Pulmonologists

肺科医师
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    考虑到印度慢性呼吸道疾病(CRD)的巨大负担,需要当地相关的肺康复(PR)服务。这项横断面调查旨在探索人们的兴趣,浦那市公关的各种利益相关者之间的需求和挑战,印度。在浦那一家多专科医院的门诊呼吸内科,印度,403名符合条件的CRD人士被邀请参与调查,其中370人(92%)回应并同意参与。(220名男性,平均±SD年龄56±15岁)。在370人中,有323人(87%)热衷于参加公关。在多重选择问题中,倾向于纸质手册,基于家庭(70%)和基于网络(84%)的计划。207个医疗保健提供者(HCP),包括医生,参与浦那市CRD患者护理的肺科医师和物理治疗师应邀参加了调查。在207人中,(80%)的HCP认为PR是一种有效的管理策略,并强调缺乏有关PR的信息,需要更好地了解PR(48%)及其转诊过程。接受调查的利益相关者已经准备好接受公关,围绕公关的进一步知识确定具体需求,交付方式,和推荐流程,这可能会促进印度医疗保健环境中相关公关计划的发展。
    Considering a huge burden of chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) in India, there is a need for locally relevant Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) services. This cross-sectional survey was aimed to explore the interest, needs and challenges among various stakeholders for PR in Pune city, India. At the outpatient respiratory medicine department of a multi-speciality hospital in Pune, India, 403 eligible people with CRDs were invited to participate in the survey, of which 370 (92%) responded and agreed to participate. (220 males, mean ± SD age 56 ± 15 years). Out of the 370, 323 (87%) people with CRDs were keen to attend PR. In a multiple selection question, there was inclination towards paper-based manuals home-based (70%) and web-based (84%) programs. 207 healthcare providers (HCPs), including physicians, pulmonologists and physiotherapists involved in the care of people living with CRDs across Pune city were invited to participate in the survey. Out of the 207, (80%) of the HCPs believed that PR was an effective management strategy and highlighted the lack of information on PR and need for better understanding of PR (48%) and its referral process. The surveyed stakeholders are ready to take up PR, identifying specific needs around further knowledge of PR, modes of delivery, and referral processes, that could potentially feed the development of relevant PR programs in the Indian healthcare settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿科肺科医师具有专业知识,可以在影响儿童呼吸健康的许多领域成为倡导者。本文概述了与健康公平相关的选定倡导主题,并提供了可以在临床中改善儿童呼吸健康的关键示例。
    Pediatric pulmonologists have the expertise to be advocates in many areas that affect the respiratory health of children. This article provides an overview of selected advocacy topics related to health equity and provides key examples that can improve child respiratory health in the clinical encounter and beyond.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:间质性肺病是系统性硬化症患者死亡的主要原因。目前,在筛查方面缺乏共识,重新筛选,诊断,以及哥伦比亚与系统性硬化症(SSc-ILD)相关的间质性肺病的随访实践。
    方法:进行了一项针对SSc-ILD患者临床实践的结构化调查。从2023年3月至2023年5月,哥伦比亚新科和西鲁加·德·托拉克斯协会(Asoneumocito)和哥伦比亚新科协会(Asoreuma)的成员应邀参加。
    结果:我们调查了51名肺科医师和44名风湿病医师。总的来说,51.6%的人报告有机会参加ILD的多学科小组讨论。在95名参与者中,一旦确定了系统性硬化症的诊断,78.9%的人会常规进行胸部高分辨率计算机断层扫描。风湿病学家(84.1%)比肺科医师(74.5%)更频繁。如果基线图像为阴性,大约一半的参与者将每年用计算机断层扫描对患者进行重新筛查(56.8%)。肺活量测定(81.1%),肺对一氧化碳的扩散能力(80.0%),6分钟步行测试(55.8%)是诊断为系统性硬化症时最常见的测试。随访期间,参与者通常会考虑每6个月重复一次肺功能检查.
    结论:肺科医师和风湿病医师对SSc-ILD的筛查率很高。诊断和随访的决策在专业之间是相似的,但是它们的频率和适应症有所不同。需要进一步的研究来评估如何在不同的环境中调整评估SSc-ILD的建议。
    BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease is a leading cause of mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding screening, rescreening, diagnosis, and follow-up practices in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD) in Colombia.
    METHODS: A structured survey focused on clinical practices in patients with SSc-ILD was conducted. Members of the Asociación Colombiana de Neumología y Cirugía de Tórax (Asoneumocito) and the Asociación Colombiana de Reumatología (Asoreuma) were invited to participate from March 2023 to May 2023.
    RESULTS: We surveyed 51 pulmonologists and 44 rheumatologists. Overall, 51.6% reported having access to multidisciplinary team discussion in ILD. Among the 95 participants, 78.9% would routinely perform a high-resolution computed tomography scan of the chest once a diagnosis of systemic sclerosis was established. This practice is more frequent among rheumatologists (84.1%) than among pulmonologists (74.5%). Approximately half of the participants would rescreen patients annually with computed tomography scan (56.8%) if baseline images were negative. Spirometry (81.1%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (80.0%), and 6-min walk test (55.8%) were the most frequently performed tests upon diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. During follow-up, participants would consider repeating pulmonary function tests mostly every 6 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: Screening of SSc-ILD is high among pulmonologists and rheumatologists. Decision-making on diagnosis and follow-up is similar between specialties, but there are variations in their frequency and indications. Further research is needed to evaluate how to adapt recommendations for assessing SSc-ILD in different settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)构成了巨大的全球健康负担,尽管在很大程度上是可以预防和治疗的。尽管有指南,COPD护理在许多情况下仍然欠佳,包括高收入国家(HIC)和中上收入国家(UMICs),具有多种诊断和管理方法。这项研究旨在确定六个国家(澳大利亚,西班牙,台湾,阿根廷,墨西哥,和俄罗斯)为改善护理的全球政策举措提供信息。
    为每个国家绘制了COPD护理路径,并补充了流行病学,健康-经济,和临床数据来自有针对性的文献综述。对17名呼吸护理临床医生进行了半结构化访谈,以进一步验证路径并确定关键障碍。主题内容分析用于生成主题。
    六个主题在大多数HIC和UMIC中很常见:“COPD诊断的挑战”,“加强初级保健的作用”,“支离破碎的医疗系统和协调挑战”,“COPD急性加重的管理不足”,“获得专门护理的机会有限”和,“资金不足和过载的医疗保健系统的影响”。一个主题,“保险范围和报销挑战”,与UMICs更相关。HIC和UMIC在患者和医疗保健提供者的意识方面有所不同,初级保健参与,肺活量测定接入,和专业护理的可用性。两者都面临着医疗保健碎片化的问题,指导方针坚持,和COPD急性加重管理。此外,UMICs还努力应对资源限制和医疗保健基础设施挑战。
    COPD护理的许多挑战在HIC和UMIC中都是相同的,强调了这些问题的普遍性。虽然特定国家的问题需要定制的解决方案,实施支持各国有效管理COPD的全球呼吸策略还有尚未开发的可能性.除了医疗保健系统级别的举措,迫切需要对COPD进行政治优先排序,以分配其所需的基本资源.
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses a significant global health burden despite being largely preventable and treatable. Despite the availability of guidelines, COPD care remains suboptimal in many settings, including high-income countries (HICs) and upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), with varied approaches to diagnosis and management. This study aimed to identify common and unique barriers to COPD care across six countries (Australia, Spain, Taiwan, Argentina, Mexico, and Russia) to inform global policy initiatives for improved care.
    UNASSIGNED: COPD care pathways were mapped for each country and supplemented with epidemiological, health-economic, and clinical data from a targeted literature review. Semi-structured interviews with 17 respiratory care clinicians were used to further validate the pathways and identify key barriers. Thematic content analysis was used to generate the themes.
    UNASSIGNED: Six themes were common in most HICs and UMICs: \"Challenges in COPD diagnosis\", \"Strengthening the role of primary care\", \"Fragmented healthcare systems and coordination challenges\", \"Inadequate management of COPD exacerbations\", \"Limited access to specialized care\" and, \"Impact of underfinanced and overloaded healthcare systems\". One theme, \"Insurance coverage and reimbursement challenges\", was more relevant for UMICs. HICs and UMICs differ in patient and healthcare provider awareness, primary care involvement, spirometry access, and availability of specialized care. Both face issues with healthcare fragmentation, guideline adherence, and COPD exacerbation management. In addition, UMICs also grapple with resource limitations and healthcare infrastructure challenges.
    UNASSIGNED: Many challenges to COPD care are the same in both HICs and UMICs, underscoring the pervasive nature of these issues. While country-specific issues require customized solutions, there are untapped possibilities for implementing global respiratory strategies that support countries to manage COPD effectively. In addition to healthcare system-level initiatives, there is a crucial need for political prioritization of COPD to allocate the essential resources it requires.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心包包括包围心脏的双壁纤维-浆膜囊。浆膜层的反射形成鼻窦和凹陷。随着多探测器计算机断层扫描(CT)技术的进步,心包凹陷经常用薄层CT检测到。了解心包的影像学解剖对于避免将充满液体的心包窦和凹陷误解为腺病/心包转移或主动脉夹层至关重要。这可能会影响患者管理和治疗决策。作者对心包解剖结构及其在CT上观察到的变化进行了全面的回顾,图像解释中的潜在陷阱,以及对肺科医师不必要的诊断程序或干预措施的影响。
    The pericardium comprises a double-walled fibrous-serosal sac that encloses the heart. Reflections of the serosal layer form sinuses and recesses. With advances in multidetector computed tomography (CT) technology, pericardial recesses are frequently detected with thin-section CT. Knowledge of pericardial anatomy on imaging is crucial to avoid misinterpretation of fluid-filled pericardial sinuses and recesses as adenopathy/pericardial metastasis or aortic dissection, which can impact patient management and treatment decisions. The authors offer a comprehensive review of pericardial anatomy and its variations observed on CT, potential pitfalls in image interpretation, and implications for the pulmonologist with respect to unnecessary diagnostic procedures or interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在COVID-19大流行期间,普遍戴口罩成为主要的公共卫生干预措施之一。正因为如此,大多数体检,包括肺部听诊,是在患者戴着外科口罩时完成的。这项研究的目的是调查戴口罩是否会对肺部听诊期间的肺科医师评估产生影响。
    这是一项重复的措施交叉设计研究。指示三名肺科医师听诊先前已证实过期时间延长的患者,喘息,或在患者戴或不戴口罩时发出裂纹(医生和患者被不透明的屏障隔开)。作为肺科医师在评估肺音方面的共识的衡量标准,我们使用了Fleisskappa(K)。
    在所有三个类别(正常肺音,有效期,和不定肺音)患者是否戴着口罩,但是在肺音评估方面,肺科医师之间存在显着差异。
    临床医生和卫生专业人员戴口罩时更安全,不会受到呼吸道感染。应鼓励患者佩戴口罩,因为我们的研究证明,无论患者是否佩戴口罩,肺科医师对听诊肺音的评估没有显著的一致性差异。
    UNASSIGNED: During the COVID-19 pandemic, universal mask-wearing became one of the main public health interventions. Because of this, most physical examinations, including lung auscultation, were done while patients were wearing surgical face masks. The aim of this study was to investigate whether mask wearing has an impact on pulmonologist assessment during auscultation of the lungs.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a repeated measures crossover design study. Three pulmonologists were instructed to auscultate patients with previously verified prolonged expiration, wheezing, or crackles while patients were wearing or not wearing masks (physician and patients were separated by an opaque barrier). As a measure of pulmonologists\' agreement in the assessment of lung sounds, we used Fleiss kappa (K).
    UNASSIGNED: There was no significant difference in agreement on physician assessment of lung sounds in all three categories (normal lung sound, duration of expiration, and adventitious lung sound) whether the patient was wearing a mask or not, but there were significant differences among pulmonologists when it came to agreement of lung sound assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinicians and health professionals are safer from respiratory infections when they are wearing masks, and patients should be encouraged to wear masks because our research proved no significant difference in agreement on pulmonologists\' assessment of auscultated lung sounds whether or not patients wore masks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:哮喘患者和COPD患者的吸入器教育通常由非肺科医师提供。我们研究了肺科医师对吸入器的教育,以确定临床结果和吸入器使用的变化。
    方法:这是一项对296名被诊断为哮喘的受试者进行的回顾性研究,COPD,或评估吸入器技术教育的使用及其对(1)吸入器/剂量变化的影响,包括同一类吸入器的剂量变化和/或吸入器数量的变化,(2)一秒用力呼气量/用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC%),(3)疾病症状控制,(4)门诊就诊,(5)紧急护理访视(6)急诊科访视,(7)住院。一组接受了肺科医师的吸入器技术培训,而另一组则没有。
    结果:接受过肺科医师吸入器技术培训的组吸入器/剂量增加的相对风险显着降低(相对风险比0.57[95%CI0.34-0.96],P=0.03),症状控制的几率显着增加(赔率2.15[95%CI1.24-3.74],与无教育组相比,1-y随访时P=0.01)。FEV1/FVC%无差异,门诊就诊,紧急护理访问,急诊部门的访问,和入院。
    结论:肺科医师对哮喘和COPD患者吸入器技术的教育与吸入器/剂量增加的相对风险降低和症状控制的几率增加相关。我们建议肺科医师为哮喘患者和COPD患者提供吸入器技术教育,而不是仅仅依靠非肺科医师的教育。需要进行前瞻性研究以确认适当吸入器技术的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: Inhaler education for patients with asthma and patients with COPD is typically provided by non-pulmonologists. We studied inhaler education by pulmonologists to determine changes in clinical outcomes and inhaler use.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 296 subjects diagnosed with asthma, COPD, or both that evaluated use of inhaler technique education and its impact on (1) inhaler/dosage change consisting of dosage change in the same class of inhaler and/or change in number of inhalers, (2) forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC%), (3) disease symptom control, (4) out-patient visits, (5) urgent care visits (6) emergency department visits, and (7) hospital admissions. One group received inhaler technique education by a pulmonologist while the other group did not.
    RESULTS: The pulmonologist inhaler technique-educated group had significantly decreased relative risk for inhaler/dosage increase (relative risk 0.57 [95% CI 0.34-0.96], P = .03) and significantly increased odds for symptom control (odds ratio 2.15 [95% CI 1.24-3.74], P = .01) at 1-y follow-up as compared to the no education group. No differences occurred for FEV1/FVC%, out-patient visits, urgent care visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonologist education of inhaler technique for patients with asthma and patients with COPD was associated with decreased relative risk for inhaler/dosage increase and increased odds for symptom control. We recommend pulmonologists provide education of inhaler technique to patients with asthma and patients with COPD and not rely on non-pulmonologist education alone. Prospective research is needed to confirm the importance of proper inhaler techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高级诊断支气管镜检查包括支气管内超声(EBUS)引导的经支气管肺和淋巴结活检,CT导航和机器人支气管镜检查。介入支气管镜检查是指为了治疗目的而进行的手术,例如气道的球囊扩张,组织减积,冷冻疗法,取出异物和插入支气管内瓣膜[1]。对于成年患者,这些程序是护理标准[2,3]。尽管缺乏正规的培训,有许多病例报告和病例系列描述了在儿童中使用先进的诊断和介入性支气管镜检查技术。EBUS-TBNA的安全性和可行性,冷冻疗法技术,这些出版物[1,4-9]中已经证明了支气管内瓣膜以及其他技术。
    方法:我们通过对美国各地儿科教学医院的调查,试图更好地了解儿科肺科医师介入和先进支气管镜检查的当前实践和观点。
    结果:我们收到了来自25个州的28个项目的43份回复。最大的支气管镜检查手术量发生在0-5岁年龄组。在我们的受访者中,31%的人自我认定为儿科介入/高级支气管镜医生。79%的人认为在小儿肺科中进行高级和介入培训是可行的,77%的人认为应该向小儿肺科研究员提供这种培训。
    结论:这是首次描述美国儿科肺科医师关于先进诊断和介入性支气管镜检查程序的当前实践和观点的研究。儿科介入肺科(IP)处于起步阶段,其开端与成人IP的开端相呼应,只有某些中心在执行这些程序。
    BACKGROUND: Advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy includes endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) guided transbronchial lung and lymph node biopsies, CT navigation and robotic bronchoscopy. Interventional bronchoscopy refers to procedures performed for therapeutic purposes such as balloon dilation of the airway, tissue debulking, cryotherapy, removal of foreign bodies and insertion of endobronchial valves [1]. For adult patients, these procedures are standard of care [2, 3]. Despite a lack of formalized training, there are numerous case reports and case series describing the use of advanced diagnostic and interventional bronchoscopy techniques in children. The safety and feasibility of EBUS-TBNA, cryotherapy techniques, endobronchial valves among other techniques have been demonstrated in these publications [1, 4-9].
    METHODS: We sought to better understand the current practices and perspectives on interventional and advanced bronchoscopy among pediatric pulmonologists through surveys sent to pediatric teaching hospitals across the United States.
    RESULTS: We received 43 responses representing 28 programs from 25 states. The highest bronchoscopy procedure volume occurred in the 0-5 years age group. Among our respondents, 31% self-identified as a pediatric interventional/advanced bronchoscopist. 79% believe that advanced and interventional training is feasible in pediatric pulmonology and 77% believe it should be offered to pediatric pulmonary fellows.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to characterize current practices and perspectives regarding advanced diagnostic and interventional bronchoscopy procedures among pediatric pulmonologists in the United States. Pediatric interventional pulmonology (IP) is in its infancy and its beginnings echo those of the adult IP where only certain centers were performing these procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    COPD是全球第三大死亡原因,在阿根廷,COPD的患病率为14.5%,但是在现实生活中对病人的管理是未知的。这项工作的目的是:a)了解阿根廷肺科医师在日常实践的不同方面管理COPD患者的意见。b)将我们的发现与西班牙的专家进行比较,c)考虑我们的结果,以计划我国COPD管理的未来指令。
    来自阿根廷的89名肺科医师,COPD专家,参加了德尔菲共识,他回答了一项有五个域名的调查。a)坚持治疗,b)控制COPD,c)可处理特征,d)吸入装置和e)治疗资源的可达性。
    经过两轮提问,77.6%的陈述达成了总体共识,并按领域区分:治疗依从性:5/9(55.5%).COPD控制:10/14(71.4%)。可处理性状:6/6(100%)。吸入装置:10/14(71.4%)和治疗可达性:6/6(100%)。在大多数的肯定中,结果与西班牙肺科医师获得的结果相似。
    来自阿根廷的肺科医师以与西班牙同事相似的方式治疗COPD患者,差异很小。很明显,在日常实践中,有一些因素会对获得指定治疗产生负面影响。我们的工作可以作为改善这种情况的起点。
    UNASSIGNED: COPD is the third cause of death globally and in Argentina COPD has a prevalence of 14.5%, but the management of patients in real life is unknown. The objectives of this work were: a) To know the opinions of pulmonologists in Argentina who manage patients with COPD in different aspects of daily practice. b) Compare our findings with specialists from Spain and c) Consider our results to plan future directives in the management of COPD in our country.
    UNASSIGNED: 89 pulmonologists from Argentina, experts in COPD, participated in a Delphi consensus, who responded to a survey with five domains. a) Adherence to treatment, b) Control of COPD, c) Treatable features, d) Inhalation devices and e) Accessibility to therapeutic resources.
    UNASSIGNED: After two rounds of questions, total consensus was achieved in 77.6% of the statements and discriminating by domain: Treatment adherence: 5/9 (55.5%). COPD control: 10/14 (71.4%). Treatable traits: 6/6 (100%). Inhalation devices: 10/14 (71.4%) and Accessibility to treatment: 6/6 (100%). In most of the affirmations, the results were similar to those obtained by Spanish pulmonologists.
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonologists from Argentina manage COPD patients in a similar way and with minimal differences with our Spanish colleagues. It became evident that, in daily practice, there are factors that negatively impact access to the indicated treatments. Our work could serve as a starting point to improve this situation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号