背景:干扰可能是实验室错误的重要来源,有可能导致免疫测定结果漂移。因此,我们评估了各种内源性和外源性物质对血管紧张素I(AngI)免疫测定的干扰,血管紧张素II(AngII),醛固酮,和肾素体外。
方法:使用筛选研究在超生理或超治疗血浆水平下评估了10种内源性物质和8种外源性物质,以鉴定潜在的干扰物质。随后,使用剂量-反应研究在最大病理或治疗血浆浓度范围内进一步测试了潜在干扰物质,以确定干扰是否存在显著偏倚.根据预设的验收标准,潜在干扰物质对AngI的干扰,AngII,并测定肾素和醛固酮测定。
结果:确定了AngI免疫测定的六种潜在干扰物质,即缬沙坦,硝苯地平,螺内酯,胆固醇,血红蛋白,和甘油三酯。同时,乙醇,硝苯地平,螺内酯,肝素钠,华法林,血红蛋白,尿酸,胆固醇,和甘油三酯似乎在AngII测定中具有潜在的干扰。醛固酮免疫测定的三种可能的干扰物是葡萄糖,缬沙坦,和螺内酯.此外,华法林,缬沙坦,螺内酯,尿酸,胆固醇,胆红素未结合,甘油三酯,和血红蛋白是肾素免疫测定的潜在干扰物质。然而,在醛固酮免疫测定中,这些潜在干扰物质中只有螺内酯超过预设的平均偏倚限值(小于±10.0%).
结论:外源性螺内酯在醛固酮免疫测定中引起临床上显著的干扰。此外,对其他物质的干扰在AngI中是可以接受的,AngII,肾素和醛固酮免疫测定。
BACKGROUND: The interference can be a significant source of laboratory errors with the potential to cause immunoassay results to drift. Therefore, we evaluated the interference in various endogenous and exogenous substances on immunoassay for angiotensin I (Ang I), angiotensin II (Ang II), aldosterone, and
renin in vitro.
METHODS: Ten endogenous and eight exogenous substances were evaluated at supraphysiologic or supratherapeutic plasma levels using the screening study to identify potential interfering substances. Subsequently, potential interfering substances were further tested within maximum pathological or therapeutic plasma concentration ranges using the dose-response study to determine whether the interference has a significant bias. According to preset acceptance criteria, the interference in potential interfering substances for Ang I, Ang II, and
renin and aldosterone assays was determined.
RESULTS: Six potential interfering substances for Ang I immunoassays were identified, namely valsartan, nifedipine, spironolactone, cholesterol, hemoglobin, and triglyceride. Meanwhile, ethanol, nifedipine, spironolactone, heparin sodium, warfarin, hemoglobin, uric acid, cholesterol, and triglyceride appeared to have potential interference in the Ang II assay. Three identified as possible interferents for aldosterone immunoassays were glucose, valsartan, and spironolactone. Moreover, warfarin, valsartan, spironolactone, uric acid, cholesterol, bilirubin unconjugated, triglyceride, and hemoglobin were potential interfering substances for
renin immunoassays. However, only spironolactone of these potential interfering substances exceeded preset mean bias limits (less than ±10.0%) in aldosterone immunoassays.
CONCLUSIONS: Exogenous spironolactone caused clinically significant interference in aldosterone immunoassays. Moreover, the interference in other substances was acceptable in Ang I, Ang II, and
renin and aldosterone immunoassays.