Rhinorrhea

鼻漏
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    反复发作的慢性鼻漏,需要考虑鼻腔内瘘管的可能性,有可能形成鼻石。我们报告了一名39岁的男子,自四年前以来,他一直抱怨反复发作。伴随着浓稠的分泌物,鼻后滴水的症状,和嗅觉紊乱。患者有切除左上磨牙(磨牙I)的病史,导致拔牙部位的瘘管,使食物和饮料更有可能进入左鼻腔。前鼻镜检查显示左下鼻道有白色肿块和脓性气味。此外,第一磨牙有牙龈缺损,多鼻窦炎,和鼻中隔偏曲.使用功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术进行了Rinolith摘除术,粘膜下切除术,用旋转皮瓣修复牙龈鼻缺损。随访1周,皮瓣到位,无并发症发生。
    Recurrent rhinorrhoea that occurs chronically, needs to consider the possibility of a fistula in the nasal cavity, which has the potential to form a rhinolith. We report the case of a 39-year-old man with complaints of recurrent rhinorrhoea since four years ago, accompanied by thick secretions, symptoms of post-nasal drips, and olfactory disturbances. The patient had a history of removing the left upper molar (molar I), which causes a fistula in the tooth extraction site, making it more likely for food and drink to enter the left nasal cavity. Anterior rhinoscopy examination revealed a white mass in the left inferior meatus and a purulent odour discharge. In addition, there were gingival defects of the first molar teeth, multi-sinusitis, and nasal septum deviation. Rinolith extraction was performed using functional endoscopic sinus surgery, submucosal resection, and repair of gingivo-nasal defects with rotational flaps. Follow-up for one week showed that the flap was in place and there were no complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:鼻后滴注可能与多种疾病有关,但并不是所有的病人都被明确诊断。慢性患者,特发性鼻后滴漏症状容易被忽视,和他们的临床特征尚未确定。本研究旨在分析慢性特发性鼻后滴漏患者的临床特征和第一代抗组胺-减充血剂治疗的反应。暗示它是一个独特的实体。
    方法:对157例慢性特发性鼻后滴流患者进行回顾性队列研究,分析人口统计学,症状,以及对第一代抗组胺药和鼻减充血药的治疗反应。
    结果:患者的平均年龄为55.4±17.0岁。症状持续时间的中位数为36个月(范围=12-66个月),视觉模拟评分的严重程度为7(范围=5-8)。喉咙不适是最常见的相关症状(73.7%)。30.3%的患者出现咳嗽。鼻后滴注的粘度与鼻漏和咽喉不适有关。在患者中,71.6%的人对第一代抗组胺-减充血药反应积极。然而,25.9%的患者出现症状复发。与其他患者相比,鼻僵硬或持续症状的患者的复发率更高。
    结论:本研究概述了慢性特发性鼻后滴注患者的临床特征,并表明它是一个独特的实体。,该提案旨在提高诊断精度并促进该领域的进一步研究。
    OBJECTIVE: Postnasal drip may be related to several diseases, but not all patients are clearly diagnosed. Patients with chronic, idiopathic postnasal drip symptoms are easily overlooked, and their clinical features are yet to be identified. This study aimed to analyze the clinical features and response to first generation antihistamine-decongestant therapy in patients with chronic idiopathic postnasal drip, suggesting it as a distinct entity.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study involving 157 chronic idiopathic postnasal drip patients was conducted, analyzing demographics, symptoms, and treatment response to first-generation antihistamines and nasal decongestants.
    RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 55.4±17.0 years old. Median duration of symptom was 36 months (range=12-66 months) and severity in the visual analogue scale was 7 (range=5-8). Throat discomfort was the most frequently associated symptom (73.7%). Cough was recorded in 30.3% of patients. Viscosity of postnasal drip was associated with rhinorrhea and throat discomfort. Of the patients, 71.6% responded positively to 1st generation antihistamine-decongestant medication. However, 25.9% of patients presented symptom re-occurrence. Patients with nasal stiffness or persistent symptoms presented a higher re-occurrence rate compared to others.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study outlines the clinical features of patients with chronic idiopathic postnasal drip and suggests it as a distinctive entity., This proposal aims to enhance diagnostic precision and promote further research in the field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Choanal闭锁是一种罕见的疾病,发病率为1:5,000-8,000例活产,更频繁地影响女性,并且经常与其他畸形有关。该病例报告介绍了一名42岁的女性患者,该患者出生时患有双侧后鼻孔闭锁,并在出生时首次接受手术干预。然而,几个月后,形成的孔口被重新阻塞,成年后需要再次手术。本病例报告的目的是详细描述双侧后鼻孔闭锁,包括它的临床表现,流行病学,诊断,发病机制,和治疗方法。它旨在增强对这种罕见但重要的状况的理解。
    Choanal atresia is an uncommon condition with an incidence of 1:5,000-8,000 live births, affecting females more frequently and often associated with other malformations. This case report presents a 42-year-old female patient who was born with bilateral choanal atresia and intervened surgically for the first time at birth. However, the formed orifice was reobstructed a few months afterward, necessitating reoperation in adulthood. The purpose of this case report is to describe bilateral choanal atresia in detail, including its clinical presentation, epidemiology, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapeutic approach. It aims to enhance understanding of this rare but significant condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了评估多点的长期安全性和有效性,阻抗控制,射频消融装置治疗慢性鼻炎12个月随访。
    预期,多中心研究。对所有参与者进行双侧后鼻神经(PNN)消融。评估在6-,9-,和12个月的访问包括视觉模拟量表鼻部症状评分(VASNSS),反射鼻部症状总评分(rTNSS),迷你鼻结膜炎生活质量问卷(迷你RQLQ),和不良事件。
    参加了36名参与者,35名参与者完成了12个月的随访。在所有3个时间点,所有5个VASNSS项目均显示相对于基线的统计学显著改善(p<0.0001)。总rTNSS从基线时的7.9±1.8提高到6个月时的4.3±2.1,9个月时3.8±2.4,12个月时为4.0±2.1(所有p<0.0001)。12个月时,91%(31/35)的参与者达到了从基线降低≥1分的最小临床重要差异(MCID),80%(28/35)的参与者符合从基线降低≥30%的应答者标准。总平均迷你RQLQ从基线时的3.0±1.0降至6个月时的1.4±0.8,9个月时1.4±1.0,12个月时为1.3±0.8(所有p<0.0001)。12个月时,86%(30/35)的参与者实现了微型RQLQ的MCID比基线降低≥0.4点。研究期间无相关严重不良事件发生。
    PNN的阻抗控制射频消融是安全的,并导致持久的,通过12个月的随访,鼻炎症状和生活质量得到显着改善。
    该研究已在www注册。clinicaltrials.gov,唯一标识符为NCT05324397。
    4.
    UNASSIGNED: To assess long-term safety and effectiveness of a multipoint, impedance-controlled, RF ablation device for treatment of chronic rhinitis through 12-month follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: A prospective, multicenter study. Bilateral posterior nasal nerve (PNN) ablation was performed on all participants. Assessments at 6-, 9-, and 12-month visits included Visual Analog Scale Nasal Symptom Score (VAS NSS), reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS), mini-Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini RQLQ), and adverse events.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-six participants were enrolled and 35 completed the 12-month follow-up. All 5 VAS NSS items demonstrated statistically significant improvement (p < .0001) over baseline at all 3 time points. The total rTNSS improved from 7.9 ± 1.8 at baseline to 4.3 ± 2.1 at 6-months, 3.8 ± 2.4 at 9-months, and 4.0 ± 2.1 at 12-months (all p < .0001). At 12-months, 91% (31/35) of participants had achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of a reduction from baseline of ≥1 point and 80% (28/35) of the participants met the responder criteria of ≥30% reduction from baseline. The total mean mini RQLQ was reduced from 3.0 ± 1.0 at baseline to 1.4 ± 0.8 at 6-months, 1.4 ± 1.0 at 9-months, and 1.3 ± 0.8 at 12-months (all p < .0001). At 12-months, 86% (30/35) of participants achieved the MCID of a reduction from baseline of ≥0.4 points for the mini RQLQ. No related serious adverse events occurred during the study.
    UNASSIGNED: Impedance-controlled RF ablation of the PNN is safe and resulted in durable, significant improvement in rhinitis symptoms and quality of life through 12-month follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov with the unique identifier of NCT05324397.
    UNASSIGNED: 4.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是评估年龄、病因学,缺陷尺寸,腰大池引流与手术技术的应用对脑脊液(CSF)瘘修复成功率的影响.
    我们诊所的电子病历(EMR)系统回顾性分析了2006年至2020年期间使用内窥镜经鼻技术治疗源自前颅底的CSF瘘的病例。共有35名患者被纳入研究。根据修复中使用的层数对患者进行分组(两个,三层或四层重建)和缺陷大小(小于5毫米,5至10毫米且大于10毫米),病因学,缺损的位置和腰椎引流的应用,如LD(+)和LD(-)。比较两组并发症和脑脊液漏复发情况。
    进行2层重建的患者的复发率明显高于进行3或4层重建的患者(p=0.049)。LD(+)组复发率(41.7%)显著低于LD(-)组(4.3%)(p=0.012)。在年龄方面,两组之间的复发率没有显着差异。缺陷尺寸,缺陷的位置和病因。
    在前颅底来源的bos瘘的内窥镜经鼻修复中,计划重建至少3次并应用腰椎CSF引流可提高成功率。
    UNASSIGNED: Our aim in this study is to assess the effect of factors such as age, etiology, defect size, application of lumbar drainage and surgical technique on Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) fistula repair success rates.
    UNASSIGNED: The Electronic Medical Records (EMR) system of our clinic was retrospectively reviewed for cases that were operated between 2006 and 2020 for CSF fistula originating from anterior skull base with endoscopic transnasal technique. A total of 35 patients were included in the study. Patients were grouped according to the number of layers used in repair (two, three or four-layered reconstruction) and defect size (smaller than 5 mm, 5 to 10 mm and larger than 10mm), etiology, location of the defect and application of lumbar drainage as LD (+) and LD (-). Complications and CSF leak recurrence were compared between groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Recurrence rates in patients who had 2 layered reconstructions were significantly higher compared to patients who had 3 or 4 layered reconstructions (p=0.049). The recurrence rate in LD (+) group (41.7%) was significantly lower compared to LD (-) group (4.3%) (p=0.012). There were no significant difference in recurrence rates between groups in terms of age, defect size, defect location and etiology.
    UNASSIGNED: In endoscopic transnasal repair of anterior skull base-derived bos fistulas, planning the reconstruction at least 3 times and applying lumbar CSF drainage increases the success rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:术后脑脊液(CSF)漏仍然是内镜经鼻入路(EEA)治疗颅底病理学的一个值得关注的并发症。提示CSF泄漏的体征和症状通常会在术后过程中引发额外的检查。我们系统地评估了术后即刻记录的主观报告的临床体征/症状与术后脑脊液漏发生率之间的关联。
    方法:回顾性图表审查在三级学术医疗中心进行,包括137名在2018年7月至2022年8月期间在EEA期间进行初次修复的术中CSF泄漏的连续患者。使用阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)评估术后CSF泄漏与临床体征和症状的关联。灵敏度,特异性和比值比(OR)通过单变量逻辑回归。
    结果:79例患者(57.7%)高流量渗漏修复,5例(3.6%)术后出现脑脊液渗漏。在报告的症状中,鼻漏最为常见(n=52,38.0%;PPV[95%CI]=7.6%[4.8%,11.9%]),其次是严重头痛(n=47,34.3%;6.3%[3.1%,12.5%]),头晕(n=43,31.4%;2.3%[0.4%,12.1%]),咸或金属味(n=20,14.6%;9.9%[3.3%,25.8%]),和咽喉引流(n=10,7.3%;9.9%[1.7%,41.4%])。恶心或呕吐是脑脊液漏出最多的症状(n=73,53.3%;PPV[95%CI]=4.1%[2.0%,8.1%])。在单变量回归中,没有迹象或症状,包括鼻漏(OR[95%CI]=7.00[0.76-64.44]),喉部引流(3.42[0.35-33.86]),咸/金属味(4.22[0.66-27.04]),严重头痛(3.00[0.48-18.62]),头晕(0.54[0.06-4.94]),发烧(3.16[0.50-19.99]),恶心/呕吐(1.33[0.22-8.21]),与术后脑脊液漏有关。
    结论:一系列主观报告的症状和体征未能预测术后脑脊液漏。需要进一步调查,以告知适当的关注和回应。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak remains a concerning complication of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for skull base pathology. Signs and symptoms suggesting CSF leak often trigger additional workup during the postoperative course. We systematically evaluate associations between subjectively reported clinical signs/symptoms noted during the immediate postoperative period and incidence of postoperative CSF leaks.
    METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary academic medical centre including 137 consecutive patients with intraoperative CSF leak during EEA with primary repair between July 2018 and August 2022. Postoperative CSF leak associations with clinical signs and symptoms were evaluated using positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), sensitivity, specificity and odds ratio (OR) via univariate logistic regression.
    RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients (57.7%) had high-flow leaks repaired and 5 (3.6%) developed CSF leaks postoperatively. Of reported symptoms, rhinorrhea was most common (n = 52, 38.0%; PPV [95% CI] = 7.6% [4.8%, 11.9%]), followed by severe headache (n = 47, 34.3%; 6.3% [3.1%, 12.5%]), dizziness (n = 43, 31.4%; 2.3% [0.4%, 12.1%]), salty or metallic taste (n = 20, 14.6%; 9.9% [3.3%, 25.8%]), and throat drainage (n = 10, 7.3%; 9.9% [1.7%, 41.4%]). Nausea or vomiting constituted the most reported sign concerning for CSF leak (n = 73, 53.3%; PPV [95% CI] = 4.1% [2.0%, 8.1%]). On univariate regression, no sign or symptom, including rhinorrhea (OR [95% CI] = 7.00 [0.76-64.44]), throat drainage (3.42 [0.35-33.86]), salty/metallic taste (4.22 [0.66-27.04]), severe headache (3.00 [0.48-18.62]), dizziness (0.54 [0.06-4.94]), fever (3.16 [0.50-19.99]), and nausea/vomiting (1.33 [0.22-8.21]), associated with postoperative CSF leak.
    CONCLUSIONS: A range of subjectively reported symptoms and signs failed to predict postoperative CSF leak. Further investigation is warranted to inform appropriate attention and response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    BACKGROUND: The first report of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea (CSFR) was described in 1679. In 1826 it was reported that one of the possible causes of CSFR was a fistula between the subarachnoid space and the nasal cavity. In 1903, chemical analysis of the fluid was proposed as a diagnostic criterion. In Mexico there has been 32 case reports.
    METHODS: Forty-nine years old female with a history of nasal polyposis, profuse rhinorrhea and cephalea who attends the allergy department with the suspicion of allergic rhinitis. After anamnesis and physical evaluation, CSFR was suspected. Chemical analysis of the fluid, head CT and biopsy of nasal polyp were performed. An etmoidal fistula associated with carcinoma was confirmed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous fistulas are rare but can erosionate the bone and adjacent tissues. Diagnosis is based on the clinical findings, patient\'s history and complementary studies such as beta-2-transferrin determination in nasal fluid.
    BACKGROUND: En 1679 se describió el primer caso de rinorrea de líquido cefalorraquídeo. En 1826 se reportó como causa una fistula entre el espacio subaracnoideo y la cavidad nasal. Para 1903 se propuso el análisis químico como criterio diagnóstico. En México sólo se han reportado 32 casos de rinorrea de líquido cefalorraquídeo.
    UNASSIGNED: Paciente femenina de 49 años, con antecedente de poliposis nasal, rinorrea abundante y cefalea, quien acudió a consulta para descartar rinitis alérgica. Luego de la anamnesis y la exploración física se sospechó de fuga de líquido cefalorraquídeo secundaria a fístula nasal. Con la histoquímica de moco, tomografía de cráneo y biopsia del pólipo nasal se estableció el diagnóstico de fístula etmoidal secundaria a carcinoma.
    UNASSIGNED: La fístulas espontáneas son excepcionales, pueden erosionar el hueso y los tejidos adyacentes. El diagnóstico se establece con la historia clínica y los antecedentes médicos, además de estudios complementarios y la determinación de Beta-2-transferrina en moco.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鼻塞,鼻漏,鼻出血是初级保健诊所常见的问题。鼻部疾病影响许多儿童和家庭的生活质量。很少,这些投诉可能代表婴儿专性鼻呼吸器的危及生命的状况或异常病理的情况。鼻漏和鼻塞的最常见原因因年龄而异,包括生理性,传染性,过敏,异物,刺激性,和创伤性原因。不太常见,儿童可能有先天性畸形,鼻窦肿块,或自身免疫性疾病。鼻出血最常见的原因是炎症,环境,创伤性原因和药物滥用,但很少,孩子可能有解剖倾向,血液学,或血管异常甚至鼻窦肿瘤。在这篇文章中,我们对初级保健诊所每天治疗的常见鼻部疾病进行了全面回顾,并简要提及了一些罕见但严重的病例,这些病例可能在不考虑全面鉴别诊断的情况下被忽视.
    Nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, and epistaxis are common presenting concerns in primary care clinics. Nasal disorders affect the quality of life for many children and families. Rarely, these complaints may represent a life-threatening condition among infant obligate nasal breathers or cases of unusual pathology. The most common causes of rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction vary by age and include physiologic, infectious, allergic, foreign body, irritant, and traumatic causes. Less commonly, children may have congenital malformations, sinonasal masses, or autoimmune disease. The most common causes of epistaxis are inflammatory, environmental, and traumatic causes and medication misuse, but rarely, children may have predisposing anatomic, hematologic, or vascular abnormalities or even sinonasal tumors. In this article, we provide a thorough review of the common nasal disorders treated every day in primary care clinics and mention briefly some of the rare but serious cases that may be overlooked without considering a full differential diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:普通感冒是全球最常见的疾病之一。这项研究的目的是确定药剂师最常推荐的OTC抗普通感冒药,以及COVID-19大流行是否影响了这些建议。
    方法:非介入,观察性研究试验使用自编问卷收集药剂师建议抗普通感冒OTC治疗的数据.这些数据是在COVID-19大流行期间(2021年12月至2022年2月)在罗兹(波兰)的四家大型社区网络药房收集的,然后与大流行前的模拟时间段(2019年12月至2020年2月)进行比较。
    结果:在COVID-19大流行期间,对乙酰氨基酚显著减少(p<0.05),乙酰水杨酸,安乃近镁,肌苷,α模拟物,粘液溶解剂,顺势疗法,和喉咙痛产品,并增加其他片剂/胶囊和附加产品的建议。对乙酰氨基酚的推荐频率之间存在显着关系(p<0.05,OR>1),肌苷,喉咙痛产品(每种症状),安乃近镁(头痛,发烧),乙酰水杨酸(头痛,发烧,疲劳),NSAIDs,α模拟物(头痛,鼻漏),伪麻黄碱(鼻漏),顺势疗法(头痛),草药产品(疲劳),抗组胺药(鼻漏,咳嗽),和粘液溶解剂(头痛,发烧,咳嗽)。
    结论:有利的价格(在COVID-19大流行之前)和关于常见NSAIDs副作用的报道(大流行开始)导致扑热息痛的高销量。对某些药物的临床有效性的认识提高或其可用性降低影响了他们有限的建议。
    BACKGROUND: The common cold is one of the most frequently occurring illnesses worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine which OTC anti-common cold medications were most often recommended by pharmacists and if the COVID-19 pandemic affected such recommendations.
    METHODS: Non-interventional, observational research trial using a self-developed questionnaire to collect data on pharmacists\' recommendations for anti-common cold OTC treatment. The data were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic (December 2021-February 2022) in four large community network pharmacies in Lodz (Poland) and then compared with an analogue period of time before the pandemic (December 2019-February 2020).
    RESULTS: During COVID-19 pandemic there was a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in paracetamol, acetylsalicylic acid, metamizole magnesium, inosines, alpha-mimetics, mucolytics, homeopathics, and sore throat products and an increase in other tablets/capsules and add-on product recommendations. There was a significant relationship (p < 0.05, OR > 1) between the recommended frequency of paracetamol, inosines, sore throat products (each symptom), metamizole magnesium (headache, fever), acetylsalicylic acid (headache, fever, fatigue), NSAIDs, alpha-mimetics (headache, rhinorrhea), pseudoephedrine (rhinorrhea), homeopathics (headache), herbal products (fatigue), antihistamines (rhinorrhea, cough), and mucolytics (headache, fever, cough).
    CONCLUSIONS: Favorable prices (before COVID-19 pandemic) and reports on common NSAIDs side effects (beginning of the pandemic) led to high sale of paracetamol. Increased awareness of clinical effectiveness of some medications or their reduced availability influenced their limited recommendations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    过敏性鼻炎影响估计15%的美国人口(约5000万人),并与哮喘的存在有关。湿疹,慢性或复发性鼻窦炎,咳嗽,紧张和偏头痛。
    当上皮屏障的破坏使过敏原穿透鼻道的粘膜上皮时,就会发生过敏性鼻炎,诱导T辅助型2型炎症反应和过敏原特异性IgE的产生。过敏性鼻炎通常表现为鼻充血的症状,鼻漏,鼻后引流,打喷嚏,眼睛瘙痒,鼻子,和喉咙。在一项国际研究中,过敏性鼻炎最常见的症状是鼻漏(90.38%)和鼻塞(94.23%)。非过敏性鼻炎患者主要表现为鼻充血和鼻后引流,通常与鼻窦压力有关。耳塞,低沉的声音和疼痛,和咽鼓管功能障碍,对鼻皮质类固醇反应较差。患有季节性过敏性鼻炎的患者通常具有水肿和苍白鼻甲的体格检查结果。常年性变应性鼻炎患者通常具有红斑和发炎的鼻甲,在体格检查中表现出与其他形式的慢性鼻炎相似的浆液性分泌物。非过敏性鼻炎患者的特异性IgE过敏原检测结果为阴性。间歇性过敏性鼻炎定义为连续4天/周或连续4周/年以下的症状。持续性过敏性鼻炎被定义为连续4天/周和连续4周/年以上的症状。过敏性鼻炎患者应避免诱发过敏原。此外,轻度间歇性或轻度持续性过敏性鼻炎的一线治疗可能包括第二代H1抗组胺药(例如,西替利嗪,非索非那定,地氯雷他定,氯雷他定)或鼻内抗组胺药(例如,氮卓斯汀,奥洛他定),而患有持续性中度至重度过敏性鼻炎的患者最初应使用鼻内皮质类固醇治疗(例如,氟替卡松,曲安奈德,布地奈德,莫米松)单独或与鼻内抗组胺药联合使用。相比之下,非过敏性鼻炎患者的一线治疗包括鼻内抗组胺药作为单一治疗或与鼻内皮质类固醇联合治疗.
    过敏性鼻炎与鼻塞症状有关,打喷嚏,眼睛瘙痒,鼻子,和喉咙。应指示患有过敏性鼻炎的患者避免引起过敏原。治疗包括第二代H1抗组胺药(例如,西替利嗪,非索非那定,地氯雷他定,氯雷他定),鼻内抗组胺药(如,氮卓斯汀,奥洛他定),和鼻内皮质类固醇(例如,氟替卡松,曲安奈德,布地奈德,莫米松),应根据症状的严重程度和频率以及患者的偏好进行选择。
    Allergic rhinitis affects an estimated 15% of the US population (approximately 50 million individuals) and is associated with the presence of asthma, eczema, chronic or recurrent sinusitis, cough, and both tension and migraine headaches.
    Allergic rhinitis occurs when disruption of the epithelial barrier allows allergens to penetrate the mucosal epithelium of nasal passages, inducing a T-helper type 2 inflammatory response and production of allergen-specific IgE. Allergic rhinitis typically presents with symptoms of nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, postnasal drainage, sneezing, and itching of the eyes, nose, and throat. In an international study, the most common symptoms of allergic rhinitis were rhinorrhea (90.38%) and nasal congestion (94.23%). Patients with nonallergic rhinitis present primarily with nasal congestion and postnasal drainage frequently associated with sinus pressure, ear plugging, muffled sounds and pain, and eustachian tube dysfunction that is less responsive to nasal corticosteroids. Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis typically have physical examination findings of edematous and pale turbinates. Patients with perennial allergic rhinitis typically have erythematous and inflamed turbinates with serous secretions that appear similar to other forms of chronic rhinitis at physical examination. Patients with nonallergic rhinitis have negative test results for specific IgE aeroallergens. Intermittent allergic rhinitis is defined as symptoms occurring less than 4 consecutive days/week or less than 4 consecutive weeks/year. Persistent allergic rhinitis is defined as symptoms occurring more often than 4 consecutive days/week and for more than 4 consecutive weeks/year. Patients with allergic rhinitis should avoid inciting allergens. In addition, first-line treatment for mild intermittent or mild persistent allergic rhinitis may include a second-generation H1 antihistamine (eg, cetirizine, fexofenadine, desloratadine, loratadine) or an intranasal antihistamine (eg, azelastine, olopatadine), whereas patients with persistent moderate to severe allergic rhinitis should be treated initially with an intranasal corticosteroid (eg, fluticasone, triamcinolone, budesonide, mometasone) either alone or in combination with an intranasal antihistamine. In contrast, first-line therapy for patients with nonallergic rhinitis consists of an intranasal antihistamine as monotherapy or in combination with an intranasal corticosteroid.
    Allergic rhinitis is associated with symptoms of nasal congestion, sneezing, and itching of the eyes, nose, and throat. Patients with allergic rhinitis should be instructed to avoid inciting allergens. Therapies include second-generation H1 antihistamines (eg, cetirizine, fexofenadine, desloratadine, loratadine), intranasal antihistamines (eg, azelastine, olopatadine), and intranasal corticosteroids (eg, fluticasone, triamcinolone, budesonide, mometasone) and should be selected based on the severity and frequency of symptoms and patient preference.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号