背景:每年,60%的腹泻病死亡发生在低收入和中等收入国家,原因是水不足,卫生,和卫生。在这些国家,腹泻病是五岁以下儿童死亡的第二大原因,不包括新生儿死亡。居住在南苏丹本提乌国内流离失所人口(IDP)营地的大约100,000人以前曾经历过水,卫生,和卫生爆发,包括2021年正在爆发的戊型肝炎。这项研究旨在评估水中的差距,环卫,卫生(WASH)优先考虑干预领域,并根据调查结果倡导改进WASH服务。
方法:在95个家庭中进行了横断面批次质量保证抽样(LQAS)调查,以收集有关水的数据,卫生,和卫生(WASH)覆盖五个部门的表现。每个部门分配了19户家庭,在LQAS调查中称为监督区域。使用与大小采样成正比的概率来确定使用地理定位系统选择的每个扇区块中要采样的家庭数量。一名成人受访者,熟悉家庭,被选中回答与WASH相关的问题,通过抽签方法选择了一名5岁以下的儿童,以评估前两周WASH相关疾病发病率的患病率。使用KoBoCollect移动应用程序收集数据。使用R统计软件和通用LQASExcel分析仪进行数据分析。粗数值,加权平均数,计算每个指标的95%置信区间.计划经理设定的目标覆盖率基准和WASH指南用于对每个指标的绩效进行分类。
结果:LQAS调查显示,13个清洁水供应指标中有5个,10项卫生和环境卫生指标中有8项,四个健康指标中有两个未达到目标覆盖率。关于清洁水供应指标,68.9%(95%CI60.8%-77.1%)的家庭报告每周六天有水可用,而37%(95%CI27%-46%)的水容器状况良好。关于个人卫生和环境卫生指标,17.9%(95%CI10.9%-24.8%)的家庭在其生活区有洗手点,66.8%(95%CI49%-84.6%)在排便后有自己的壶进行清洁,26.4%(95%CI17.4%-35.3%)的家庭有一块肥皂。超过40%的家庭在葬礼上清洗尸体,并在共用的碗中洗手。卫生设施处于可接受水平的家庭为22.8%(95%CI15.6%-30.1%),而13.2%(95%CI6.6%-19.9%)的家庭厕所洗手点正常。在过去的两周里,57.9%(95%CI49.6-69.7%)的家庭报告没有腹泻,71.3%(95%CI62.1%-80.6%)报告5岁以下儿童没有眼部感染.
结论:营地的卫生和卫生状况需要立即采取干预措施,以阻止戊型肝炎的爆发,并防止与WASH相关的进一步爆发和健康问题。LQAS调查结果被用来倡导解决WASH差距的干预措施,导致WASH和卫生行为者介入。
BACKGROUND: Every year, 60% of deaths from diarrhoeal disease occur in low and middle-income countries due to inadequate water, sanitation, and hygiene. In these countries, diarrhoeal diseases are the second leading cause of death in children under five, excluding neonatal deaths. The approximately 100,000 people residing in the Bentiu Internally Displaced Population (IDP) camp in South Sudan have previously experienced water, sanitation, and hygiene outbreaks, including an ongoing Hepatitis E outbreak in 2021. This study aimed to assess the gaps in Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH), prioritise areas for intervention, and advocate for the improvement of WASH services based on the findings.
METHODS: A cross-sectional lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) survey was conducted in ninety-five households to collect data on water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) coverage performance across five sectors. Nineteen households were allocated to each sector, referred to as supervision areas in LQAS surveys. Probability proportional to size sampling was used to determine the number of households to sample in each sector block selected using a geographic positioning system. One adult respondent, familiar with the household, was chosen to answer WASH-related questions, and one child under the age of five was selected through a lottery method to assess the prevalence of WASH-related disease morbidities in the previous two weeks. The data were collected using the KoBoCollect mobile application. Data analysis was conducted using R statistical software and a generic LQAS Excel analyser. Crude values, weighted averages, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each indicator. Target coverage benchmarks set by program managers and WASH guidelines were used to classify the performance of each indicator.
RESULTS: The LQAS survey revealed that five out of 13 clean water supply indicators, eight out of 10 hygiene and sanitation indicators, and two out of four health indicators did not meet the target coverage. Regarding the clean water supply indicators, 68.9% (95% CI 60.8%-77.1%) of households reported having water available six days a week, while 37% (95% CI 27%-46%) had water containers in adequate condition. For the hygiene and sanitation indicators, 17.9% (95% CI 10.9%-24.8%) of households had handwashing points in their living area, 66.8% (95% CI 49%-84.6%) had their own jug for cleansing after defaecation, and 26.4% (95% CI 17.4%-35.3%) of households had one piece of soap. More than 40% of households wash dead bodies at funerals and wash their hands in a shared bowl. Households with sanitary facilities at an acceptable level were 22.8% (95% CI 15.6%-30.1%), while 13.2% (95% CI 6.6%-19.9%) of households had functioning handwashing points at the latrines. Over the previous two weeks, 57.9% (95% CI 49.6-69.7%) of households reported no diarrhoea, and 71.3% (95% CI 62.1%-80.6%) reported no eye infections among children under five.
CONCLUSIONS: The camp\'s hygiene and sanitation situation necessitated immediate intervention to halt the hepatitis E outbreak and prevent further WASH-related outbreaks and health issues. The LQAS findings were employed to advocate for interventions addressing the WASH gaps, resulting in WASH and health actors stepping in.