Over the past decades, extensive preclinical research has been conducted to develop vaccinations to protect against substance use disorder caused by opioids, nicotine, cocaine, and designer drugs. Morphine or fentanyl derivatives are small molecules, and these compounds are not immunogenic, but when conjugated as haptens to a carrier protein will elicit the production of antibodies capable of reacting specifically with the unconjugated hapten or its parent compound. The position of the attachment in opioid haptens to the carrier protein will influence the specificity of the antiserum produced in immunized animals with the hapten-carrier conjugate. Immunoassays for the determination of opioid drugs are based on the ability of drugs to inhibit the reaction between drug-specific antibodies and the corresponding drug-carrier conjugate or the corresponding labelled hapten. Pharmacological studies of the hapten-carrier conjugates resulted in the development of vaccines for treating opioid use disorders (OUDs). Immunotherapy for opioid addiction includes the induction of anti-drug vaccines which are composed of a hapten, a carrier protein, and adjuvants. In this review we survey the design of opioid haptens, the development of the opioid radioimmunoassay, and the results of immunotherapy for OUDs.

In Japan, the traditional method for measuring plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was radioimmunoassay (RIA), which had several challenges, including poor traceability of certified reference materials and reduced detection sensitivity at low concentrations. To overcome these issues, a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for PAC measurement was introduced in April 2021 and the Japan Endocrine Society published new guidelines for primary aldosteronism (PA). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the transition from RIA to CLEIA for PAC measurement on PA diagnosis. Data from 190 patients admitted to the Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, between April 2012 and March 2021 were analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with PA underwent adrenal venous sampling. The PAC measured by RIA (PAC(RIA)) was converted to the estimated PAC measured by CLEIA (ePAC(CLEIA)) using a conversion formula. The present study evaluated the discordance rates in diagnoses based on screening (SC), captopril challenge test (CCT), saline infusion test (SIT), and diagnosis of PA between results judged by PAC(RIA) according to the previous guidelines and those judged by ePAC(CLEIA) according to the new guidelines. The results revealed discordant diagnosis rates of 6.4% for SC and 10.1% for CCT, with no discordance for SIT. The discordant diagnosis rate for PA was 3.7%. Our study reveals the challenges in establishing appropriate diagnostic criteria for PA using PAC(CLEIA) and highlights the demand for further research on provisionally positive categories.

Orexin in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a neuropeptide synthesized by a cluster of neurons in the lateral hypothalamus. It mainly functions to maintain arousal, regulate feeding, and participate in reward mechanisms. Radioimmunoassay (RIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) can detect CSF orexin. At present, RIA is widely used but is limited by various conditions, which is not conducive to its widespread development. We aimed to determine whether ELISA can replace RIA in detecting orexin in CSF. We investigated the results of 20 patients with central disorders of hypersomnolence, including 11 with narcolepsy type 1, 2 with narcolepsy type 2, 5 with idiopathic hypersomnia, and 2 with other causes of somnolence. RIA and ELISA were used to detect CSF orexin, and P values <.05 were considered to be significant. In the narcolepsy and non-narcolepsy type 1 groups, there was no correlation between the RIA and ELISA results (P > .05). In the narcolepsy type 1 group, the ELISA and RIA results were significantly different (P < .05), but this was not observed in the non-narcolepsy type 1 group (P > .05). The accuracy of ELISA to detect CSF orexin was lower than that of RIA (P < .05). ELISA cannot replace RIA in the measurement of CSF orexin, and RIA is recommended as the first choice when narcolepsy is suspected.

暂无摘要。

The measurement evolution enabled more accurate evaluation of aldosterone production in hypertensive patients. However, the cut-off values for novel assays have been not sufficiently validated. The present study was undertaken to validate the novel chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for aldosterone in conjunction with other methods. Moreover, we also aimed to establish a new cut-off value for primary aldosteronism in the captopril challenge test using the novel assay. First, we collected 390 plasma samples, in which aldosterone levels measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry ranged between 0.18 and 1346 ng/dL. The novel chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay showed identical correlation of plasma aldosterone with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, in contrast to conventional radioimmunoassay. Further, we enrolled 299 and 39 patients with primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension, respectively. Plasma aldosterone concentrations measured using the novel assay were lower than those measured by radioimmunoassay, which resulted in decreased aldosterone-to-renin ratios. Subsequently, positive results of the captopril challenge test based on radioimmunoassay turned into \"negative\" based on the novel assay in 45% patients with primary aldosteronism, using the conventional cut-off value (aldosterone-to-renin activity ratio > 20 ng/dL per ng/mL/h). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that aldosterone-to-renin activity ratios > 8.2 ng/dL per ng/mL/h in the novel assay was compatible with the conventional diagnosis (sensitivity, 0.874; specificity, 0.980). Our study indicates the great measurement accuracy of the novel chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for aldosterone, and the importance of measurement-adjusted cut-offs in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism.

OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting tumor-specific PD-1/PD-L1 significantly improve the overall survival rate of patients with advanced cancer by reactivating the immune system to attack cancer cells. To explore their tumor killing effect, we used the radionuclide iodine-131 (131I) to label the anti-PD-L1 antibody Atezolizumab (131I-PD-L1 mAb).
METHODS: We prepared the radioimmunoassay molecular probe 131I-PD-L1 mAb by the chloramine-T method and evaluated its affinity using Lewis lung cancer (LLC) cells. The uptake of 131I-PD-L1 mAb by transplanted tumors was examined through SPECT and its in vivo distribution. We then compared the in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor efficacy of groups treated with control, PD-L1 mAb, 131I-PD-L1 mAb, and 131I-PD-L1 mAb + PD-L1 mAb combined treatment. We performed H&E staining to examine the changes in tumor, as well as the damage in major tissues and organs caused by potential side effects. The anti-tumor mechanism of 131I-PD-L1 mAb was analyzed by Western blot, RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC).
RESULTS: 131I-PD-L1 mAb was highly stable and specific, and easily penetrated into tumor. 131I-PD-L1 mAb suppressed cancer cell proliferation in vitro, and inhibited tumor growth in vivo by inducing ferroptosis, thus prolonging the survival of experimental animals while demonstrating biological safety.
CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, our study suggested that 131I-PD-L1 mAb affected the expression of tumor-related factors through β-rays and thus promoted ferroptosis in tumor. Combined treatment showed better anti-tumor effect compared to single ICI treatment.

Oxytocin (OT) is a peptide hormone synthesized in the hypothalamus and released into systemic circulation or other areas of the brain. Its physiological roles include action as a hormone with stimulation of uterine contractions and that as a neuromodulator with involvement in social behaviors and regulation of mood. Its small size and low levels within biological matrices make it challenging to accurately measure. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the specificity of the antibody, sensitivity, and reproducibility of the Phoenix Pharmaceuticals (PP) OT radioimmunoassay (RIA) for use in human urine, serum, and saliva. Specificity of the antibody was assessed by high pressure liquid chromatography with ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) separation and assay of the fractions. Immunoreactivity was evaluated using the percent OT bound, and the fraction retention times were compared to the retention time of an intact OT standard to determine which fractions contained OT in the extracted samples. Reproducibility was assessed by running replicates of pools of each biomatrix over several assays. Sensitivity was assessed by repeated measurement of physiologically relevant low-concentration specimens. In all tested specimens the greatest reactivity in assay corresponded to the same fraction(s) as the OT standard. Only minimal reactivity was found in the other fractions, suggesting that in an unfractionated sample the antibody reacts mostly with intact OT. Reproducibility was acceptable for all specimens and the coefficient of variation (CV) ranged from 3.72 to 8.04% and 5.89-12.8%, for intra and inter-assay, respectively. The limits of quantitation (LOQ) were sufficient for measurement of normal values in urine (0.643 & 1.43 pg/mL), serum (1.90 pg/mL), and saliva pools (0.485 & 4.42 pg/mL). In conclusion, the PP OT RIA is specific and sensitive enough for reproducible measurement of intact OT in human peripheral biological matrices.

Plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was routinely measured using radioimmunoassay (RIA); however, the RIA kit was discontinued in March 2021 in Japan. This study examined PAC conversion in adrenal venous sampling (AVS) and AVS criteria when measured using chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). PAC of 415 adrenal venous blood samples from AVS (including segmental AVS) of 63 patients with primary aldosteronism was measured using RIA (Spac-S aldosterone kit; Fujirebio Inc.) and CLEIA (Lumipulse Presto Aldosterone; Fujirebio Inc.). PAC of 70 AVS samples was also measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS, ASKA Pharma Medical Co., Ltd.). PAC conversion formulas were determined for each AVS sample assay. PAC measured using CLEIA was significantly correlated with that measured using RIA (correlation coefficient = 0.971). The PAC conversion formula was PAC (CLEIA) = PAC (RIA) × 0.772 - 1,199 pg/mL. The PAC of 14,000 pg/mL in RIA was equivalent to 9,613 pg/mL in CLEIA. PAC measured using CLEIA was also correlated with that measured using LC-MS/MS, and the PAC conversion formula was PAC (CLEIA, pg/mL) = 0.97 × PAC (LC-MS/MS, pg/mL) + 211. The inter-assay coefficient of variability (CV) was 1.1-1.3% and intra-assay CV was 1.0-1.7%, measured using CLEIA. The PAC conversion formula for AVS samples was obtained using CLEIA and RIA, and the conversion formula was different from that for peripheral blood. PAC values measured by CLEIA showed preferable accuracy and high concordance with those measured by LC-MS/MS, even in AVS samples. The study outcomes are useful for interpreting AVS results using non-RIA measurement methods.

To compare 3 different methods for the detection of antibodies against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK).
MuSK antibody testing was performed in 237 serum samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and fixed cell-based assay (f-CBA-IFA). One hundred and forty-eight (148) of the sera had previously been tested by RIA during clinical testing: 47 MuSK antibody positive and 101 MuSK antibody negative. Of the MuSK RIA negative antibodies, 46 tested positive for other neural antibodies. Additionally, 89 sera were subsequently tested by all three methods: 70 healthy controls and 19 sera positive for other neural antibodies.
Qualitative inter-assay agreement based on tiered RIA values was 100% for results of 1.00 nmol/L or greater by both methods; 81% and 94% for results between 0.21 and 0.99 nmol/L by ELISA and f-CBA-IFA, respectively; and 0% for results of 0.04-0.20 nmol/L by both methods. Negative results showed 100% agreement between RIA and both ELISA and f-CBA-IFA (n = 55). None of the controls positive for other neural autoantibodies or healthy controls were positive in any assay.
Overall, excellent agreement was observed between the 3 methods used to detect antibodies against MuSK. Both the f-CBA-IFA and ELISA performed comparably to RIA and exhibited excellent overall accuracy for MuSK IgG detection, with the f-CBA-IFA demonstrating higher agreement between positive samples with the RIA than the ELISA without identifying false positives in the control samples. Advantages of non-radioactive methods for the detection of MuSK antibodies include reduced handling and disposal of hazardous materials, potential for automation and the reagents having a longer shelf-life, reducing costs associated with both workflow and lot validations. Thus, commercially available ELISA and transfected cell-based assays are viable alternatives to the traditional radioactive assay used for serologic determination of MuSK IgG.

The dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) is the current gold standard biomarker of the timing of the central circadian clock in humans and is often assessed from saliva samples. To date, only one commercially available salivary melatonin assay is considered accurate at the low daytime levels required to accurately detect the DLMO (Novolytix RIA RK-DSM2). The aim of this study was to conduct the first independent evaluation of a newly improved enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Novolytix MLTN-96) and compare it with the recommended radioimmunoassay (RIA)-both in terms of melatonin concentrations and derived DLMOs. Twenty participants (15 females, 18-59 years old) provided saliva samples every 30 min in dim light starting 6 h before their habitual bedtime, yielding a total of 260 saliva samples. Both the RIA and ELISA yielded daytime melatonin concentrations <2 pg/mL, indicating adequate accuracy to detect the DLMO. The melatonin concentrations from the two assays were highly correlated (r = .94, p < .001), although the RIA yielded lower levels of melatonin concentration than the ELISA, on average by 0.70 pg/mL (p = .006). Seventeen DLMOs were calculated from the melatonin profiles and the DLMOs from both assays were not statistically different (p = .36) and were highly correlated (r = .97, p < .001). Two DLMOs derived from the RIA occurred more than 30 min earlier than the DLMO derived from the ELISA. These results indicate that the new Novolytix ELISA is an appropriate assay to use if the Novolytix RIA is not feasible or available.