Pulmonary endarterectomy

肺内膜切除术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺内膜切除术(PEA)用于治疗慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)患者,能有效清除有组织的血栓形成物质和增生性内膜,改善血流动力学。据报道,PEA围手术期几种炎症因子的水平发生了变化。即使他们的具体角色仍然未知,这可能有一些相关性。在这项研究中,我们回顾了最近发表的关于PEA中这些因素的数据,试图理解它们的潜在影响。
    Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is used to treat chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients, and it can effectively remove organized thrombotic materials and proliferative intima as well as improve hemodynamics. It has been reported that the levels of several inflammatory factors were altered in the peri-operative period of PEA. Even though their specific role remains unknown, this could have some relevance. In this study, we reviewed the recently published data addressing these factors in PEA, attempting to understand their potential implications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺动脉肉瘤(PAS)是一种极为罕见且研究不足的疾病,导致其优化管理的不确定性。这项研究旨在介绍我们的机构经验和PAS肺内膜切除术的结果。
    我们收集了临床特征,术中数据,术后结果,以及2016年12月至2023年9月期间在我们机构接受手术治疗的PAS患者的预后信息.
    共有20例PAS患者接受了肺内膜切除术。患者的中位年龄为52岁(IQR45,57),12名患者(60%)为女性。在19例患者中证实了内膜肉瘤,其余1例被诊断为大细胞神经内分泌癌。围手术期死亡率为3例(15%)。随访的中位时间为14个月(范围:1-61)。在后续期间,11例患者复发或转移,5名患者死于该病。所有20例患者的1年和2年累积生存率分别为66.4%和55.3%。分别。
    肺动脉内膜切除术是治疗PAS的一种姑息但有效的方法,特别是当辅以术后治疗如化疗和靶向治疗时,它们共同有助于实现有利的长期生存结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonary artery sarcoma (PAS) is an exceedingly rare and insufficiently investigated disease, leading to uncertain in its optimal management. This study aims to present our institutional experience and the outcomes of pulmonary endarterectomy for PAS.
    UNASSIGNED: We gathered clinical characteristics, intraoperative data, postoperative outcomes, and prognosis information from PAS patients who underwent surgical treatment at our institution between December 2016 and September 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 20 patients with PAS underwent pulmonary endarterectomy. The median age of the patients was 52 (IQR 45, 57) years, with 12 patients (60%) being female. Intimal sarcoma was confirmed in 19 patients, while the remaining one was diagnosed with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. The perioperative mortality rate was three cases (15%). Follow-up was conducted for a median duration of 14 months (range: 1-61). During the follow-up period, 11 patients experienced recurrence or metastasis, and 5 patients succumbed to the disease. The estimated cumulative survival rates at 1 and 2 years for all 20 patients were 66.4% and 55.3%, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonary endarterectomy emerges as a palliative but effective approach for managing PAS, particularly when complemented with postoperative therapies such as chemotherapy and targeted therapy, which collectively contribute to achieving favorable long-term survival outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)被认为是肺血管系统中血栓栓塞过程的后遗症。CTEPH的病理生理学是多因素的,包括受损的纤维蛋白溶解,内皮失调,和低氧适应。考虑到症状的非特异性,CTEPH的诊断通常会延迟。缺乏筛查,发病率相对较低。诊断工具包括通气灌注测试,超声心动图,心导管插入术,还有肺动脉造影.CTEPH的唯一潜在治疗方法是肺内膜切除术。大约40%的患者无法手术。目前,只有Riociguat被食品和药物管理局专门批准用于CTEPH,正在进行其他药物试验。
    Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is thought to occur as a sequelae of thromboembolic processes in the pulmonary vasculature. The pathophysiology of CTEPH is multifactorial, including impaired fibrinolysis, endothelial dysregulation, and hypoxic adaptations. The diagnosis of CTEPH is typically delayed considering the nonspecific nature of the symptoms, lack of screening, and relatively low incidence. Diagnostic tools include ventilation-perfusion testing, echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and pulmonary angiography. The only potentially curative treatment for CTEPH is pulmonary endarterectomy However, approximately 40% of patients are inoperable. Currently, only Riociguat is Food and Drug Administration approved specifically for CTEPH, with additional drug trials underway.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自第一个病例系列报告30多年前接受球囊肺血管成形术治疗的慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压患者的结局以来,手术技术的重大改进使球囊肺血管成形术(BPA)成为我们今天所知的安全有效的治疗方法.然而,BPA有小的并发症风险,这需要快速识别和立即管理。与BPA相关的最常见的并发症包括肺血管损伤和再灌注肺水肿。
    Since the publication of the first case series reporting the outcomes of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension who underwent treatment with balloon pulmonary angioplasty more than 30 years ago, significant improvements to the procedural technique have made balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) a safe and effective therapy that we know today. Nevertheless, BPA carries a small risk of complications, which require rapid recognition and immediate management. The most commonly seen complications associated with BPA include pulmonary vascular injury and reperfusion pulmonary edema.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的十年中,慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)的治疗进展改变了疾病的格局,然而,全球对临床实践的洞察力仍然有限。CTEPH全球横断面科学调查(CLARITY)旨在收集有关当前诊断的信息,治疗,和CTEPH的管理,并确定未满足的医疗需求。本文重点介绍CTEPH患者的治疗和管理。该调查于2021年9月至2022年5月通过科学协会和其他医疗组织分发给医院医学专家。参与CTEPH治疗的212名受访者中,大多数来自每年执行多达50例肺动脉内膜切除术(PEA)和/或球囊肺血管成形术(BPA)手术的中心。在被认为符合PEA/BPA的患者的报告比例中观察到差异,以及那些接受手术的人,包括多模式治疗和随后的后续实践。据报道,在术前设置和大多数不可手术的患者中,不同比例的患者使用了肺动脉高压特异性治疗的处方。维生素K拮抗剂和直接口服抗凝剂的报告使用情况相似(86%vs.82%),但受不同因素驱动。这项研究提出了CTEPH治疗方法的异质性,这可能归因于特定中心的经验和特定地区的护理障碍,强调需要新的临床和队列研究,综合临床指南,和继续教育。
    Advances in the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) over the past decade changed the disease landscape, yet global insight on clinical practices remains limited. The CTEPH global cross-sectional scientific survey (CLARITY) aimed to gather information on the current diagnosis, treatment, and management of CTEPH and to identify unmet medical needs. This paper focuses on the treatment and management of CTEPH patients. The survey was circulated to hospital-based medical specialists through Scientific Societies and other medical organizations from September 2021 to May 2022. The majority of the 212 respondents involved in the treatment of CTEPH were from centers performing up to 50 pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and/or balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) procedures per year. Variation was observed in the reported proportion of patients deemed eligible for PEA/BPA, as well as those that underwent the procedures, including multimodal treatment and subsequent follow-up practices. Prescription of pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific therapy was reported for a variable proportion of patients in the preoperative setting and in most nonoperable patients. Reported use of vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants was similar (86% vs. 82%) but driven by different factors. This study presents heterogeneity in treatment approaches for CTEPH, which may be attributed to center-specific experience and region-specific barriers to care, highlighting the need for new clinical and cohort studies, comprehensive clinical guidelines, and continued education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)是肺动脉高压(PH)分类第4组的一部分,通常影响到PH中心的三分之一以上的患者。这是一种三室疾病,涉及近端(肺叶到节段)和远端(亚节段)肺动脉,被持续性纤维化血栓形成物质阻塞,和肺动脉高压时可能受到影响的毛细血管前肺动脉。它是肺栓塞(PE)的罕见并发症,PE幸存者的发病率约为3%。在普通人群中观察到的CTEPH发病率约为每百万六例,但可能比这高出三倍,根据PE发病率估计。然而,以前的静脉血栓栓塞发作并不总是有记录.随着多模态成像和治疗管理的进步,对于可手术和不可手术的患者,CTEPH的生存率都有所提高。肺动脉造影的高级成像有助于区分近端和远端阻塞性疾病。然而,右心导管检查对于确定PH的诊断和血流动力学严重程度至关重要。治疗策略依赖于逐步的方法,从可操作性评估开始。肺内膜切除术(PEA),也被称为肺血栓内膜切除术,是可手术患者的一线治疗。不断增长的经验和手术技术的进步使PEA的远端界限得以扩大,并显着改善了围手术期和中长期死亡率。在PEA后不能手术或有持续性/复发性PH的患者中,药物治疗和/或球囊肺血管成形术(BPA)是具有良好预后的有效治疗选择,且应用日益广泛.所有的治疗决定都应该由一个多学科的团队,包括一个PEA外科医生,BPA专家,还有胸部放射科医生.
    Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is part of group 4 of the pulmonary hypertension (PH) classification and generally affects more than a third of patients referred to PH centers. It is a three-compartment disease involving proximal (lobar-to-segmental) and distal (subsegmental) pulmonary arteries that are obstructed by persistent fibrothrombotic material, and precapillary pulmonary arteries that can be affected as in pulmonary arterial hypertension. It is a rare complication of pulmonary embolism (PE), with an incidence of around 3% in PE survivors. The observed incidence of CTEPH in the general population is around six cases per million but could be three times higher than this, as estimated from PE incidence. However, a previous venous thromboembolic episode is not always documented. With advances in multimodality imaging and therapeutic management, survival for CTEPH has improved for both operable and inoperable patients. Advanced imaging with pulmonary angiography helps distinguish proximal from distal obstructive disease. However, right heart catheterization is of utmost importance to establish the diagnosis and hemodynamic severity of PH. The therapeutic strategy relies on a stepwise approach, starting with an operability assessment. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), also known as pulmonary thromboendarterectomy, is the first-line treatment for operable patients. Growing experience and advances in surgical technique have enabled expansion of the distal limits of PEA and significant improvements in perioperative and mid- to long-term mortality. In patients who are inoperable or who have persistent/recurrent PH after PEA, medical therapy and/or balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) are effective treatment options with favorable outcomes that are increasingly used. All treatment decisions should be made with a multidisciplinary team that includes a PEA surgeon, a BPA expert, and a chest radiologist.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对RV流出道多普勒模式的评估提供了对慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)的血流动力学的见解。我们研究了通过多普勒超声心动图在术前评估肺血流收缩切迹的时机是否与CTEPH肺内膜切除术(PEA)后的长期生存有关。
    方法:61例连续CETPH患者中有59例(平均年龄53±14岁,研究了2002年6月至2005年6月期间接受PEA的34%男性)。临床,术前评估超声心动图和血流动力学变量,并在PEA后3个月进行重复超声心动图检查。用脉冲多普勒评估缺口比(NR),并计算为从肺血流开始到缺口的时间除以从缺口到肺血流结束的时间。2021年5月至2022年2月期间获得了长期随访。
    结果:术前平均肺动脉压(mPAP)为45±15mmHg,肺血管阻力(PVR)为646±454dynes.s.cm-5。PEA前超声心动图显示7例患者无切口,33的NR<1.0,19的NR>1.0。PEA后三个月,超声心动图显示,NR<1.0和NR>1.0的长期存活者sPAP显著降低,而仅NR<1.0组TAPSE/sPAP显著升高.平均长期临床随访为14±6年。幸存者和非幸存者的NR有显着差异(0.73±0.25vs.1.1±0.44,p<0.001),但在mPAP或PVR中没有观察到显着差异。与NR>1.0的患者相比,NR<1.0的患者在14年时的长期生存率明显更好(83%vs.37%,p=<0.001)。
    结论:术前评估NR是接受PEA的CTEPH患者长期生存的预测因子,NR<1.0的患者死亡率低。NR<1.0和NR>1.0的长期幸存者在PEA后sPAP显著降低。然而,NR<1.0组TAPSE/sPAP显著升高。在NR<1.0组中,在术前和术后1年随访时,6分钟步行试验显著增加.NR是一个简单的超声心动图参数,可用于PEA的临床决策。
    BACKGROUND: Assessment of the pattern of the RV outflow tract Doppler provides insights into the hemodynamics of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We studied whether pre-operative assessment of timing of the pulmonary flow systolic notch by Doppler echocardiography is associated with long-term survival after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for CTEPH.
    METHODS: Fifty-nine out of 61 consecutive CETPH patients (mean age 53 ± 14 years, 34% male) whom underwent PEA between June 2002 and June 2005 were studied. Clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic variables were assessed pre-operatively and repeat echocardiography was performed 3 months after PEA. Notch ratio (NR) was assessed with pulsed Doppler and calculated as the time from onset of pulmonary flow until notch divided by the time from notch until end of pulmonary flow. Long-term follow-up was obtained between May 2021 and February 2022.
    RESULTS: Pre-operative mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) was 45 ± 15 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was 646 ± 454 dynes.s.cm-5. Echocardiography before PEA showed that 7 patients had no notch, 33 had a NR < 1.0 and 19 had a NR > 1.0. Three months after PEA, echocardiography revealed a significant decrease in sPAP in long-term survivors with a NR < 1.0 and a NR > 1.0, while a significant increase in TAPSE/sPAP was only observed in the NR < 1.0 group. Mean long-term clinical follow-up was 14 ± 6 years. NR was significantly different between survivors and non-survivors (0.73 ± 0.25 vs. 1.1 ± 0.44, p < 0.001) but no significant differences were observed in mPAP or PVR. Long-term survival at 14 years was significantly better in patients with a NR < 1.0 compared to patients with a NR > 1.0 (83% vs. 37%, p =  < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative assessment of NR is a predictor of long-term survival in CTEPH patients undergoing PEA, with low mortality risk in patients with NR < 1.0. Long-term survivors with a NR < 1.0 and NR > 1.0 had a significant decrease in sPAP after PEA. However, the TAPSE/sPAP only significantly increased in the NR < 1.0 group. In the NR < 1.0 group, the 6-min walk test increased significantly between pre-operative and at 1-year post-operative follow-up. NR is a simple echocardiographic parameter that can be used in clinical decision-making for PEA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    自发性腹膜后血肿(SRH)是抗凝治疗的罕见并发症。由于失血,表现可能从肢体麻痹到低血容量性休克。最佳治疗方法是有争议的。它可以保守或手术管理。我们报告了一例73岁的男子,在进行肺内膜切除术(PEA)手术25天后,腹痛逐渐恶化,左下肢剧烈疼痛。根据我们对PEA患者的机构方案,他正在接受抗凝治疗。调查显示,自发性髂腰肌血肿。我们的病人接受了保守治疗,SRH稳定下来了.
    Spontaneous retroperitoneal hematoma (SRH) is a rare complication of anticoagulation therapy. Presentation may vary from limb paresis to hypovolemic shock due to blood loss. The optimal treatment is controversial. It can be managed conservatively or surgically. We report a case of a 73-year-old man presenting with progressively worsening abdominal pain and severe pain radiating to his left lower limb twenty-five days after his pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) surgery. He was on anticoagulation per our institutional protocol for PEA patients. Investigations revealed a large, spontaneously occurring iliopsoas hematoma. Our patient was treated conservatively, and the SRH stabilised.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肺动脉内膜切除术(PEA)是慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压的标准治疗方法。然而,它会带来围手术期血管并发症的风险,这可能导致严重的临床结果。这项研究介绍了一种新型的无创无辐射临床成像工具,电阻抗断层成像(EIT),用于PEA后肺灌注的实时床旁评估。它确定了术后并发症引起的通气-灌注不匹配,对于血流动力学不稳定的患者特别有价值,从而消除与CT室转移相关的风险。这篇文章报道了一个案例,其中EIT用于识别PEA后的原位血栓形成,标记第一个这样的应用程序。重点是使用EIT进行早期检测,这为治疗干预和改善术后评估提供了一种有希望的方法。
    Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the standard treatment for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. However, it poses risks of perioperative vascular complications, which can lead to serious clinical outcomes. This study introduces a novel noninvasive and radiation-free clinical imaging tool, electrical impedance tomography (EIT), for real-time bedside assessment of lung perfusion after PEA. It identifies ventilation-perfusion mismatches arising from postoperative complications, particularly valuable for patients with hemodynamic instability, thus eliminating risks tied to CT room transfers. The article reports a case where EIT was used to identify an in-situ thrombosis post-PEA, marking the first such application. The emphasis is on early detection using EIT, which offers a promising approach for therapeutic interventions and improved postoperative evaluations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺动脉内膜切除术(PEA)是慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)患者的一线治疗方法。然而,一些CTEPH患者被认为不能手术,在过去的十年里,球囊肺血管成形术(BPA)已成为这些手术风险过高或PEA后肺动脉高压复发患者的可行治疗选择.许多国际中心增加了BPA的手术量,并报告了肺血流动力学的改善。患者功能类别和右心室功能。随机对照试验也证明了类似的发现。最近在程序技术方面的改进,操作者经验的增加和程序技术的进步显著降低了BPA术后并发症的风险.目前的指南推荐BPA用于不能手术的CTEPH和PEA后持续肺动脉高压的患者。肺动脉内皮在CTEPH的病理生理发育和进展中起着至关重要的作用。
    Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the first-line treatment for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). However, some patients with CTEPH are considered inoperable, and in the last decade, balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has emerged as a viable therapeutic option for these patients with prohibitive surgical risk or recurrent pulmonary hypertension following PEA. Numerous international centers have increased their procedural volume of BPA and have reported improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics, patient functional class and right ventricular function. Randomized controlled trials have also demonstrated similar findings. Recent refinements in procedural technique, increased operator experience and advancements in procedural technology have facilitated marked reduction in the risk of complications following BPA. Current guidelines recommend BPA for patients with inoperable CTEPH and persistent pulmonary hypertension following PEA. The pulmonary arterial endothelium plays a vital role in the pathophysiologic development and progression of CTEPH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号