BACKGROUND: There is discussion about the frequency of STI screening among pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users. The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence of STIs and to evaluate different screening models in order to optimise the follow-up.
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted between 2017 and 2023, including 138 PrEP users in a STI clinic. Participants were tested for STIs every three months. Unscheduled visits were performed for those with STI-related symptoms or for people who were notified for an STI by a sexual partner. We performed a survival analysis of repeated events, estimating the cumulative incidence (CI) and incidence rate (IR).
RESULTS: The overall CI by quarterly screening was 8.3 (95% CI: 7.6-9.1) infections per person over six years, with a decreasing trend. The most frequently diagnosed pathogen was Neisseria gonorrhoeae, with a IR of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.84). If the frequency of screening is reduced to every six months, the IR of STIs is reduced by (95% CI: 0.5-0.66) infections per user per year, and at 12 months by 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.89). In the case of no pharyngeal or urethral screening, IR is reduced by 0.37 (95% CI: 0.32-0.42) infections per person per year and in those over 35 years of age by 0.33 (95% CI: 0.25-0.4). Eliminating unscheduled visits, the reduction in IR is 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24-0.42).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of STIs among PrEP users is high, especially in the rectum, but it does not increase over time. STI screening could be optimised reducing the frequency of pharyngeal and urethral testing, particularly in those over 35 years of age. It is essential to redistribute health resources for unscheduled visits, which have been shown to be the most cost-effective screening.

BACKGROUND: Countering HIV infection remains a primary objective of the Spanish National Health System. Emergency services play a crucial role in reducing missed diagnostic opportunities, with estimates suggesting that one in 3 such opportunities occur here. The aim of the study is to examine the geographical dispersion of newly diagnosed HIV cases, within a downtown Madrid hospital.
METHODS: This is an observational, descriptive, retrospective study evaluating the geographical distribution of new HIV diagnoses in the care area of a tertiary University Hospital in the Community of Madrid.
RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty-seven individuals with a new diagnosis of HIV infection between 2018 and 2020 were analysed, the majority being young people with an average age of 36±9 years. 86% were gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men and 48.6% were immigrants. 15.3% presented with CD4+<200cells/mm3 and 9.5% with an AIDS-defining illness. 32.7% and 5.1% had an RNA-HIV-1>100,000copies/mL and >500,000copies/mL, respectively, with up to 13.7% of subjects presenting resistance mutations at diagnosis. Geographically, 51.4% of individuals came from 4 Health Centres and more than 70% of the new diagnoses were included in nine Health Centres.
CONCLUSIONS: Better understanding the geographical distribution of new HIV diagnoses by health areas allows us to identify areas of higher transmission risk, thereby directing and implementing prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment measures.

We aim to estimate the prevalence of daily HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use 6 months after public funding approval in Spain and identify associated factors in a national sample of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM).
We analysed 4692 HIV-undiagnosed GBMSM men recruited via an online questionnaire distributed nationally via gay contact apps and websites between May and July 2020. We estimated the proportion of participants using daily PrEP and identified associated factors using Poisson regression with robust variance.
Daily PrEP use was reported by 2.8% (95% CI 2.3-3.3) of all participants. Daily PrEP use was independently associated with being recruited into community programmes, being older than 30 years, living in a large city, living with men, having condomless anal intercourse with more than 10 sexual partners, using drugs for sex, especially chemsex drugs, and being diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection.
Six months after PrEP was approved in Spain, the prevalence of daily use is low in a national sample of GBMSM men. There is a need to promote access, demand and interest in PrEP, especially among young GBMSM men, those living in small and medium-sized cities, and those who hide their relationships with other men.

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is a biomedical intervention to prevent HIV infection in seronegative people at high risk of becoming infected. This strategy was endorsed in October 2019 by the Spanish Ministry of Health.
To present the PrEP initial experience in the HIV Unit of the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, paying special attention to the analysis of the vulnerability factors in the cohort.
Retrospective, descriptive study. The epidemiological, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics of the users included in the program during the first year are analyzed, paying particular attention to Infections, risky practices, and substance use.
190 individuals were included, 177 men and 12 trans women with a mean age of 35 years (8 SD). 70% had higher education, and half had Spanish nationality. An average of 10 couples per trimester and 60% reported unprotected anal sex. 31% had at least one positive PCR for STIs, with N. gonorrhoeae being the most prevalent microorganism (51%) and the rectal sample the most affected (21%). 63% reported chemsex use, 19% polydrug use, and 8% \"slamming\". Half expressed concern about consumption and/or sexual practices and 25% the need for help.
The PrEP user profile attended in our Hospital Unit justifies the creation of multidisciplinary teams that allow us to provide holistic attention to the sexual life of these people.

BACKGROUND: Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is a biomedical intervention to prevent HIV infection in seronegative people at high risk of becoming infected. This strategy was endorsed in October 2019 by the Spanish Ministry of Health.
OBJECTIVE: To present the PrEP initial experience in the HIV Unit of the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, paying special attention to the analysis of the vulnerability factors in the cohort.
METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive study. The epidemiological, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics of the users included in the program during the first year are analyzed, paying particular attention to Infections, risky practices, and substance use.
RESULTS: 190 individuals were included, 177 men and 12 trans women with a mean age of 35 years (8 SD). 70% had higher education, and half had Spanish nationality. An average of 10 couples per trimester and 60% reported unprotected anal sex. 31% had at least one positive PCR for STIs, with N. gonorrhoeae being the most prevalent microorganism (51%) and the rectal sample the most affected (21%). 63% reported chemsex use, 19% polydrug use, and 8% \"slamming\". Half expressed concern about consumption and/or sexual practices and 25% the need for help.
CONCLUSIONS: The PrEP user profile attended in our Hospital Unit justifies the creation of multidisciplinary teams that allow us to provide holistic attention to the sexual life of these people.

HIV infection remains an important public health problem worldwide. The traditional preventive measures, such as sexual education, screening, and early antiretroviral treatment initiation, despite having shown their effectiveness, are not enough to control new infections. In this context, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) has been investigated as a preventive measure. Currently, it has been extensively documented that the administration of antiretroviral treatment in an HIV exposed, but not infected population, could reduce the risk of transmission without significant drawbacks. Despite its high efficacy for HIV prevention, the use of PrEP remains a controversial measure, particularly its cost-effectiveness. For this reason, the access to PrEP is not available for all the HIV risk groups. Therefore, and based on the evidence found, the current approach must be the repercussions of not to implement PrEP, more than its cost or its effectiveness.

To implement HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Spain, several possible models fitting the Spanish National Health System must be considered. The experience of other countries with a similar background let us foresee their benefits and their defects before implementing them. Possible implementation models for prescription-follow-up-dispensing circuits may involve hospitals, STI clinics or primary care centres and community pharmacies. On the one hand, a hospital-based circuit is the least effective of them all and it may not satisfy the potential demand, even though it could be deployed immediately. On the other hand, accessibility would increase with PrEP prescription in Primary care and dispensing by community pharmacists. Involvement of community-based STI clinics and publicly-funded STI clinics would be the best option to attract the population not frequenting the general health system, and co-management with Primary Care teams would ensure nation-wide access to PrEP.

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) consists of administering antiretroviral drugs to HIV-seronegative individuals who engage in high-risk practices, with the aim of reducing the probability of acquiring the infection. Despite its safety and efficacy, PrEP is still not available within Spain\'s public healthcare system. The aim of this study was to estimate the preventive impact of adding PrEP to the other preventive measures. We estimated the number of HIV seroconversions that could have been prevented (if PrEP had been available) among initially seronegative transsexual women and men who have sex with men.
METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of recent HIV seroconverters between 2014-2016 in a reference HIV/sexually transmitted infection clinic in Madrid. We analysed the individuals who were indicated PrEP, according to the guidelines of the 2016 AIDS Study Group. The statistical analysis to estimate the HIV infections that could have been prevented (if PrEP had been available) was conducted using Stata 14.
RESULTS: We estimated that 195 of the 228 men who have sex with men and transsexual women, with documented HIV seroconversion, were indicated for PrEP. Considering the preventive efficacy reported in European studies, we estimated that 168 HIV seroconversions could have been prevented, which represents 73.7% of the diagnosed infections.
CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the need to promote combined preventive programs against HIV that integrate all possible measures, including PrEP.

HIV infection is still not controlled in Spain. New HIV infection prevention strategies are required, especially in populations of higher incidence, by means of combined interventions. Early diagnosis and treatment of HIV-infected individuals is the most cost-effective strategy to control the epidemic, including interventions designed to motivate behavioural changes. These types of campaigns must not only be directed to the general population through mass channels, but also to key populations through more specific channels and messages. Biomedical interventions like pre-exposure prophylaxis, uses a combination of biomedical tools to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition, and are usually accompanied of behavioural interventions. The influence of structural factors, social justice and defending the rights of people living with HIV have a significant impact on prevention strategies. Structural interventions are designed to influence these factors that make some individuals or populations more vulnerable to HIV infection.

This study focuses on actions at the political and administrative level in Spain in relation to the implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We analysed a whole range of different formal initiatives taken by the political and administrative actors involved. The information was obtained from official public data sources. As of February 2018, PrEP had not been implemented. The decision is dependent on both state and regional governments. The Ministry of Health and some Autonomous Regions are working on different interventions, but without providing an implementation timetable. The political parties have kept a very low profile in terms of initiatives related to the implementation of PrEP. From a legal point of view, proceedings are passing back and forth with the extension of the patent. The role of intergovernmental and interdepartmental institutions is very important for the implementation of PrEP in Spain.