言机器人方法的优越性,强调需要仔细考虑影响膝关节置换术结果的各种因素。
    OBJECTIVE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common orthopedic surgery, yet postoperative dissatisfaction persists in around 20% of cases. Robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) promises enhanced precision, but its impact on patient satisfaction compared to conventional TKA remains controversial (cTKA). This systematic review aims to evaluate patient satisfaction post-rTKA and compare outcomes with cTKA.
    METHODS: Papers from the following databases were identified and reviewed: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Online Library, using keywords like \"Knee replacement,\" \"Total knee arthroplasty,\" \"Robotic,\" and \"Patient satisfaction.\" Extracted data included patient satisfaction measures, Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, Forgotten Joint Score, SF-36, HSS, and KOOS. Statistical analysis, including odds ratio and 95% CI was performed using R software. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane\'s Q test.
    RESULTS: The systematic review included 17 articles, involving 1148 patients (571 in the rTKA group and 577 in the cTKA group) assessing patient satisfaction following rTKA. An analysis of proportions reveals rTKA satisfaction rate was 95%, while for cTKA, it was 91%. A meta-analysis comparing rTKA and cTKA found no statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction. Additionally, various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were examined, showing mixed results across different studies and follow-up periods.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study found no difference in patient satisfaction outcomes in the short to mid-term for rTKA compared to conventional methods. This study does not assert superiority for the robotic approach, highlighting the need for careful consideration of various factors influencing outcomes in knee arthroplasty.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    切片切除术是保留实质的替代(扩展)右半肝或左半肝切除术。然而,机器人切开术(RS)与机器人(扩展)半肝切除术(RH)治疗肝肿瘤的有效性和安全性尚不清楚.我们回顾了2021年3月至2023年7月期间接受机器人肝切除术的连续患者的前瞻性数据库,并包括所有RS和RH患者。人口统计数据,分析并比较两组的围手术期结局和长期结局.30名患者符合我们的纳入标准,其中16例患者接受RS,而14例患者接受RH。基线特征在研究组之间具有可比性。RS组Pringle动作的持续时间明显更长,而其余手术细节具有可比性。研究组之间的切除术后结果没有显着差异。所有患者的切缘均为阴性。RS是一种安全有效的保留薄壁组织的治疗方式。
    Sectionectomy is a parenchma-sparing alternative to (extended) right or left hemihepatectomy. However, the effectiveness and safety of robotic sectionectomy (RS) versus robotic (extended) hemihepatectomy (RH) for the treatment of liver tumors remains unclear. We reviewed our prospective database for consecutive patients who had undergone robotic hepatectomies between March 2021 and July 2023 and included all patients with RS and RH. Demographic data, perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes were analyzed and compared between both groups. Thirty patients met our inclusion criteria, of whom 16 patients underwent RS as opposed to 14 patients who underwent RH. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the study groups. The duration of Pringle maneuver was significantly longer in the RS group, while the remaining operative details were comparable. There were no significant differences in posthepatectomy outcomes between the study groups. All patients had negative resection margins. RS is a safe and effective parenchyma-sparing treatment modality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是评估在接受机器人辅助妇科手术的患者中,通过护理点多普勒超声测量颈动脉校正流量时间及其体积扩张引起的变化来预测液体反应性的能力。
    在这项前瞻性研究中,使用颈总动脉容积扩张前后的多普勒图像测量颈动脉校正血流时间.使用MostCare的无创心脏输出量监测记录每个时间点的每搏输出量指数。在52名患者中,26回答
    颈动脉校正流量时间和体积扩大引起的颈动脉校正流量时间变化的接收器工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.82和0.67。它们的最佳截止值为357和19.5ms,分别。
    颈动脉校正流量时间优于容量扩张引起的颈动脉校正流量时间的变化,以预测该人群的液体反应性。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of point-of-care Doppler ultrasound measurements of carotid corrected flow time and its changes induced by volume expansion to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted gynecological surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: In this prospective study, carotid corrected flow time was measured using Doppler images of the common carotid artery before and after volume expansion. The stroke volume index at each time point was recorded using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring with MostCare. Of the 52 patients enrolled, 26 responded.
    UNASSIGNED: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the carotid corrected flow time and changes in carotid corrected flow time induced by volume expansion were 0.82 and 0.67, respectively. Their optimal cut-off values were 357 and 19.5 ms, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Carotid corrected flow time was superior to changes in carotid corrected flow time induced by volume expansion for predicting fluid responsiveness in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    机器人臂辅助单室膝关节置换术(UKA)是单室膝关节炎患者的绝佳解决方案。虽然结果往往对UKAs有利,修订操作,通常是由于部件错位和错位导致加速磨损,是一个主要问题。术中技术,比如机器人辅助,可以帮助更好地确保根据患者的特定解剖结构和机械生理学来定位植入物。然而,机器人辅助UKAs的长期生存率和患者报告满意度有限.因此,本研究的目的是评估接受机械臂辅助单室膝关节置换术的患者的10年结局.具体来说,我们评估了:1)10年生存率;2)患者满意度评分;和3)再次手术。
    来自单个外科医生和单个机构,185名平均年龄65岁的患者(范围,39至92),平均体重指数为31.6(范围,22.4至39)在平均10年的随访中进行了评估(范围,9至11)。对于所有患者来说,术中使用了相同的机器人辅助设备,所有患者均接受标准化物理治疗,并接受标准化疼痛控制管理.然后用Kaplan-Meir曲线计算10年生存率,使用5点Likert量表评估患者满意度,再次手术被评估为主要结果.
    植入物总生存率为99%,只有两名患者需要翻修手术。有一位病人转行全膝关节置换术,而另一名患者在5周时接受了聚乙烯交换,导致急性感染并成功保留植入物。总的来说,97%的患者对其术后结局满意,81%的患者报告非常满意。还有另外两名患者需要关节镜介入治疗:一名患者需要去除水泥松动的身体,另一种方法是去除脂肪垫和前十字韧带上粘附的疤痕。
    这项研究是首次为机器人辅助的UKA患者提供长期(平均10年)生存率和患者报告的满意度结果之一。这些数据显示了对使用这种手术技术的强烈支持,因为几乎所有患者都维持了他们原来的假体,平均10年后报告满意。因此,基于这些结果,我们建议在执行UKAs时使用机器人辅助。
    UNASSIGNED: Robotic-arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an excellent solution for patients suffering from single-compartment knee arthritis. While outcomes tend to be favorable for UKAs, revision operations, commonly due to component malpositioning and malalignment resulting in accelerated wear, are a major concern. Intraoperative technologies, such as robotic assistance, can help better ensure that implants are positioned based on a patient\'s specific anatomy and mechanical physiology. However, long-term survivorship and patient-reported satisfaction with robotic-assisted UKAs are limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the 10-year outcomes of patients who underwent robotic-arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Specifically, we evaluated: 1) 10-year survivorships; 2) patient satisfaction scores; and 3) re-operations.
    UNASSIGNED: From a single surgeon and single institution, 185 patients who had a mean age of 65 years (range, 39 to 92) and a mean body mass index of 31.6 (range, 22.4 to 39) at a mean of 10 years follow-up were evaluated (range, 9 to 11). For all patients, the same robotic-assistive device was utilized intraoperatively, and all patients underwent standardized physical therapy and received standardized pain control management. Then 10-year survivorships with Kaplan-Meir curves, patient satisfaction evaluations with a 5-point Likert scale, and re-operations were assessed as primary outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall implant survivorship was 99%, with only two patients requiring revision surgery. There was one patient who was converted to a total knee arthroplasty, while the other patient underwent polyethylene exchange at 5 weeks for an acute infection with successful implant retention. Overall, 97% of the patients were satisfied with their postoperative outcomes, with 81% of patients reporting being very satisfied. There were two other patients who required arthroscopic intervention: one to remove a cement loose body, the other to remove adhered scar from the fat pad and the anterior cruciate ligament.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is one of the first to provide longer-term (mean 10-year) survivorship and patient-reported satisfaction outcomes for robotic-assisted UKA patients. These data show strong support for utilizing this surgical technique, as nearly all patients maintained their original prostheses and reported being satisfied after a mean of 10 years. Therefore, based on these results, we recommend the use of robotic assistance when performing UKAs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号