BACKGROUND: COPD has become more prevalent among women, revealing a specific feminine phenotype. Women experience greater dyspnea and a more impaired quality of life. The main objective of this study was to assess the effect of gender on dyspnea during a pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP).
METHODS: Retrospective study including COPD patients having participated in PRPs. The following data were analyzed according to gender before and after a PRP: dyspnea, quality of life, anxiety and depression, exercise capacity, muscle function (quadriceps and inspiratory muscles).
RESULTS: More than 500 patients (252 men and 252 women) were included. We did not find a significant effect of gender on the evolution of dyspnea, anxiety or depressive disorders, exercise capacity, inspiratory muscle strength, or overall quality of life score. That said, we found a possible effect on the sub-scores of the quality of life questionnaire, and regarding quadriceps strength. All criteria improved during the program in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: During a PRP, gender does not impact the evolution of dyspnea. While women may nonetheless benefit to a greater extent in terms of quality of life sub-scores (impact, activities, symptoms) and quadriceps strength, these results still require confirmation.

The role of the physiotherapist in the assessment and management of dyspnea. Dyspnea is the most common symptom in cardio-respiratory diseases. Recently improved comprehension of dyspnea mechanisms have underlined the need for three-faceted assessment. The three key aspects correspond to the \"breathing, thinking, functioning\" clinical model, which proposes a multidimensional - respiratory, emotional and functional - approach. Before initiating treatment, it is essential for several reasons to assess each specific case, determining the type of dyspnea affecting the patient, appraising the impact of shortness of breath, and estimating the effectiveness of the treatment applied. The physiotherapist has a major role to assume in the care of dyspneic patients, not only in assessment followed by treatment but also as a major collaborator in a multidisciplinary team, especially with regard to pulmonary rehabilitation. The aim of this review is to inventory the existing assessment tools and the possible physiotherapies for dyspnea, using a holistic approach designed to facilitate the choice of techniques and to improve quality of care by fully addressing the patient\'s needs.

BACKGROUND: While pulmonary rehabilitation is registered in the COPD management guidelines with a high level of evidence, it is not adequately performed in accordance with patients\' needs. Advanced nurse practitioners (IPA, in French) provide expertise enabling improved access and enhanced implementation of rehabilitation programs. Based on foreign experience, the present study has been designed to propose avenues for the development of more effective practices in France.
METHODS: Using Google Scholar and Pubmed databases, a search algorithm was used to identify international publications from 2003 to 2022 dealing with the role of nurse practitioners (IP, in French) in respiratory rehabilitation for COPD patients.
RESULTS: Fourteen articles, mainly from English-speaking countries, were analysed. The involvement of nurse practitioners in pulmonary rehabilitation is very broad-based, their main missions being initial disease assessment, therapeutic education, improved professional sensitivity and patient follow-up at all stages of a rehabilitation program.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurse practitioners have a major role in the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation programs for COPD patients. Their involvement at different levels can improve access and success of programs over time.

BACKGROUND: Exacerbations are major events in the course and prognosis of COPD. Following acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), functional recovery is not always complete and the risk of relapse is high, requiring proactive management.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary and extrapulmonary consequences of AECOPD require comprehensive and individualized care. Muscle function and nutritional status are key elements to target. Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective strategy designed to deal with these aspects and to facilitate a comprehensive, patient-centered approach.
CONCLUSIONS: Access to pulmonary rehabilitation programs is limited, and existing barriers need to be more precisely identified as a first step toward their possible removal. Long-term exercise maintenance strategies likewise warrant further study.
CONCLUSIONS: The physiotherapist has a major role to assume in per- and post-exacerbation management of people with COPD; it is up to him to assess the patient and to put into place an individualized pulmonary rehabilitation program; it is also up to him to provide long-term support, helping the patient to maintain an active lifestyle while coping with a chronic pathology.

BACKGROUND: Active body-mind movement therapies are performed with the aim of engaging the person in taking care of their health. They are represented by Qi gong, Tai Chi and yoga. They all include postures, breathing exercises and meditation. When utilized together with traditional medicine, they allow a more holistic view of the patient, thereby facilitating improved quality of life.
BACKGROUND: While these therapies have been studied in cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and compared to routine care or walking-type physical activity, they have seldom been studied in the context of respiratory rehabilitation, even though their effects on quality of life and functional capacity are clinically significant, while some comorbidities may likewise be positively impacted.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of these therapies should be extended to GOLD grade 1 and 4 patients while studying their effects on the occurrence of bronchial exacerbations. The value of their performance as a replacement for - or complement to - respiratory rehabilitation remains to be evaluated and confirmed.
CONCLUSIONS: These therapies can be used to facilitate behavior change from a preventive and therapeutic standpoint, thereby attenuating the impact of aggravating factors in respiratory disease.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity in daily life (PA) in patients with chronic respiratory disease is reduced. Inactivity is associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation and mortality. Even though pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is associated with improved quality of life (fewer symptoms, greater exercise capacity…), its benefits with regard to PA remain unclear.
BACKGROUND: For each patient, it is important during a respiratory rehabilitation (RR) programme to evaluate PA and its determinants. Only programs aimed at improved self-management and including educational therapy (ETP) have shown a short-term increase of PA following PR. Several studies have reported better long-term adherence when professionals help the patient to construct a personalised PA project, with regular follow-up and an array of activities (local facilities, urban walking…) chosen by the patient and adapted to the environment.
CONCLUSIONS: The ongoing SARS-CoV2 pandemic has highlighted the importance of human interaction, even at a distance using information and communication technologies, as a means of sustaining patient motivation. Future controlled and randomized studies should focus on the long-term impact on PA of innovative strategies in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. Moreover, it would be interesting to quantify the socioeconomic impact as well as the sustainable health benefits of the different strategies outlined in this review.
CONCLUSIONS: It is not possible to offer a single solution likely to maintain RR benefits over an extended lapse of time. However, follow-up with an ETP and/or regular and customized support during the post-training period facilitates the long-term adoption of active behavior.

In ancient times Hippocrates described a disease, the 3rd phthisis, which seems to correspond to COPD and is mainly treated by walking, gradually increasing the number of steps until reaching 10,000 steps a day at the end of the initial period of treatment. The recent era began in the second half of the 20th century and ended in 2015, with an unusual Cochrane Library editorial in which it was stated that the accumulated evidence (statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in clinical signs, tolerance to exercise, quality of life, days hospitalization…) on the effects of rehabilitation programs suffice to suspend research on the subject and to justify focus on new elements in the programs. It is essential, in fact, to establish uniform practical recommendations for the prescription of routine rehabilitation (number and duration of physical activity sessions, therapeutic education, re-training intensity…). In addition, studies should be carried out on new practices: community or home rehabilitation, long-term rehabilitation, tele-rehabilitation.

Physical activity is reduced in people with asthma compared to the general population, especially in situations where patients have uncontrolled asthma symptoms, persistent airflow obstruction and other long-term medical problems, in particular obesity and anxiety. Exertional dyspnea, which is of multifactorial origin, is the main cause of reduced physical activity reduction and draws patients into a vicious circle further impairing quality of life and asthma control. Both the resumption of a regular physical activity, integrated into daily life, adapted to patients\' needs and wishes as well as physical and environmental possibilities for mild to moderate asthmatics, and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for severe and/or uncontrolled asthmatics, improve control of asthma, dyspnea, exercise tolerance, quality of life, anxiety, depression and reduce exacerbations. A motivational interview to promote a regular programme of physical activity in mild to moderate asthma (steps 1 to 3) should be offered by all health professionals in the patient care pathway, within the more general framework of therapeutic education. The medical prescription of physical activities, listed in the Public Health Code for patients with long-term diseases, and pulmonary rehabilitation should be performed more often by specialists or the attending physician. Pulmonary rehabilitation addresses the needs of severe asthma patients (steps 4 and 5), and of any asthmatic patient with poorly controlled disease and/or requiring hospitalized for acute exacerbations, regardless of the level of airflow obstruction, and/or with associated comorbidities, and before prescribing biological therapies.

The physiotherapist\'s practice involves taking care of patients with various chronic pathologies: neurological, rheumatic, respiratory, etc. The physiotherapist must carry out an educational approach in these patients, at the same time as the physical work of re-education, in order to induce behavioural changes beneficial to their physical and psychological health and to empower them in the best possible way in the management of their pathology.

Despite effectiveness and clear international guidelines, respiratory rehabilitation remains underutilized: less than 15% of suitable patients in France and worldwide receive this treatment. The factors of this lack of referral and uptake have been studied and are not limited to a problem of quantitative adequacy of supply and demand. The lack of knowledge of health professionals, patients, payers, heterogeneous programs which does not necessary correspond to the needs of the patient (modalities, geography, duration), the lack of trained and available professionals, the profile of patients and prescribers and the quality of the programs are identified as potentially hindering the completion of a rehabilitation program. It is essential to analyze these barriers and to find solutions to the greatest number of respiratory patients can benefit optimal healthcare and integrate into a coherent care planning.