背景:当无法插管时,需要紧急的颈部气道前部(FONA),不能充氧危机发生。在特定情况下,FONA也可能是气道管理的主要选择。FONA有两种技术,有文献支持手术技术而不是经皮手术。幸运的是,由于死亡率很高,因此报告的院前FONA需求很少见。由于发病率低,关于FONA的文献在不同的设置方面是有限的,技术和运营商。作为未来研究和改善患者护理的基础,我们的目标是描述频率,适应症,技术,成功,以及芬兰直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)中FONA的结果。
方法:这项回顾性描述性研究回顾了2012年1月至8.9月2019年在芬兰HEMS进行的FONA。芬兰HEMS由六个单元组成,主要由麻醉师组成。临床数据收集自国家HEMS数据库和波谷图综述。死亡率数据来自人口登记。仅进行描述性统计。
结果:在研究期间共进行了22次FONA,7例患者为主要患者,14例在插管失败后进行(缺少有关一次尝试指示的数据)。这相当于0.13%(14/10,813)的抢救需要FONA和0.20%(22/10,813)的FONA率。除一个FONA外,所有FONA均采用手术方法(20/21,95%,缺失数据=1),全部成功(22/22,100%)。适应症主要为心脏骤停(10/22,45%)和外伤(6/22,27%),需要二次FONA的最常见原因是食物或液体阻塞气道(7/14,50%).现场死亡率为36%(8/22),30天死亡率为90%(19/21,缺失数据=1)。
结论:在具有经验丰富的气道提供者的HEMS系统中,对FONA的需求很少。即使该过程已成功执行,死亡率明显较高。
BACKGROUND: An emergent front of neck airway (FONA) is needed when a \'can\'t intubate, can\'t oxygenate\' crisis occurs. A FONA may also in specific cases be the primary choice of airway management. Two techniques exist for FONA, with literature favouring the surgical technique over the percutaneous. The reported need for a prehospital FONA is fortunately rare as the mortality has been shown to be high. Due to the low incidence, literature on FONA is limited with regards to different settings, techniques and operators. As a foundation for future research and improvement of patient care, we aim to describe the frequency, indications, technique, success, and outcomes of FONA in the Finnish helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS).
METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study reviews FONA performed at the Finnish HEMS during 1.1.2012 to 8.9.2019. The Finnish HEMS consists of six units, staffed mainly by anaesthesiologists. Clinical data was gathered from a national HEMS database and trough chart reviews. Data on mortality was obtained from a population registry. Only descriptive statistics were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 22 FONA were performed during the study period, 7 were primary and 14 performed after failure to intubate (missing data regarding indication for one attempt). This equals a 0.13 % (14/10,813) need for a rescue FONA and a rate of 0.20 % (22/10,813) FONA out of all advanced airway management. All but one FONA was performed using a surgical approach (20/21, 95 %, missing data = 1) and all were successful (22/22, 100 %). Indications were mainly cardiac arrest (10/22, 45 %) and trauma (6/22, 27 %), and the most common reason for a need for a secondary FONA was obstruction of airway by food or fluids (7/14, 50 %). On-scene mortality was 36 % (8/22) and 30-day mortality 90 % (19/21, missing data = 1).
CONCLUSIONS: The need for FONA is scarce in a HEMS system with experienced airway providers. Even though the procedure is successfully performed, the mortality is markedly high.