Revisión paraguas

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着患病率的增加,孤独和与隔离相关的结构是公共卫生问题。该保护伞的目的是整理和评分证据,以分析实际和主观的孤独感作为健康风险因素。在预期注册之后,在Pubmed进行了系统的搜索,Embase,Scopus,WebofSciences,psycoINFO和Cochrane图书馆,直到2023年8月。选择了评估实际和主观孤独感与不良健康结果之间关联的系统评价。使用AMSTAR-2工具评估偏倚风险。数据列表,综合叙述。共选择13篇系统评价(4篇纳入荟萃分析)。10篇综述的方法学质量极低(76.92%),3篇综述的方法学质量极低(23.08%)。结果表明,孤独感与不良幸福感有关,并增加了不良身心健康的风险。现有数据表明,但不允许因果关系的确认。大多数孤独感似乎与心理和身体健康状况有关。应该建议采取预防策略,特别是弱势群体。
    Loneliness and related constructs associated with isolation are public health problems with increasing prevalence. The aim of this umbrella was to collate and grade evidence analyzing actual and subjective loneliness as a health risk factor. Following prospective registration, a systematic search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Sciences, psycoINFO and Cochrane Library until August 2023. Systematic reviews assessing the association between actual and subjective loneliness with adverse health outcomes were selected. Risk of bias was evaluated using AMSTAR-2 tool. Data were tabulated and synthesis was narrative. A total of 13 systematic reviews was selected (four included meta-analysis). The methodological quality was critically low in 10 reviews (76.92%) and low in 3 (23.08%). Results showed that loneliness was related to poor well-being and increase the risk of negative mental and physical health. The available data suggested but did not allow the confirmation of a causal association. Most constructs of loneliness seem to be related to mental and physical health conditions. A preventive strategy ought to be recommended, especially for vulnerable populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:老年人滥用,一个重要的人权问题和公共卫生问题,增加了残疾和死亡率。在过去的几十年里,一些综述综合了主要研究以确定其患病率。这项总括性审查旨在估计全球社区和护理环境中虐待老年人的总体患病率。
    方法:在PROSPERO(CRD42021281866)进行前瞻性注册后,我们对8个电子数据库进行了搜索,以确定从开始到2023年1月17日的系统评价。计算校正的覆盖面积以估计评论之间初步研究的潜在重叠。使用改良的AMSTAR-2仪器评估所选评论的质量。我们提取了社区和护理环境中任何类型的老年人(60岁或以上的人)虐待的患病率数据。
    结果:在2007年至2022年之间检索了16篇系统综述,其中有10篇在全球范围内捕获的患病率,三个在伊朗,一个在土耳其,一个在中国,一个在巴西。这16篇综述共包括1988年至2020年的136项主要研究。综述之间的研究重叠被发现是中等的(5.5%)。评论质量低(2,12.5%)或极低(14,87.5%)。估计全球整体虐待老年人的患病率范围很广(1.1-78%),而对特定滥用率的估计为0-81.8%的忽视,1.1-78.9%的心理虐待,财务滥用占0.7-78.3%,身体虐待占0.1-67.7%,和0-59.2%的性虐待。
    结论:尽管证据的低质量和现象的异质性使得很难提供准确的患病率数据,毫无疑问,虐待老年人是一个普遍存在的问题,而且分布广泛。注意力的重点应转向干预措施和决策,以防止这种形式的滥用。
    OBJECTIVE: Elder abuse, an important human rights issue and public health problem, contributes to increased disability and mortality. In the last decades, several reviews have synthesized primary studies to determine its prevalence. This umbrella review aimed to estimate the worldwide overall prevalence rate of elder abuse in the community and care setting.
    METHODS: Following prospective registration at PROSPERO (CRD42021281866) we conducted a search of eight electronic databases to identify systematic reviews from inception until 17 January 2023. The corrected covered area was calculated to estimate the potential overlap of primary studies between reviews. The quality of the selected reviews was assessed using a modified AMSTAR-2 instrument. We extracted data on the prevalence of any type of elder (people aged 60 years old or older) abuse in the community and care setting.
    RESULTS: There were 16 systematic reviews retrieved between 2007 and 2022, out of which ten captured prevalence globally, three in Iran, one in Turkey, one in China and one in Brazil. The 16 reviews included 136 primary studies in total between 1988 and 2020. The overlapping of studies between reviews was found to be moderate (5.5%). The quality of reviews was low (2, 12.5%) or critically low (14, 87.5%). The estimated range of global prevalence of overall elder abuse was wide (1.1-78%), while the estimations of specific abuse prevalence ranged from 0-81.8% for neglect, 1.1-78.9% for psychological abuse, 0.7-78.3% for financial abuse, 0.1-67.7% for physical abuse, and 0-59.2% for sexual abuse.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although the low quality of the evidence and the heterogeneity of the phenomenon makes it hard to give precise prevalence data, it is without a question that elder abuse is a prevalent problem with a wide dispersion. The focus of attention should shift towards interventions and policymaking to prevent this form of abuse.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Subjective well-being (SWB) refers to being satisfied with one\'s life, having positive affect and having little negative affect. We may understand it as a subjective definition of good life, or in colloquial terms \"happiness\", and it has been associated with several important benefits such as lower mortality. In the last decades, several randomized controlled trials (RCT) have investigated the efficacy of several interventions in increasing SWB in the general population but results from different disciplines have not been integrated.
    METHODS: We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCT that assess the efficacy of any kind of interventions in increasing SWB in the general population, including both positive psychology interventions (PPI) and other interventions. We (re)calculated the meta-analytic statistics needed to objectively assess the quality of the evidence of the efficacy of each type of intervention in improving each component of SWB according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
    RESULTS: There was moderate-quality evidence that PPI might induce small decreases of negative affect, and low-quality evidence that they might induce moderate increases of positive affect. We found similar results for those PPI specifically consisting in conducting acts of kindness (especially spending money on or giving items to others), for which there was low-quality evidence that they might induces small increases of life satisfaction, but not for PPI specifically consisting in practicing gratitude. Quality of the evidence of the efficacy for the other interventions included in the umbrella review (yoga, resilience training, physical activity, leisure, control enhancement, psychoeducation, and miscellaneous) was very low.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that PPI, and specially conducting acts of kindness such as spending money on others, may increase the SWB of the general population. The quality of the evidence of the efficacy for other interventions (e.g., yoga, physical activity, or leisure) is still very low. Registration number: PROSPERO CRD42020111681.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号