目的:目前的建议支持心脏手术患者房颤(AF)的外科治疗。这些手术被称为伴随的,并且可以使用射频能量或冷冻消融进行。这项研究旨在评估同时进行冷冻消融的患者的电生理发现。
方法:接受冠状动脉旁路移植术和/或瓣膜修复/置换的非阵发性房颤患者,如果同时进行冷冻消融是当前指南的治疗计划的一部分,则纳入试验。本研究报告的患者被分配接受分阶段经皮射频导管消融(PRFCA),即,混合治疗,作为SURHYB试验方案的一部分。
结果:我们分析了手术后105±35天接受PRFCA的103例患者。在65例(63.1%)和63例(61.2%)患者中发现左肺静脉和右肺静脉(PVs)分离,分别。在38例(36.9%)和18例(20.0%)患者中发现LA后壁隔离和二尖瓣峡部传导阻滞,分别。左侧PV的电气重新连接(间隙)通常位于上方而不是下方(57.9%vs.26.3%,P=0.005)和前比后(65.8%vs.31.6%,P=0.003)。右侧PV的间隙在前后分布更均匀,但在上段占主导地位(72.5%与40.0%,P=0.003)。与劣线相比,屋顶线上的间隙数量更高(131(67.2%)与67(42.2%),P<0.001)。与心外膜冷冻消融相比,心内膜在创建PVs和LA后壁隔离中更有效(P<0.05)。使用一氧化二氮(N20)或氩气(Ar)作为冷却剂的冷冻消融同样有效(P=NS)。
结论:手术冷冻消融术在实现左心房透壁性和持久性病变方面的有效性令人惊讶地低。间隙主要位于PV的上部和前部以及车顶线上。心内膜冷冻消融比心外膜消融更有效,不管使用的冷却剂。
OBJECTIVE: Current recommendations support surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients indicated for cardiac surgery. These procedures are referred to as concomitant and may be carried out using radiofrequency energy or cryo-ablation. This study aimed to assess the electrophysiological findings in patients undergoing concomitant cryo-ablation.
METHODS: Patients with non-paroxysmal AF undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve repair/replacement were included in the trial if concomitant cryo-ablation was part of the treatment plan according to current guidelines. The patients reported in this study were assigned to undergo staged percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation (PRFCA), i.e., hybrid treatment, as a part of the SURHYB trial protocol.
RESULTS: We analyzed 103 patients who underwent PRFCA 105 ± 35 days after surgery. Left and right pulmonary veins (PVs) were found isolated in 65 (63.1%) and 63 (61.2%) patients, respectively. The LA posterior wall isolation and mitral isthmus conduction block were found in 38 (36.9%) and 18 (20.0%) patients, respectively. Electrical reconnections (gaps) in the left PVs were more often localized superiorly than inferiorly (57.9% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.005) and anteriorly than posteriorly (65.8% vs. 31.6%, P = 0.003). Gaps in the right PVs were more equally distributed anteroposteriorly but dominated in superior segments (72.5% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.003). There was a higher number of gaps on the roof line compared to the inferior line (131 (67.2%) vs. 67 (42.2%), P < 0.001). Compared to epicardial cryo-ablation, endocardial was more effective in creating PVs and LA posterior wall isolation (P < 0.05). Cryo-ablation using nitrous oxide (N20) or argon (Ar) gas as cooling agents was similarly effective (P = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of surgical cryo-ablation in achieving transmural and durable lesions in the left atrium is surprisingly low. Gaps are located predominantly in the superior and anterior portions of the PVs and on the roof line. Endocardial cryo-ablation is more effective than epicardial ablation, irrespective of the cooling agent used.