Red cell antibodies

  • 文章类型: Review
    产前患者免疫血液学检测的主要适应症是检测和鉴定母体红细胞抗体。如果有预期会溶血胎儿红细胞的抗体,必须测试它们的反应强度,并确定胎儿的抗原状态。交货后,进行测试以评估母胎出血的程度,大出血可能需要其他治疗干预。免疫血液学检测的另一个主要作用是当由于母体同种免疫或其他原因导致的胎儿贫血需要宫内输血时,适当选择血液成分。分子方法的补充改变了免疫血液学的实践,特别适用于Rh血型系统的D抗原分型。尽管测试取得了进展,输血服务和产科服务之间的密切协调和沟通是确保为产前患者提供最佳护理的基础,以及新妈妈和他们的婴儿。这篇综述描述了产前患者的测试和输血实践,使用病例介绍强调选定的免疫血液学结果的管理。它还包括目前尚未解决的关键患者管理主题的讨论。
    The primary indication for immunohematological testing in the prenatal patient is to detect and identify maternal red cell antibodies. If there are antibodies that are expected to hemolyze the fetus\' red cells, their strength of reactivity must be tested, and the fetus\' antigen status determined. After delivery, testing is performed to assess the extent of fetomaternal hemorrhage, as a large hemorrhage may require other therapeutic interventions. Another major role for immunohematological testing is to select blood components appropriately when intrauterine transfusion is required for fetal anemia resulting from maternal alloimmunization or some other cause. Supplementation with molecular methods has transformed the practice of immunohematology, particularly as it applies to typing for the D antigen of the Rh blood group system. Notwithstanding the advances in testing, close coordination and communication between the transfusion service and the obstetrics service are the foundation for ensuring the finest care for prenatal patients, and for new mothers and their infants. This review describes testing and transfusion practices for prenatal patients, using case presentations to highlight the management of selected immunohematological findings. It also includes a discussion of key patient management topics that are currently unresolved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:这项研究是为了确定孕妇对各种血型抗体的同种免疫频率,以及胎儿和新生儿溶血病的风险。
    未经批准:所有产前妇女,无论妊娠期或产科史,包括在内,而那些服用抗D免疫预防或有输血史的患者被排除在外.使用Bio-RadID微分型系统进行抗体筛选和鉴定。
    未经批准:2,084名产前女性,1,765个为D-抗原阳性和319个D-抗原阴性。65名(3.119%)妇女接受同种免疫。在54名(2.591%)对D抗原致敏的患者中,11(0.527%)也对其他抗体致敏。鉴定的这11种同种抗体包括:抗M(n=6;9.23%),抗c(n=1;3.076%),抗E(n=1;1.538%),反e(n=1;1.538%),反刘易斯(a)(n=1;1.538%),和未指明的抗体(n=1;1.538%)。在四名患者中发现了多种抗体:抗D和抗C(n=2;3.076%),抗e和抗c(n=1;1.538%),抗D和抗G(n=1;1.538%)。
    UASSIGNED:D-抗原阴性女性的同种免疫率很高。除此之外,产科病史不良的妇女的同种免疫率非常高,8.1%。在印度等发展中国家,普遍的产前抗体筛查,虽然可取,目前可能没有理由,因为RhD抗原阳性女性的同种免疫接种率较低,所需的成本和基础设施将是巨大的。然而,有必要实施适当制定的方案来筛查有不良产科史的孕妇。
    OBJECTIVE: The study was conducted to determine the frequency of alloimmunization to various blood group antibodies in pregnant women, and the risk of hemolytic disease in the fetus and newborn.
    METHODS: All antenatal women, irrespective of the period of gestation or obstetric history, were included, whereas those taking anti-D immune-prophylaxis or with a history of blood transfusion were excluded. Antibody screening and identification were performed using a Bio-Rad ID microtyping system.
    RESULTS: Of 2,084 antenatal females, 1,765 were D-antigen positive and 319 D-antigen negative. Sixty-five (3.119%) women alloimmunized. Out of 54 (2.591%) who had sensitized to D-antigen, 11 (0.527%) also sensitized to other antibodies. These 11 alloantibodies identified included: anti-M (n=6; 9.23%), anti-C (n=1; 3.076%), anti-E (n=1; 1.538%), anti-e (n=1; 1.538%), anti-Lewis (a) (n=1; 1.538%), and unspecified antibodies (n=1; 1.538%). Multiple antibodies were seen in four patients that combined: anti-D and anti-C (n=2; 3.076%), anti-e and anti-c (n=1; 1.538%), and anti-D and anti-G (n=1; 1.538%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The rate of alloimmunization in D-antigen-negative women was high. Apart from this, the alloimmunization rate in women with bad obstetric history was very high, at 8.1%. In developing countries such as India, universal antenatal antibody screening, though desirable, may not be justified at present, as the cost and infrastructure required would be immense because of the lower alloimmunization rates in RhD antigen-positive women. However, it is necessary to impose properly formulated protocols to screen pregnant women with bad obstetric history.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大量输血方案(MTP)对失血性休克损伤患者有生存益处。虽然有许多已发表的关于大量出血患者输血管理的研究,在MTP激活期间接受过产品的患者的同种免疫风险相对未知.因此,我们试图确定接受来自不匹配的megapack的血液制品的MTP患者中新抗体形成的频率.
    方法:我们对2014年5月至2020年7月期间因创伤复苏而接受MTP激活的患者进行了回顾性资料回顾。数据来自符合以下标准的患者:MTP被激活,患者接受了至少一个单位的红细胞,一单位新鲜冷冻血浆,一个单位的血小板,在输血后6周内有重复类型和筛查。这些纳入标准导致28名患者在6年的时间框架。
    结果:总体而言,在我们的创伤患者人群中,MTP继发同种免疫的风险为3.6%.新开发的抗体后MTP被认为具有临床意义,这意味着如果暴露于含有这些抗原的供体红细胞,它们会导致溶血。
    结论:急性出血患者应优先给予血液制品,以防止MTP激活期间的缺血性损伤,尽管存在同种免疫的风险。在我们的单一机构研究中,大量输血患者接受不匹配红细胞的同种免疫率与接受交叉匹配红细胞的患者相似。
    BACKGROUND: Injured patients in hemorrhagic shock have a survival benefit with massive transfusion protocol (MTP). While there are many published studies on the transfusion management of massively bleeding patients, the risk of alloimmunization in patients that have received products during an MTP activation is relatively unknown. Therefore, we sought to determine the frequency of new antibody formation in MTP patients that received blood products from an uncrossmatched megapack.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective data review of patients who underwent an MTP activation for trauma resuscitation between May 2014 and July 2020. Data were collected from patients who met the following criteria: MTP was activated, the patients received at least one unit of packed red blood cells, one unit of fresh frozen plasma, one unit of platelets, and had a repeat type and screen within 6 weeks of transfusion. These inclusion criteria resulted in 28 patients over the 6-year timeframe.
    RESULTS: Overall, the risk of alloimmunization secondary to MTP is 3.6% in our trauma patient population. The newly developed antibodies post-MTP are considered clinically significant, meaning they can cause hemolysis if exposed to donor red blood cells containing those antigens.
    CONCLUSIONS: Blood products should be given preferentially over crystalloids to acutely bleeding patients to prevent ischemic injury during an MTP activation despite the risk of alloimmunization. In our single-institution study, the alloimmunization rate in massive transfusions where patients receive uncrossmatched red blood cells is similar to those receiving crossmatched red blood cells.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of red cell antibodies in pregnancy varies with ethnicity and geographical location, while the obstetric outcome depends on the available standard of care. Despite being the tertiary fetal medicine centre in West Yorkshire, the prevalence of red cell antibodies, and the outcome of pregnancies associated with these antibodies at the Leeds University Teaching Hospitals Trust remains unreported. This article aims to provide this information for the purpose of patient education and counselling.
    METHODS: The data of pregnant women with red cell antibodies between January 2011 and December 2016 was obtained from the Trust\'s database and reconciled with the Fetal Medicine Unit records using Viewpoint©. Fetal anaemia requiring in utero transfusion (IUT) was defined as a Middle Cerebral Artery Peak Systolic Velocities ≥ 1.5multiple of the median expected for gestational age. The mean gestational age at delivery, and perinatal outcomes of the pregnancies were recorded.
    RESULTS: Overall, 398 of the 96, 692 pregnant women that were screened had red cell antibodies, giving a prevalence of 1: 242 pregnancies. The Anti- E and Anti-M antibodies were the most common (114 women; 28.6%, and 112 women; 28.1% respectively), but did not cause fetal anaemia in isolation, while anti-D alloimmunization was the predominant indication for in-utero transfusion (IUT). Anti-DE and anti-Kell antibodies had the highest mean number of transfusions per pregnancy. The mean gestational age at delivery was 34 ± 2weeks. Post-transfusion fetal demise was recorded in two hydropic fetuses, both at a gestational age of 25 weeks; giving a transfusion-related mortality rate of 2.5%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of red cell antibodies at West Yorkshire is lower compared with reports from other Caucasian populations.Nevertheless, these antibodies are important causes of iatrogenic preterm delivery and fetal morbidity. The prognosis is however good with prompt diagnosis and management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed to determine the prevalence of alloimmunization due to antibodies to red blood cell (RBC) antigens (other than rhesus [Rh] antigen) and report the maternal, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records of all patients with minor RBCs antibodies alloimmunization who were followed and delivered at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Oman from June 2011 to June 2013. Maternal characteristics, antibody type, antibody titer in addition to perinatal and neonatal outcomes were reviewed.
    RESULTS: There were 1160 patients with Rh positive status in the study. The most common ABO blood group was O, followed by A, B, and AB. We found 33 out of 1160 Rh positive women alloimmunized with minor RBCs antibodies that gave a prevalence of minor RBCs alloimmunization of 2.7%. The most frequent antibody was anti-E 38%, followed by anti-c 17% and anti-kell 17%. 6 of these 33 patients were identified to have significant antibody titer, and two cases showed evidence of fetal anemia. Only one case required an intrauterine blood transfusion. The most common neonatal complication was jaundice in 53%, followed by respiratory distress syndrome in 28%. Two cases complicated by neonatal anemia required a postnatal blood transfusion.
    CONCLUSIONS: Alloimmunization with anti-E, anti-c, and anti-kell were the most common antibodies among the study group. Minor RBCs alloimmunization was an important cause of neonatal morbidity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    BACKGROUND: Providing adequate transfusion support for alloimmunised patients for whom antigen negative blood is not readily available is hampered by the risk of a haemolytic reaction. The monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) has shown good correlation between the antibody clinical significance and the fate of antigen positive blood.
    METHODS: From 2006 to 2013, the clinical significance of red cell alloantibodies produced by 61 patients was evaluated using a MMA; and antigen positive blood offering the best survival advantage was selected for transfusion following a secondary MMA crossmatch. Post-transfusion, patients were evaluated for clinical signs of haemolysis.
    RESULTS: Overall, 19 of 61 (31·1%) of our antibodies were potentially clinically significant, with a monocyte index (MI) > 5%. There was no correlation between the clinical significance as showed by the MMA, and the specificity of the antibody or the strength of reactivity at antihuman globulin (AHG) phase. Using the MMA as a secondary crossmatch method, 31 alloimmunised patients (including: eight anti-hr(B), four anti-Yt(a), one each anti-Rg1, -Co(a), Er(a), Le(b), -LW, -Sl1) received 103 antigen positive blood units with no clinical sign of a post-transfusion reaction. For three patients (one each anti-Jo(a), -AnWj, unidentified \'HTLA\'), initial MMA was performed as part of an investigation of a suspected haemolytic reaction. In each case, the MMA accurately identified the unit responsible for the reaction.
    CONCLUSIONS: Used as a crossmatch surrogate, the MMA provided valuable information in the decision of transfusing antigen positive blood to alloimmunised patients, avoiding delay because of the search of rare antigen negative units.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号