Radiosurgery

放射外科
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对带有虹膜准直器的CyberknifeM6进行独立的GPU加速蒙特卡罗(MC)剂量验证,并评估Raytracing(TPS-RT)算法和蒙特卡罗(TPS-MC)算法在精确治疗计划系统(TPS)中的剂量计算精度。
    方法:将GPU加速的MC算法(ArcherQA-CK)集成到商业剂量验证系统中,ArcherQA,在CyberknifeM6系统中实施针对患者的质量保证。临床30例(头部10例,胸部有10例,本研究收集了10例腹部病例)。对于每种情况,三种不同的剂量计算方法(TPS-MC,TPS-RT和ArcherQA-CK)基于相同的治疗方案实施并相互比较。为了评估,对靶体积和危险器官(OAR)的三维全局伽马分析和剂量参数进行了对比分析。
    结果:对于2%/2毫米标准的伽马通过率,TPS-MC与TPS-MC的结果超过98.0%TPS-RT,TPS-MCvs.ArcherQA-CK和TPS-RTvs.头部病例中的ArcherQA-CK,TPS-MC的84.9%与TPS-RT,TPS-MC的98.0%与ArcherQA-CK和TPS-RT的83.3%与ArcherQA-CK在胸部病例中,TPS-MC的98.2%与TPS-RT,TPS-MC的99.4%与ArcherQA-CK和TPS-RT的94.5%与腹部病例中的ArcherQA-CK。对于胸部病例的计划目标体积(PTV)的剂量参数,TPS-RT与TPS-MC和ArcherQA-CKvs.TPS-MC有显著性差异(P<0.01),以及TPS-RT与TPS-MC和TPS-RTvs.ArcherQA-CK相似(P>0.05)。与TPS-MC相比,ArcherQA-CK的计算时间更短(1.66minvs.65.11分钟)。
    结论:我们提出的MC剂量引擎(ArcherQA-CK)与PrecisionTPS-MC算法具有高度的一致性,能快速识别TPS-RT算法对某些胸部病例的计算误差。ArcherQA-CK可以在临床实践中提供准确的患者特异性质量保证。
    OBJECTIVE: To apply an independent GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo (MC) dose verification for CyberKnife M6 with Iris collimator and evaluate the dose calculation accuracy of RayTracing (TPS-RT) algorithm and Monte Carlo (TPS-MC) algorithm in the Precision treatment planning system (TPS).
    METHODS: GPU-accelerated MC algorithm (ArcherQA-CK) was integrated into a commercial dose verification system, ArcherQA, to implement the patient-specific quality assurance in the CyberKnife M6 system. 30 clinical cases (10 cases in head, and 10 cases in chest, and 10 cases in abdomen) were collected in this study. For each case, three different dose calculation methods (TPS-MC, TPS-RT and ArcherQA-CK) were implemented based on the same treatment plan and compared with each other. For evaluation, the 3D global gamma analysis and dose parameters of the target volume and organs at risk (OARs) were analyzed comparatively.
    RESULTS: For gamma pass rates at the criterion of 2%/2 mm, the results were over 98.0% for TPS-MC vs.TPS-RT, TPS-MC vs. ArcherQA-CK and TPS-RT vs. ArcherQA-CK in head cases, 84.9% for TPS-MC vs.TPS-RT, 98.0% for TPS-MC vs. ArcherQA-CK and 83.3% for TPS-RT vs. ArcherQA-CK in chest cases, 98.2% for TPS-MC vs.TPS-RT, 99.4% for TPS-MC vs. ArcherQA-CK and 94.5% for TPS-RT vs. ArcherQA-CK in abdomen cases. For dose parameters of planning target volume (PTV) in chest cases, the deviations of TPS-RT vs. TPS-MC and ArcherQA-CK vs. TPS-MC had significant difference (P < 0.01), and the deviations of TPS-RT vs. TPS-MC and TPS-RT vs. ArcherQA-CK were similar (P > 0.05). ArcherQA-CK had less calculation time compared with TPS-MC (1.66 min vs. 65.11 min).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed MC dose engine (ArcherQA-CK) has a high degree of consistency with the Precision TPS-MC algorithm, which can quickly identify the calculation errors of TPS-RT algorithm for some chest cases. ArcherQA-CK can provide accurate patient-specific quality assurance in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:放疗(RT)与免疫检查点阻断(ICB)协同作用。肿瘤微环境中的CD1c(BDCA-1)/CD141(BDCA-3)髓样树突状细胞(myDC)在启动效应T细胞反应和对ICB的反应中是必不可少的。
    方法:在这项II期临床试验中,抗PD-1ICB预处理的寡转移患者(肿瘤无关者)接受了白细胞去除术,然后分离CD1c(BDCA-1)+/CD141(BDCA-3)+myDC.在低分割立体定向体RT(3×8Gy)之后,患者被随机分组(3:1).分别,在手臂A(立即治疗),肿瘤内(IT)ipilimumab(10mg)和avelumab(40mg)联合静脉(IV)pembrolizumab(200mg),然后IT注射myDC;随后,继续静脉注射派姆单抗和ITipilimumab/avelumab(q3W)。在B臂(当代控制臂)中,患者接受静脉注射pembrolizumab,有可能在进展中交叉。主要终点是1年无进展生存率(PFS)。次要终点是安全性,可行性,客观反应率,PFS,总生存率(OS)。
    结果:13例患者(A组10例,八种非小细胞肺癌,和五个黑色素瘤)被登记。两个病人交叉。A臂的一年PFS率为10%,B臂为0%。一名患者获得了稳定的疾病作为最佳反应。在B臂,一名患者获得了SD。中位PFS和OS分别为21.8周(A组)和24.9周(B组),和62.7对57.9周,分别。医源性气胸是唯一的3级治疗相关不良事件。
    结论:SBRT和派姆单抗联合或不联合ITavelumab/ipilimumab和ITmyDC在寡转移患者中是安全可行的,具有临床意义的肿瘤反应率。然而,该研究未能达到主要终点.
    背景:临床试验:NCT04571632(2020年8月9日)。
    2019-003668-32。注册日期:2019年12月17日,2021年3月1:6日,2022年2月2:4日。
    BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). CD1c(BDCA-1)+/CD141(BDCA-3)+ myeloid dendritic cells (myDC) in the tumor microenvironment are indispensable at initiating effector T-cell responses and response to ICB.
    METHODS: In this phase II clinical trial, anti-PD-1 ICB pretreated oligometastatic patients (tumor agnostic) underwent a leukapheresis followed by isolation of CD1c(BDCA-1)+/CD141(BDCA-3)+ myDC. Following hypofractionated stereotactic body RT (3 × 8 Gy), patients were randomized (3:1). Respectively, in arm A (immediate treatment), intratumoral (IT) ipilimumab (10 mg) and avelumab (40 mg) combined with intravenous (IV) pembrolizumab (200 mg) were administered followed by IT injection of myDC; subsequently, IV pembrolizumab and IT ipilimumab/avelumab were continued (q3W). In arm B (contemporary control arm), patients received IV pembrolizumab, with possibility to cross-over at progression. Primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival rate (PFS). Secondary endpoints were safety, feasibility, objective response rate, PFS, and overall survival (OS).
    RESULTS: Thirteen patients (10 in arm A, eight non-small cell lung cancer, and five melanoma) were enrolled. Two patients crossed over. One-year PFS rate was 10% in arm A and 0% in arm B. Two patients in arm A obtained a partial response, and one patient obtained a stable disease as best response. In arm B, one patient obtained a SD. Median PFS and OS were 21.8 weeks (arm A) versus 24.9 (arm B), and 62.7 versus 57.9 weeks, respectively. An iatrogenic pneumothorax was the only grade 3 treatment-related adverse event.
    CONCLUSIONS: SBRT and pembrolizumab with or without IT avelumab/ipilimumab and IT myDC in oligometastatic patients are safe and feasible with a clinically meaningful tumor response rate. However, the study failed to reach its primary endpoint.
    BACKGROUND: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04571632 (09 AUG 2020).
    UNASSIGNED: 2019-003668-32. Date of registration: 17 DEC 2019, amendment 1: 6 MAR 2021, amendment 2: 4 FEB 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估肢端肥大症的诊断特征,并分析其在三级护理环境中15年的管理结果。
    方法:描述性,队列,回顾性研究在阿加汗大学医院进行,卡拉奇,包括2005年1月至2019年12月根据生化和放射学证据诊断为肢端肥大症的两种性别的成年患者的数据.从医疗记录中检索数据。数据采用SPSS19进行分析。
    结果:在84名受试者中,男性54人(64.3%),女性30人(35.7%)。总体平均年龄为38.69±13.52岁。患者出现症状后5.43±4.3年,具有体细胞生长特征,如扩大的手和脚这是最常见的投诉81(96.4%)。在所有的病人中,73例(86.9%)接受了经蝶入路手术切除垂体腺瘤,11人(13.1%)选择退出手术方案。Further,9例(12.3%)患者在手术后6个月出现生化和放射学缓解。在其余64名(87.7%)患者中,38人(59.4%)接受了放射外科或放射治疗,15人(23.4%)接受了重复的经蝶手术,11人(17.2%)选择医疗。
    结论:大多数患者经蝶手术后未能达到缓解,这是治疗的第一线。放疗/重复手术通常是那些患有持续性疾病的人所采取的选择。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic features of acromegaly, and analyse its management outcomes over a 15-year period in a tertiary care setting.
    METHODS: The descriptive, cohort, retrospective study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised data of adult patients of either gender diagnosed with acromegaly based on biochemical and radiological evidence between January 2005 and December 2019. Data was retrieved from the medical records. Data was analysed using SPSS 19.
    RESULTS: Of the 84 subjects, 54(64.3%) were males and 30(35.7%) were female. The overall mean age was 38.69±13.52 years. The patients presented 5.43±4.3 years after the onset of symptoms, with somatic growth features, such as enlarged hands and feet which was the most common complaint 81(96.4%). Of all the patients, 73(86.9%) underwent trans-sphenoidal surgery for the removal of the pituitary adenoma, while 11(13.1%) opted out of the surgical option. Further, 9(12.3%) patients showed biochemical and radiological remission 6 months post-surgery. Out of the remaining 64(87.7%) patients, 38(59.4%) received radiosurgery or radiotherapy, 15(23.4%) underwent repeat trans-sphenoidal surgery, and 11(17.2%) chose medical treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Majority of patients failed to achieve remission after trans-sphenoidal surgery, which is the first line of treatment. Radiotherapy/repeat surgery was generally the options taken by those with persistent disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本范围综述提供了有关高剂量放射治疗(RT)对骨结构和功能影响的临床前和临床数据。
    方法:对相关问题进行了广泛的PubMed搜索。然后将数据合成为可用的相关体外综合总结,临床前和临床文献。
    结果:高剂量RT对细胞培养物的体外研究表明,骨骼原代细胞的活力和功能能力受到相当大的损害;破骨细胞,成骨细胞,和骨细胞。体内动物模型表明,高剂量RT诱导骨的显著形态变化,抑制骨骼修复损伤的能力,增加骨头的脆性.临床数据表明,随着时间的推移,骨骼受损的风险越来越大,比如骨折,高剂量RT后。
    结论:这些研究结果表明,单部分RT的安全剂量可能存在限制,必须考虑高剂量RT对患者的长期后果。
    OBJECTIVE: This scoping review presents the preclinical and clinical data on the effects of high-dose radiation therapy (RT) on bone structure and function.
    METHODS: An extensive PubMed search was performed for the relevant questions. The data were then synthesized into a comprehensive summary of the available relevant in-vitro, preclinical and clinical literature.
    RESULTS: In-vitro studies of high-dose RT on cell cultures show considerable damage in the viability and functional capacity of the primary cells of the bones; the osteoclasts, the osteoblasts, and the osteocytes. In-vivo animal models show that high-dose RT induces significant morphological changes to the bone, inhibits the ability of bone to repair damage, and increases the fragility of the bone. Clinical data show that there is an increasing risk over time of damage to the bone, such as fractures, after high-dose RT.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that there may be a limit to the safe dose for single-fraction RT, and the long-term consequences of high-dose RT for the patients must be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脑转移瘤(BM)的术前放射外科(SRS)旨在实现腔局部控制,与术后SRS相比,软脑膜复发(LMD)减少,并且没有额外的放射性坏死。我们介绍了在神经外科切除脑转移瘤(PREOP-1)之前进行基于直线加速器的立体定向放射外科(SRS)的前瞻性可行性试验的最终结果。
    合格标准包括用于选择性切除的直径最大为4cm的BM。主要终点是在预期的大体肿瘤切除之前在所有患者中提供基于直线加速器的术前SRS的可行性。次要终点包括LMD率,局部控制和总体生存率。探索性终点是免疫学和增殖标志物的表达水平。
    招募了13名中位年龄65岁(范围41-77)的患者。12例(92%)患者接受术前放射外科和转移瘤切除术,1例患者直接手术并接受术后SRS,因此未达到主要终点.转诊与术前SRS的中位时间为6.5个工作日(1-10),从SRS到神经外科手术的中位时间为1天(0-5)。中位处方剂量为16Gy(14-19),中位计划目标体积为12.7cm3(5.9-26.1)。5例患者在术前SRS后完成了12个月的随访,无局部复发或软脑膜疾病。接受术后FSRT的患者在六个月后发展为LMD。有一种短暂的毒性(2级脱发),9名患者死于颅外原因。患者在6个月时报告了运动无力的显着改善(P=0.04)。没有观察到标记表达变化的模式。
    在没有颅内压升高的大型脑转移患者中,基于直线加速器的术前SRS在12/13例患者中是可行的,在12/12例患者中是安全的,没有任何手术延迟或颅内并发症.
    UNASSIGNED: Preoperative radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases (BM) aims to achieve cavity local control with a reduction in leptomeningeal relapse (LMD) and without additional radionecrosis compared to postoperative SRS. We present the final results of a prospective feasibility trial of linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) prior to neurosurgical resection of a brain metastasis (PREOP-1).
    UNASSIGNED: Eligibility criteria included a BM up to 4 cm in diameter for elective resection. The primary endpoint was the feasibility of delivering linac-based preoperative SRS in all patients prior to anticipated gross tumour resection. Secondary endpoints included rates of LMD, local control and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints were the level of expression of immunological and proliferative markers.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirteen patients of median age 65 years (range 41-77) were recruited. Twelve patients (92 %) received preoperative radiosurgery and metastasectomy and one patient went directly to surgery and received postoperative SRS, thus the primary endpoint was not met. The median time between referral and preoperative SRS was 6.5 working days (1-10) and from SRS to neurosurgery was 1 day (0-5). The median prescribed dose was 16 Gy (14-19) to a median planning target volume of 12.7 cm3 (5.9-26.1). Five patients completed 12-month follow-up after preoperative SRS without local recurrence or leptomeningeal disease. The patient who received postoperative FSRT developed LMD after six months. There was one transient toxicity (grade 2 alopecia) and nine patients have died from extracranial causes. Patients reported significant improvement in motor weakness at 6 months (P = 0.04). No pattern in changes of marker expression was observed.
    UNASSIGNED: In patients with large brain metastasis without raised intracranial pressure, linac-based preoperative SRS was feasible in 12/13 patients and safe in 12/12 patients without any surgical delay or intracranial complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:总结我们使用自动束保持(ABH)技术进行全身前列腺立体定向身体放射治疗(SBRT)的经验,并评估10毫米(mm)直径的ABH耐受性。方法:分析了2018年1月3日至2021年3月使用ABH技术治疗的32例患者(160个分数)。治疗期间,每20度机架旋转获取kV图像,以可视化前列腺内的3-4个金基准以跟踪目标运动。如果基准中心落在公差圆(直径=10mm)之外,光束自动关闭重新成像和重新定位。记录了波束保持的数量和沙发平移运动的幅度。通过移动计划的等中心来计算与帧内运动的剂量学差异。主要结果:沙发垂直运动幅度(平均值±SD),纵向和横向分别为-0.7±2.5、1.4±2.9和-0.1±0.9mm,分别。对于大多数馏分(77.5%),没有必要纠正。需要一个的分数的数量,两个,或三次修正为15.6%,5.6%和1.3%,分别。在49项更正中,主要在垂直(31%)和纵向(39%)方向观察到大于3mm的沙发移位;在2%和6%的病例中,相应的沙发移位大于5mm.剂量测定,临床目标体积(CTV)的100%覆盖率下降不到2%(-1±2%),而PTV的覆盖率下降不到10%(-10±6%)。膀胱剂量,肠和尿道趋于增加(膀胱:ΔD10%:184±466cGy,ΔD40%:139±241cGy,肠道:ΔD1cm3:54±129cGy;ΔD5cm3:44±116cGy,尿道:ΔD0.03cm3:1±1%)。直肠剂量趋于减少(直肠:ΔD1cm3:-206±564cGy,ΔD10%:-97±426cGy;ΔD20%:-50±251cGy)。意义:随着从常规分级强度调制放射治疗到SBRT的转变,用于局部前列腺癌治疗,必须确保剂量递送在空间上是准确的,以便适当覆盖目标体积并限制剂量到周围器官.可以使用对基准标记和ABH成像的触发成像来实现帧内运动监测,以允许针对过度运动的重新成像和重新定位。
    Objective: To summarize our institutional prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) experience using auto beam hold (ABH) technique for intrafractional prostate motion and assess ABH tolerance of 10-millimeter (mm) diameter.Approach: Thirty-two patients (160 fractions) treated using ABH technique between 01/2018 and 03/2021 were analyzed. During treatment, kV images were acquired every 20-degree gantry rotation to visualize 3-4 gold fiducials within prostate to track target motion. If the fiducial center fell outside the tolerance circle (diameter = 10 mm), beam was automatically turned off for reimaging and repositioning. Number of beam holds and couch translational movement magnitudes were recorded. Dosimetric differences from intrafractional motion were calculated by shifting planned isocenter.Main Results: Couch movement magnitude (mean ± SD) in vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions were -0.7 ± 2.5, 1.4 ± 2.9 and -0.1 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. For most fractions (77.5%), no correction was necessary. Number of fractions requiring one, two, or three corrections were 15.6%, 5.6% and 1.3%, respectively. Of the 49 corrections, couch shifts greater than 3 mm were seen primarily in the vertical (31%) and longitudinal (39%) directions; corresponding couch shifts greater than 5 mm occurred in 2% and 6% of cases. Dosimetrically, 100% coverage decreased less than 2% for clinical target volume (CTV) (-1 ± 2%) and less than 10% for PTV (-10 ± 6%). Dose to bladder, bowel and urethra tended to increase (Bladder: ΔD10%:184 ± 466 cGy, ΔD40%:139 ± 241 cGy, Bowel: ΔD1 cm3:54 ± 129 cGy; ΔD5 cm3:44 ± 116 cGy, Urethra: ΔD0.03 cm3:1 ± 1%). Doses to the rectum tended to decrease (Rectum: ΔD1 cm3:-206 ± 564 cGy, ΔD10%:-97 ± 426 cGy; ΔD20%:-50 ± 251 cGy).Significance: With the transition from conventionally fractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy to SBRT for localized prostate cancer treatment, it is imperative to ensure that dose delivery is spatially accurate for appropriate coverage to target volumes and limiting dose to surrounding organs. Intrafractional motion monitoring can be achieved using triggered imaging to image fiducial markers and ABH to allow for reimaging and repositioning for excessive motion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随机对照试验数据支持在多达4个脑转移瘤(BMs)中使用立体定向放射外科(SRS)。我们提供来自大型单中心队列的数据,报告>10个BMs和>20个BMs亚组的生存率。总共包括1181名接受SRS的BMs患者。从SRS转诊时开始前瞻性地收集数据。使用Kaplan-Meier图和logrank测试比较各组之间的生存率。使用Cox比例风险模型进行多变量分析,以解释组特征的差异。1BM的中位生存率(n=379),2-4个弹道导弹(n=438),5-10个BM(n=236),和>10BMs(n=128)分别为12.49、10.22、10.68和10.09个月,分别。使用2-4个BM作为参考组,在我们的单变量(p=0.6882)或多变量分析(p=0.0564)中,>10个BMs的患者的生存率无显著差异.在我们的分组分析中,>20例BMs的中位生存期与2-4例BMs的中位生存期相当(10.09vs.10.22个月,p=0.3558)。这项研究为多转移患者的SRS现有文献提供了大量数据集,并支持越来越多的证据表明,应考虑使用>10个BMS的SRS。
    Randomised control trial data support the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in up to 4 brain metastases (BMs), with non-randomised prospective data complementing this for up to 10 BMs. There is debate in the neuro-oncology community as to the appropriateness of SRS in patients with >10 BMs. We present data from a large single-centre cohort, reporting survival in those with >10 BMs and in a >20 BMs subgroup. A total of 1181 patients receiving SRS for BMs were included. Data were collected prospectively from the time of SRS referral. Kaplan-Meier graphs and logrank tests were used to compare survival between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to account for differences in group characteristics. Median survival with 1 BM (n = 379), 2-4 BMs (n = 438), 5-10 BMs (n = 236), and >10 BMs (n = 128) was 12.49, 10.22, 10.68, and 10.09 months, respectively. Using 2-4 BMs as the reference group, survival was not significantly different in those with >10 BMs in either our univariable (p = 0.6882) or multivariable analysis (p = 0.0564). In our subgroup analyses, median survival for those with >20 BMs was comparable to those with 2-4 BMs (10.09 vs. 10.22 months, p = 0.3558). This study contributes a large dataset to the existing literature on SRS for those with multi-metastases and supports growing evidence that those with >10 BMs should be considered for SRS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一些前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)表现为囊性形态。众所周知,与手术治疗中的实体VS相比,这些囊性VS具有不同的风险特征。尽管如此,目前还没有一项直接的比较研究比较SRS和SURGERY在囊性VS中的有效性.这项回顾性双中心队列研究旨在分析在显微外科(SURGERY)和立体定向放射外科(SRS)的双中心研究中,囊性VS与实体VS的治疗。囊性形态定义为在介入前MRI中存在任何大小的T2高强度和钆对比剂阴性囊肿。通过确定匹配的SURGERY处理的固体VS和SRS处理的固体VS的亚组进行匹配的亚组分析。功能状态,然后比较介入后肿瘤体积大小。从2005年到2011年,在两个研究地点都接受了N=901例原发性和孤立性VS患者的治疗。其中,6%为囊性形态。囊性VS的发生率随肿瘤大小而增加:KoosI中的1.75%,KoosII中的4.07%,KoosIII中的4.84%,KoosIV发病率最高,为15.43%。与实体VS相比,囊性VS的分流依赖性明显更高(p=0.024),与实体VS相比,囊性VS患者的Charlson合并症指数(CCI)明显更差(p<0.001)。囊性VS的GTR率为87%,因此显着降低,与固体VS中的96%相比(p=0.037)。与匹配的实体VS相比,SRS后动态体积变化(减少和增加)的发生率在囊性VS中明显更常见(p=0.042)。囊性VS中SRS的肿瘤进展发生率为25%。当比较外科治疗的囊性与实性VS中的EOR时,GTR的肿瘤复发率为4%,显著低于STR的50%(p=0.042).囊性VS中的肿瘤控制优于外科手术,当高度切除级别治疗时,与SRS相比。与实性VS相比,囊性SRS的治疗反应较差。然而,当通过手术治疗囊性VS时,GTR的比率低于整体,和坚实的VS队列。在囊性VS中,患有相关术后面神经麻痹的患者人数显着增加,而不是唯一的囊性形态。囊性VS应在专门中心进行手术治疗。
    Some vestibular schwannoma (VS) show cystic morphology. It is known that these cystic VS bear different risk profiles compared to solid VS in surgical treatment. Still, there has not been a direct comparative study comparing both SRS and SURGERY effectiveness in cystic VS. This retrospective bi-center cohort study aims to analyze the management of cystic VS compared to solid VS in a dual center study with both microsurgery (SURGERY) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Cystic morphology was defined as presence of any T2-hyperintense and Gadolinium-contrast-negative cyst of any size in the pre-interventional MRI. A matched subgroup analysis was carried out by determining a subgroup of matched SURGERY-treated solid VS and SRS-treated solid VS. Functional status, and post-interventional tumor volume size was then compared. From 2005 to 2011, N = 901 patients with primary and solitary VS were treated in both study sites. Of these, 6% showed cystic morphology. The incidence of cystic VS increased with tumor size: 1.75% in Koos I, 4.07% in Koos II, 4.84% in Koos III, and the highest incidence with 15.43% in Koos IV. Shunt-Dependency was significantly more often in cystic VS compared to solid VS (p = 0.024) and patients with cystic VS presented with significantly worse Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) compared to solid VS (p < 0.001). The rate of GTR was 87% in cystic VS and therefore significantly lower, compared to 96% in solid VS (p = 0.037). The incidence of dynamic volume change (decrease and increase) after SRS was significantly more common in cystic VS compared to the matched solid VS (p = 0.042). The incidence of tumor progression with SRS in cystic VS was 25%. When comparing EOR in the SURGERY-treated cystic to solid VS, the rate for tumor recurrence was significantly lower in GTR with 4% compared to STR with 50% (p = 0.042). Tumor control in cystic VS is superior in SURGERY, when treated with a high extent of resection grade, compared to SRS. Therapeutic response of SRS was worse in cystic compared to solid VS. However, when cystic VS was treated surgically, the rate of GTR is lower compared to the overall, and solid VS cohort. The significantly higher number of patients with relevant post-operative facial palsy in cystic VS is accredited to the increased tumor size not its sole cystic morphology. Cystic VS should be surgically treated in specialized centers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:立体定向放射外科(SRS)和经皮甘油根切断术都是无法进行微血管减压术的患者治疗TN的绝佳选择。然而,之前的SRS对神经根切断术后疼痛结局的影响尚不清楚.
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了2011年至2022年在我们机构接受经皮神经根切断术的所有患者。仅考虑在SRS(SRS-神经根切开术)后接受经皮甘油根切开术或接受原发性甘油根切开术的患者。我们收集了基本的人口统计,临床,和每个患者的疼痛特征。此外,我们描述了疼痛表现和围手术期并发症。手术立即失败定义为手术后1周内出现TN疼痛症状,短期失败定义为手术后3个月内出现TN疼痛症状。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来评估病史SRS与经皮甘油根切断术后手术失败的关系。
    结果:在所有患者中,30人在甘油根切断术之前有SRS病史,而371人接受了初次经皮甘油根切断术。有SRS病史的患者更有可能认可V3疼痛症状,p=0.01。此外,有SRS病史的患者术前BNI疼痛评分较高,p=0.01。有SRS病史的患者更有可能认可术前麻木,p<0.0001。SRS的历史与立即失效独立相关[OR=5.44(2.06-13.8),p<0.001和短期失败的甘油根切断术[OR=2.41(1.07-5.53),p=0.03]。此外,发现年龄增加与甘油根切断术短期失败的几率较低相关[OR=0.98(0.97-1.00),p=0.01]结论:SRS病史可能会增加经皮甘油根切断术后立即和短期失败的风险。这些结果可能适用于不良手术候选人,需要多种无创/微创选择以有效控制疼痛的患者。
    BACKGROUND: Both stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and percutaneous glycerol rhizotomy are excellent options to treat TN in patients unable to proceed with microvascular decompression. However, the influence of prior SRS on pain outcomes following rhizotomy is not well understood.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing percutaneous rhizotomy at our institution from 2011 to 2022. Only patients undergoing percutaneous glycerol rhizotomy following SRS (SRS-rhizotomy) or those undergoing primary glycerol rhizotomy were considered. We collected basic demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics for each patient. Additionally, we characterized pain presentation and perioperative complications. Immediate failure of procedure was defined as presence of TN pain symptoms within 1-week of surgery, and short-term failure was defined as presence of TN pain symptoms within 3-months of surgery. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate the relationship of a history SRS and failure of procedure following percutaneous glycerol rhizotomy.
    RESULTS: Of all patients reviewed, 30 had a history of SRS prior to glycerol rhizotomy whereas 371 underwent primary percutaneous glycerol rhizotomy. Patients with a history of SRS were more likely to endorse V3 pain symptoms, p = 0.01. Additionally, patients with a history of SRS demonstrated higher preoperative BNI pain scores, p = 0.01. Patients with a history of SRS were more likely to endorse preoperative numbness, p < 0.0001. A history of SRS was independently associated with immediate failure [OR = 5.44 (2.06-13.8), p < 0.001] and short-term failure of glycerol rhizotomy [OR = 2.41 (1.07-5.53), p = 0.03]. Additionally, increasing age was found to be associated with lower odds of short-term failure of glycerol rhizotomy [OR = 0.98 (0.97-1.00), p = 0.01] CONCLUSIONS: A history of SRS may increase the risk of immediate and short-term failure following percutaneous glycerol rhizotomy. These results may be of use to patients who are poor surgical candidates and require multiple noninvasive/minimally invasive options to effectively manage their pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号