背景:幽门螺杆菌感染影响了世界人口的50%以上。抗生素耐药性的增加是治疗失败的主要原因。主要目的是分析在应用新的ESPGHAN治疗建议和引入PCR作为直接诊断技术后的根除成功,描述抗生素耐药性局部模式的演变,并评估PCR应用的成本效益,隔离或与文化结合作为诊断策略。
方法:本中心2013-2019年所有幽门螺杆菌微生物分离株的回顾性描述性研究,通过比较2013-2016年和2017-2019年期间的耐药性和根除成功率。直接诊断测试的成本效益研究,比较3种不同的选择:培养和PCR;仅培养;仅PCR。
结果:纳入192例患者,98例通过培养(2013-2016)检测到,94例通过培养和/或PCR(2017-2019)检测到。153名患者建立了抗生素治疗,第一阶段90(2011年ESPGHAN指南:根除率62.2%),第二(2017年ESPGHAN指南:根除率:73%)。观察到对克拉霉素的耐药性增加,从第一阶段的16.3%(n=16)开始,2017-2019年为53.2%(n=48)(PCR检测到98%,60%的文化)。其余抗生素耐药性没有差异。分离的PCR应用的成本效益分析比(CEAR)为71.91,而培养物的成本效益分析比为92.16,培养物和PCR的组合为96.35。
结论:ESPGHAN2017指南的应用取得了更大的根除成功,虽然比以前出版物中观察到的要少,没有达到至少90%的目标。观察到对大环内酯类药物的抗性增加,无法区分它是真正的增加还是分子技术的更高的诊断灵敏度,对PCR的单独请求是最具成本效益的策略。
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection affects more than 50% of the world population. Increased antibiotic resistance is the main cause of treatment failure. The main objective was to analyze the eradication success after the application of the new ESPGHAN treatment recommendations and the introduction of PCR as a direct diagnosis technique, describe the evolution of the local pattern of antibiotic resistance, and assess the cost-effectiveness of PCR application, isolated or in conjunction with culture as a diagnostic strategy.
METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study of all microbiological isolates of Helicobacter pylori in 2013-2019 in our center, by comparing the percentage of resistance and eradication success between the periods 2013-2016 and 2017-2019. Cost-effectiveness study of direct diagnostic tests, comparing 3 different options: culture and PCR; only culture; PCR only.
RESULTS: 192 patients were included, 98 were detected by culture (2013-2016) and 94 by culture and/or PCR (2017-2019). Antibiotic treatment was established in 153 patients, 90 in the first period (2011 ESPGHAN guidelines: eradication percentage 62.2%), 63 in the second (2017 ESPGHAN guidelines: eradication percentage: 73%). An increase in resistance to clarithromycin was observed, going from 16.3% (n=16) in the first period, to 53.2% (n=48) in 2017-2019 (98% detected by PCR, 60% by culture). There were no differences in the rest of antibiotic resistances. The isolated PCR application presented a cost-effectiveness analysis ratio (CEAR) of 71.91, compared to 92.16 for the culture and 96.35 for the culture and PCR combined.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of the ESPGHAN 2017 guidelines achieved greater eradication success, although less than that observed in previous publications, without reaching the target of at least 90%. An increase in resistance to macrolides was observed, without being able to discriminate whether it is a real increase or a greater diagnostic sensitivity of molecular techniques, with the isolated request for PCR being the most cost-effective strategy.