Randomized-controlled trial

随机对照试验
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当应用循证医学的标准时,对公众而言,遮脸的功效并不能令人信服地防止SARS-CoV-2等呼吸道病毒的传播。这一发现主要由随机对照试验(RCT)的结果解释,当时确保了高感染率和戴口罩的高依从性。在这些研究中,没有观察到显著的保护作用。使用外科口罩的观察性研究描述了显着的保护作用,但容易产生物理距离等混杂因素。与外科或医用口罩(RCT)相比,呼吸器不提供额外的健康益处。社区口罩甚至会增加感染风险(RCT)。根据循证医学的类别,疗效结果最好归类为相互矛盾的证据.许多相关的不良事件被描述时,口罩佩戴数小时,如呼吸困难(12.2-52.8%),头痛(3.9-73.4%),瘙痒(0.0-60.0%),和皮肤反应(0.0-85.0%)。呼吸器的频率通常较高。在未来的大流行中,口罩应仅在可预期临床相关健康益处的环境中推荐或强制使用,定义为预防严重的,危重或致命的疾病,这显然超过了预期的相关不良反应。
    The efficacy of face masking for the public is not convincing to prevent the transmission of respiratory tract viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 when the criteria of evidence-based medicine are applied. This finding is mainly explained by the results from randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) when a high prevalence of the infection and a high compliance in mask wearing was assured. Throughout these studies no significant protective effect was observed. Observational studies with surgical masks describe a significant protective effect, but are prone to confounders such as physical distance. Respirators do not provide an additional health benefit compared to surgical or medical masks (RCTs). Community masks can even increase the risk of infection (RCTs). Based on the categories of evidence-based medicine, the efficacy results can best be categorized as conflicting evidence. Many relevant adverse events are described when masks are worn for hours such as dyspnea (12.2-52.8%), headache (3.9-73.4%), pruritus (0.0-60.0%), and skin reactions (0.0-85.0%). Their frequency is often higher with respirators. In future pandemics, masks should only be recommended or mandated for settings in which a clinically relevant health benefit can be expected, defined as the prevention of severe, critical or fatal disease, that clearly outweighs the expectable associated adverse reactions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    将音乐融入疼痛治疗中显示出显著的益处,有效降低主观疼痛水平和围手术期阿片类药物的需求。目前,特定类型音乐的影响与听众的社会文化背景之间的关系尚不清楚。考虑到社会学研究表明这些因素会对音乐偏好和感知产生显着影响,这一点尤其重要。目前的证据表明,选择自己音乐的人可能会获得更大的好处。然而,需要更多的研究来全面掌握(首选)音乐对疼痛耐力的影响是否在不同的社会文化背景下保持一致.
    在这项研究中,医学和社会学研究人员的一项合作努力旨在研究健康志愿者中音乐诱导的镇痛作用,其区别在于社会文化背景.参与者(n=84)将倾听自我,以及研究人员选择的音乐和播客作为交叉研究设计中的控制条件。这项研究的主要结果是通过增加强度的电刺激来测量疼痛耐力。将使用详细的社会学验证问卷。考虑到先前研究中发现的教育水平对音乐品味形成的显着影响及其作为社会文化分化来源的关键作用,参与者将根据他们的教育水平进行分层。
    这项实验研究代表了对音乐治疗潜力的社会文化差异理解的首次努力之一。因此,这可以为有目的地和包容性地在医疗保健环境中实施个性化音乐铺平道路。
    UNASSIGNED: Integrating music into pain treatment demonstrates significant benefits, effectively reducing subjective pain levels and perioperative opioid requirements. Currently, the relationship between the impact of specific types of music and listeners\' socio-cultural background is still unclear. This is especially relevant given that sociological research indicates that these factors can have a notable influence on music preference and perception. Current evidence suggests that individuals who choose their own music may experience greater benefits. However, additional research is needed to comprehensively grasp whether the effect of (preferred) music on pain endurance remains consistent across different socio-cultural backgrounds.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, a collaborative effort between medical and sociological researchers aims to investigate music-induced analgesia differentiated by socio-cultural background in healthy volunteers. Participants (n = 84) will listen to self-, and researcher-chosen music and a podcast as a control condition in a cross-over study design. The primary outcome of this study is pain endurance measured by electric stimuli of increasing intensity. Detailed sociological validated questionnaires will be utilized. Considering the notable influence of educational level on music taste formation found in previous research and its crucial role as a source of socio-cultural differentiation, participants will be stratified based on their level of education.
    UNASSIGNED: This experimental study represents one of the first efforts to gain a socio-culturally differentiated understanding of the therapeutic potential of music. Consequently, this could pave the way to purposefully and inclusively implement personalized music in healthcare settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:失业影响着全世界数百万人,除了其经济影响之外,对人们的福祉和心理健康有严重影响。针对这种现象,已经开发了不同的程序,但迄今为止,求职干预已被证明是最有效的,尤其是JOBSII计划。JOBSII计划不仅对再就业有效,而且对受益人的心理健康也有积极影响(即,减少焦虑或抑郁)。然而,到现在,这一基于证据的计划仅在实施该计划的各个国家/地区现场交付。在数字时代,基于Web的替代方案是非常需要的,因为它们具有可扩展性和成本效益的优势。
    目标:在这种情况下,我们的目标是调查iJobs的功效,JOBSII计划的基于网络的改编,在求职强度和努力上,求职行为的质量,和求职自我效能感。Further,干预后1个月,我们还将评估就业状况和对工作的满意度(如果适用)。这项研究还将调查iJobs对幸福感和心理健康的影响(即,焦虑和抑郁)。
    方法:本研究是一项2臂随机对照试验。2个独立组(干预与等待列表对照组)将交叉3个测量时间(即,基线,干预后的时间点,和1个月的随访)。设计将是2(干预与控制)×3(基线,干预后的时间点,和1个月随访)析因设计。iJobs是一个为期2周的干预,由6个模块组成:一个入门模块和5个模块,从原始的JOBSII计划改编为基于网络的设置和罗马尼亚人口。基于网络的干预也有人的成分,因为受益人在平台上的每个模块后都会收到参与该项目的心理学家团队的个性化书面反馈。
    结果:研究参与者的招募始于2023年6月,预计将于2024年5月结束。数据收集预计将于2024年7月完成。预计结果将于2024年夏季提交发布。
    结论:这项研究是第一个大规模随机对照试验,旨在测试基于网络的JOBSII计划适应的有效性。如果我们的结果支持iJobs的功效,他们将为它成为一个基于证据的前提,罗马尼亚失业者可获得的替代方案,可能会在其他国家实施。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05962554;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05962554。
    PRR1-10.2196/55374。
    BACKGROUND: Unemployment affects millions of people worldwide and, beyond its economic impact, has severe implications for people\'s well-being and mental health. Different programs have been developed in response to this phenomenon, but to date, job-search interventions have proved to be most effective, especially the JOBS II program. The JOBS II program proved not only to be effective for re-employment but also has a positive impact on beneficiaries\' mental health (ie, reduces anxiety or depression). However, by now, this evidence-based program has been delivered only on site in the various countries where it was implemented. In the digital era, web-based alternatives to such programs are highly needed because they have the advantages of scalability and cost-effectiveness.
    OBJECTIVE: In this context, we aim to investigate the efficacy of iJobs, the web-based adaptation of the JOBS II program, on job-search intensity and effort, the quality of job-search behaviors, and job-search self-efficacy. Further, 1 month after the intervention, we will also assess the employment status and the satisfaction with the job (if applicable). This study will also investigate the effect of iJobs on well-being and mental health (ie, anxiety and depression).
    METHODS: This study is a 2-arm randomized controlled trial. The 2 independent groups (intervention vs waiting list control group) will be crossed with 3 measurement times (ie, baseline, the postintervention time point, and 1-month follow-up). The design will be a 2 (intervention vs control) × 3 (baseline, the postintervention time point, and 1-month follow-up) factorial design. iJobs is a 2-week intervention consisting of 6 modules: an introductive module and 5 modules adapted from the original JOBS II program to the web-based setting and Romanian population. The web-based intervention also has a human component, as beneficiaries receive personalized written feedback after each module on the platform from a team of psychologists involved in the project.
    RESULTS: The enrollment of study participants started in June 2023 and is expected to end in May 2024. The data collection is expected to be completed by July 2024. The results are expected to be submitted for publication in the summer of 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first large-scale randomized controlled trial aiming to test the efficacy of a web-based adaptation of the JOBS II program. If our results support the efficacy of iJobs, they will offer the premise for it to become an evidence-based, accessible alternative for unemployed people in Romania and might be implemented in other countries.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05962554; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05962554.
    UNASSIGNED: PRR1-10.2196/55374.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    痴呆症对护理人员和护理接受者的健康都有负面影响。以社区为基础的治疗性唱诗班演唱提供了音乐参与和社会参与的机会,为痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者提供了可访问和相互愉悦的机会,并促进了共享和有意义的音乐互动。这可以支持关系质量。本研究旨在探讨Remini-Sing治疗性合唱团干预对关系质量的影响。生活质量,抑郁症,以及二元组的社会联系,以及照顾者的负担和照顾接受者的焦虑。使用具有180个二元组的目标样本的随机对照试验设计。由于招聘困难,招募了34名参与者,并将其随机分配到20周组唱歌条件(n=16)或等待组对照组(n=18)。参与者由痴呆症患者及其居住在社区家中的家庭照顾者组成。Remini-Sing治疗合唱团在社区环境中举行。在基线时由蒙面评估员进行评估,11周,21周。21个二元组在主要时间点(第11周)完成评估。招聘和留用问题导致了一项没有统计学意义的研究。对于患有痴呆症的合唱团参与者,焦虑和抑郁的平均下降得到了中等到大的效应大小的支持,表明潜在的干预效果有待在未来的动力研究中探索。与研究设计相关的关键学习在招聘方面进行了讨论,保留,参与者负担,和可持续性,并对未来的痴呆症研究提出了建议。
    Dementia negatively affects the wellbeing of both caregivers and care recipients. Community-based therapeutic choir singing offers opportunities for music participation and social engagement that are accessible and mutually enjoyable for people with dementia and their family caregivers and promotes shared and meaningful musical interactions, which may support relationship quality. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the Remini-Sing therapeutic choir intervention on relationship quality, quality of life, depression, and social connectedness for dyads, as well as caregiver burden and care recipient anxiety. A randomized-controlled trial design was used with a target sample of 180 dyads. Due to recruitment difficulties, 34 participant dyads were recruited and randomly assigned to a 20-week group singing condition (n = 16) or a waitlisted control group (n = 18). Participant dyads consisted of people with dementia and their family caregivers who resided at home in the community. The Remini-Sing therapeutic choirs were held in community settings. Assessments were conducted by masked assessors at baseline, 11 weeks, and 21 weeks. Twenty-one dyads completed assessments at the primary timepoint (Week 11). Issues with recruitment and retention resulted in an unpowered study with no statistically significant findings. Mean decreases in anxiety and depression for choir participants with dementia were supported by medium to large effect sizes, indicating a potential intervention effect to be explored in future powered studies. Key learnings related to study design are discussed regarding recruitment, retention, participant burden, and sustainability, with recommendations made for future dementia research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    如今,运动干预被认为是精神分裂症患者的有效附加治疗方法,但通常与高辍学率相关。因此,本研究从一项大型多中心研究中调查了依从性的潜在预测因素,包括两种类型的运动训练,与精神分裂症患者进行了为期6个月的研究。首先,我们检查了多个参与者的角色,包括功能水平,症状严重程度,认知表现,生活质量,和身体健康。第二,我们使用K-means聚类来确定可能表现出优异依从性的参与者的临床亚组.最后,我们探索了是否可以使用随机森林在个体水平上预测依从性,Logistic回归,和岭回归。我们发现,基线时功能水平较高的个体更有可能坚持运动干预,而其他因素如症状严重程度,认知表现,生活质量或身体素质似乎影响较小。因此,与重症患者组相比,低症状的高功能组更有可能坚持干预措施.尽管结合了各种算法,无法在个体水平上预测依从性.这些发现增加了对影响运动干预依从性的因素的理解。他们强调了日常生活功能的预测重要性,同时表明症状严重程度和依从性之间缺乏关联。未来的研究应侧重于制定有针对性的策略来提高依从性,特别是对于患有日常功能受损的精神分裂症患者。临床试验注册该手稿所基于的该手稿的研究已在国际临床试验数据库中注册,ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT编号:NCT03466112,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03466112?term=NCT03466112&draw=2&rank=1)和德国临床试验注册(DRKS-ID:DRKS00009804。
    Exercise interventions are nowadays considered as effective add-on treatments in people with schizophrenia but are usually associated with high dropout rates. Therefore, the present study investigated potential predictors of adherence from a large multicenter study, encompassing two types of exercise training, conducted over a 6-month period with individuals with schizophrenia. First, we examined the role of multiple participants\' characteristics, including levels of functioning, symptom severity, cognitive performance, quality of life, and physical fitness. Second, we used K-means clustering to identify clinical subgroups of participants that potentially exhibited superior adherence. Last, we explored if adherence could be predicted on the individual level using Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and Ridge Regression. We found that individuals with higher levels of functioning at baseline were more likely to adhere to the exercise interventions, while other factors such as symptom severity, cognitive performance, quality of life or physical fitness seemed to be less influential. Accordingly, the high-functioning group with low symptoms exhibited a greater likelihood of adhering to the interventions compared to the severely ill group. Despite incorporating various algorithms, it was not possible to predict adherence at the individual level. These findings add to the understanding of the factors that influence adherence to exercise interventions. They underscore the predictive importance of daily life functioning while indicating a lack of association between symptom severity and adherence. Future research should focus on developing targeted strategies to improve adherence, particularly for people with schizophrenia who suffer from impairments in daily functioning.Clinical trials registration The study of this manuscript which the manuscript is based was registered in the International Clinical Trials Database, ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT number: NCT03466112, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03466112?term=NCT03466112&draw=2&rank=1 ) and in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00009804.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:在骨科手术中使用第一代或第二代头孢菌素预防围手术期抗生素是有证据的。有,然而,预防耐药手术部位感染(SSI)风险较高的情况。
    方法:我们进行了一项优势随机对照试验,其幅度为10%,功效为90%,有利于广谱预防。我们将随机选择骨科干预措施,由于选择了耐药性病原体(开放性骨折,在治疗性抗生素下进行手术,骨科肿瘤手术,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分≥3分的脊柱手术)采用前瞻性交替方案(1:1,头孢呋辛标准预防与广谱预防联合单次注射万古霉素1g和庆大霉素5mg/kg肠胃外注射)。对于大多数骨科手术,主要结果是6周时的“缓解”,对于植入手术,主要结果是1年时的“缓解”。次要结果是预防性耐药SSI病原体的风险,任何原因的修正手术,感染治疗期间抗生素治疗的变化,不良事件,以及6周内除SSI以外的术后医疗保健相关感染(例如,尿液感染或肺炎)。无事件手术在广谱中达到95%,而在标准预防组中达到85%,我们需要2×207个矫形手术.
    结论:在因选择预防性耐药SSI而具有感染高风险的选定患者中,万古霉素和庆大霉素的广谱组合可能比头孢呋辛预防更好地预防SSIs(和其他术后感染).
    背景:ClinicalTrial.govNCT05502380。2022年8月12日注册。协议版本:2(2022年6月3日)。
    BACKGROUND: The perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with 1st or 2nd generation cephalosporins is evidence-based in orthopedic surgery. There are, however, situations with a high risk of prophylaxis-resistant surgical site infections (SSI).
    METHODS: We perform a superiority randomized controlled trial with a 10% margin and a power of 90% in favor of the broad-spectrum prophylaxis. We will randomize orthopedic interventions with a high risk for SSI due to selection of resistant pathogens (open fractures, surgery under therapeutic antibiotics, orthopedic tumor surgery, spine surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3 points) in a prospective-alternating scheme (1:1, standard prophylaxis with cefuroxime versus a broad-spectrum prophylaxis of a combined single-shot of vancomycin 1 g and gentamicin 5 mg/kg parenterally). The primary outcome is \"remission\" at 6 weeks for most orthopedic surgeries or at 1 year for surgeries with implant. Secondary outcomes are the risk for prophylaxis-resistant SSI pathogens, revision surgery for any reason, change of antibiotic therapy during the treatment of infection, adverse events, and the postoperative healthcare-associated infections other than SSI within 6 weeks (e.g., urine infections or pneumonia). With event-free surgeries to 95% in the broad-spectrum versus 85% in the standard prophylaxis arm, we need 2 × 207 orthopedic surgeries.
    CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with a high risk for infections due to selection of prophylaxis-resistant SSI, a broad-spectrum combination with vancomycin and gentamycin might prevent SSIs (and other postoperative infections) better than the prophylaxis with cefuroxime.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT05502380. Registered on 12 August 2022. Protocol version: 2 (3 June 2022).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:强迫症(OCD)通过暴露和反应预防(ERP)得到有效治疗,然而,很少有退伍军人在退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)内接受强迫症的ERP。退伍军人是一个临床复杂的人群,并且之前没有研究评估ERP在患有OCD或合并OCD和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的退伍军人中的有效性。鉴于VHA内经ERP培训的提供商的可及性有限,有必要对ERP的视频远程医疗(VTH)交付进行评估。
    方法:将随机分配160名患有OCD的退伍军人(80名被诊断患有PTSD合并症)的样本,以接受多达16次ERP或通过VTH提供的压力管理培训控制。评估将在基线时进行,后处理,6个月随访。主要结果将评估ERP对参与者功能的影响,次要结局包括生活质量和强迫症症状.在治疗后,对退伍军人的定性采访,临床医生,管理人员将探索治疗提供的障碍和促进者,以及ERP的实施潜力。
    结论:结果将为退伍军人中强迫症和PTSD合并症的治疗提供指导,以及VHA内部ERP未来实施工作的指导。
    结果:gov标识符:NCT05240924。
    Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is effectively treated with exposure and response prevention (ERP), yet very few veterans receive ERP for OCD within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Veterans are a clinically complex population, and no prior research has evaluated the effectiveness of ERP in veterans with OCD or comorbid OCD and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Given the limited accessibility of ERP-trained providers within VHA, assessment of video telehealth (VTH) delivery of ERP is warranted.
    A sample of 160 veterans with OCD (80 diagnosed with comorbid PTSD) will be randomly assigned to receive up to 16 sessions of ERP or a stress management training control delivered via VTH. Assessments will occur at baseline, posttreatment, and 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome will evaluate the impact of ERP on participants\' functioning, and secondary outcomes will include quality of life and OCD symptoms. At posttreatment, qualitative interviews with veterans, clinicians, and administrators will explore barriers and facilitators to treatment delivery, and the implementation potential of ERP.
    Results will provide direction for the treatment of OCD and comorbid PTSD in veterans, as well as guidance for future implementation efforts for ERP within VHA.
    gov Identifier:NCT05240924.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:哮喘是一种慢性呼吸道疾病,有喘息发作的症状,呼吸急促,胸部紧绷。即使预先存在的治疗恶化也不受控制。
    目的:本研究使用哮喘控制测试比较了瑜伽干预和非瑜伽干预组的哮喘控制。
    方法:在这项随机对照试验中,参与者以1∶1的比例分为两组-瑜伽干预和非瑜伽干预.只有结果评估者是盲目的。计算样本大小为200。18至60岁的人,我们对被诊断为轻度至中度哮喘且过去1个月内未出现恶化的患者进行了筛查和纳入.按照方案进行分析以评估哮喘控制测试的结果和支出。(CTRI/2020/02/023534)结果:共有192名参与者参加,165人完成了这项研究,他们被考虑进行最终分析。在13周时,瑜伽与非瑜伽运动组之间存在显着差异(p<0.001)。非瑜伽运动组的费用更高。
    结论:我们的研究结果证实,常规医疗护理下的瑜伽运动可以减少哮喘的发作并改善哮喘的控制。
    BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with symptoms of attacks of wheezing, shortness of breath, & tightness in the chest. Even with pre-existing treatment exacerbations go uncontrolled.
    OBJECTIVE: This study compared asthma control in yoga intervention versus non-yoga intervention group using Asthma Control Test.
    METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, participants were allocated into two groups in 1:1 ratio - yoga intervention versus non-yoga intervention. Only outcome assessor was blinded. Sample size of 200 was calculated. Individuals between 18 and 60 years of age, diagnosed with mild to moderate asthma with no exacerbation in past one month were screened and enrolled. Per-protocol analysis was done to assess the outcomes of Asthma Control Test and expenditure.(CTRI/2020/02/023534) RESULTS: A total of 192 participants enrolled, 165 completed this study who were considered for final analysis. A significant difference (p < 0.001) was found between yoga and non-yoga exercise group at 13 weeks. Expenses were more in non-yoga exercise group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that yoga exercise with routine medical care reduces exacerbations and improves asthma control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:自杀意念和自杀未遂在青少年中引起了严重的公共卫生问题。以学校为基础的自杀预防计划是解决这一问题的关键工具。然而,需要更多的研究来评估它们的有效性,可接受性,和安全。作为回应,HEYLiFE自杀预防计划旨在加强寻求帮助,减少对自杀同伴的污名,减少自杀的危险因素。本文介绍了德国中学HEYLiFE计划的评估结果。
    方法:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,测量仅干预组的短期组内效应和6个月随访时的中期效应。学校被随机分配到干预组或对照组(无盲法)。我们招募了年龄≥12岁的学生。主要结果是关于自杀的知识,对自杀的态度,对一个有自杀倾向的同伴的污名,寻求帮助的意图和行为,自杀的危险因素。采用线性混合模型和广义线性混合模型对数据进行分析。
    结果:共有N=745名学生参加(n=353干预组,n=392对照组)。我们观察到对知识的短期影响,对自杀的态度和对自杀同伴的恐惧。出乎意料的是,该计划还导致了对社交距离的渴望增加,并减少了对自杀同伴的亲社会情绪。该计划的中期效果是完全有利的,导致对寻求帮助的态度增强,同时防止自杀风险因素急剧增加和社会距离增加。该计划对女性和13岁以上的学生产生了更有利的影响。这个项目受到了学生们的欢迎,未报告严重不良事件.
    结论:这些发现证明了HEYLiFE通用自杀预防计划在解决青少年中期自杀意念和自杀未遂相关变量方面的有效性。将来应该解决对污名的短期负面影响和对男性的更多负面影响。未来的评估研究应检查其对自杀的影响及其在高危人群中的有效性。
    背景:该研究已在德国临床试验注册中进行了预注册(注册编号:DRKS00017045;注册日期:02/04/2019)。
    Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts present a serious public health concern among adolescents and young adults. School-based suicide prevention programs are a key tool for addressing this problem. However, more research is necessary to assess their effectiveness, acceptability, and safety. In response, the HEYLiFE suicide prevention program was developed to enhance help-seeking, reduce stigma towards suicidal peers and diminish risk factors for suicidality. This article presents the evaluation findings of the HEYLiFE program in German secondary schools.
    We conducted a randomized-controlled trial measuring short-term pre-post within-group effects in the intervention group only and mid-term effects at 6-months-follow-up compared to a waitlist-control group. Schools were assigned randomly to the intervention or control group (no blinding). We recruited students ≥12 years of age. Primary outcomes were knowledge about suicidality, attitudes towards suicidality, stigma towards a suicidal peer, help-seeking intentions and behaviours, risk factors for suicidality. The data was analysed with linear mixed models and generalized linear mixed models.
    A total of N = 745 students participated (n = 353 intervention group, n = 392 control group). We observed favourable short-term effects on knowledge, attitudes towards suicidality and fear towards a suicidal peer. Unexpectedly, the program also led to an increase in desire for social distance and a decrease in prosocial emotions towards a suicidal peer. The mid-term effects of the program were exclusively favourable, resulting in enhanced attitudes towards help-seeking while protecting from a sharper rise in risk-factors for suicidality and from an increase in social distance. The program had more favourable effects on females and on students aged >13 years. The program was well-received by the students, and no serious adverse events were reported.
    These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the HEYLiFE universal suicide prevention program in addressing variables associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among adolescents on the mid-term. The short-term negative effects on stigma and more negative effects on males should be addressed in the future. Future evaluation studies should examine its effects on suicidality and its effectiveness within populations at high risk.
    The study was preregistered in the German Clinical Trials Register (registration number: DRKS00017045; registration date: 02/04/2019).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于氯氮平耐药的精神分裂症(CRS)患者,尚无既定的治疗方法。与安慰剂相比,使用抗精神病药或其他物质的氯氮平增强策略有效,而电惊厥治疗(ECT)与常规治疗(TAU)相比有效,但与安慰剂(假ECT)相比无效。在目前的双盲随机对照试验中,我们比较了40名门诊患者接受了20次ECT(n=21)或假ECT(n=19)(年龄=37.40±9.62,男性=77.5%,病程=14.95±8.32年,平均总阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)=101.10±24.91),符合明确的CRS标准,包括基线氯氮平血浆水平≥350ng/mL。主要结果为PANSS总分降低≥50%;次要结果为PANSS分量表的得分。PANSS五因素维度,PANSS-6和卡尔加里抑郁量表(CDRS)。通过减少百分比分析治疗反应,线性混合模型和效果大小。在基线时,除了学校教育年限(作为协变量包括在内)外,两组均无差异。在端点,ECT组仅有1/19的完成者(5.26%)和假ECT组的0/17显示PANSS总评分降低≥50%.两组PANSS总分无显著差异(F=0.12;p=0.73),正(F=0.27,p=0.61),负(F=0.25,p=0.62),和一般精神病理学评分(F=0.01,p=0.94)以及所有PANSS五个因素,PANSS-6和CDRS。因此,本研究没有发现在CRS患者中ECT优于Sham-ECT的证据.未来有必要进行更大样本量的假ECT对照研究,以测试ECT对CRS患者的疗效。
    There is no established treatment for patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS). Clozapine augmentation strategies with antipsychotics or others substances are effective in comparison with placebo while and Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) showed to be effective in comparison with treatment as usual (TAU) but not with placebo (sham-ECT). In the present double- blind randomized controlled trial, we compared 40 outpatients who received 20 sessions of ECT (n = 21) or sham-ECT (n = 19) (age = 37.40 ± 9.62, males = 77.5 %, illness duration = 14.95 ± 8.32 years, mean total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) = 101.10 ± 24.91) who fulfilled well-defined CRS criteria including baseline clozapine plasma levels ≥350 ng/mL. The primary outcome was the ≥50 % PANSS Total Score reduction; secondary outcomes were the scores of the PANSS subscales, PANSS five-factor dimensions, PANSS-6 and the Calgary Depression Rating Scale (CDRS). Treatment response was analyzed by percentage reduction, Linear Mixed Models and effect sizes. At baseline both groups showed no differences except for years of school education (included as a covariate). At endpoint, only 1/19 of the completers (5.26 %) in the ECT group and 0/17 in the sham-ECT group showed a ≥50 % total PANSS score reduction. Both groups showed no significant differences of the total PANSS score (F = 0.12; p = 0.73), Positive (F = 0.27, p = 0.61), Negative (F = 0.25, p = 0.62), and General Psychopathology scores (F = 0.01, p = 0.94) as well for all PANSS five factors, the PANSS-6 and CDRS. Thus, the present study found no evidence that ECT is better than Sham-ECT in patients with CRS. Future sham-ECT controlled studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to test the efficacy of ECT for patients with CRS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号